Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:07 AM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 14
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default The 940 Centennial

Ok,

Been looking for one of these at a decent price for a while now.

I would love to hear opinions from those of you that own one or have previously owned one.

Over-all reviews?
As a concealed firearm?
Vs. .38 and .357?
Complaints or issues?
Other thoughts considerations?

If you have one, post pics so I can drool.
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:42 AM
mclark202 mclark202 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 215
Likes: 1
Liked 286 Times in 57 Posts
Default

I love mine. I traded a nice 686 for it years ago with member "HEADKNOCKER" who many consider the 940 expert. I don't know what all he did to this 940 other than reaming the cylinder, but it is a SMOOTH trigger on this gun! Mine has some Spegel grips that are perfect for it.

From what I have read the cylinders in these are notorious for not ejecting the casings, so smoothing out the inside of them is a common practice to make them eject more cleanly.

I have to admit, I have yet to shoot mine. It's just so pretty I have never taken it out....lol.


__________________
Mike C
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:45 AM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 14
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

*Droooooooool*

Very very nice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2012, 12:18 PM
Matt C. Matt C. is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: N. DE.
Posts: 307
Likes: 465
Liked 211 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Just picked up a 940-1 and am also impressed by the trigger.

It feels "substantial" in hand but not much heavier than my (converted) 642.


Also, I think the 9mm round is near perfect out of a snubby.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2012, 03:21 PM
st regis st regis is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 606
Likes: 102
Liked 388 Times in 110 Posts
Default

I have one on my ankle as I type this...it's a back up for the S&W 1911 PD in the basketweave....great gun....stand by for a link....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2012, 03:22 PM
st regis st regis is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 606
Likes: 102
Liked 388 Times in 110 Posts
Default

940 ballistics

see if that worked....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2012, 04:14 PM
mc5aw's Avatar
mc5aw mc5aw is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The free state of PA
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 5,721
Liked 8,584 Times in 2,782 Posts
Default

Snappy to shoot, and the cylinder often needs to be honed.
__________________
I'm with the banned ...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2012, 04:42 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,907
Likes: 10,039
Liked 10,047 Times in 4,758 Posts
Default

Like all the steel Centennials, it is a heavy gun, for what it is. Otherwise, it has the usual Centennial features. They generally have good triggers and shoot well enough. I did not have the trouble with extraction that some have had, but my gun did have noticeably small throats (exit-bores). I had the throats honed to .3555-.3560 diameter to see if that would improve accuracy. Probably kind of a pointless exercise to worry too much about accuracy in this type of gun. Anyway, the gun was trouble-free and it turned out the honing was not necessary - probably not detrimental, just not necessary.

I did not like the heavy barrel profile. Some 940s were made with the light barrels, but they are hard to find. I gave up looking for a gun with one, or just for the barrel.

I think it is probably a better solution than the 640 if you are not averse to carrying speedloaders/moon-clips. If you are a speed-strip guy, the 940 is a non-starter.

The steel guns were always just too darned heavy for me. Mine weighed 24 oz. loaded, and I could substitute my 3913 for four more ounces, it was flatter (or at least it seemed to be), and it carried easier for me. If S&W would have made the gun with the lightweight frame, and if it would hold up, I would have preferred a "942" to the 940.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2012, 04:47 PM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 14
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by st regis View Post
940 ballistics

see if that worked....
Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2012, 04:49 PM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 14
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M29since14 View Post
Like all the steel Centennials, it is a heavy gun, for what it is. Otherwise, it has the usual Centennial features. They generally have good triggers and shoot well enough. I did not have the trouble with extraction that some have had, but my gun did have noticeably small throats (exit-bores). I had the throats honed to .3555-.3560 diameter to see if that would improve accuracy. Probably kind of a pointless exercise to worry too much about accuracy in this type of gun. Anyway, the gun was trouble-free and it turned out the honing was not necessary - probably not detrimental, just not necessary.

I did not like the heavy barrel profile. Some 940s were made with the light barrels, but they are hard to find. I gave up looking for a gun with one, or just for the barrel.

I think it is probably a better solution than the 640 if you are not averse to carrying speedloaders/moon-clips. If you are a speed-strip guy, the 940 is a non-starter.

The steel guns were always just too darned heavy for me. Mine weighed 24 oz. loaded, and I could substitute my 3913 for four more ounces, it was flatter (or at least it seemed to be), and it carried easier for me. If S&W would have made the gun with the lightweight frame, and if it would hold up, I would have preferred a "942" to the 940.

I have heard that some have done this conversion with a 642 and a 9mm cylinder.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:43 PM
tekarra tekarra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,131
Likes: 126
Liked 535 Times in 431 Posts
Default

I like my 940 and would like to get one with a 3" barrel. The 940 is heavy and the recoil is snappy. S&W did make a 942 for Wiley Clapp who said the recoil was quite snappy. As noted previously, some forum members have installed 940 cylinders in the 642. Do a search and you will find some interesting reading on the topic.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2012, 03:34 PM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Falls Church, Virginia
Posts: 14
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tekarra View Post
I like my 940 and would like to get one with a 3" barrel. The 940 is heavy and the recoil is snappy. S&W did make a 942 for Wiley Clapp who said the recoil was quite snappy. As noted previously, some forum members have installed 940 cylinders in the 642. Do a search and you will find some interesting reading on the topic.
will do,

Thanks!

-Robert
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2012, 08:51 PM
walkin' trails walkin' trails is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1,771
Liked 548 Times in 311 Posts
Default

I bought one new back in the early 90s. I liked the way it shot. I even put some 115 and 124 grain +P+ thru it and thought it handled great. I think that heavy 158 grain +Ps and hot 125s kicked more from a .38 than the 9 mms from that gun. I wasn't keen about the moon clips, but it was more of a personal thing. The problem I had with the gun was that it locked up and would not let me open the cylinder one afternoon. I'd been shooting Fed Hydra Shok 147s. After it cooled down, I got it unloaded and back to the shop that sold it. It got back to S&W, allegedly fixed, but no explaination as to what was actually done, so I traded it for a .38 version right there. Now I wish I'd kept it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-16-2014, 05:14 AM
HEADKNOCKER's Avatar
HEADKNOCKER HEADKNOCKER is offline
Member
The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial The 940 Centennial  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Grab Your Ankles
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 852
Liked 628 Times in 343 Posts
Default

Mike C sell me that 940 Cheap!!
Gary/Hk
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 3913, 640, 642, 686, 940, basketweave, centennial, concealed, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, smith-wessonforum.com, snubby, spegel

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTS: S&W Mod 42 Centennial mjblazer GUNS - For Sale or Trade 3 03-01-2014 12:09 AM
Centennial OldDominion S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 12 01-18-2014 09:30 AM
S&W Centennial haroldchrismeyer S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 9 10-29-2013 09:41 PM
Pre Mod 40 Centennial augeringin S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 12-17-2012 08:33 PM
NIB M42 Centennial Sonny Crocket S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 5 06-13-2009 08:28 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)