|
|
07-21-2014, 10:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
NEW Mod 60 (162420) Canted Barrel
Just picked up new S&W Mod 60 (162420) and when I opened in at home noticed almost immediately that there was more metal on the the right side of the frame where the barrel and frame meet.
Just eye-balling it, it looks like the barrel is canted to the left.
I'ill do some measuring and post pic tomorrow.
This is a brand new firearm, I'm the first owner--I'm assuming S&W is going to fix this?
|
07-22-2014, 12:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 1,078
Liked 778 Times in 411 Posts
|
|
Ahhhh, grasshopper, you have encountered the magic canted barrel. A rare variation from the deep jungle where all bullets must turn left to find their targe....
Oh, alright, it is a manufacturing defect. A very common one these days. Smith will rectify it at no charge and quite quickly to boot. Call their customer service line and explain your problem. They will send you a FedEx shipping label, the gun should be back to you in about 10 days. I just had a similar problem with a 640 which was corrected blindingly fast.
The guy at the FedEx counter recognized the Smith address immeidately, has he seen too many Smith labels lately?
__________________
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-22-2014, 08:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 1
Liked 179 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
I had the same issue on my brand new 686+ 3". Emailed Smith, had it back the next week with the barrel lined up correctly.
|
07-22-2014, 03:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 1,078
Liked 778 Times in 411 Posts
|
|
At the risk of sounding like an old curmudgeon (I know, I sound like that anyway), it seems it would be cheaper for Smith to go back to pinned barrels when building the guns. We never had "canted barrel syndrome" back in the day. The cost of all this air freighting plus the cost of dedicating staff to correcting the problem could pay for a lot of barrel pins.
__________________
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-22-2014, 07:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 36
Liked 49 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Amen, sac-gunslinger. Best, Joe
|
07-22-2014, 09:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Got home late...do they come to your home to pick it up or do I have to go to them? Pain in the neck...thanks for the replies they have made me fill a lot better, as long as they fix that will work for me...
Last edited by itr674; 07-22-2014 at 09:41 PM.
|
07-22-2014, 10:42 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 3,516
Liked 6,738 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sac-gunslinger
At the risk of sounding like an old curmudgeon (I know, I sound like that anyway), it seems it would be cheaper for Smith to go back to pinned barrels when building the guns. We never had "canted barrel syndrome" back in the day. The cost of all this air freighting plus the cost of dedicating staff to correcting the problem could pay for a lot of barrel pins.
|
I'm sorry, but the pin in the barrel has absolutely NOTHING to do with the canted barrel. There are plenty of posts on this.
I will say that the new style 2-piece barrel as on the new Model 66 and Model 69 completely eliminates the possibility of the canted barrel. There are many good reasons why S&W should adopt this new barrel design across the board, and this is one of them.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2014, 09:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 1
Liked 179 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
S&W sells out a call tag (usually Fed Ex) to you, sometimes in an email, where you box up the firearm, print out and attach the label to the box and then you usually call Fed Ex to schedule a pick up. They include the label and all instructions as an attachment to the email, so make sure you open and print the attachments!
|
07-23-2014, 10:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: TWILIGHT ZONE
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 13,000
Liked 4,632 Times in 1,190 Posts
|
|
I will say that the problems encountered in todays new guns and new anything else, is a sign of the times and the almighty dollar being the bottom line, instead of quality. These QC issues are not specific to Smith & Wesson. They are applicable to just about every brand of mass produced guns.
I bought a Ruger SP101 a couple of weeks ago. Took it apart for initial cleaning, oiled and assembled. Wiping it down and I notice the gun has end shake. Brand new, never fired gun. Call Ruger and off to New Hampshire it goes. Got a call yesterday from Ruger CS. Gun is non repairable. ????? For end shake. Must have been something more serious unknown to me. They are sending me a new gun. Had to send them FFL info.
First new gun I have bought in ages. Probably will be the last. I'm not saying the majority of new guns are not fine. I think it is a roll of the dice.
Chock it up to business in America.
Last edited by KLYDE; 07-23-2014 at 02:19 PM.
|
07-23-2014, 11:25 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,792
Likes: 18,502
Liked 22,390 Times in 8,268 Posts
|
|
Yes, the pinned barrel guns did come with a cant sometimes, and ask anyone that had been through the armorer school back in the 60's, 70's, 80's the purpose of the babbot bar that was included in the armorers tool kit. The cant was never as pronounced as the ones presently being shipped, but they did happen.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2014, 11:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 220
Likes: 5
Liked 134 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLYDE
I will say that the problems encountered in todays new guns and new anything else, is a sign of the times and the almighty dollar being the bottom line, instead of quality. These QC issues are not specific to Smith & Wesson. They are applicable to just about every brand of mass produced guns.
I bought a Ruger SP101 a couple of weeks ago. Took it apart for initial cleaning, oiled and assembled. Wiping it down and I notice the gun has end shake. Brand new, never fired gun. Call Ruger and off to New Hampshire it goes. Got a call yesterday from Ruger CS. Gun is non repairable. ????? For end shake. Must have been something more serious unknown to me. They are sending me a new gun. Had to send them FFL info.
First new gun I have bought in ages. Probably will be the last. I'm not saying the majority of new guns are not fine. I think it is a roll of the dice.
Chock it up to business in America.
|
Or to the huge demand for guns over the last several years that caused the manufacturers to add new hires and churn the guns out as fast as the lines could roll
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-23-2014, 01:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 334
Likes: 152
Liked 112 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLYDE
I will say that the problems encountered in todays new guns and new anything else, is a sign of the times and the almighty dollar being the bottom line, instead of quality. These QC issues are not specific to Smith & Wesson. They are applicable to just about every brand of mass produced guns.
|
The almighty dollar has always been the bottom line, its just that in the past you could actually produce a quality product in the USA at an affordable price. Now you have to choose between "quality product" or "affordable price" because the morons in D.C. that have never had a real job in their lives have made it damn near impossible to put out any product at all.
__________________
Paul
|
07-23-2014, 02:00 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,807
Likes: 4,238
Liked 15,203 Times in 4,161 Posts
|
|
FWIW when our agency traded (late '70s) our blue M15s for stainless models a good many had to be tweaked by the range guys. Those that could not be tweaked were returned to S&W. I doubt this is anything new.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
|
07-23-2014, 02:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: TWILIGHT ZONE
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 13,000
Liked 4,632 Times in 1,190 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old cop
FWIW when our agency traded (late '70s) our blue M15s for stainless models a good many had to be tweaked by the range guys. Those that could not be tweaked were returned to S&W. I doubt this is anything new.
|
I reckon you are right. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
|
07-23-2014, 05:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 244
Likes: 22
Liked 140 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
I bought a new Ruger 3" GP100 last August and was not educated on the "canted barrel" issue until a few months ago while reading some posts on the Ruger forum. Grabbed my GP and looked closely at it and noticed that the barrel did indeed have about a 1-degree cant of over-torque. A lot of people say that is no big deal if it still shoots accurately.
I am going to take it to the range next week and shoot from a bench rest at 11 & 25 yards and see what happens. I contacted Ruger about it and they also said bench shoot it first and if that yields unsatisfactory results then send it back for repair. Does seem to be a fairly common issue on production line guns, regardless of manufacturer.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|