Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:47 AM
Telecaster Telecaster is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 5
Liked 41 Times in 15 Posts
Default Model 63

I'm looking for a .22LR revolver, is there any reason not to get a S&W Model 63? The danger I see is it might make me want to trade my SP101 for a Model 60...

Why not get the SP101 in .22, you ask? It just doesn't sing to me, for some reason. The 3" S&W just seems right, and the price is pretty close. I just wish it wasn't so darned expensive - how much sense does it make to spend that much money to shoot "cheap" .22 ammo?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:57 AM
Camster Camster is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Surrounded by too many people
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 501
Liked 765 Times in 422 Posts
Default

Buy the expensive grades of 22 ammo if it makes you feel better.
Personally,I prefer the hammer and design of the earlier 4 inch 63s.however stumbling across one of those in your LGS might not be so easy..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:12 PM
THE PILGRIM's Avatar
THE PILGRIM THE PILGRIM is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 2,630
Liked 6,830 Times in 2,762 Posts
Default

Unless it's way over priced-
Or has some serious conditions issues-
Hard to go wrong on a 63!
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:18 PM
22hipower 22hipower is offline
SWCA Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 766
Likes: 1,033
Liked 749 Times in 297 Posts
Default

Nothing wrong with current production 63s although I haven't bought one since my 63-4 five inch several years ago. Only issue that you might want to consider is whether a 617 might serve you better. If you want the smaller J frame, no problem. I just find the K frames easier to shoot and for target/plinking and the larger size is a benefit not a hindrance, for me anyway. Either way you'll likely be very happy with either a 63 or 617 whether you find an older one or current production. Good luck.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:33 PM
BAM-BAM BAM-BAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 138
Liked 6,724 Times in 3,218 Posts
Default

IMHO 63 are for "carrying a lot and shooting a little"........ they are a "Kit Gun" to have handy when you don't expect to need one.......

while ......

617s and 17/18s are for "shooting a lot and carrying a little"!!!!!



The exception is hunting...... "which for me is carrying a lot and shooting a little" ...... then a 6" 17 is hard to beat.


I have Models ;17,18,617,34 and 63.......................

Last edited by BAM-BAM; 02-16-2017 at 12:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:51 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
SWCA Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 6,158
Likes: 1,141
Liked 5,429 Times in 1,840 Posts
Default

The J-22 and K-22 cost about the same, the J frame .22lr is great as a trainer before stepping a novice up to a J frame .38, Other than that I prefer a K-22 for plinking and target shooting any day of the week as it fills the hand and shoots better IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:56 PM
firewire's Avatar
firewire firewire is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: OKC
Posts: 57
Likes: 85
Liked 27 Times in 9 Posts
Default

To address your first question, I recently purchased a used 2015 63-5 and haven't shot it yet. I will tell you that I tried the SP101 (.22) trigger and truly thought it was so heavy that my youngest kid wouldn't be able to pull it in double action mode. It's THAT heavy. Pretty much night and day difference if that is a concern. A regular sp101 wasn't like the .22lr trigger.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2017, 05:59 PM
Telecaster Telecaster is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 5
Liked 41 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM View Post
IMHO 63 are for "carrying a lot and shooting a little"........ they are a "Kit Gun" to have handy when you don't expect to need one...
I don't understand. The 11.7 oz aluminum 317 might be "carry a lot and shoot a little," but the all stainless 63 looks like endless range fun.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 02-16-2017, 06:04 PM
BAM-BAM BAM-BAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 138
Liked 6,724 Times in 3,218 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telecaster View Post
I don't understand. The 11.7 oz aluminum 317 might be "carry a lot and shoot a little," but the all stainless 63 looks like endless range fun.

...... well ya; compared to the 317...... but IMHO a 4" 18 or 6" 17 are way better range/target guns than a 2 or 4 inch 63.

If you have a shot at getting a 63 .... my advice is .... do it....

I have 2 anib 34s...... I wanted a 4"63 for "fun/Kit gun" ..... took me 5/6 years to find one at a LGS!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:22 PM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 847
Liked 2,650 Times in 1,386 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telecaster View Post
I don't understand. The 11.7 oz aluminum 317 might be "carry a lot and shoot a little," but the all stainless 63 looks like endless range fun.
My wife has a 5" Model 63. It is one of the best handling S&W revolvers that I have ever got ahold of, but it's too small for me to shoot for any length of time. The springs are stiff enough that she can't shoot it DA and has to resort to SA only.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:30 PM
DS-10-SPEED DS-10-SPEED is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clio, Michigan
Posts: 78
Likes: 1
Liked 73 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telecaster View Post
I'm looking for a .22LR revolver, is there any reason not to get a S&W Model 63? The danger I see is it might make me want to trade my SP101 for a Model 60...

Why not get the SP101 in .22, you ask? It just doesn't sing to me, for some reason. The 3" S&W just seems right, and the price is pretty close. I just wish it wasn't so darned expensive - how much sense does it make to spend that much money to shoot "cheap" .22 ammo?
I had an SP101 8 shot (at the bottom) but I didn't like the trigger or the small grips, I sold it. My model 63 is just above the Ruger, even with stock grips it fits my hand better than the SP101 did. I now have a set of round to square butt conversion Altamont grips on the 63. They seem to be the perfect fit for me on a J-frame.
Attached Thumbnails
Model 63-rev22_small-jpg   Model 63-63_3-jpg   Model 63-63_1-jpg   Model 63-63_2-jpg  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:40 PM
Macinaw's Avatar
Macinaw Macinaw is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 348
Liked 1,182 Times in 427 Posts
Default

At a Steel Challenge shooting competition I started off using a model 63. Wasn't very accurate for me. I switched to a model 617 and had a much better match.






Model 63-dsc_0223-jpg
Attached Thumbnails
Model 63-dsc_0223-jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:42 PM
31FordA 31FordA is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 195
Likes: 681
Liked 241 Times in 117 Posts
Default

I had a SP-101 in .22, trigger was awful. Everyone who shot it remarked about the heavy trigger. I like SP-101's, own several, but did not care for the .22 version. Sold the SP, bought a Model 18 No Dash and a Model 63-3 2". A friend has a 317, also a nice gun.
__________________
Wheel guns are real guns.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:54 PM
garywh garywh is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 5
Likes: 2
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

I have a 63-6 that I bought after selling my Ruger Mark3 and I love it.
It is nice to go to the range and not have to deal with jams.
The 63 is reasonably accurate and helps me to practice for my model 36 -1 Chiefs Special.
Great little gun, you can't go wrong, you can always buy more.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-16-2017, 08:59 PM
RichCapeCod RichCapeCod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Liked 776 Times in 198 Posts
Default

The 63 is a wonderful shooter. Had mine since new (mid-70s handgun). Needed a little work from a gunsmith (mostly had to smooth out the chambers to prevent/stop stuck spent shells from ejecting without use of a mallet!). My little revolver has Fuzzy Farrant grips on it (double palm swell, no checkering).

One little "trick" for all rimfire revolvers; I keep Q-tips in my shooting kit as well as a small bottle of Hoppe's 9. Every X-number of rounds (depends on the brand) I run a solvent soaked Q-tip through each chamber. Makes life so much easier. :-)

Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 02-17-2017, 01:22 AM
Camster Camster is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Surrounded by too many people
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 501
Liked 765 Times in 422 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Telecaster View Post
I don't understand. The 11.7 oz aluminum 317 might be "carry a lot and shoot a little," but the all stainless 63 looks like endless range fun.
Perhaps,if you have small hands and you're just interested in casual plinking..When cocked,the reach is pretty short on J frames. A K frame just has a nicer action(leaf main spring vs the coil of the J frame) and many more grip options.For a nice all purpose/all shooter gun,one that isn't too big or heavy,it's hard to beat the Model 18.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 02-17-2017, 06:14 AM
ofnsaz ofnsaz is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 21
Likes: 37
Liked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Default

The Pachmayr grips turned my J-frame 22 (4" barrel) into a very comfortable handgun...but I have small hands. Guess my kids do too, because they argue over who will inherit it! Had it for close to 40 years now. The same grips make my Model 60 an OK 357 magnum, too.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-17-2017, 06:49 AM
Ranger98's Avatar
Ranger98 Ranger98 is offline
US Veteran
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 923
Likes: 224
Liked 533 Times in 203 Posts
Default

Get the 63 and ream the cylinder,change the grips if you want and be happy Also toss the lock..
__________________
JR
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 02-17-2017, 11:39 AM
saemetric's Avatar
saemetric saemetric is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Deming, NM
Posts: 804
Likes: 341
Liked 869 Times in 241 Posts
Default

__________________
Jaguar lover
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 02-17-2017, 01:29 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 15,315
Likes: 6,117
Liked 7,576 Times in 3,531 Posts
Default

A Model 63 (or the Blued variant Mod 34) is one of the most versatile handguns S&W ever made. It is the perfect size handgun to introduce youths and most women to shooting. It isn't so large or so heavy for them to handle. It is the perfect size to carry as a woods walking gun. When you do your part, it is as accurate as any Mod 17/18 K Frame. Either the 63 or 34 will last more than your lifetime if properly cared for, regardless how many rounds you put through them.

Yes, I have a 17 and a Pre 18 as well as a 63 & 34, and the Mod 63 gets more range time than any of them.

Just ask my Granddaughter. I think she has the 34 here and the 63 is on the table).



__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 02-17-2017, 01:53 PM
THE PILGRIM's Avatar
THE PILGRIM THE PILGRIM is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 5,428
Likes: 2,630
Liked 6,830 Times in 2,762 Posts
Default

Well I thought that I really liked shooting my 63s.
Most all revolvers need a grip change.
The factory grips are usually not the best choice for most folks.
And trial and error is recommended.
Try as many brands, styles, and shapes as you can.
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-17-2017, 07:24 PM
VaTom VaTom is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 288
Likes: 603
Liked 432 Times in 146 Posts
Default

Love my 63 4" pinned barrel (1981). I have had it for about 5 years. Found some NOS square butt J frame target grips on E-Bay. (See H Richard Post above). Fun to shoot and always goes to the range with the bigger boys.

The few I have seen at gun shows in our area are priced around $900. Glad I got mine when I did. If you find one at a good price - jump on it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-17-2017, 07:47 PM
Gripgrabber's Avatar
Gripgrabber Gripgrabber is offline
US Veteran
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Brooksville, FL
Posts: 259
Likes: 95
Liked 219 Times in 103 Posts
Default

Hay, I always wanted one, found a nice one last year!
SEMPER PARATUS
Attached Thumbnails
Model 63-img_1873-jpg  
__________________
NRA Life Member
CPO
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #24  
Old 02-17-2017, 11:27 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 113
Liked 539 Times in 299 Posts
Default

I finally got to handle an older 4" Model 63 at a gun show and was impressed by the quality and the compact size. It's really pretty svelte. I would love to have the 2".

As for the current 3" 63-5, it seems a little chunkier with the IL style frame, but I love the 8-shot cylinder the 3" barrel and the excellent balance. It has performed flawlessly, with clean ejection and no sticky chambers. I think I'm a little disappointed because I have only shot it at indoor ranges and I can't shoot it as well as my 6" Model 17. My wife loves it and it's a good size for her. i think I'll appreciate it more once I get it in the field, but definitely a keeper.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #25  
Old 02-19-2017, 10:49 PM
BoCash's Avatar
BoCash BoCash is offline
Member
Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63 Model 63  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: western NC
Posts: 46
Likes: 18
Liked 34 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Just to share: The model 63 is the Last Gun I would sell. This "COULD" also apply to model 34's, 43's, etc.........because in my hand, this is the perfect "woods gun," plinker, fishing carry gun, etc. that I can actually hit something with. With 6 model 63's, 2 model 43's, 6 model 34's, and 2 model 317's in the stable, it would take a while to whittle down to "just one," and that would be a 4" model 63 because of the stainless finish. These are words from a "Kit Gun" freak. There are plenty of model 17's, 18's, and 617's in the stable. Those models get more target time. The 63 gets more holster time and doubles to shoot marshmellows and punch holes in paper at 25 yards.

There are a lot of Smith wheelguns in the stash, but the 63 could dispatch a nasty coppernoggin, provide food if in a survival situation, yet take the center out of a target at 20 yards.

Further, I just invested in a pair of Ruger SP-101's: a .22 and a .357. Yes, they are tough as a tank, but comparing the .22 SP-101 with a Smith 63.......... no comparison!! The Ruger trigger is terrible. The Ruger sights wiggle and wobble and won't hold firm. Even the hammer does not have the same feel and my thumb will not grip it was well as a 63. The Ruger just does not have the feel of the Smith.....................

As for a model 63 with 4-inch barrel............ how much does an extra inch matter when the piece is still small enough to tuck in a waist band and can actually hit something when used in a steady hand? Get the older 63. I have one in each of two vehicles (along with bigger medicine if needed) and carry one on the hip in the National Forests. First two rounds are "rat shot" and the next four are hollow points. A speed loader can get one back into shooting quickly if you don't like the newer and not as aesthetically pleasing 8-shot versions.

2 Cents............. Get an older 63, 4-inch, 6-shot. Yes, they are hovering around $900 but I just found another one for $775, 98%, and in the box. This used 63 was $200 more than the "new" SP-101 I just bought and, to me, worth every penny.

Y'all be good, Bo

Last edited by BoCash; 02-19-2017 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tulsa Gunshow this Saturday: Model 63, Model 60, Model 351PD, Model 500 retiredsquid GUNS - For Sale or Trade 1 04-08-2010 04:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)