So I was about ready to buy a PC 627 8 shot 357 magnum. But upon reviewing my revolvers, I’ve decided to get another 44 magnum. I still really like the looks of the short barreled PC guns, and they do offer the same platform chambered in 44.
Again, I am looking for advice, opinions, and first-hand experience from you guys. I have it narrowed down to two choices:
1. PC 629 with a 2 5/8” barrel.
-Has full length ejector rod
-Performance Center Model
-Really nice looks
-Ball detent lock-up
2. Talo 629 with a 3” barrel.
-I like the half-lug barrel. But it has a short ejector rod
-Comes with slightly longer barrel
-Classic looks
So, upon reviewing gunbroker, the PC gun is slightly more($75-$150). But not a whole compared to the 3” Talo model. They are pretty similar. I do like that the PC model has a full length ejector rod. But would it be more beneficial to get the ever so slightly longer 3” barrel? They are both short barreled, would the velocity loss even be noticeable with 3/8” less barrel?
Also, is the ball detent style lock up on the PC model a better design than the traditional set up? I honestly don’t know how beneficial or not this would be.
This revolver will be mostly used as a second weapon while out hunting. And also just for general woods bumming. And I suppose if I am feeling extra ambitious, I’ll CCW it in the winter time. But it’s main purpose will be carried in a holster while out of doors. I am familiar with the recoil of heavy 44 magnum ammo. But will spend most range time with more pleasant handloaded rounds for general plinking. Thanks in advance for the help, folks!