Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2013, 06:21 PM
Infidel_319's Avatar
Infidel_319 Infidel_319 is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Payson, UT
Posts: 262
Likes: 144
Liked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Default To port or not to port

Ok, just bought a 640 Pro Series and love it. That being said, it's still a bit of a handfull with full .357 loads (Remington 125 grain JSP). I have Hogue "tamer" grips on it and it's really not bad to shoot using BOTH hands. I am a Police Officer and carry this particular gun on my ankle so I can get it with my left hand if needed. I'm right handed. If I should ever need to use this gun in the line of duty, I would probably need to be able to shoot it left handed, with ONE hand. The other hand/arm may be injured, busy keeping my sidearm in its holster, etc. I know this is a very unlikely situation, but prepare for the worst, hope for the best, right?
Ok, now down to the question. Would felt recoil be reduced enough by magnaporting my ankle gun or would I be wasting my money. I do also like to shoot it at the range, it's a fun gun. Just looking for opinions. Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2013-02-02_19-05-29_245.jpg (84.3 KB, 74 views)
__________________
Still got the shovel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 02-04-2013, 06:26 PM
HotRoderX's Avatar
HotRoderX HotRoderX is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 718
Likes: 164
Liked 348 Times in 157 Posts
Default

Why not load it with 38special +P's? I would think out of a short barrel the difference between 357mag vs 38special +P velocity wise would be negligible. The 38special even in a +P round is much easier to handle then a 357 Magnum.

The other thing is can they port that gun with the flutes on the barrel? I am by no means a expert but just looking at that. I would think taking off more metal from the barrel could cause issues.

just my opinon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2013, 06:31 PM
jinx's Avatar
jinx jinx is offline
US Veteran
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 1,259
Liked 995 Times in 456 Posts
Default

I have a model 19 that is Mag-Na-Ported but is used for target and hunting. I like it because it does tame the recoil. A lot of the folks on here do not like the porting because of muzzle flash at night or low light situations because it can blind you. Also, some say it is too loud.
This will be a consideration for you as you are LEO, as well it should be.
For me, neither of these are bothersome.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 02-04-2013, 06:46 PM
Infidel_319's Avatar
Infidel_319 Infidel_319 is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Payson, UT
Posts: 262
Likes: 144
Liked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Default Have tested both

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotRoderX View Post
Why not load it with 38special +P's? I would think out of a short barrel the difference between 357mag vs 38special +P velocity wise would be negligible. The 38special even in a +P round is much easier to handle then a 357 Magnum.

The other thing is can they port that gun with the flutes on the barrel? I am by no means a expert but just looking at that. I would think taking off more metal from the barrel could cause issues.

just my opinon
I have done testing on both .357 and 38+p gold dots and .38 was lacking in the penetration department. .357 was great. There is difinately a difference. I will run them over my chrono and let you guys know what the actual difference is, though that will have to wait til this weekend.
Also, I did not even consider the barrel being fluted. Good point. I guess that's something to look at as well.
__________________
Still got the shovel

Last edited by Infidel_319; 02-04-2013 at 06:48 PM. Reason: added info
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2013, 07:16 PM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

I would not port a gun being used for that mission. Close and dirty is no place for a ported gun, much less a magnum one.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 02-04-2013, 07:33 PM
KLYDE's Avatar
KLYDE KLYDE is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: TWILIGHT ZONE
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 13,000
Liked 4,632 Times in 1,190 Posts
Default

Infidel,
The Buffalo Bore Standard 38 non +P had close to 20" penetration in gelatin with two layers of fabric. I'm sure the BB +P performs even better. Might want to do some testing with that prior to any porting.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 02-04-2013, 07:53 PM
LEO918's Avatar
LEO918 LEO918 is offline
SWCA Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Death Valley, AZ
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 14,012
Liked 9,007 Times in 1,403 Posts
Default

I am not a fan of porting. It will devalue your gun by a $100 per hole generally.
__________________
Living a dream - S&WCA #2364
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2013, 11:45 PM
Infidel_319's Avatar
Infidel_319 Infidel_319 is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Payson, UT
Posts: 262
Likes: 144
Liked 65 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info guys, I will not be porting. I will also try that buffalo bore ammo, have never gave that a try. Thanks for your input. That's why I came here to ask, you're the experts. Much appreciated.
__________________
Still got the shovel
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 02-05-2013, 12:05 AM
DR505's Avatar
DR505 DR505 is offline
US Veteran
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 3,375
Liked 8,469 Times in 2,310 Posts
Default

My department doesn't allow ported weapons for the reason that you might have to shoot with the gun in-close to your own body and the hot gas coming out of the ports, not to mention particulates, could be directed into your face. In such a scenario felt recoil will be the least of your issues.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2013, 12:57 AM
luangtom's Avatar
luangtom luangtom is offline
US Veteran
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Hall County, GA
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 513
Liked 741 Times in 324 Posts
Default

Well, besides lowering the value of your 640, it will blow the cap right off yer head if you do close-quarters shooting. I attempted to do a night-shoot and the blast of the ports blew my cap off and blinded me. I got rid of that revolver. Good move in not porting...........
__________________
GA Carry member
Vietnam Vet
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 02-05-2013, 12:15 PM
fltbed's Avatar
fltbed fltbed is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 88
Likes: 344
Liked 44 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infidel_319 View Post
I have done testing on both .357 and 38+p gold dots and .38 was lacking in the penetration department. .357 was great. There is difinately a difference.
Have you tried any of the reduced recoil 357 magnum rounds designed for short barrels?

My favorite is the Cor-Bon DPX but I think Federal and CCI/Speer offer similar offerings.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-05-2013, 12:27 PM
sodacan sodacan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 1,105
Liked 5,152 Times in 1,580 Posts
Default

+1 for .38+P. 357 magnum ammo in a lightweight gun with a 2" barrel makes little sense, at least to me. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-07-2013, 04:04 AM
ceedubb2000 ceedubb2000 is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 6
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

I recently had my .357 Magnum Model 60-9 ported, polished and jeweled by Magnaport, and am very happy with both form and function. The port even on a 1.5" barrel really helps reduce muzzle flip and recoil, in my opinion.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-07-2013, 05:50 AM
baccusboy's Avatar
baccusboy baccusboy is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seoul and Iowa
Posts: 307
Likes: 3
Liked 81 Times in 53 Posts
Default

I had a Ruger GP-100 that was magna-ported. It had a long barrel on it, and it was a joy to shoot. I never felt blinded by the ports.

Did make me feel like I was shooting some gun from Logan's Run, though.


Last edited by baccusboy; 02-07-2013 at 05:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-07-2013, 07:44 AM
ogilvyspecial's Avatar
ogilvyspecial ogilvyspecial is offline
Member
To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port To port or not to port  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infidel_319 View Post
Thanks for the info guys, I will not be porting. I will also try that buffalo bore ammo, have never gave that a try. Thanks for your input. That's why I came here to ask, you're the experts. Much appreciated.
I think that you will really like the Buffalo Bore ammo.
I've been relying on it now for about 2 yr's and
just wish I would have tried it sooner.
__________________
Ogy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mag Na Port Motown2579 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 32 09-27-2018 05:07 PM
To mag-na-port or not To mag-na-port ? 620 mag S&W-Smithing 25 05-13-2011 03:41 AM
sw 340 pd mag-na port DR DICK S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 10 03-04-2011 02:29 PM
To port or not to port your Smiths.... sipowicz S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 32 07-04-2010 09:50 AM
WTS: SW 442 Mag-Na-Port drh1045 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 7 10-08-2009 01:27 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)