Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2012, 02:08 PM
harrison_creek's Avatar
harrison_creek harrison_creek is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 45
Likes: 23
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds

FYI,

I noticed today that Buds Gun Shop is advertising no lock 442's and 642's available again. Discount Guns for Sale - Buds Gun Shop.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 04-16-2012, 05:50 PM
M3Stuart's Avatar
M3Stuart M3Stuart is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
Default

Thanks for the tip! They must have sold out and just now got them back in stock.
__________________
But then, what do I know?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2012, 01:00 AM
JoeGun JoeGun is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 179
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by harrison_creek View Post
FYI,

I noticed today that Buds Gun Shop is advertising no lock 442's and 642's available again. Discount Guns for Sale - Buds Gun Shop.
Thanks HC,

Got one of the 642 No Lock's coming my way...

After handleing one the other day in the Pawn Shop,, I was bit,, and just had to have one.

I'm really looking forward to seeing it for the First Time. Sort of Like an Early Christmas for me. I thought about waiting,, but didn't want to take a chance in not being able to persuade Santa,

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:49 AM
BobR1 BobR1 is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SC Missouri
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 281
Liked 331 Times in 221 Posts
Default

I just got a 442 Pro "Moon Clip" from Bud's. I have not even gotten around to firing it so far.
I have been working with my F Class Target Rifle the last couple weeks.
I need to get an order off to TK and get more moon clips and a couple J Frame California Competition Works Moon Clip Carriers for it.

Bob
__________________
ICORE MO2908
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:32 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is online now
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,803
Likes: 58,019
Liked 53,070 Times in 16,553 Posts
Default

Better get em' while you can. I was at my FFL last evening, he can't get any 2 inch J frames from his distributor, not a one. The panic is on.

Oh, he has some Glops though.
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 04-19-2012, 07:45 PM
allglock allglock is offline
Banned
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
Default

My local dealer has stacks of new J Frames. He must have 50 boxes stacked up!
Maybe , if I looked through them all, I might find a good one....lol
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-19-2012, 10:05 PM
357 shooter 357 shooter is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 451
Likes: 77
Liked 492 Times in 217 Posts
Default

I picked up a 642 non-lock last month although on gunbroker. My first ever J-Frame.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:24 PM
JoeGun JoeGun is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 179
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13 View Post
Better get em' while you can. I was at my FFL last evening, he can't get any 2 inch J frames from his distributor, not a one. The panic is on.

Oh, he has some Glops though.
L13,

Bud's price has gone up 13 $'s since I got mine!!!

S&W M642 38 1 7/8 No Lock Stainless $394.00 SHIPS FREE

LifeTime Warranty

Make Hay Whilst The Sun Shine's,

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2012, 06:40 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is online now
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,803
Likes: 58,019
Liked 53,070 Times in 16,553 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeGun View Post
L13,

Bud's price has gone up 13 $'s since I got mine!!!

S&W M642 38 1 7/8 No Lock Stainless $394.00 SHIPS FREE

LifeTime Warranty

Make Hay Whilst The Sun Shine's,

Joe

Great to hear you got one, the most popular J frame out there. Still a bargain at $394, imo.
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2012, 08:13 PM
ColColt's Avatar
ColColt ColColt is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 27
Liked 284 Times in 131 Posts
Default

If I'm going to have just a five shot I'd just as soon have my SP101 that will shoot 38 or 357.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-21-2012, 06:57 PM
JoeGun JoeGun is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 179
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColColt View Post
If I'm going to have just a five shot I'd just as soon have my SP101 that will shoot 38 or 357.
CC,

That was pretty much my thinking too with my Taurus 650 SS2. But at 24oz,, it was just too heavy for my pocket.

When I saw the 642,, it looked just like my 650,, but was waaay liter, coming in at 9oz diff.,, felt like it was going to float out of my hand.

True enough that the 642 won't shoot 357 mag,, but will handle 38 +P. Haveing a Gun,, that won't weigh me down,, and feel clumsy toteing in the pocket,, it's a tradeoff I'm willing to deal with. I'll still keep the 650 around though,, as a backup...

Seems like for me anyway,, that I tend to drift more towards convenience and less complicated,, which is why I like DAO, No Lock, & Lite as a Feather,

Joe
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 04-21-2012, 08:08 PM
rebelrouseri rebelrouseri is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default I'll go w/ the smith....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColColt View Post
If I'm going to have just a five shot I'd just as soon have my SP101 that will shoot 38 or 357.
better trigger, lighter weight, and more concealable. that little smith can fit easily into your pocket.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 04-21-2012, 08:16 PM
rebelrouseri rebelrouseri is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default I'll go w/ the smith....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColColt View Post
If I'm going to have just a five shot I'd just as soon have my SP101 that will shoot 38 or 357.
better trigger, lighter weight, and more concealable. that little smith can fit easily into your pocket.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-21-2012, 10:56 PM
Cook74's Avatar
Cook74 Cook74 is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Olalla, WA
Posts: 88
Likes: 22
Liked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Mine was $327.99 plus $20 shipping last month through sportsmans outdoor superstore...
__________________
Doug;}
RSO from WA State
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-22-2012, 11:56 AM
tripledipper tripledipper is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 934
Likes: 141
Liked 450 Times in 163 Posts
Default

They were going for $425-50 a couple of years ago before Smith reduced the prices on j-frames so anyone who bought then will always lose on a re-sale. Better off just keeping.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:29 AM
BobR1 BobR1 is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SC Missouri
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 281
Liked 331 Times in 221 Posts
Default

I carry all the time, and have for years. I pocket carry in a jacket or vest pocket, when I pocket carry.
My findings on weight for pocket carry:

J Frame Airweight: a perfect weight for pocket carry. Recoil is brisk.

LCR-22 or LCR 38: a perfect weight for pocket carry. Factory grips are a hair bulkey however, but not a real problem. The bulky grips soak up recoil well.

LCR 357: The 357 version is right on the line of being to heavy for pocket carry. With the combination of the grips and added weight of the 357 model, it soaks up recoil well, and is not bad to shoot at all with +P.

SP101: To heavy for pocket carry for most people. Great choice for belt carry in a quality holster like a Lobo Enhanced Pancake.

K Frame 2" or 2-1/2": To heavy for pocket carry. Great for belt carry, and a very shootable size handgun.

For pocket carry the J Frame Airweight carrys the best of all listed above as it comes out of the box.

Bob
__________________
ICORE MO2908
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 04-24-2012, 03:58 PM
M3Stuart's Avatar
M3Stuart M3Stuart is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
Default

I experimented with an airweight, an old Model 36 and a Model 60. For me, pocket carry for revolver just wasn't going to work. So I picked my favorite - the model 60 - got an IWB holster, and sold the 36. Works for me.
__________________
But then, what do I know?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-24-2012, 04:35 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is online now
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,803
Likes: 58,019
Liked 53,070 Times in 16,553 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cook74 View Post
Mine was $327.99 plus $20 shipping last month through sportsmans outdoor superstore...

For anyone looking, I checked yesterday, they still had this great price.
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-24-2012, 04:42 PM
gr7070's Avatar
gr7070 gr7070 is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 53
Liked 234 Times in 147 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobR1 View Post
I carry all the time, and have for years. I pocket carry in a jacket or vest pocket, when I pocket carry.
My findings on weight for pocket carry:

J Frame Airweight: a perfect weight for pocket carry. Recoil is brisk.

LCR-22 or LCR 38: a perfect weight for pocket carry. Factory grips are a hair bulkey however, but not a real problem. The bulky grips soak up recoil well.

LCR 357: The 357 version is right on the line of being to heavy for pocket carry. With the combination of the grips and added weight of the 357 model, it soaks up recoil well, and is not bad to shoot at all with +P.

SP101: To heavy for pocket carry for most people. Great choice for belt carry in a quality holster like a Lobo Enhanced Pancake.

K Frame 2" or 2-1/2": To heavy for pocket carry. Great for belt carry, and a very shootable size handgun.

For pocket carry the J Frame Airweight carrys the best of all listed above as it comes out of the box.

Bob
Interesting info; I appreciate the insight.

What's the thought on the 15 oz. Airweights vs. the 11.4 oz. scandium AirLites (I think AirLite is the proper term). Is the nearly 4 oz. less weight noticed in the pocket? Is that 4 oz. noticed while shooting +P ammo?

Has a general concensus, even if loosely, been formed about the benefit or lack thereof been formed on the scandium J-frames?

While I highly doubt the difference in weight is worth the price, I am curious if the difference in weight would be appreciated while in one's pocket.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-25-2012, 09:45 AM
f2 f2 is offline
Member
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 223
Likes: 11
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gr7070 View Post
What's the thought on the 15 oz. Airweights vs. the 11.4 oz. scandium AirLites (I think AirLite is the proper term). Is the nearly 4 oz. less weight noticed in the pocket? Is that 4 oz. noticed while shooting +P ammo?
my airlite's frame is not scandium, though it does have a titanium cylinder - 342 pre-lock. both 342 and 642-1 have hogue bantam grips and absorb the kick of +P speer gold dot 135 gr. .38 spl no problem. no difference in kick between the two. try some other grips and you will get some other result.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-25-2012, 11:17 AM
allglock allglock is offline
Banned
642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds 642 & 442 No Locks Advertised at Buds  
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gr7070 View Post
Interesting info; I appreciate the insight.

What's the thought on the 15 oz. Airweights vs. the 11.4 oz. scandium AirLites (I think AirLite is the proper term). Is the nearly 4 oz. less weight noticed in the pocket? Is that 4 oz. noticed while shooting +P ammo?

Has a general concensus, even if loosely, been formed about the benefit or lack thereof been formed on the scandium J-frames?

While I highly doubt the difference in weight is worth the price, I am curious if the difference in weight would be appreciated while in one's pocket.
IMO, if it weighs more than about 13.5 ozs. loaded, it is too heavy for pocket carry. This after trying several different weights through the years. If you want it to be not noticeable in the pocket... 13.5 ozs is my limit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
327, 442, 642, 650, airweight, hogue, j frame, lock, model 60, scandium, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, sp101, taurus, titanium


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hope this is OK. 629 advertised in Nashville. 5-Shot S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 11-21-2014 10:22 PM
pocotango Delivers as Advertised SASABERANGER Feedback 0 11-13-2012 09:08 PM
BudMan5 A+ Parts better than advertised Arman4461 Feedback 0 08-12-2011 10:44 PM
Need some help....K-22 as advertised? hunterdeneugene S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 17 04-06-2010 06:26 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)