|
|
07-28-2013, 02:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 5,473
Liked 6,418 Times in 1,861 Posts
|
|
Which are more durable 357s - k frames or modern J frames
The story I've always heard was the K frames proved to have durability problems with 357 magnum cartridges.
This lead S&W to design the beefed up L frames like the 586/686.
But also, Smith has come out with J frames that have been upgraded to shoot 357 magnum.
So, are modern 357 magnum J frames more durable than K frames with the same diet?
Or should guns like the current production M60 not be shot much with 357?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 02:20 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 350
Likes: 87
Liked 49 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
I have a M681 modified revolver six shot and,a Ruger and a Ruger Speed Six Post Office old timer back 30+ years ago. I like and love these more than these newer S&W's with that Klinton Lock on it.
|
07-28-2013, 07:59 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,780
Likes: 934
Liked 18,872 Times in 9,240 Posts
|
|
This may have a two-part answer; current metallurgy may have improved, and few owners have pushed large numbers of full-house .357s through their J frames. I certainly haven't. Here is a link:
Technical advice concerning J-frame revolver and .357 Rem. mag. cartridges
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
07-28-2013, 09:30 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
|
|
My opinion is the J Frame should have never been chambered for the .357. Even K Frames (with a steady diet of heavy loads) show increased wear. The L Frame was made to shoot the 357 as were the N Frames.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 09:45 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 638
Liked 461 Times in 270 Posts
|
|
I have a 19-4 that I have been shooting heavy reloads from for about 15 years with no ill effects!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 11:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,602 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
The only problem K frames have with .357 mag. is the lighter bullets shot from them. The thinner part of the forcing cone is prone to wear with the lighter bullets (110gn).
By "forcing cone" I mean the first part of the barrel that has a thin underneath section that may crack.
For some ballistic reason I don't understand the heavier bullets (158gn) don't cause a problem.
Last edited by Macinaw; 07-28-2013 at 01:15 PM.
|
07-28-2013, 11:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,835
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H Richard
My opinion is the J Frame should have never been chambered for the .357. Even K Frames (with a steady diet of heavy loads) show increased wear. The L Frame was made to shoot the 357 as were the N Frames.
|
I fully agree! EVEN IF the J Frames did stand up to the 357's well, a 19 ounce J Fame is NOT an easy gun to shoot well! The other important factor here is that a 357 Mag. out of a 2" tube is just about what a Buffalo Bore +p 38 special is and the Magnum load leaves big long flash behind as it exists a 2" bbl.
The shortest gun I own in 357 Mag. is a 3" M65 and IMHO the 357 was actually developed for a 6" bbl. gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 12:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 13,846
Likes: 8,066
Liked 25,337 Times in 8,518 Posts
|
|
I have fired thousands of 357s in K frames with no ill effect that know of. I have fired dozens of 357s in J frames and don't actually enjoy it that much. Probably will get to thousands fired in J frames!
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 01:10 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,701
Likes: 29,443
Liked 22,967 Times in 5,777 Posts
|
|
The K frame revolvers will safely handle .357 Magnum ammo, it's just not a good idea to shoot any hot ammo with a bullet that weighs less than 158Grs.
As for .357 magnum ammo in a J frame, I'm sure it is safe to do, but that is something this old man has no desire to try more than once, thank you....
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 05:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
|
|
Disclaimer: The following is personal opinion and worth exactly what you are paying for it.
The K-frame was designed and intended as a platform for the 38 Special cartridge. When S&W wanted to shoot heavy loaded 38 Specials (38/44) they went to the N-frame...the Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman.
The J-frame was designed and intended as a platform for the 32 caliber if I'm not mistaken but was stretched to take 38 Specials by reducing the cylinder to 5 holes from the original 6.
The K-frame is an absolute delight with 38 Specials, from target wadcutters to +P defensive loads. The J-frame is doable in 38 Special although in almost 20 years of firearms instructing/training I never saw or met anyone who could shoot one really well when pushed to go very fast. I personally can't shoot the little guns as my hands are either too big or just shaped wrong. After a very brief stint with them in my early LEO career I gave up on the J-frame and haven't owned one in years.
As for 357 Magnums, yes the K-frames are made to take them and countless people own and shoot them. Tens of thousands of rounds of full Magnums are fired through K-frames (at least on the internet) with no ill affects. And yet, there is a reason why S&W came out with the L-frame. That was a major financial investment on their part and there was a real, not imagined, reason behind it. Magnum ammunition is hard on the K. Simple as that. I personally saw many examples of it at my department with their M-66s.
But when it comes to the J-frame I sincerely believe the 357 chambering is a classic case of, "Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should!" Chambering J-frames for the 357 was purely a marketing ploy, nothing more.
Finally, and I know this is going to start an argument, metallurgy hasn't change all that much. There are no new, magic, lighter and stronger secret alloys out now. Do a little research. Gun steels are pretty simple and the same series of carbon steels and stainless steels are being used as in the past. Better heat treating may have made some difference but science and engineering have had a pretty good grasp of materials and their use for the past 100 or so years.
YMMV,
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 07:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central Florida
Posts: 798
Likes: 1,203
Liked 1,015 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
Marketing is the main reason that the S&W J frame is produced in .357/.38Spl caliber. A small powerful "magnum" revolver has a strong appeal to the CCW holders. Even though the revolvers will shoot the .357 most owners will opt for the lighter .38Spl loads.
Smith was in a unique position producing the K and N frame .357 revolvers. The S&W guns were in high demand and selling well in spite of the difficulties some few were experiencing with the K frames. Colt was Smith's main competition at the time and the Python and Trooper models were admired for their mid size and ability to handle the heaviest .357 loads.
Smith decided to add a like size .357 to compete which resulted in the L frame. It was no coincidence that it was produced with a full lug resembling Colt's Python. The K frame 19 and 66models stayed in production long after the introduction of the L frame and are still sought after today. As ownership of S&W changed, corporate cost cutting and the demand for L frame spelled the end of the K frame .357s.
Last edited by Jdavis; 07-28-2013 at 07:30 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 07:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Coast CA
Posts: 185
Likes: 30
Liked 54 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
What DaveT and JDavis said. The answer to your question is "neither the J frame or K frame was originally designed for a steady diet of 357."
If you want to shoot 357 a lot buy an L frame or N frame. If you want to hotrod your 357 loads buy an N frame.
Last edited by RGMoore; 07-28-2013 at 07:48 PM.
Reason: punctuation
|
07-28-2013, 08:29 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,907
Likes: 3,513
Liked 6,728 Times in 2,620 Posts
|
|
It is apples and oranges. Cylinder strength probably goes to the J frame as the locking notches are cut into the thickest part of the cylinder between the charge holes, rather than over the charge hole where the steel is thinnest.
That said, the issue with K frames was the amount of steel at the 6 o'clock position of the barrel shank, which created a thin section which was subject to more aggressive wear once the shorter bullets at high velocity became more popular. Shorter bullets close the gap just a very minute amount of time less than longer bullets, allowing correspondingly hotter gasses and flames.
Stay with 158 grain Magnums, shoot them occasionally and practice with 38s and you will be ok with either gun.
Quite frankly, most people never get around to damage as such ammo at today's prices will send you to the poor house before your gun has to go to the repair shop.
On the other hand, K frame magnums are no longer in production, certain parts are hard to find, so I would limit my shooting of magnums in K frames for that reason alone.
Last edited by shawn mccarver; 07-28-2013 at 08:34 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 09:13 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal44
The story I've always heard was the K frames proved to have durability problems with 357 magnum cartridges.
This lead S&W to design the beefed up L frames like the 586/686.
But also, Smith has come out with J frames that have been upgraded to shoot 357 magnum.
So, are modern 357 magnum J frames more durable than K frames with the same diet?
Or should guns like the current production M60 not be shot much with 357?
|
K frame 357 Magnums have been around almost 60 years now. In that time there have been advances in both metallurgy and manufacturing techniques
A modern K-frame is more durable than a modern J-frame
A modern J-frame is more durable than a 1950s or 1960s K-frame
|
07-28-2013, 09:17 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
few owners have pushed large numbers of full-house .357s through their J frames. I certainly haven't.
|
What is your definition of "large numbers of full-house .357s"?
I have been shooting, and teaching with J-magnums since they were introduced more than 15 years ago. My oldest model 60 has well over 10,000 Remington factory 357 Magnums through it. My oldest 340 has 6000+ Remington and Hornady factory 357 Magnums through it so far
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 09:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
I Have no idea which gun would last longer shooting .357s, but I GUARANTEE you that YOUR HAND will wear out FASTER shooting .357's out of that J frame!
__________________
But then, what do I know?
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 10:15 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,386 Times in 11,801 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave T
But when it comes to the J-frame I sincerely believe the 357 chambering is a classic case of, "Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should!"
|
I agree. The J-frame is not an easy gun for most folks to shoot well in .38 Special. In .357 Magnum it's exponentially tougher for nearly everyone I know who owns one. They almost invariably load their J-magnums with .38 +P.
Call me an old wuss, but I am not nearly fond enough of hard recoil, muzzle jump, or hellacious flash and blast to fire .357 stuff in a 21 ounce gun with a short barrel. Especially in a self-defense situation that may call for a fast second shot.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-28-2013, 11:09 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 172
Likes: 31
Liked 77 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Have been out of the revolver world for a long time. Recently went to the range with a 3"barrel "J" frame size Rossi .357. Had some .38, some +p and some +P+ that I found in my closet. And 10 rounds of
.357 It was a pleasant little gun to shoot until the +P+, and the magnums left my hand a bit numb. When I was 20 I would never waste time on .38s but at sixty I think I will not waste my time on magnums anymore. Just was not fun. The +P+ had to be from the late '80s. Still packed some punch. My wife has a 640 Centennial I bought in the '80s and its rated for +P+.
|
02-23-2016, 06:58 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,352 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
Hikok45 did a video on s&w frames. There's another one with two guys shooting 357 J frame it looked uncomfortable.
|
02-23-2016, 07:25 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
I don't like shooting .357 out of my Model 60-15.
I like shooting .357 out of my Model 19-2.
But what I mostly shoot out of both is a .38 special.
|
02-23-2016, 07:29 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,352 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
Two words, well three, Magnum N Frame. For heavy shooting. Ccw carry L frame. K frame 38 special.
Ruger security six 357 24/7.
|
02-23-2016, 08:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: central il
Posts: 511
Likes: 37
Liked 202 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
i shoot a lot of 357's out of my 60-14 and 60-15 pro. I think if you shoot them often they are Very accurate little guns. and my hands has never hurt after shooting 357's. but im a blue collar worker, my hands get abused everyday.
|
02-23-2016, 08:45 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rural Midwest
Posts: 421
Likes: 30
Liked 386 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
All modern j-frames are not created equal. I have no desire to shoot magnums from a scandium j-frame or even my wife's steel framed Ladysmith, but have no problem carrying and shooting mid-range magnums like the 125 grain Golden Sabers from my full-lugged, three-inch 60-15 with closed back wooden grips. When hiking the Rockies, I even carry 180 grain Buffalo Bore hardcast in it. Not really that bad to shoot.
Last edited by InTheWoods; 02-24-2016 at 09:15 AM.
|
02-23-2016, 08:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
158gr JSP's bark in my Model 60-15 and sometimes bite. I'll try the 125.
|
02-24-2016, 12:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,835
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE PILGRIM
I have fired thousands of 357s in K frames with no ill effect that know of. I have fired dozens of 357s in J frames and don't actually enjoy it that much. Probably will get to thousands fired in J frames!
|
Check your end shake. Very common to increase in K's with lots of Magnums.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|