Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 09-23-2020, 11:31 PM
ruger 22 ruger 22 is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 802
Likes: 1,634
Liked 1,081 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Either will serve you well. It may come down to what is readily available in your area. If both are available I would go with the 686,(no hole). It is a bit beefier for lots of shooting.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #102  
Old 09-24-2020, 07:34 AM
mike from st pete's Avatar
mike from st pete mike from st pete is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: st pete fla
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 5,648
Liked 2,763 Times in 1,213 Posts
Default

686 without a doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 10-22-2020, 11:38 PM
flockdance flockdance is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Red face 66 4” vs 19 4”

I decided to go with the 66 in the 4” instead of the 686 4” cause it’s lighter but then I have not been able to find a new one so I bought the 19 in the 4” and the store is holding it till my permit arrives, which it just did today. I hear the blue rusts more easily so should I wait for the 66 to come in or go with the 19? It is beautiful but I think I prefer the stainless steel. Anyway, hope I am making the right choice. The 686 was definitely too heavy and bulky for me.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #104  
Old 10-23-2020, 07:38 AM
shocker's Avatar
shocker shocker is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 550
Liked 1,427 Times in 666 Posts
Default

I prefer SS for lower maintenance, and I would also go for a 66 over a 686 unless I needed the 7th shot.
All I do for blue guns is wipe with a rag wetted with a little bit of oil after handling. Never have had one show rust.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 10-23-2020, 07:43 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is online now
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,248
Likes: 17,884
Liked 23,919 Times in 6,782 Posts
Default

Of the 2 you mention, I’d go with the 686 because I prefer the aesthetics of the 1 piece barrel of the current production 66. To my eye Smith’s 2 piece barrels just don’t have a clean, well executed look - they look cheap. Also the 686 is a real tank.
__________________
213th FBINA

Last edited by CH4; 10-23-2020 at 07:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 10-23-2020, 08:22 AM
BB57's Avatar
BB57 BB57 is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 4,710
Likes: 3,527
Liked 12,553 Times in 3,342 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flockdance View Post
I decided to go with the 66 in the 4” instead of the 686 4” cause it’s lighter but then I have not been able to find a new one so I bought the 19 in the 4” and the store is holding it till my permit arrives, which it just did today. I hear the blue rusts more easily so should I wait for the 66 to come in or go with the 19? It is beautiful but I think I prefer the stainless steel. Anyway, hope I am making the right choice. The 686 was definitely too heavy and bulky for me.
It depends what you are going to do with it.

If you want to conceal carry then stainless steel is a much better option. I carried a Model 13 for years and in daily carry in an IWB holster preventing rust was literally a daily task in a hot, humid southern summer. Miss a day and I'd literally finds rust starting on the barrel on the body side of the revolver.

Stainless steel isn't totally rust proof, but wiping it down can be dropped back to every week or two.

Holster wear on the finish is also much more noticeable on a blued gun, especially around the sides of the barrel at the muzzle and on the front edge of the cylinder. It'll still happen with stainless, steel, it's just much harder to see.

If it's for range use, or home defense a blued finish is just fine.


----

In the 4" and 6" lengths, I greatly prefer the Model 19 or 66 to the Model 686. The full underlug barrel was mostly a style thing. It adds weight to the barrel which some folks think helps tame recoil, but a 4" or 6" K or L frame revolver doesn't need any more recoil taming in .357 Magnum. What is does is ruin the balance that you have with the Model 19 or Model 66.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:13 AM
flockdance flockdance is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Red face 66 4” vs 19 4”

There is no conceal carry in NJ. One of the worst states to own/carry a handgun. Mostly for home defense and practice. You never know though ., maybe I would be able to carry it if I ever move out of state or the laws change (unlikely though). I just don’t want to have to deal with rusting. Summers are hot and humid here but will mostly be indoors except for practice. Thks.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 10-23-2020, 09:20 AM
flockdance flockdance is offline
Member
The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question The dreaded 66 vs 686 question  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default 686 vs 66 in the 4”

Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
Of the 2 you mention, I’d go with the 686 because I prefer the aesthetics of the 1 piece barrel of the current production 66. To my eye Smith’s 2 piece barrels just don’t have a clean, well executed look - they look cheap. Also the 686 is a real tank.
I agree regarding aesthetic of the 686 vs the 66 in the 4”. At first I had the 686 on hold because that is the one I really want. I love the way it looks but I after holding it for a few minutes on several occasions and then comparing it to the weight of the 66, in my hand, I feel it will make a real difference. I’m 128 pounds and do not have the strongest wrists so I think I should go with something the lighter less bulkier model.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The dreaded “It’s the gun or me” gauntlet... Maximumbob54 The Lounge 167 09-12-2020 09:35 PM
The dreaded lock question! John Rus S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 42 01-17-2016 07:01 PM
The Dreaded IL, the Plug, etc. S&W Rover S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 12-14-2013 01:10 PM
Another dreaded sight question larryofcc S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 3 12-02-2013 08:15 PM
Got bit by the dreaded Winchester bug bushmaster1313 Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 28 10-27-2011 08:51 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)