|
|
05-01-2012, 03:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
Other great target revolvers?
Hi,
I'm really digging my model 17 with the long barrel. It's a sweet range gun. That long barrel reaches out and touches the target at 25 yards. The sights and trigger are great. By the way, what's that trigger generally set to? I don't have a scale, I'm thinking it's around 3 pounds. Whatever it is...it's sweet.
I'd like to get another really nice target revolver. I'm open to other calibers. I just want something with a trigger as nice as the M17 and good sights too.
What do you guys suggest I look for?
Thanks,
Dave
And photos...got to have photos...
I do like the target grips on this bad boy.
There's a 6" M17 in nice shape that I could pick up for a fair price. I think it's a 17-3. Is there a big difference in trigger pull and all that good stuff if it didn't come with the target upgrades?
I do have a 686 with a trigger job from Clark and upgraded sights...but I'm not nearly as accurate with it compared to the K22. This is about the best I could do with it from 25 yards...offhand...on this 8" target.
Thanks,
Dave
Last edited by Super Dave; 05-01-2012 at 03:27 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2012, 04:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 667
Liked 6,774 Times in 1,312 Posts
|
|
__________________
Vaya con Dios
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-01-2012, 05:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
I have a long barrel K38 that's very good,and don't forget the Dan Wessons, they are VERY accurate.
|
05-01-2012, 08:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 395
Liked 828 Times in 274 Posts
|
|
There are a lot of great S&W target revolvers, and of course you already have one in your model 17. You can't go wrong with a model 14 (or earlier K-38) in .38 special, which are plentiful and can be had for a reasonable price. I personally like the K frame .32's, but they are harder to find and more expensive. My favorites are this model 16-3 and these 16-4's, low recoil and very accurate, just a pleasure to shoot.
|
05-01-2012, 10:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
Liked 450 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
The most accurate handgun you can buy is a freedom arms. Here is a picture of fa 252 that is previously owned. Frame was designed for 454 casual, though the 22 cylinder still only held 5 rounds. Chambers were so tight you had to seat the round with a wooden rod. With a 12 power scope I saw a group shot under 1 inch at a 100 yards with this gun.
|
05-01-2012, 10:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Peach State! GA!!!
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 14,218
Liked 6,250 Times in 2,325 Posts
|
|
A few years ago I found and bought a 625-2. I'd never owned a .45 ACP revolver. I'd never thought much about them. I bought it with no real idea what I'd use it for. I didn't expect more than typical results from it when I first took it to the range. To say I was shocked by the results would be a gross understatement. That 625 has turned out to be the most accurate revolver I've ever owned excluding .22 LR revolvers. With care one can keep 50 rounds inside the 10 rings of a Silhouette target at 25 yds. fired off-hand from a Weaver stance. At 50 long steps I've been able to hit scrap steel railroad plates time after time after time firing off-hand.
__________________
<><
|
05-01-2012, 10:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,225
Likes: 12,697
Liked 13,445 Times in 3,391 Posts
|
|
I just got this one a Model 48
I was pleasantly surprised by how precise it is.
I didn't expect much from a .22 mag.
Perhaps wrongly
Target was only 10 yards but with someone more capable than I tend to be
could be a real tack driver
|
05-01-2012, 10:58 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 6
Liked 473 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
I have an 8 3/8" Model 14, with the Single Action Only hammer and trigger and a light rebound spring.
If ever a gun was made for 25 yard Bullseye matches, with .38 WC rounds, this is it.
I swapped out the wood target grips for a set of period correct no medallion Large Pachmayrs, for maximum grip and control one-handed. I figured I would set the gun up for serious target shooting, and the finish damage takes it out of "collectible" status anyway.
|
05-01-2012, 11:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 209
Liked 1,195 Times in 457 Posts
|
|
Just about every Smith revolver made with adjustable sights could be called a "target revolver" with more than a little justification.
My 6" Model 686 gave me a "best" target recently - standing at 25 yards:
Either of my 625's (a 4" Model 625-8 JM Special and a 5" Model 625-6 model of 1989):
Here is my 6½" Model 624:
When you have a fine revolver like most Smiths are, the performance will be determined by the ability of the shooter.
My recommendation would be to pick a caliber that is especially useful (or desirable) to YOU. Then just pick whichever adjustable sighted Smith revolver that best supports that caliber and you should be good to go.
Keep in mind that you will NEVER shoot to YOUR potential until you reload your own ammo and better yet cast your own bullets. Unless you are independently wealthy, you will not be able to shoot as much as you need to do your best.
It just flat takes "trigger time". With most of us, that means a LOT of trigger time (but that is good, no?).
Dale53
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2012, 11:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,225
Likes: 12,697
Liked 13,445 Times in 3,391 Posts
|
|
Dale I'm glad you don't shoot my revolvers
Then I'd know how much I let them down
|
05-01-2012, 12:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stantheman86
I have an 8 3/8" Model 14, with the Single Action Only hammer and trigger and a light rebound spring.
If ever a gun was made for 25 yard Bullseye matches, with .38 WC rounds, this is it.
I swapped out the wood target grips for a set of period correct no medallion Large Pachmayrs, for maximum grip and control one-handed. I figured I would set the gun up for serious target shooting, and the finish damage takes it out of "collectible" status anyway.
|
+1 on the Model 14 in 8 3/8 inch barrel.
|
05-01-2012, 12:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,993
Likes: 4,998
Liked 7,681 Times in 2,618 Posts
|
|
Trigger pull: Most S&Ws come with SA trigger pulls in the 3-lb. range, and some as low as 2 1/2. I have some previously owned revolvers that came to me tuned to the 1 to 1 1/2 pound level, but that feels a little too light for comfort.
Clearly a lot of people can work wonders with a K-38, and the long tube on those seems to confer a distance benefit. But I find that in .38 Special I'd really rather shoot an N-frame, and the .38/44 Outdoorsman (either the transitional model or the Pre-23) is a fine distance hitter. All that steel out there at the end of my arm seems to act like a mass damper and suppress the effects of arm tremors. That's my theory, at any rate. I certainly shoot heavier guns better than light ones. Even my short-barrel N-frames sometimes give me accuracy better than I can achieve with a lighter-frame long-barrel gun. I'm thinking in particular of a PC 627 with a 2 5/8" barrel.
__________________
David Wilson
|
05-01-2012, 01:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 313
Liked 777 Times in 390 Posts
|
|
8 3/8" 629 DX...out of the box- 2"@50 yds.
My 6" 16-4 is really sweet. I seem to do best with longer full-lug barrels. Allthough I have a 2nd model 44spl (convertered to target) that can put all 6 touching at 15yds.
|
05-01-2012, 01:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 339
Likes: 12
Liked 193 Times in 80 Posts
|
|
Since you didnt mention it had to be a S&W my vote is for a Freedom Arms .22
When the "dope bag" tested them many years ago they reported this revolver was the most accurate .22 handgun they ever tested, bar none. And that included single and semi auto's designed for Olympic competition.
|
05-01-2012, 01:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 1,903
Liked 4,430 Times in 1,360 Posts
|
|
My 6" Security Six has served me well and is very accurate.
I don't have one of the "new" SP101's in .22LR but it may be a good option too with the new fiber optic front site and all.
|
05-01-2012, 02:47 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: washington illinois
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 9,209
Liked 2,712 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
|
The only target revolver that i have any experience with is the s&w model 60 .357 magnum with a 3 inch barrel its a nice little gun.
|
05-01-2012, 03:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the great suggestions. I'm at work now so I'll have to look into all these cool models later.
I do have a quick quetions on the Freedom Arms. I had considered one of those...kind of pricey...but the thing that turned me off was it looked like the grip was designed for one hand. I shoot with two hands. Does that type of cowboy grip style work with two hands?
Thanks,
Dave
|
05-01-2012, 03:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SE Mich - O/S Detroit
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 2,026
Liked 2,801 Times in 1,017 Posts
|
|
Here are both my 8 3/8" barreled S&W's. Both are tack drivers. If it were me, I'd go after a Model 14. They're as sweet as they come.
Note - This is a little heretical, especially here, but Colt Officer Model Match revolvers are also an excellent choice.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-01-2012, 03:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
Liked 381 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
A S&W Model 25 in 45 ACP would go nicely with your Model 17. Here's my Model 25 no dash, made in 1957:
If you want a really cool old-school target revolver, try a Colt Shooting Master:
|
05-02-2012, 03:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
Wow, great stuff.
I would definately like to try a Model 14 at some point. But, the cost of ammo would take the fun out of it. I'm looking at $25 a box for some generic .38s on Oahu.
So, I best stick with the guilt free .22.
How would a Colt Officer Model Match .22 compare to my target S&W M17 in feel and trigger pull? Are they equals?
Is the Colt Officer Model Match a higher grade revolver than a standard Model 17 (without target sights, hammer, grips)?
I wouldn't mind branching out and trying something different.
Thanks,
Dave
|
05-02-2012, 07:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Dave
Wow, great stuff.
I would definately like to try a Model 14 at some point. But, the cost of ammo would take the fun out of it. I'm looking at $25 a box for some generic .38s on Oahu.
So, I best stick with the guilt free .22.
How would a Colt Officer Model Match .22 compare to my target S&W M17 in feel and trigger pull? Are they equals?
Is the Colt Officer Model Match a higher grade revolver than a standard Model 17 (without target sights, hammer, grips)?
I wouldn't mind branching out and trying something different.
Thanks,
Dave
|
If you want to stick with a 22LR I'd get a Model 18 with 4 inch barrel or Model 17 with 6 inch barrel.
|
05-02-2012, 11:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 235
Likes: 69
Liked 87 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
If you don't have a M41, I highly recommend it. While not the revolver you are looking for, it is one nice target gun. I have a M17 and a M617 and while I like them both, I am a better shot with the 41. I think its due to the grip, which just plain fits me better than a revolver grip.
kas
|
05-02-2012, 11:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,225
Likes: 12,697
Liked 13,445 Times in 3,391 Posts
|
|
So, I best stick with the guilt free .22.
That's why I only bumped you to a .22 mag...LOL
|
05-02-2012, 02:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
Right on guys. I appreciate the good advice.
Yea, I want one of those M41's too.
Just when I was content...I had to start thinking about what I don't have.
Human nature I suppose.
Back to work now...
Dave
|
05-02-2012, 03:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Montezuma, IA
Posts: 165
Likes: 4
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
625-4 I'll be picking her up in the next week or so. I have pretty high hopes that she'll be quite the tack driver. Not quite sure yet what mods have been done aside from the sights and cylinder latch.
I've never heard a bad thing about any of the 625s but I'm pretty happy to have found one pre-lock/MIM.
__________________
Son of a Gun...Smith
|
05-02-2012, 09:20 PM
|
|
WW II Vet
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 718
Liked 4,294 Times in 630 Posts
|
|
How about.a 6in.mdl.34-1 or a mdl.35 6in.
Dick
6in.34-1
|
05-03-2012, 10:44 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
|
|
Your 686 should shoot better than that. My 6" 686 all stock but a slightly smoothed trigger will shoot into about 2" at 25 yds. Perhaps you need some handloads "tuned" to your gun. Mine likes my 38 spec load of 4.9 gr. 231 behind a 158 gr. RNFP and sparked with a Fed primer. Load is right out of the old Lyman cast bullet handbook as most accurate load with that bullet. (and it is).
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
05-03-2012, 05:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
I agree with you Richard on the 686. I don't know what it is with that gun but I've never warmed up to it. It's accurate when bench rested. Off hand I just can't seem to get right with it. It's been like that since day one...and I invested in new grips, trigger job and new sights and still can't seem to warm up to it. I should probably sell it.
The 686 was my first wheel gun. I thought that maybe I just wasn't cut out for revolvers. That's why I was so stoked with the model 17.
Anyway, I appreciate all the ideas.
Dave
|
05-03-2012, 06:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 612
Likes: 319
Liked 400 Times in 151 Posts
|
|
What do the K-38 14-4's go for these days, say if they have the original box, manual etc?
__________________
Existimo ergo sum armis
|
05-04-2012, 01:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 447
Likes: 276
Liked 467 Times in 144 Posts
|
|
What's the difference between the target sights and the non target sights on the Model 17's?
Do the full target models have a sweeter trigger pull than the non target models? Thanks,
Dave
|
05-04-2012, 09:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Palmyra, VA
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 0
Liked 171 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
My bullseye target revolvers
From the top are a Model 17 tuned by the Performance Center; a Model 16 converted to 38 Special by Hamilton Bowen; a Model 625 by the Performance Center; and a Model 625 with only a little work done by a friend of mine (S&W trained). The top two and the one at the bottom I use regularly in 2700s (shooting low- to mid-2500's) but the 625 PC I'm still working up a load for. Interestingly, that gun is one of the first 100 JM guns built. All the grips are Nill Hemphill PPC grips. They work the best for me since I shoot DA for all sustained fire strings.
Keith
Last edited by keithherrington; 05-04-2012 at 09:26 AM.
|
05-04-2012, 09:52 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 8,270
Liked 2,071 Times in 590 Posts
|
|
Wow, I usually come away from this forum feeling pretty good but, this thread is beginning to hurt my feelings. I'm happy to put all six on an 8" plate at 25 yards. Maybe it's my old eyes.
Here's one of my favorites for target shooting, a model 1950 shipped in 1955
|
05-04-2012, 11:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,225
Likes: 12,697
Liked 13,445 Times in 3,391 Posts
|
|
That one has me green DGT
|
05-04-2012, 12:00 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 8,270
Liked 2,071 Times in 590 Posts
|
|
Thanks weatherby, I'm not sure if I own it or it owns me
|
05-04-2012, 04:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
What's up with those long barrels?
When I want to deliver a grouping at 25 yards I reach for this bad boy:
The venerable Bobcat 22 LR with a 2" barrel!
Oh wait...did I say 25 yards? I meant 25 FEET. Or was that INCHES?
__________________
But then, what do I know?
|
05-04-2012, 05:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 421
Likes: 137
Liked 168 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
"Cannon" barrels rock!
Model 48-2 full target 8-3/8"bbl in .22 WMRF, with model 17-2 6"bbl .22LR, also full target.
Model 57-1 with 8-3/8"bbl .41mag, full target
Last edited by MakeMyNight; 05-04-2012 at 06:55 PM.
|
05-04-2012, 07:56 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 622
Likes: 965
Liked 1,137 Times in 339 Posts
|
|
Here are a couple of mine:
A 1955 Target produced in 1955. It was wearing a cheap set of fake ivory grips when I bought it. I installed the S&W retro targets seen here. The throats slug out at .4555" but it still shoots better than I do.
The second is a K38 that dates to 1952. The picture says it all.
Both still get regular work outs, especially the K38. If only I could consistently shoot to their potential...
|
05-04-2012, 09:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 8,789
Liked 7,778 Times in 2,375 Posts
|
|
Never shot bullseye with a revolver. Silhouettes were another matter.
My 17-4 did just fine at the IHMSA rimfire revolver matches back in the day.
It could really slam the little rams at 100 meters.
Its 29-2 wasn't too shabby either. It finally began to suffer from 1000s of heavy loads so it went back home last year for a rejuvenation. Note that I had changed the front sight over to a patridge so both guns sighted the same.
Here they are, along with their Model 14 cousin "practice" gun, all dressed up for their family portrait:
Back in the day, they all wore plain Pachs as their "working" stocks.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
12-18-2012, 01:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sorta Downeast
Posts: 935
Likes: 2,877
Liked 1,740 Times in 419 Posts
|
|
Like "Dennis the B" I'm not trying to be rude, but this 1960 Colt Officers Model Match has the best trigger pull and accuracy of any handgun I have ever shot:
|
12-18-2012, 08:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,676
Likes: 1,769
Liked 3,702 Times in 1,242 Posts
|
|
I have a real soft spot for quality .22 LR revolvers. Pre-17's, 17's, 18's, 34's, 617's, Ruger Single-Six's. For pure shooting fun in a S&W I humbly submit my recommendation The Model 617-6 ten shot, four inch. Yes, I know it has the stupid lock, however in thousands of rounds I have not had any issues. The factory trigger has smoothed into near perfection and the revolver is more accurate than several other K-22's in my safe.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-18-2012, 10:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 6,980
Liked 2,474 Times in 1,144 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Dave
What's the difference between the target sights and the non target sights on the Model 17's?
Do the full target models have a sweeter trigger pull than the non target models? Thanks,
Dave
|
1)Probably a bit late (Super Dave hasn't been to the site since August!), but all the adjustable rear sights on S&Ws since WWII have been essentially the same. (With exceptions in numerous small details!) About the only thing your eye will notice is whether it's a "white outline" rear notch, or plain black. The front sights have a little more visible variations, but most Model 17s have a patridge front blade, just like yours. A Model 18 would have a ramp type front sight.
2)As far as factory trigger pulls go, it's completely random! Try it before you buy it. A snubby J-frame can have a better trigger than a "target model anything".
The triggers themselves will vary in width and may be grooved or smooth. Some target models come with a trigger stop, but I've found them ineffectual.
|
12-18-2012, 10:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
If you wanted a matched set in terms of balance and weight get a Model 14 with 8 3/8 inch barrel. In the 50's and 60's the Model K38/14 was used a lot by competition shooters and S&W made the Model 17 to have the same weight and balance so that these shooters could practice with less expensive 22LR ammo.
Model 17-4
Model 14-4
Last edited by fyimo; 12-18-2012 at 11:05 AM.
|
12-18-2012, 11:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
Most any of the Dan Wesson's from the Monson Mass.
plant or the CZA factory.
|
|
Tags
|
16-4, 2nd model, 357 magnum, 44 magnum, 624, 686, bullseye, k frame, k22, k38, m17, model 14, model 16, model 17, model 29, model 624, model 625, model 686, n-frame, outdoorsman, scope, silhouette, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, weaver |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|