Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2015, 09:26 PM
Shark Bait Shark Bait is offline
Member
69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696?  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
Default 69 vs 696?

I apologize if there is already a thread about this, but my search function hasn't worked since I joined the forum.

I have a 696 and have read a lot of concerns about its thin forcing cone. Doesn't the model 69 have the same issue, or am I mistaken?

The reason I ask is that I would like to shoot some of the hotter factory loads, like Buffalo Bore, which they claim is safe for modern .44 Special revolvers, except for the Charter Arms Bulldog. These loads are a fair bit lighter than the average factory .44 Magnum loads, which can be fired out of the 69. It seems reasonable to me that the 696 should be able to handle the hotter cast lead loads if the 69 can handle jacketed .44 Mag. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2015, 10:07 PM
steelslaver's Avatar
steelslaver steelslaver is offline
US Veteran
69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696?  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 12,742
Liked 39,093 Times in 9,967 Posts
Default

I have one of each and both great guns.

The model 69 was made a bit different than the 696. The 69 uses a shrouded barrel and the front lock is on the crane. This allowed the frame where the barrel to be threaded in to be larger and the forcing cone on them is considerably thicker than on the 696 which is pretty thin. I wouldn't want to wreck a 696 for another 100fps, they are sweet.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 10-12-2015, 10:10 PM
Dave Lively Dave Lively is offline
Member
69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696?  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 780
Liked 1,363 Times in 649 Posts
Default

If a site's search function doesn't work right you can search it using Bing, Google and probably others like this:

site:smith-wessonforum.com 69 696

It usually works as well or better than the search function in most forums. If found the thread below pretty quickly. Search for 696 forcing cone the same way and you should be able to find the previous threads about this.

There was recent thread about the 69 that had a couple of pictures of the forcing cones for both guns at Model 69 examination: . The 69 is a lot thicker.

If you are not real attached to your 696 and want to shoot a lot of strong .44 specials consider trading it for a 69. I really like my 69 and think it is a great gun for stout .44 special power levels.

Last edited by Dave Lively; 10-12-2015 at 10:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 10-12-2015, 10:35 PM
Paul105 Paul105 is offline
Member
69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696? 69 vs 696?  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 580
Liked 1,839 Times in 603 Posts
Default

New model 69 barrel shank:
.

.
M696 Barrel Shank:
.

.
As you can see, the M69s barrel shank/forcing cone area is substantially more robust.

Buffalo Bore's website lists velocities for the M396 (Ti/Al version of 696) using the "Heavy .44 Special" ammo

https://www.buffalobore.com/index.ph...ct_detail&p=89

Brian Pearce wrote an article on the .44 Special in which he addressed the strength of various .44 specials an the appropriate load levels for each group guns.

http://www.goodrichfamilyassoc.org/4...%20Special.pdf

Internet chatter speaks of barrel shank/forcing cone failure with use of heavy loads (only one that I've seen actually saw this occur). Begs the question of how "heavy" is heavy?

In the end, it's your gun, and you'll have to be the final arbiter.

FWIW,

Paul

Last edited by Paul105; 10-12-2015 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply

Tags
696, buffalo bore

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)