|
|
04-07-2012, 04:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Model 649 is home...
Picked her up today. Out of all the revolvers Smith has made the 49 series has always gotten my attention. Could waste a lot of time on the positive attributes of the 49, I will just show the 649.
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 04:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
I have a new M638-3, a M649-3 & my most recent addition, a no dash M649.
It's no surprise that I like the 649 better than the 638, which I like a lot, but what
surprises me is that I like the 649 more than the -3, which I like a lot more than the 638.
I still can't put my finger on why the 649 beats out the -3, maybe it's simply an
issue of weight. The one place the M649-3 beats out the 649 is in it's longer ejector rod.
__________________
Ogy
Last edited by ogilvyspecial; 04-07-2012 at 04:37 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 04:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 504
Likes: 1
Liked 115 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
The 649 was my first off-duty gun, great weapon. Wish I'd kept it.
|
04-07-2012, 04:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogilvyspecial
I have a new M638-3, a M649-3 & my most recent addition, a no dash M649.
It's no surprise that I like the 649 better than the 638, which I like a lot, but what
surprises me is that I like the 649 more than the -3, which I like a lot more than the 638.
I still can't put my finger on why the 649 beats out the -3, maybe it's simply an
issue of weight. The one place the M649-3 beats out the 649 is in it's longer ejector rod.
|
That is my very thought also. Ever since I saw your -3, I have added to my list of wants. I want the -3 for the extra weight and it looks so much better. I forgot about the longer ejector rod. Plus the usage of 357 magnums when and if I ever have to use it. So in the mean time I will still have to admire your's!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-07-2012, 04:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidray
That is my very thought also. Ever since I saw your -3, I have added to my list of wants. I want the -3 for the extra weight and it looks so much better. I forgot about the longer ejector rod. Plus the usage of 357 magnums when and if I ever have to use it. So in the mean time I will still have to admire your's!
|
The two reasons you mentioned, longer ejector rod & .357 capability are
why the -3 should beat out the no dash 649 without it even being a contest.
That's why it surprises me so much..
Maybe it's simply the fact that the no dash is the new kid on the block
and I'm still in the "honeymoon phase."
Admire away......
__________________
Ogy
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 04:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogilvyspecial
Admire away......
|
It just hit me...from that angle it is like a baby L-frame!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-07-2012, 05:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 17
Liked 775 Times in 378 Posts
|
|
I like the 49 series. They are my favorite snubbie. I have a 649 as well. They are habit forming.
__________________
The American dream is alive
|
04-07-2012, 05:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidray
It just hit me...from that angle it is like a baby L-frame!
|
Good comparison!
It is one hefty J Frame, that's for sure!!
From the ejector rod side......
__________________
Ogy
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 05:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 11,156
Liked 12,130 Times in 1,940 Posts
|
|
Oops
couldn't resist. This is my baby...
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 06:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,322 Times in 2,921 Posts
|
|
Congrats on your new 649 they are great guns.
Living in South Florida means I wear shorts about 95% of the year ,
As a result I prefer the Airweight 38/638 version for CCW only because it carrys easier for me in the front pocket.
If you like 649's you might find this one interesting,
Its 1 of 100 engraved 649's made to comemorate the release in 1985 ,
Coincidentally its serial number ends in 1 as well.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 04-07-2012 at 06:27 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 06:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
South Florida...
When we came back from Ramey A.F.B. in Puerto Rico it was to McCoy A.F.B. in Orlando Florida. When my dad got new orders he didn't know were Orlando was, as it was just a small town in 1969. A few years later it would become famous because of Disney. 30 years later I moved to Georgia as the high temps and high humidty was to much...so I know why you go with lighter and shorts!
Very nice collection of Humpback's you have there!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-07-2012, 06:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,813
Likes: 58,043
Liked 53,098 Times in 16,564 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinn
couldn't resist. This is my baby...
|
Beautiful pinto ya got there.
__________________
Sure you did
|
04-07-2012, 07:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,813
Likes: 58,043
Liked 53,098 Times in 16,564 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogilvyspecial
I have a new M638-3, a M649-3 & my most recent addition, a no dash M649.
It's no surprise that I like the 649 better than the 638, which I like a lot, but what
surprises me is that I like the 649 more than the -3, which I like a lot more than the 638.
I still can't put my finger on why the 649 beats out the -3, maybe it's simply an
issue of weight. The one place the M649-3 beats out the 649 is in it's longer ejector rod.
|
Hey Jack, you have me all .............
__________________
Sure you did
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2012, 09:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northwest Washington
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 2,437
Liked 2,284 Times in 474 Posts
|
|
Rapidray,
Great looking 649! I have an M649 and a M49 both "no dash" models. I carry the 649 daily.
De Oppresso Liber
|
04-07-2012, 09:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Halethorpe, Maryland USA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I have a 649 no dash, and it's a great gun. The bodyguard configuration is my favorite J frame. Enjoy your new acquisition, it's really nice.
__________________
NRA Cert. Pistol Instr.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-08-2012, 09:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
ogilvyspecial,
Is your 649-3 a full stainless steel (with the longer ejection rod), .357 Magnum rated and without "the lock"?
That is exactly what I have been looking for, but was told did not exist. Folks (including S&W) said that the full stainless 649, with the slightly longer barrel and .357 rating came at the same time as "the lock". Is yours a very new version (dreaming!) or one that came just before the lock was added?
Dumb question I guess, I'm looking at your pictures, but I am dumb-struck, so I guess I need your confirmation.
Kicking myself too, because I gave up my hunt and spent a lot of money on a 640 Pro, just because it came without "--- ----"! ^L^
Nice collection too, I have an old model 49 and model 38, but I like the heavier construction of the 649.
- Thomas
(Searching web now for "649-3"!!)
Last edited by ThomasH; 04-08-2012 at 11:52 AM.
Reason: Added 640 Pro image
|
04-08-2012, 09:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Ogy has a no lock 649-3. Nice 640 Pro you have there.
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-08-2012, 11:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidray
Ogy has a no lock 649-3. Nice 640 Pro you have there.
|
Thanks Ray, sorry about that. I did notice in a minute or two and adjusted my post, but too late! Sorry!
I like my 49, the blued steel model, but after a steady diet of the 158 grain +P it is starting to develop end-shake, so I was looking to move to a stronger version.
Carried my 640pro IWB yesterday for the first time, cinch up the belt it's heavy! ^L^
I also have to find a simple accessible way to carry a couple of loaded moon clips. I have a nice little black nylon two section pouch with velcro covers, but it's too "tactical" to be subtle. I need something more "innocent" looking.
- Thomas
|
04-08-2012, 11:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 612
Likes: 319
Liked 400 Times in 151 Posts
|
|
Nice CCW piece. Do you guys find more people returning to reveolvers for CCW after carrying an auto for a period of time?
|
04-08-2012, 12:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
I did.
Carrying a 1911 is no fun during the summer. Got a '52 Colt LW Commander and it is still a little to much. The J-frames are great and the 49 series is perfect!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-08-2012, 01:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasH
ogilvyspecial,
Is your 649-3 a full stainless steel (with the longer ejection rod), .357 Magnum rated and without "the lock"?
That is exactly what I have been looking for, but was told did not exist. Folks (including S&W) said that the full stainless 649, with the slightly longer barrel and .357 rating came at the same time as "the lock". Is yours a very new version (dreaming!) or one that came just before the lock was added?
Dumb question I guess, I'm looking at your pictures, but I am dumb-struck, so I guess I need your confirmation.
|
To add a little more to Ray's confirmation, my 649-3 dates to 1996 or
early 1997, roughly 4 years prior to the lock showing up.
The M649-3 came on the scene (1996) when the MIM parts were being
introduced so you will find the 649-3's with either a forged hammer & trigger
or MIM. I feel I got lucky in that the only MIM part on mine, not that I'm against MIM
mind you, generally speaking, was the firing pin.
Since I have heard reports of the MIM pins breaking, which might be why
S&W now, for the most part, uses stainless pins I recently swapped out
the MIM pin on mine for a new, factory stainless firing pin.
Good luck in your quest, they are out there.
I recently found one for a forum member at the same shop I stumbled across mine.
__________________
Ogy
|
04-08-2012, 04:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Sigh...
Thanks Ogy,
I suppose I "should" just stick with my superb 640 Pro, but that hasn't stopped me before!
Sigh....
- Thomas
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 327, 357 magnum, 638, 640, 649, airweight, bodyguard, ccw, colt, commander, ejector, engraved, j frame, lock, m649, pinto, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, tactical |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|