Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2012, 07:51 PM
zHendrix zHendrix is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Internal lock failure

Has anyone really had a problem w the internal lock on a j frame? I just started to carry a 360pd as my everyday gun. I choose this after experiencing reliability issues with about every 380 I bought. And I spent everywhere from $200 Keltec's to $800+ pistols. So I thought a J frame would be the most reliable BUG. So why are people now telling me that the internal lock could malfunction and lock the gun? Is this a rumor? Or does it really happen? I didn't plan on modifying this gun but should I have the lock removed? This whole issue kind of scares me. I need a gun I can trust with my life. Thanks for the info. I'm sure this issue has come up a million times so I'm sorry about the repost
  #2  
Old 01-17-2012, 08:36 PM
Rockhanger Rockhanger is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: So. Ohio
Posts: 22
Likes: 2
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Mine has never malfunctioned nor do I believe it is pron to. A lot of people just like to complain about anything different. IMHO a j-frame with an internal lock is a lot less likely malfunction than any auto.
  #3  
Old 01-17-2012, 08:44 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,807
Likes: 4,238
Liked 15,203 Times in 4,161 Posts
Default

I had the same gun and shot hundreds of very hot +P and .357 through it and it never failed me. I only sold it to fund another purchase. Currently I have a 5" model 63 (.22) w/the lock and have put thousands of rounds through it w/no failures.

The only advise I can offer is to shoot your gun w/lots of hot stuff and see what happens. I don't like the lock but have never had a problem w/those I've owned. What I suspect is that S&W did have a problem w/some early models they quietly fixed. Please do not pay attention to the Internet stuff. Some may have blamed the lock when in reality the problem was elseware.
  #4  
Old 01-17-2012, 09:09 PM
BlueOvalBandit BlueOvalBandit is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 926
Likes: 204
Liked 445 Times in 243 Posts
Default

2000 run through my 625-8 in the last month no IL failure. Although depending on how dirty the cylinder stop and notches are the stop may get stuck and not release from the notch. A slight wiggle releases it, and a little lube makes it go away totally.

I wonder if you just barely disengage the IL could it then get kicked on from recoil?
  #5  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:43 PM
zHendrix zHendrix is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well I read that link and now I feel even worse about my $1000 investment. I hate to sound paranoid. And I'm sure the likelihood of a malfunction of the lock would be about as likely as a bad round. But I can't believe that S&W would ever in a million years keep this on a firearm meant to protect lives. I'm sure some lawsuit pressured them into adding the lock. But imagine if this malfunction was to blame for a loss of life.
I don't plan on selling this gun so I may consider having the lock removed by a gunsmith. I heard it is easy and takes 20 min. But I seriously hate to alter my brand new revolver. Has anyone had this done?
  #6  
Old 01-17-2012, 10:50 PM
2hawk's Avatar
2hawk 2hawk is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4,558
Liked 2,141 Times in 770 Posts
Default Easy to take care of, if you're so inclined...

http://smith-wessonforum.com/accesso...9-fs-plug.html

Just put the parts you take out in a bag and save them, re-install as needed. And, of course, make sure you have the skills and tools to disassemble and reassemble without damaging the gun. Not hard, just takes a little care and some properly sized screwdrivers. Took me about 15 minutes, and that was taking my time.

You have a fine carry piece, I wouldn't worry about it too much.

And, welcome to the forum!
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  #7  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:03 PM
BlueOvalBandit BlueOvalBandit is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 926
Likes: 204
Liked 445 Times in 243 Posts
Default

Take a look at Jerry's other 627 in 38 super it still has the lock... I'm not convinced, there are stories for everything. Jerry is supposed to come down and shoot Norco and I will ask.
  #8  
Old 01-17-2012, 11:50 PM
zHendrix zHendrix is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok thanks every1! This is by far the best forum I have found. I love firearms and I really love nice guns. I have always been a proponent of "you get what you pay for". And I would think $1000 for a revolver would be a nice carry piece. Granit I have paid 2-3x that for a nice 1911. And exponentially more for an AR, rifle or bird shot gun. But $1000 is the top range for a carry gun in my book. Especially when I can buy a Glock 26 for half the price(no offence) and know it will shoot every time.
So please everyone keep the great info coming! Thanks again!!!
  #9  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:01 AM
logictox's Avatar
logictox logictox is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 98
Likes: 1
Liked 49 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Well mine was an X frame 500 and not a J frame but it locked up at the range. Locked up solid and of course I didn't have the key with me. My guess is that recoil activated the lock. I only own two S&W's with locks out of a pretty large collection. Now I simply refuse to add anymore with locks to my collection.

I was one of the who cares if it has a lock until it happened to me. Now I could never trust my 500 or SSR.
  #10  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:11 AM
Crazy88Fingers Crazy88Fingers is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

It's non-essential for the firearm to function. And there are about a million other ways to disable the gun for safety's sake. Plus the more you browse online forums the more you'll see phrases like "infernal lock" or "lawyer lock", and they aren't completely unmerited.

Now that you've read that there may be a one in a million chance of it malfunctioning it will always be there in the back of your mind. Yank it out, and sleep a little easier.
  #11  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:23 AM
Ashlander's Avatar
Ashlander Ashlander is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 4,996
Liked 1,309 Times in 685 Posts
Default

When the lock was developed nobody was designing it for a 500. I have seen the recoil on those things break scope mounts! So don't think there is any application to a J-frame.

Moreover, if the lock was unreliable it would have been redesigned a long time ago (and who is to say it hasn't!). S&W has done scores of engineering changes on their guns over the years -- this would not be any different.

No disrespect is intended to those who disagree -- but I think there has been so much "group think" on this issue that people start going along with this anti-lock stuff just because it's become dogma.
  #12  
Old 01-18-2012, 06:39 AM
blujax01's Avatar
blujax01 blujax01 is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
Default

My Grandfather swore power steering was a safety issue and should be banned.

My father's third wife still won't have a car with electric windows.

The IL was added to placate the Clinton administration. (You mean a revolver has no safety?!) This was purely a political move that sent ripples of discontent throughout the S&W community.

It does not serve any useful purpose. Maybe one-in-several-million has hung up. Maybe more S&W revolvers have failed for other reasons. Maybe ...

There is a guy on this forum who sells a kit to remove the lock inexpensively and handsomely. He is a stand-up guy with a nice product.

I for one would not care to answer a Prosecutor's question about me "removing such a critical safety device" from my gun. On the other hand, I can and do make my own self defense ammo so there's some hypocrisy to chew on.

I have shot thousands of round through my two IL equipped revolvers. No problem.

In the final analysis, this is America and you have a choice.

Take it off or leave it on.

YMMV
  #13  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:45 AM
jeeps jeeps is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southside
Posts: 920
Likes: 280
Liked 1,284 Times in 418 Posts
Default

Be as it is my ils 642 -2 10 years ago locked up and the cly. would not turn till the key was put back in to unlock it. I was shooting 125+P 38spec when the lock kicked back on locking the gun stone dead. I got rid of it and found a no-lock 642-1 and just recently a new 442-1 no -lock. I would buy more if they took the lock off all models. A 438 and 1917 would be first.

Last edited by jeeps; 01-18-2012 at 07:48 AM.
  #14  
Old 01-18-2012, 08:59 AM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

My 637-2 kind of half way locked up on me. I say half way since the flag half raise up and the nub on it went into the hammer enough to jam it up, but it didn't fully engauge. I gutted it and tossed the parts. When the frame cracked on it and it was shipped home to S&W for repair, they put the part back in to fill the hole and left out everythign else. I really want to break down and buy a new 442 that is junk parts free.
  #15  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:25 AM
Wayne Wayne is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 205
Likes: 9
Liked 90 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blujax01 View Post
My Grandfather swore power steering was a safety issue and should be banned.

My father's third wife still won't have a car with electric windows.

The IL was added to placate the Clinton administration. (You mean a revolver has no safety?!) This was purely a political move that sent ripples of discontent throughout the S&W community.

It does not serve any useful purpose. Maybe one-in-several-million has hung up. Maybe more S&W revolvers have failed for other reasons. Maybe ...

There is a guy on this forum who sells a kit to remove the lock inexpensively and handsomely. He is a stand-up guy with a nice product.

I for one would not care to answer a Prosecutor's question about me "removing such a critical safety device" from my gun. On the other hand, I can and do make my own self defense ammo so there's some hypocrisy to chew on.

I have shot thousands of round through my two IL equipped revolvers. No problem.

In the final analysis, this is America and you have a choice.

Take it off or leave it on.

YMMV
HMMM, a safety is a device, or switch if you like, that does not allow a gun to fire accidentially if you apply to much pressure on the trigger, and is easily "opened" when ready to fire.

A lock is a device that disables the gun so it cannot be fired, and reqires an extra device (key), to make the gun operable.

I'm just say'in ! The info is out there and not just from Internet hacks, but from many respected people in the gun world. I have one with a lock, and it is a "fun" gun, so I don't care, but I would not carry one for self defense with the lock. It's like forgetting to buy your lottery numbers, and you say oh well, it's a 1 in a million chance, and your numbers win !
__________________
Wayne

Last edited by handejector; 01-18-2012 at 10:25 AM.
  #16  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:34 AM
chp chp is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 465
Likes: 48
Liked 31 Times in 21 Posts
Default

I simply disassemble the gun and grind down the little nub on the lock. I can turn the key and put the lock "on" and the J still works. Problem solved . . .
  #17  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:20 AM
Macinaw's Avatar
Macinaw Macinaw is offline
Member
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,602 Times in 538 Posts
Default

I have been using my 625 JM, 627 PC and 617 for Steel Challenge competition with the lock in and have had no problems.

For my carry guns, M&P 340 and 632 Pro, I have removed the "flag" portion of the lock. The key part of the lock is still in the gun.

I think that even if the "key" part of the locking system comes loose it will not block the hammer.
  #18  
Old 01-18-2012, 04:52 PM
cjtraining's Avatar
cjtraining cjtraining is offline
US Veteran
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 377
Likes: 489
Liked 168 Times in 67 Posts
Default

Everyone has an opinion about the locks. FWIW here is mine. I have three M638s. They sometimes are carry guns. I replaced the lock with a plug. Why take a chance on a self defense gun. I have three other guns with the lock that are range guns. I won't change them. My everyday carry is a M649 with no lock.
  #19  
Old 01-18-2012, 05:02 PM
Smith357's Avatar
Smith357 Smith357 is offline
Moderator
Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure Internal lock failure  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 4,552
Likes: 931
Liked 3,590 Times in 816 Posts
Default

This lock thread has gone full circle.

thread closed


LOCK- ..can't get past "the hole".
__________________
Regards,
Guy-Harold Smith II
Closed Thread

Tags
1911, 340, 360pd, 380, 442, 617, 627, 632, 637, 642, glock, gunsmith, j frame, lock, model 625, model 63, scope, smith-wessonforum.com

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Failure to fire and possible internal lock problem MarkL_01 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 33 04-21-2016 03:15 PM
442 internal lock "reverse failure"? SFShep S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 01-16-2013 01:17 AM
Internal Lock Failure Poll NOW OPEN FOR RATIONAL DATA DISCUSSION Tyrod S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 21 12-24-2011 10:42 PM
Internal Lock Failure - Happened to Me? TAROMAN S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 34 07-28-2011 02:41 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)