Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2017, 08:14 AM
balin balin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 98
Likes: 12
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default 686 3" vs 5"

I have a 3 inch 686 that I like and am thinking of getting one in 5 inch. Mostly just for shooting maybe some home defense. There is never a good reason to not get a new gun. But I was wondering what people have thought that have shot these 2 before.
__________________
balin
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2017, 09:44 AM
diyj98 diyj98 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 446
Likes: 23
Liked 333 Times in 175 Posts
Default

For my own uses, I'm not a big fan of large framed guns with short barrels. They're bigger than I want to try to conceal and you get a shorter sight radius and less velocity. I have a 686+ with a full underlug 5" barrel that's great for hunting or shooting off the bags. The extra sight radius and weight make it a great target gun and help keep recoil to a minimum.

Last edited by diyj98; 01-11-2017 at 03:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 01-11-2017, 02:06 PM
wadcutter1 wadcutter1 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 129
Likes: 18
Liked 99 Times in 45 Posts
Default

I have a 3" 686 and used to have a 6". For me the difference in accuracy is substantial. The 6" was a tack driver and and the 3" is so-so. I keep the 3" has my home defense gun, but I miss the 6" at the range.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2017, 02:12 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 118
Liked 551 Times in 309 Posts
Default

I handled the 3" and 5" Talo 3-5-7 versions at a gun show. Loved the look of the 5" but it felt slightly muzzle-heavy, not too bad but might get tiring after a while. I felt the 3" was too short. A 4" might have been the best fit for me personally.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2017, 02:12 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 706
Liked 3,159 Times in 1,486 Posts
Default

I don't think you can obtain a 5" barreled M686 these days unless it is a Performance Center model. ICBW of course....

I have a 2.5", 3", and 4" M686+. I like them all. If I really want to play tack driver I use my 586 with its 6" barrel.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 01-11-2017, 03:07 PM
robvious robvious is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastern Nebraska
Posts: 450
Likes: 804
Liked 701 Times in 274 Posts
Default

I have 3", 5" & 6"...
3 inch for carry... CS-1 2M... very nice
5 inch half lug is my favorite by just a bit over the 3 inch... perfectly balanced
6 inch was a deal and shoots great too but in last place of the 3...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2017, 04:05 PM
balin balin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 98
Likes: 12
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I like the looks of the Talo 5 incher. I thought that a 6 inch model might be a little barrel heavy for offhand shooting.
__________________
balin
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2017, 05:32 PM
wproct's Avatar
wproct wproct is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 640
Likes: 631
Liked 183 Times in 101 Posts
Default

Not the 686, but I have the similarly sized GP100 in both 3 in and 5 in bbl length. I like the 3 inch model because it just plain looks cool and is a really handy revolver for general use open carried. The 5 inch model is just perfectly balanced and easier to shoot because of the longer sight radius and would be my pick of the two.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2017, 05:58 PM
Blade37db Blade37db is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 88
Likes: 2
Liked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I had a 5" 7 shot 686. It was a nice range gun, but to me, wasn't good for much else (except for maybe hunting which I don't do). A little front heavy for my likes. A 4 inch (L frame) feels much more balanced.
For 3" barrels, I much prefer K frames.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2017, 01:58 AM
Mehutch's Avatar
Mehutch Mehutch is online now
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 307
Likes: 1,465
Liked 877 Times in 208 Posts
Default

Happy happy happy....

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 01-12-2017, 08:36 AM
rich5674 rich5674 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 65
Likes: 3
Liked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Default 3" vs 5"

My 2c. I love my 3" 66 but cant hit too much with it. My 5" 686 and M 27 I'm satisfied I can shoot and hit as good as I possibly can.
For me and 686s, for target, hunting and field it would be a 5". For home and car defense there would be no better revolver than a 3" barreled 7 shooter 686.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-12-2017, 08:51 AM
Phish's Avatar
Phish Phish is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Lake shore, Ohio
Posts: 83
Likes: 333
Liked 51 Times in 33 Posts
Default

I got eyes out for the 5" barrel as it a good compromise between the 4" and 6" plus It legal for Ohio deer hunting if want to.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-12-2017, 09:39 AM
ultratec00 ultratec00 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Liked 76 Times in 60 Posts
Default

I picked up a 5" talo 686+ last year and every so often think about a shorter version. The 5" is a good compromise, longer than the 4" but shorter than the 6". Good all around home defense/woods firearm. Mine turned out very well. Obviously if your primary purpose is concealed carry, the shorter barrel is the choice. Home defense, the 5" would work just fine, provide better ballistics, have less muzzle flash, and longer sight radius would help shootability.

Last edited by ultratec00; 01-12-2017 at 10:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-12-2017, 10:52 AM
jtcarm's Avatar
jtcarm jtcarm is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 726
Liked 1,784 Times in 824 Posts
Default

For an HD gun, I'd stay with the 3". Much less barrel for someone to wrestle out of your hand.

A 5" would make a good all around "field gun."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 01-12-2017, 10:58 AM
DD357 DD357 is online now
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Morgan Co, IN
Posts: 530
Likes: 340
Liked 348 Times in 200 Posts
Default

I've owned 2.5,3,4 & 6" 686's over the years. Don't have any now as I prefer a K for SD and a N for a field gun. However for a home defense gun I'd choose a 4" out of the bunch.
__________________
K & N S&W revolvers
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-12-2017, 12:43 PM
diggler1833's Avatar
diggler1833 diggler1833 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NC
Posts: 165
Likes: 107
Liked 375 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by balin View Post
I have a 3 inch 686 that I like and am thinking of getting one in 5 inch. Mostly just for shooting maybe some home defense. There is never a good reason to not get a new gun. But I was wondering what people have thought that have shot these 2 before.
Having a three inch, but no five inch is reason enough to get one.

Another reason would be that I think simply due to human error, that you will find you shoot the five inch a little better.

Sorry that I only have a four inch 686, but I have quite a few Smiths of that caliber with barrel lengths ranging from 2-1/2 to 8-3/8". Longer is better for me with the .357.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-18-2017, 01:41 PM
Mehutch's Avatar
Mehutch Mehutch is online now
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 307
Likes: 1,465
Liked 877 Times in 208 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=jtcarm;139412910]For an HD gun, I'd stay with the 3". Much less barrel for someone to wrestle out of your hand.

If you let them get that close to your 3" or 5" it wont matter, you'll be dead soon.

“When You Have to Shoot, Shoot. Don't Talk.” - Tuco in 'The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly'
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-18-2017, 02:19 PM
apollo99 apollo99 is online now
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 391
Likes: 17
Liked 509 Times in 213 Posts
Default

Mehutch, I love that movie, it was just on. No matter where in the movie, i catch it, I always watch it in the end. As far as a 3" vs a 6", I'm not a big fan of 3" guns, I would go with a 2 1/2" and a 4" and a 6".
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-18-2017, 03:28 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 118
Liked 551 Times in 309 Posts
Default

One thing going for the 5" would be rarity, though the 3-5-7 series with unfluted cylinder is now a regular catalog item instead of a Talo special order. Not too many 5" L-frames out there.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-18-2017, 04:35 PM
Telecaster Telecaster is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 8
Liked 61 Times in 25 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wproct View Post
Not the 686, but I have the similarly sized GP100 in both 3 in and 5 in bbl length. I like the 3 inch model because it just plain looks cool and is a really handy revolver for general use open carried. The 5 inch model is just perfectly balanced and easier to shoot because of the longer sight radius and would be my pick of the two.
I have a 3" and a 4" GP100 and agree with this. The 4" has Williams fiber optic sights and it's a tack driver, the 3" has fixed "gutter" sights but it's just plain fun to shoot. For range satisfaction, I'd go ahead and get a long-snout version.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 01-19-2017, 01:54 PM
ridgewalker ridgewalker is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Western USA
Posts: 536
Likes: 556
Liked 264 Times in 163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by balin View Post
I have a 3 inch 686 that I like and am thinking of getting one in 5 inch. Mostly just for shooting maybe some home defense. There is never a good reason to not get a new gun. But I was wondering what people have thought that have shot these 2 before.
I'd use the 3 inch for home defense and get a 6 inch 686 for fun at the range.
__________________
Accuracy supercedes Speed
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-19-2017, 06:00 PM
RIDE-RED 350r's Avatar
RIDE-RED 350r RIDE-RED 350r is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Blossvale NY
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 3,447
Liked 828 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Wait wait, are we talking about a standard profile, full underlug 5" 686?? When did they start making those?
__________________
Formerly: "Dooman"
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-26-2017, 11:15 PM
Viper1357 Viper1357 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MN strange weather here
Posts: 28
Likes: 6
Liked 93 Times in 25 Posts
Default

I've had this 686+ 5" Talo 3-5-7 for about 3 years now, and I don't think it was a normal catalog item back then. Not that it matters if it's the same item. It's a little heavy, but that actually helps with the recoil and slow fire holding stability when slow fire target shooting. It's a real tack driver. I added the Hogue grips in lieu of the silver black laminate ones. The laminate looks nice, but doesn't fit my palm comfortably.







"
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #24  
Old 01-27-2017, 12:16 AM
JohnRoc65 JohnRoc65 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 35
Likes: 73
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Default

^^^^^^
Gorgeous
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-27-2017, 07:44 AM
bigwheelzip's Avatar
bigwheelzip bigwheelzip is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 4,543
Liked 9,520 Times in 2,521 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by balin View Post
I have a 3 inch 686 that I like and am thinking of getting one in 5 inch.
My 4" 686+ is a great shooter, but during long range sessions I wouldn't mind if it was a bit less heavy. A 5" standard 686 would be too heavy for me to target shoot for very long.
That's why I'm considering the 5" PC Pro 686+, with the slab barrel (SKU: 178038). It's a bit lighter than the standard 4", and comes with a nice PC target configuration.

Last edited by bigwheelzip; 01-27-2017 at 08:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 01-27-2017, 08:13 AM
EricR EricR is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 116
Likes: 474
Liked 177 Times in 50 Posts
Default

I'm certainly no great shot, but the balance of my 2.5" 686-3 makes it incredibly accurate for me. I impress myself. Having said that, I'd love to have a 5" too.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #27  
Old 01-27-2017, 11:54 AM
Redlegvzv's Avatar
Redlegvzv Redlegvzv is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 453
Likes: 179
Liked 436 Times in 165 Posts
Default

I have a 4" 686+ and a 6" 686 (six shooter). I would not want a shorter barrel than 4" for range or HD use because the shorter the sight radius, the less accuracy. Personally I like anything between 4" and 6" fine; I do not find the 6" all that heavy, and the weight helps manage recoil. 38 spls. feel like .22LR rounds with the 6".

Unless you are carrying the weapon concealed, I think that the OP will do well with a 4, 5, or 6 inch 686.
__________________
Army veteran, NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-27-2017, 02:20 PM
rwt1405's Avatar
rwt1405 rwt1405 is offline
Member
686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5" 686 3" vs 5"  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Delaware
Posts: 916
Likes: 590
Liked 606 Times in 303 Posts
Default

I have 2.5", 3", and 4" 686's, and would consider a 5", but the 6" feel to muzzle heavy for me, thus I have not, nor want to get one.

As for HD, I personally would not want to use a revolver longer then 4", and much prefer a 3" or less, as someone else above mentioned it is easier to control if they were to get close enough to grab it.

And if you think that could never happen, you feel free to live in your little fantasy world, as for me, I know that anything is possible, including the possibility of someone grabbing the barrel of my revolver.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For All You "Squids", "Swabbies", and "Anchor-Clankers" semperfi71 The Lounge 37 02-07-2016 03:06 PM
Thinking of ordering a 686P 4" 7 round .357 .... "Help"!! Need some reviews on them... Is the 6" better or is the 4" equally good? .460V & XVR Magnum Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 27 03-07-2014 09:24 AM
If you liked "Red Dawn" and "Jericho" - "Falling Skies" starts Sunday GatorFarmer The Lounge 15 08-14-2012 11:58 PM
"SPF" 5906 Square TG, W/ 2 ext. mags "Shipped" "SPF" Rone GUNS - For Sale or Trade 7 12-15-2010 12:40 PM
Use caution when dealing with "roniva123", a.k.a. "PB Firearms", a.k.a. "Snubbies" allglock Feedback 17 08-07-2009 04:31 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)