Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2015, 05:11 PM
superglide54 superglide54 is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Default 17's

hi forum,i have a nib 617 no dash 6 shot 6 inch barrel,and a nib 17-4 6 inch,want to sell one, which you keep and why?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2015, 05:28 PM
Yorkie Man Yorkie Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 562
Likes: 4
Liked 260 Times in 134 Posts
Default

Both are nice revolvers. I have a 17-5 4" full lug bbl but I would prefer the stainless. I had a 17 6" with the full lug barrel and it was muzzle heavy to me. I guess it depends on which one you prefer.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 11-29-2015, 06:33 PM
Peak53's Avatar
Peak53 Peak53 is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 6,282
Liked 7,472 Times in 2,287 Posts
Default

I vote blue. My 17-4 is a keeper.
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 11-29-2015, 08:05 PM
lagavulin62 lagavulin62 is offline
Member
17's 17's  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 669
Likes: 14
Liked 98 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Easy answer. I would keep the 17-4. It's blue and not the full lug barrel. Also depending on the date of manufacture it may be a pinned barrel. I just think the 17-4 is a more classic look whereas the 617 has a more utility look and feel. I believe the 17-4 would be the better investment of the two, although I don't collect guns for investment purposes.

Last edited by lagavulin62; 11-29-2015 at 08:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2015, 08:37 PM
wproct's Avatar
wproct wproct is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 1,412
Liked 869 Times in 486 Posts
Default

If I were the owner, I would be keeping the 617. I say that because I would be shooting it, and I prefer stainless steel and full lug barrel.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 11-29-2015, 08:48 PM
diyj98 diyj98 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,437
Likes: 402
Liked 2,846 Times in 1,265 Posts
Default

I'd sell both those junkers and buy a nice Heritage Arms Actually I'd probably keep the 617. The stainless would fit more into the woods/plinking role I'd probably use it for.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2015, 09:04 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,778
Likes: 2,484
Liked 8,314 Times in 2,917 Posts
Default

The Model 17 had a very long run in all of its revisions where the six shot pre lock 617 did not.

If you need more dough the 617 should bring more at auction than the 17-4.
There has been a guy advertising a 6" Model 17-5 on a local forum for $950 every week for about 3 years now with no interest where a 617 ND may sell fairly quickly near that IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2015, 09:12 PM
Camster Camster is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peak53 View Post
I vote blue. My 17-4 is a keeper.
So is mine.....and when downsizing myself,the 617 was sold,even though it was perfectly nice.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-29-2015, 09:44 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,778
Likes: 2,484
Liked 8,314 Times in 2,917 Posts
Default

K-22 comparison eye candy
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 11-29-2015, 10:12 PM
jack the toad jack the toad is offline
SWCA Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
Default

This may not be relevant as I realize the 4" 617 no dash currently seems to bring a premium but one just sold on GB this evening for over $1200. It had no box or accessories and had been modified with a gold bead front sight plus the wooden combats had been replaced with some aftermarket rubber hogues.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-30-2015, 10:47 AM
Green Frog Green Frog is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,648
Likes: 1,567
Liked 9,404 Times in 4,215 Posts
Default

This is a question with no answer (at least the way you posed it.) The one to keep is the one YOU like best by whatever metric you use to decide it. As you see from the conflicting answers you have already gotten, it is a personal decision at best.

Oh yeah, if I were making the decision for me, I would probably keep the stainless 617 because I would be shooting and carrying it... but then again, I already have a 1948 vintage K-22 and it's not going anywhere, but that's a story for another thread.

Froggie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-30-2015, 01:17 PM
superglide54 superglide54 is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Default

thanks for all the responses.take care.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-30-2015, 11:16 PM
fishcreekrim fishcreekrim is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon desert
Posts: 293
Likes: 419
Liked 310 Times in 132 Posts
Default

If you knock around outdoors you need the 617, if you like range time with a truly great classic you need the 17. If you enjoy both activities you might consider selling a kidney, and keeping both. JMHO/YMMV
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-01-2015, 12:44 AM
johngalt's Avatar
johngalt johngalt is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,356
Likes: 1,452
Liked 6,723 Times in 2,578 Posts
Default

I prefer blue. Mine is a 17-3. I don't like the full lug, it is heavy enough without it.
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2015, 07:36 AM
MajorD MajorD is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 34
Liked 961 Times in 497 Posts
Default

I do not like either stainless or the full lug. I would keep the blued. In my decades of shooting and carrying including some pretty adverse environments I never saw stainless as an advantage if even minimal care is provided to a blue gun. I must say I even like blue with wear on it!
I would buy a blued no lug ten shot 17 but I do not believe such an animal exists.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-01-2015, 01:18 PM
MTBD MTBD is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Default

The blued versions are in my opinion the best looking.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-01-2015, 01:43 PM
fyimo's Avatar
fyimo fyimo is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
Talking

I'd keep the one that feels best in your hand and that you shoot the most accurately.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 12-01-2015, 06:50 PM
JH1951's Avatar
JH1951 JH1951 is online now
US Veteran
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South-Central PA
Posts: 3,914
Likes: 19,188
Liked 6,502 Times in 2,034 Posts
Default

Your call based upon what you like the best.
If it were me, I would try to keep both. I was faced with a similar problem, and both are growing roots in the safe (two pre mod 17's came up at the same time and place. Thought I would sell one to pay for the other, but that hasn't happened.) If it was my decision I would be keeping the blue one as it suits my tastes better, but that's me, not you, and our differing tastes is what makes life most interesting.
Let us know what you decide.....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:11 PM
MR.G MR.G is offline
Member
17's  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 59
Liked 109 Times in 60 Posts
Default

I also have a unfired since leaving the factory 617 4" 10 shot, and a 17-6 Nickel 6" full lug. Have been debating for some time which to get rid of, since I have been liquidating. I am leaning toward selling the 17 since stainless steel has always been my preference.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:25 PM
Wee Hooker Wee Hooker is offline
Member
17's 17's 17's 17's 17's  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
Default

Been there- Done that. Eventually, your going to regret whatever decision you make, either way.
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)