Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2017, 10:19 AM
mainegrw mainegrw is offline
Member
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 538
Likes: 616
Liked 1,014 Times in 256 Posts
Default Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...

I am not new to revolvers, especially those made by S&W, however my 17-9 is relatively new to me.

I noticed last night while shooting at the range, that every once in a while I would get hit by particulate on the top of my left thumb when I fired the gun. My hold in the gun keeps my thumbs well clear of the cylinder gap, so I got a bit concerned. Inspection of the area around the forcing cone shows some particulate build-up, though nothing I would consider abnormal, just a little build-up around the area where a flame cut would form on a center fire revolver. I also inspected my cases for signs of splits or cracks in the off-chance they are splitting and blowing gases backwards, but no evidence suggests that this is occurring. Last night I shot a box of Winchester 222, and shot DA only, which is typical. Edit: I want to add that I perceived no loss of accuracy while shooting, which were at varying distances between 15 and 25 yards, producing groups averaging 3 to 4 inches at those distances, with maybe the largest group at 25 yards being around 6 inches (I am not a marksman by any stretch). There was also no sign of key holing either.

Is this relatively normal? Could a factor be the ammo I was using? I usually shoot CCI AR Tactical in all of my guns, sometimes Winchester Super X, the 222 was a box that I happened to have hanging around.



Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Last edited by mainegrw; 03-17-2017 at 10:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2017, 10:35 AM
g8rb8 g8rb8 is offline
Member
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 5,443
Liked 2,921 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mainegrw View Post
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...
Is this relatively normal? Could a factor be the ammo I was using?
Short answer: Normal.

Longer answer: I have experienced what you are experiencing from the following models similar to a 17-9:
K-22 Masterpiece (i.e. pre-model 17), Model 17 no-dash, 17-2, 17-3, 17-4, and a 617-6 (newest version of model 17 in stainless steel). In my experience the phenomenon you describe is more likely the dirtier they get, typically after about 200 rounds without cleaning, and as best I recall seems more likely with plated .22 ammo but also occurs with non-plated ammo.
__________________
Scoundrel & Ne'er-Do-Well
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2017, 11:43 AM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,795
Likes: 18,509
Liked 22,391 Times in 8,268 Posts
Default

Have you measured the B/C gap? For best results a gap of .005 to .007, but it is quite normal to find the gap up around .010 or even .012. Usually the wider the gap the more the possibility of "spitting" and the closer the gap the lesser the possibility. Keeping the gun clean and the residue accumulation on the top strap scrapped off helps. It is a very common condition with .22 revolvers.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2017, 02:07 PM
mainegrw mainegrw is offline
Member
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 538
Likes: 616
Liked 1,014 Times in 256 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H Richard View Post
Have you measured the B/C gap? For best results a gap of .005 to .007, but it is quite normal to find the gap up around .010 or even .012. Usually the wider the gap the more the possibility of "spitting" and the closer the gap the lesser the possibility. Keeping the gun clean and the residue accumulation on the top strap scrapped off helps. It is a very common condition with .22 revolvers.
Thanks for the info, I have not measured the cylinder gap, however if I estimated based on my experiences with Dan Wesson revolvers and the 0.006 gap they use, I'm going to guess that my 17-9 has gap that is roughly equivalent or maybe a little tighter than that. I do also keep thisngun very clean, she gets a thorough scrub down after each range trip, so she was clean when I started shooting last night. Rarely, I will go two range trips without cleaning, but the fowling in the chambers usually becomes a problem. I'm guessing the Winchester 222 is just a little dirtier than the CCI AR Tactical that I usually use, which is why I never noticed the flying particulate before.

I will add that regardless of brand, 95% of the time I shoot copper jacketed bullets through all of my 22s (all of my center fire guns too), as I find they tend to leave less mess to clean up, and the fowling does not build up as fast. This habit goes back to a 500 round batch of 38 special I loaded several years ago using 158gr Speer LRN bullets that left my guns with a hard to remove build-up of lead inside the forcing cone. I spent more time with a tornado brush and brass pot scrabbers removing lead from the barrels of my guns than it took to fire all 500 rounds at the range. I have had the same issue with other 22 revolvers as well. Since then it has been all jacketed bullets, even 22 caliber, the exception being the occasional use of CB longs, or Super Colibri.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2017, 05:14 PM
MajorD MajorD is offline
Member
Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap... Model 17-9: particulate ejection at the cylinder gap...  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 34
Liked 961 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Ammo can definitely be a factor I notice some particulate blow by when I used the lower quality ammo like Winchester and Remington. But no such occurrences with CCI or the European makes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 17 ejection tough pmanton S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 19 05-13-2016 01:25 PM
Model 41 ejection issues TLO24 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 19 04-11-2016 07:33 PM
New Model 41 Ejection Problems sneltyr Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 3 04-17-2013 10:28 PM
Model 25-5 ejection question amazingflapjack S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 11-21-2011 03:26 AM
Model 646 spitting particulate at cylinder christy S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 03-02-2009 07:27 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)