Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
Forum Register Expert Commentary Members List


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2014, 12:08 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 692
Likes: 128
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Default New S&W model 69 44 Mag

With all the problems S&W had from L-frames in 44 Spl breaking, I wonder what they've done to believe an L-frame 44 Mag will hold up? A 2-piece barrel & ball-detent? I suppose time will tell.

Smith & Wesson Model 69 Combat Magnum - YouTube

Last edited by Broker50; 01-12-2014 at 01:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 01-12-2014, 01:34 PM
TAROMAN's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 3,765
Likes: 1,834
Liked 2,008 Times in 875 Posts
Default

Interesting.
First I'd heard of that one.
I guess if they could make a J-Frame .357 hold up then this might be possible.
I'll just keep my 696, however.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2014, 01:46 PM
625smith's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 711
Liked 655 Times in 201 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
With all the problems S&W had from 646's in 44 Spl breaking, I wonder what they've done to believe an L-frame 44 Mag will hold up? A 2-piece barrel & ball-detent? I suppose time will tell.

Smith & Wesson Model 69 Combat Magnum - YouTube

FYI a 646 is 40 S&W a 696 is a .44 spl.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 01-12-2014, 01:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 692
Likes: 128
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 625smith View Post
FYI a 646 is 40 S&W a 696 is a .44 spl.
Thanks! Yeah, I don't always type so good, & didn't proof read. I knew what I meant, just didn't come out right..........
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 01-12-2014, 04:53 PM
US Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 4,852
Liked 751 Times in 399 Posts
Default

Will it be available in Pink? Maybe with a flower etched around the hole? I, like Broker 50, think they should fix what they're making now before venturing out with a new holer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:26 PM
Macinaw's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 577
Likes: 101
Liked 259 Times in 146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
With all the problems S&W had from L-frames in 44 Spl breaking, I wonder what they've done to believe an L-frame 44 Mag will hold up? A 2-piece barrel & ball-detent? I suppose time will tell.

Smith & Wesson Model 69 Combat Magnum - YouTube
Did S&W make a 44 Special in a L frame? I thought it was only available on a N frame. Please school me!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:30 PM
perfectcircle1's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 913
Likes: 1,079
Liked 468 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Is this the part where everyone starts crying about the IL? Lol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:31 PM
KLYDE's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Commiewealth of MA
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 4,577
Liked 1,130 Times in 363 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KLYDE
Default

Oh no. Here we go again. Help me.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 793
Likes: 695
Liked 522 Times in 258 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perfectcircle1 View Post
Is this the part where everyone starts crying about the IL? Lol
Don't forget the MIM parts and the frame mounted firing pin!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:36 PM
perfectcircle1's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 913
Likes: 1,079
Liked 468 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Honestly the first one I see I'm buying.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:37 PM
pharmer's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 236
Liked 1,000 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Taurus has been making these for at least 5 years. About time. Joe
__________________
Member"Other Half"01/20/2017
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:44 PM
bigtubby's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 666
Likes: 7
Liked 99 Times in 45 Posts
Default

Not for me need at least 6 holes
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:56 PM
Doug M.'s Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 1,848
Liked 1,144 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macinaw View Post
Did S&W make a 44 Special in a L frame? I thought it was only available on a N frame. Please school me!
*
696, I think, a 5 shot revolver that if I recall right came in 2 formats, one of which was a Mountain Gun like version, and the 296, a really big centennial style, looking like a 342 on 'roids. Maybe more, not my area of knowledge, although I have and like the 296.
__________________
Watch your front sight.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 01-12-2014, 05:56 PM
75Vette's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Newnan, Ga
Posts: 143
Likes: 1,007
Liked 136 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perfectcircle1 View Post
Is this the part where everyone starts crying about the IL? Lol
Oh Lawdy! Help me Oprah!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-12-2014, 06:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 692
Likes: 128
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macinaw View Post
Did S&W make a 44 Special in a L frame? I thought it was only available on a N frame. Please school me!
As Doug M said, two, 696, & 296. Both discontinued now.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-12-2014, 07:35 PM
RIDE-RED 350r's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Blossvale NY
Posts: 736
Likes: 1,175
Liked 270 Times in 138 Posts
Default

I want one!

Love me a 44, and the new m69 is really tripping my trigger.....

So many S&W's, so little extra dinero!

I have to go pay for a nearly mint condition 28-2 this week.... It never ends.
__________________
Formerly: "Dooman"
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:23 PM
Dennis The B's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SE Mich - O/S Detroit
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 793
Liked 775 Times in 306 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macinaw View Post
Did S&W make a 44 Special in a L frame? I thought it was only available on a N frame. Please school me!
This is an L frame, Model 696, chambered in .44 Special. There were some issues with N frame Model 624 guns which had cylinder issues. This one's a five-round revolver, and it's tough as nails. I've trusted my life with it.
__________________
Best,
Dennis
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:31 PM
Snapping Twig's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 111
Liked 512 Times in 199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
With all the problems S&W had from L-frames in 44 Spl breaking, I wonder what they've done to believe an L-frame 44 Mag will hold up? A 2-piece barrel & ball-detent? I suppose time will tell.


Problems with the 696?!

I haven't heard of them. What would they be?

Thin forcing cone I understand, but other than that...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:42 PM
murphydog's Avatar
SWCA Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,094
Likes: 7
Liked 1,135 Times in 856 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
As Doug M said, two, 696, & 296. Both discontinued now.
And the 396...
__________________
Alan
SWCA 2023
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 01-12-2014, 08:46 PM
WCCPHD's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 243
Liked 260 Times in 72 Posts
Default

As I posted on the other Model 69 thread, I have a 696 and love it. I probably will not buy a new 69, not because of the lock or MIM, but because the 696 is all I need. Since they discontinued the 696 and current guns are rarely on the market and very expensive when they are, I think the Model 69 will sell very well. I don't know if people will fire magnum ammo from it, just like I doubt most shoot 357 mag ammo from the new model 60's, but it will be a great gun with 44 special ammo.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 01-12-2014, 09:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Runnells, Iowa, USA
Posts: 69
Likes: 18
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I had a 15gr of 2400 load with a 240gr XTP or hard cast lead bullet I shot a few times from my 696 years ago. It made 1000fps and was a handful. I also carried it in bear country, I figure a similar load with a 280-300gr bullet at 950fps will be very controllable and a great bear stopper in the M69. Easy load to produce with 44 Mag brass.
__________________
Captain Dave Funk
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:17 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 692
Likes: 128
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snapping Twig View Post


Problems with the 696?!

I haven't heard of them. What would they be?

Thin forcing cone I understand, but other than that...
It was my understanding that forcing cone & frame failures, along with very slow sales were the reasons they were discontinued.
'Course I could be wrong, haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn in a long while.............
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:23 PM
jdh's Avatar
jdh jdh is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 29
Liked 435 Times in 202 Posts
Default

Hold on a minute! A few years ago the experts said a 5 shot L in 41 Mag was not possible but now one in 44 Mag is being produced.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #24  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:30 PM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 138
Liked 749 Times in 306 Posts
Default

A M69 is ideal for me.
In WA state a handgun must have a 4" barrel or more for big game hunting even if it is for the "Coup de grāce".
My M696 does not fit the bill in this case......
__________________
The worst is yet to come

Last edited by STCM(SW); 01-12-2014 at 10:30 PM. Reason: add
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-12-2014, 10:54 PM
US Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 4,852
Liked 751 Times in 399 Posts
Default

624's-as I got it, had some problems in the heat treating of the cylinders of some guns, but they were unable to supply replacement cylinders, and the ser #'s of effected guns seemed vague when I looked into it several years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-12-2014, 11:33 PM
Sebago Son's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 5,981
Liked 5,494 Times in 1,635 Posts
Default

That thing is going to kick like an angry mule with factory ammo...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #27  
Old 01-13-2014, 12:01 AM
STCM(SW)'s Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 138
Liked 749 Times in 306 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebago Son View Post
That thing is going to kick like an angry mule with factory ammo...
That's why I handload....
__________________
The worst is yet to come
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-13-2014, 01:54 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 757
Likes: 322
Liked 272 Times in 178 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
It was my understanding that forcing cone & frame failures, along with very slow sales were the reasons they were discontinued...
Not a lot of forcing cone thickness when compared to an "N" frame's.

.

396NG
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-13-2014, 03:22 AM
Snapping Twig's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 111
Liked 512 Times in 199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broker50 View Post
It was my understanding that forcing cone & frame failures, along with very slow sales were the reasons they were discontinued.
'Course I could be wrong, haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn in a long while.............
Not.

Slow sales - yes.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-05-2014, 09:57 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I look forward to the new model 69. Not super happy with the lock etc but I guess it's just a sign of the times. I like my original classic 5". It shoots great but I don't like the weight. I had the 3" L frame scandium frame it was ok but didn't ever warm up to the 44spl. It shot good and was a delight to carry. I then got the 44 mag 4" with the scandium frame. Couldn't really warm up to it. It was tolerable with full house loads but I found it way to light to hold on target. I looked at the L frame 44 spl. It felt good in the hand but by then I got rid of my 44spl brass and didn't want to mix. I picked up a 3" 629 I like it but kind of wished for a mountain gun with the 4" tube. I am looking forward to when I can check out the new 69. It can shoot light loads without changing brass or fouling the chamber and have the heavy loads for when I need them with a little lighter and slightly thinner gun. Jerry J.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

This model 69 looks like my dream date. I have owned most of the 44s under discussion, but am down to a 29-5.
__________________
Lou
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-11-2014, 05:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toney, AL USA
Posts: 144
Likes: 6
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I thought it was my dream date too. However when i got one in my hands, it looked like this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderball View Post


So I wrote S&W customer service. This is their response:
"Dear Customer,

well they try to get them as close as possible but they dont line up perfect

that is normal

If further assistance is required please reply accordingly. "

I will just wait and see if they correct the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-11-2014, 05:46 PM
MrTrolleyguy's Avatar
US Veteran

 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Phiadelphia PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 944
Liked 687 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amazingflapjack View Post
Will it be available in Pink? Maybe with a flower etched around the hole? I, like Broker 50, think they should fix what they're making now before venturing out with a new holer.
They addressed the forcing cone problem with the model 66 when the dash 6 F comp model came out. They changed the forcing cone and the metallurgy. That was back in 93 or 96 IIRC Since then there have been more improvements in metallurgy so the problem should have been addressed.

There is no need to pile on Smith. JMHO

Trolley
__________________
Trolley is my first name
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-11-2014, 06:23 PM
KLYDE's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Commiewealth of MA
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 4,577
Liked 1,130 Times in 363 Posts
Send a message via AIM to KLYDE
Default

I just love the new guns. Top quality. They are the best.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-14-2014, 06:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 158
Likes: 3
Liked 29 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Well, if Taurus can make one work well (which the Tracker seems to), I'd guess S&W might be able to make a run at it.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-15-2014, 05:10 AM
jaymoore's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: US of A
Posts: 774
Likes: 1,781
Liked 399 Times in 247 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebago Son View Post
That thing is going to kick like an angry mule with factory ammo...
Yes, but it plants bullets with very satisfactory accuracy. Good enogh it'll probably go deer hunting this fall.

And it shoots soft swaged bullets (Speer LSWC) with minor leading. Which is a VAST improvement over any of my older .44s! Same ammo was a complete disaster previously.

Yah, it's an old thread. But revived above. And I'm so tickled with the thing there may be another. Didn't think it could be so good! Indifferent appearance aside, it's a shooter.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old Yesterday, 11:36 AM
Smith61's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 60
Likes: 74
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Talking It is RB right?

I'm guessing the 69 is a roundbutt L-Frame right? I mean sure it has a rubber grip standard. But nothing on S&W website or here on the forums has identified RB vs. SB.......

Is it Roundbutt? anybody?

Last edited by Smith61; Yesterday at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old Yesterday, 12:16 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 220
Likes: 27
Liked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunderball View Post
I thought it was my dream date too. However when i got one in my hands, it looked like this:


So I wrote S&W customer service. This is their response:
"Dear Customer,

well they try to get them as close as possible but they dont line up perfect

that is normal

If further assistance is required please reply accordingly. "

I will just wait and see if they correct the problem.

Might not appear very elegant but it looks functional to me. I can't really see them being able to line it up any closer than that.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old Yesterday, 01:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 7
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Default "Close as they could get?"

You must be kidding. The crane fits so beautifully and tightly... The fit and finish on the gun is spot on. I want to hear Smith and Wesson say that's the way it's supposed to be, if that is the case.

I would have loved to be in the meeting when they made the compromising decision to ship the Model 69 like this.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present Thread, New S&W model 69 44 Mag in Smith & Wesson Revolvers; With all the problems S&W had from L-frames in 44 Spl breaking, I wonder what they've done to believe an ...
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2013
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)