Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:57 AM
DeanD DeanD is offline
Member
25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
Liked 129 Times in 21 Posts
Default 25-7 vs. 25-9

Been scouting for a .45 Colt and the 25-9 has the longer stop notch change. In the opinion of you all with the experience is it really significant and worth trying to find a -9? I don't plan on shooting super hot loads but I think anything that makes a gun stronger is good, but they -9's are hard to find.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2017, 12:23 PM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is online now
SWCA Member
25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,579
Likes: 3,066
Liked 22,559 Times in 5,844 Posts
Default

Longer stop notches were not added to provide firing strength.

Both the -7 and -9 engineering revisions of the model 25 are capable of safely containing the exact same pressures.

In 1989 when the unfluted cylinder variant of the model 627 was first produced (SKU 101024) the smaller chambers created one of the heaviest N-frame cylinders ever.

As these rotated, the excessive mass of the cylinder caused the cylinder stop to peen the notches into destruction. This happened VERY fast.

Only 278 Model 627s were manufactured before the factory stopped production and eventually implemented the cylinders with the longer notches and corresponding cylinder bolts to go with them. This caused the 627s engineering revision to be incremented to -0

This design modification was added to the other N-frames starting with the 44 Magnums as a continuance of the Endurance package upgrades in 1990 at the -4 revision of the model 29

The Model 25 also received the longer stop notches in 1990 with the -8 (45ACP) and -9 (45LC) engineering revisions

So feel confident with either revision of the model 25


Last edited by colt_saa; 02-23-2017 at 12:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 02-23-2017, 12:25 PM
Hoosier45's Avatar
Hoosier45 Hoosier45 is offline
SWCA Member
25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 701
Likes: 919
Liked 1,926 Times in 331 Posts
Default

I can't imagine there being a noticeable difference. The only group of Model 25's that have known issues were some early 25-5's which had oversized throats like .454-.457 and could impact accuracy. I've not heard of any complaints/issues regarding the later engineering changes found in the 25-7 and 25-9. These are all getting much harder to find, so I'd advise buying the first one you see at a price you can stomach. I have a 25-9 4" Blued and it is very accurate and quite nice. I also have a 25-9 5" matte blue revolver, commonly seen as a 25-7... but this one is marked as a 25-9 (later ones). I believe there is a 4", 6", and 8-3/8" 25-9 in the blued finish and the 5" is a matte finish. There is also the 25-9 Richard Petty commemorative and the 26-1 5" Georgia HP Commemorative. Of course you can get a 625-5, 625-6, and 625-7 in .45 CLT as well
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2017, 12:30 PM
SmithNut SmithNut is offline
US Veteran
25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 1
Liked 8,827 Times in 1,526 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanD View Post
Been scouting for a .45 Colt and the 25-9 has the longer stop notch change. In the opinion of you all with the experience is it really significant and worth trying to find a -9? I don't plan on shooting super hot loads but I think anything that makes a gun stronger is good, but they -9's are hard to find.

Thanks!
If you have the patience of waiting, I'd say go for the M25-9 given the added features. Either would give you good shooting experiences, but if you do ever want to with higher pressure loads, I'd opt for the -9.

__________________
.............SmithNut
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 02-23-2017, 12:46 PM
jack the toad jack the toad is offline
SWCA Member
25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9 25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
Default

Cant comment on one versus the other but have the -9 in 4" and like it so that's what I recommend.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 02-23-2017, 02:33 PM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is offline
Member
25-7 vs. 25-9  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 2,722
Liked 5,054 Times in 1,442 Posts
Default

Neither one is terribly common to come across. I have a 25-7 I was lucky enough snag off the WTS board here. I've never had the cylinder jump or unlock. You would be perfectly fine with either as I tend to doubt you will produce enough recoil with that cartridge in that platform to cause a problem. Maybe I'm wrong.....

The 5" bull barrel ejector shroud N frame in .45 COLT is one cool looking, fun shooting gun. My 25-7 would definietly be one the last to leave my possession. You will greatly enjoy ether the -7 or -9.

Last edited by SLT223; 02-23-2017 at 02:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)