Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2012, 07:41 AM
Triggernosis Triggernosis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 517
Likes: 3
Liked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Default J-frame vs. J-magnum frame?

Does anyone have a picture of the old J-frame beside the J-magnum frame? Please post if you do.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2012, 08:28 AM
riverrat38 riverrat38 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 984
Likes: 1,216
Liked 421 Times in 256 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triggernosis View Post
Does anyone have a picture of the old J-frame beside the J-magnum frame? Please post if you do.
Actually, S&W still makes them. The Classic M36, for instance.
See:
Product: Model 36

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2012, 09:01 AM
s&wchad's Avatar
s&wchad s&wchad is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 14,962
Likes: 1,661
Liked 3,251 Times in 1,024 Posts
Default

I believe the 36 Classic is actually built on the J Mag frame. According to the SCSW, the easy way to tell is the style of cylinder stop lug. Conventional J frames have the cylindrical shaped inserted lug and the J Mag has the integral bar shaped lug.

The stop lug is the projection at the bottom back corner of the frame window in these photos. It limits rearward travel of the cylinder, keeping it from falling off they yoke barrel.

J frame (this one's a Centennial):


J Mag frame:
__________________
"I also cook."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 10-24-2012, 09:12 AM
Imaposer Imaposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 344
Likes: 31
Liked 80 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Not in the same pic, side by side, but here's one of each that I have...

Older Model 49:



Newer 638:

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2012, 10:14 AM
snubbiefan snubbiefan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern Mississippi
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 22
Liked 301 Times in 190 Posts
Default

If the light-weight J-Mag frame wears-out at the integral cylinder-stop.....throw the frame away. If the older non J-Mag frame wears-out at the cylinder-stop....replace the lug. I suppose if you have a lifetime guarantee....don't matter unless it happens to be one of your cherished frames you'd like to keep, or don't mind the hassle of wondering what you'll get back from Smith in return. I have picked-up a J-Mag frame off the table...opened it up and had the cylinder fall off in my hand. Then...I put it back on the table and walk on.

Not pro or con one way or the other....just sayin'.

Last edited by snubbiefan; 10-24-2012 at 10:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2012, 11:00 AM
Imaposer Imaposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 344
Likes: 31
Liked 80 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Well, not really a defense of the newer integral lug, but I can't imagine how you could possibly "wear one out" with normal use and proper handling. The only purpose it really serves is to prevent the cylinder from sliding off the yoke while fully open. About the only wear I see them getting is from many, many forceful ejections of spent cases. I suppose it could happen, but I can't say that I've ever heard of it being an issue.

But, like you, I do prefer replaceable, serviceable parts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2012, 11:17 AM
GerSan69 GerSan69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: metro Phoenix
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 4,728
Liked 942 Times in 461 Posts
Default

Is that yoke pivot area different on the J-mag also? Looks in the photos as though there's a ridge to catch the cylinder at the front as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2012, 12:29 PM
ogilvyspecial's Avatar
ogilvyspecial ogilvyspecial is offline
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,660
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,308 Times in 687 Posts
Default

I'm not sure if these will help, but I'll throw 'em out there, just in case.



__________________
Ogy
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 10-24-2012, 02:18 PM
hotrod150's Avatar
hotrod150 hotrod150 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: western Washington
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 1
Liked 716 Times in 443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riverrat38 View Post
Actually, S&W still makes them. The Classic M36, for instance. See
Product: Model 36
No offense to them that has 'em & likes 'em, but IMHO that "Classic model 36" is a joke. It is NOT a classic model 36, it has the internal lock. And even if you don't mind the lock, the revolver frame was re-shaped to accomodate it which ruined the looks of the gun. Check the curvature of the frame in the area of the hammer. The Bodyguard & Centennial style frame shapes aren't affected by the lock, but the exposed-hammer guns sure are.
It's highly unlikely, but if they came out with a no-lock Classic 36 with the older-style frame shape it'd sure be an improvement.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.32 H&R Mag J frame and .327 Federal Magnum K Frame PoorKnight S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 71 12-12-2015 08:00 PM
J Frame vs. J Magnum Frame--any noticeable difference? aterry33 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 12 10-28-2014 07:54 PM
K frame .357 magnum's volgunner S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 22 09-17-2011 07:32 PM
N-Frame 327 Fed Magnum ! True Grit Smith & Wesson - The Wish List 9 11-26-2010 01:59 AM
N-Frame 357 vs .44 magnum? Whitetaild33r S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 10 08-27-2009 08:24 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)