Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-07-2016, 12:35 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default Contrasting Airweights

This started at being bothered by the logo on the 442 being obscured by the LaserGrip. Not liking the looks of the 642 with said grip, the only solution was to start swapping stuff.

The 442 with a few years head start has about 3x the rounds through it and a butter smooth trigger. The 642 has a slight hitch before breaking...only noticeable in deliberate slow fire. Swapping cylinders left the 642 with 442 cylinder unable to fire. Subsequently, the hammer, trigger, and hand were swapped as well. Interestingly, the hitch stayed with the 642, but with a slightly improved action. Also as interesting, the 442 stayed as well as it was (if not better).

Enough talk.
20160407_115830 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr
20160407_115919 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr

My only real concern is that the 442 which had a tight barrel/cylinder gap is now almost touching. If it can get through 50 rounds without locking up I'll be happy.

I guess it'll be the 642's turn to get beat up in the ankle holster (the flat grip is nice for that mode of carry).

It'll be interesting to see how they shoot and if they maintain their individual personalities. The 442 was my favorite by far. Now I'm not so sure.

Last edited by Rick_A; 04-07-2016 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 04-07-2016, 02:29 PM
kaaskop49 kaaskop49 is offline
Member
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
Default

Nice looking guns, Rick! I'm not as daring/adventurous as you are. That tight b/c gap on the 442 being even tighter now would worry me. I've had one brand/weight of ammo (Blazer 158gr LRN) jam up one Chief and run like a deer in another 36. Ammo quality seems to vary in 2016.

I might want to replace the parts to their proper guns. If one action is inferior IYO, replace the gun or have it fixed. They're carry guns; I wouldn't take a chance by swapping parts. JMHO.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 04-07-2016, 03:40 PM
Kernel Crittenden's Avatar
Kernel Crittenden Kernel Crittenden is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 3,410
Liked 6,481 Times in 3,065 Posts
Default

It would be cool if you could swap barrels. Probably not advised with alloy frames (they sometimes crack!), but it would allow some adjustment of the cylinder gap.
__________________
~ S&W aficionado in training ~
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 04-07-2016, 03:57 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaaskop49 View Post
Nice looking guns, Rick! I'm not as daring/adventurous as you are. That tight b/c gap on the 442 being even tighter now would worry me. I've had one brand/weight of ammo (Blazer 158gr LRN) jam up one Chief and run like a deer in another 36. Ammo quality seems to vary in 2016.

I might want to replace the parts to their proper guns. If one action is inferior IYO, replace the gun or have it fixed. They're carry guns; I wouldn't take a chance by swapping parts. JMHO.

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
I'll find out upon shooting it. It has enough end shake to shim some gap into it if needed.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 04-07-2016, 03:58 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kernel Crittenden View Post
It would be cool if you could swap barrels. Probably not advised with alloy frames (they sometimes crack!), but it would allow some adjustment of the cylinder gap.
That's what I was thinking. Not worth the risk.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 04-28-2016, 07:39 PM
Rick_A's Avatar
Rick_A Rick_A is offline
Member
Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights Contrasting Airweights  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Northern GA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 2,025
Liked 4,843 Times in 1,479 Posts
Default

Took them out to the range. They're workin' just fine.
20160428_135104_Richtone(HDR) by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airweights photoman S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 02-08-2012 05:49 PM
Airweights M&PStrapped S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 06-13-2011 11:19 PM
M12 vs J Airweights ENGINE18 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 16 08-14-2010 04:52 PM
S&W airweights imjin138 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 17 09-08-2009 10:13 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)