|
|
05-07-2016, 02:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
.38 Airweight Exposed Hammer or Shrouded Hammer
I bought an Airweight Exposed Hammer Model 637. I compared both Exposed Hammer and Shrouded and chose the Exposed. I know Shrouded is better for pocket carry, but my thought is that the Exposed Hammer fits my needs better.
I would like your input on Exposed compared to
Shrouded Hammer.
|
05-07-2016, 02:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 8,078
Likes: 13,051
Liked 13,524 Times in 5,108 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlight
I bought an Airweight Exposed Hammer Model 637. I compared both Exposed Hammer and Shrouded and chose the Exposed. I know Shrouded is better for pocket carry, but my thought is that the Exposed Hammer fits my needs better.
I would like your input on Exposed compared to
Shrouded Hammer.
|
The hammer issue is a moot point to me. I have 2 shrouded pocket guns and two regular hammer ones (all .38s). Both types fit and work quite well with a pocket holster. I shoot only double action so I never have the need to thumb back a hammer.
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
|
05-07-2016, 02:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 2,809
Liked 5,794 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
|
If it fits your need better then you got the right one
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 02:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 403
Liked 2,849 Times in 1,265 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlight
... but my thought is that the Exposed Hammer fits my needs better.
|
I'd say your needs are more important than anyone else's opinion, but I prefer a shrouded hammer for pocket carry. For other holster carry, I prefer a regular hammer.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 02:34 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,896
Likes: 987
Liked 19,015 Times in 9,304 Posts
|
|
An exposed or shrouded hammer works the same for pocket 'carry', but for drawing the shrouded hammer won't catch on the inside of the pocket. Also, in theory an exposed hammer will catch if you try shooting through the pocket - I've seen controlled tests of doing this but not in real life.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
05-07-2016, 02:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: S.E Pa. north of Phila
Posts: 275
Likes: 4
Liked 144 Times in 69 Posts
|
|
My 638 shrouded hammer is best of both worlds. DOA and SA (for load testing)
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 02:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 4,748
Liked 4,791 Times in 1,679 Posts
|
|
I like my Model 38 nickel airweight with shrouded hammer. Different strokes for different folks. I occasionally carry it in a jacket pocket but more often in an IWB holster.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 03:55 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,808
Likes: 4,240
Liked 15,205 Times in 4,162 Posts
|
|
I have a Model 37 & Model 38 and carried each as the mood suited me. My Model 38 has a hammer that is real stiff and hard to cock, no real reason I can find.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
|
05-07-2016, 04:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 465
Liked 1,574 Times in 700 Posts
|
|
I bought a 637 as well. I like exposed hammers on revolvers.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 06:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 3,243
Liked 3,859 Times in 1,966 Posts
|
|
I own both and find myself ccw'ing the shrouded 442 more as I don't have to worry about the hammer in the pocket.
|
05-07-2016, 06:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Home is Texas.
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 3,410
Liked 1,408 Times in 847 Posts
|
|
I have a 637 also. Personally, I like the look of a revolver with an exposed hammer. When I carry the 637 in my pocket either in a DeSantis Superfly, or without, I make sure to put my thumb on the hammer as I draw so that it doesn't catch. I don't thumb the hammer back though.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 07:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 414
Liked 2,249 Times in 1,032 Posts
|
|
I don't know what your needs are, but if your choice meets them the best, then that's all that really matter.
My primary focus is personal defense and between an exposed, shrouded or enclosed hammer J-frame, I feel the fully enclosed hammer models meets my perceived needs the best. The reason is I do not feel having single capability is of much value for personal defense. A scenario of having to make a controlled precision first shot with a snub revolver in a civilian defense situation is extremely unlikely. The majority of self-defense are reactive and occur at close distances and it's relatively common for them involve physical contact with the assailant(s) and by retaining single action capability, you lose other qualities that are more likely to be of applicable advantage in the most probable defense scenarios.
The enclosed hammer frame makes for a snag free draw, prevents lint/debris from getting into the action, allows for a high hand grasp and more grip variations, it can be fired from inside a jacket pocket or otherwise entangled in clothing. There is no hammer to get blocked in a close-quarter struggle. It eliminates any accusations you cocked and accidentally fired it as well as actually doing so. It also has a better double action trigger.
That's my personal perspective. Your wants, needs and opinions may differ from mine.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2016, 08:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 5,459
Liked 2,780 Times in 1,263 Posts
|
|
Draw that exposed hammer from deep concealment often enough and you're going to snag it. Unload the gun and practice drawing it from pockets, IWB, what have you. You'll see. I'd suggest open carry only.
|
05-07-2016, 08:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,135 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
I bought an exposed hammer 637 Airweight based on advice of a good friend with a career in law enforcement, 25 years . He said the hammer is NOT an issue. I have pocket carried this one since 2005 , Its NOT an issue. Having a hammer when you need it is a big plus . Most gun holsters are secured by a strap over it...thus its more secured in a belt holster.
Drawing from pocket , the hammer has never snagged. Your thumb naturally covers it. People who claim snagging, aren't doing it right or haven't carried one.
Pocket carry 637 since 2005.....I vote hammer.
Gary
Last edited by gwpercle; 05-07-2016 at 08:29 PM.
|
05-07-2016, 08:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,243
Likes: 20,275
Liked 13,107 Times in 4,172 Posts
|
|
The M38, 49, 40 and 42 are my favorite pocket handguns.
For my purposes, the exposed hammer j frames are poor choices. I have as much trouble getting them into the pocket as getting them out.
|
05-07-2016, 09:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 332
Liked 1,906 Times in 523 Posts
|
|
I like both a thumb back hammer and the least likely to get snagged exiting a pocket so I got the shrouded M638.
|
05-08-2016, 01:41 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1,349
Liked 1,693 Times in 530 Posts
|
|
For me the question is exposed hammer or centennial hammer??
For pocket carry I need two options... The covered hammer plus Airweight, or in my case the 642 (top right).
The heavier steel guns ride on my belt regardless of hammer style.
Edmo
__________________
TRUTH: Don't delete my posts!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-08-2016, 02:19 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 1,325
Liked 10,597 Times in 3,228 Posts
|
|
I tried pocket CC of a M36.
Must be me, caught it too many times on the pocket.
I like my M638 for pocket CC.
Plus it looks nice too....
That has nothing to do with what works for you.
__________________
Only difference Fool/Mule-ears
|
05-08-2016, 04:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: illinois, chicago burbs
Posts: 162
Likes: 347
Liked 156 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
i have a model 640-2 that is the sweetest ccw revolver i own, so my vote goes for shrouded hammer i suppose.
Last edited by Davinman; 05-08-2016 at 04:29 AM.
|
05-08-2016, 09:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 2,256
Liked 3,495 Times in 1,485 Posts
|
|
I have no use for a spur on a revolver for self-defense. I trained long and hard to learn to shoot a revolver double-action, so no need for the hammer spur. Now for a revolver used in hunting or target shooting, I like the hammer spur. YMMV
|
05-08-2016, 09:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 1,062
Liked 2,109 Times in 860 Posts
|
|
No winners in this long debated topic.
Hammers do give you a bit more options if you have to make a controlled shot,
They look cool.
They make it easier to teach new shooters.
Other than that,
They can, and will, snag in pants or jacket pockets and no amount of training or discussion will eliminate that possibility in the panic of a life or death situation.
Although the chance may be remote, I opt for no external hammer if I need to shoot from a jacket pocket or purse.
The humpback being larger than the S&W hammerless models gives the concealability edge to that DA only group.
If you enjoy watching a hammer move, you might opt for a DA only gun with a bobbed hammer. I suspect there are quite a few of the Wyatt Deep Cover Mod. 637's around at great prices. Nice gun with actually an even smaller profile than the 442, 642, 340 series and every one I have handled had a great Performance Center tuned action.
My 2¢ that nobody asked for.
Last edited by gnystrom; 05-08-2016 at 09:58 AM.
|
05-09-2016, 12:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 2
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I put a 638 hammer on my 360. It let me keep the looks while reducing the snag.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-09-2016, 12:45 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OK
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
I carry a Colt (Gasp!) Agent with a bobbed hammer. Best of both worlds; no snag, yet can still cock, if necessary (Really, not likely).
__________________
Mama, take this badge offa me
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|