|
|
04-26-2017, 11:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 12
Liked 535 Times in 209 Posts
|
|
Please remove
Last edited by MP1518; 05-28-2018 at 10:52 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 11:32 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 635
Likes: 261
Liked 1,700 Times in 444 Posts
|
|
Two words, buy it, or send the contact information to me.
Best regards, Bob
__________________
SWCA #2785
OGCA #35078
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 01:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 268
Likes: 52
Liked 151 Times in 74 Posts
|
|
Buy it. That's a great price if it's in good condition.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 02:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,769
Likes: 57,858
Liked 52,996 Times in 16,526 Posts
|
|
5 inch, I'd buy it. I have a -4 , but doesn't have the flash chromed H&T like the -3's, and looks a bit odd imo against the stainless frame.
Last edited by ladder13; 04-26-2017 at 03:12 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 09:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 165
Likes: 53
Liked 156 Times in 64 Posts
|
|
Next in line if no one else buys it! lol
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 11:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,777
Likes: 2,484
Liked 8,313 Times in 2,917 Posts
|
|
Good deal,
Like the flash chromed hammer trigger, Endurance package, drilled and tapped for scope mount...
Only slight I can put on the 629-3 classic 5" is that the rear site is unique to that revision so dont lose it if removed.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-27-2017, 01:48 AM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 3,410
Liked 6,481 Times in 3,065 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
... the rear site is unique to that revision....
|
How so?
Doesn't it have the appearance of the current new style slight with the rounded tang, or is it different?
__________________
~ S&W aficionado in training ~
|
04-27-2017, 03:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 648
Likes: 598
Liked 879 Times in 293 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRatliff
Two words, buy it, or send the contact information to me.
Best regards, Bob
|
Ditto!!!!!
Another Bob
|
04-27-2017, 07:53 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: S.W. Fl.
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 678
Liked 1,160 Times in 448 Posts
|
|
Why such demand ? Is it because of the 5" barrel ?
I have a 629-4 with the 5" that I bought new back around 94-95 and probably have maybe 100 rounds through it .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-28-2017, 10:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 165
Likes: 53
Liked 156 Times in 64 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kernel Crittenden
How so?
Doesn't it have the appearance of the current new style slight with the rounded tang, or is it different?
|
It's a different length. The screw for the front of the sight is just above the throat. Later version is longer.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-29-2017, 11:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,769
Likes: 57,858
Liked 52,996 Times in 16,526 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladder13
5 inch, I'd buy it. I have a -4 , but doesn't have the flash chromed H&T like the -3's, and looks a bit odd imo against the stainless frame.
|
Here's what I'm talking about.
|
04-29-2017, 06:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 473
Likes: 290
Liked 648 Times in 240 Posts
|
|
The -4 686,66,629 revolver versions had the non flash chrome hammers and triggers. Smith was phasing out blued revolvers at this time and the rumor is that they used up the excess inventory of plain case hardened hammers and triggers in the stainless revolvers.
The 629-3 and 29-5 classic (full lug) revolvers have a unique to them longer, rounded front rear sight. In the 629-4 and 29-6 revolvers Smith went to the current rear sight still being used today. If you use a current rear sight on a 629-3 or 29-5 Classic you will have a gap in front of the sight.
Also of note is that the non classic versions (non full lug) of the 629-3 and 29-5 were still using the old square front rear sight and these were not factory drilled and tapped for scope mounting.. In the 629-4 and 29-6 versions all barrel styles wore the new rounded front rear sight and all were drilled and tapped.
|
04-29-2017, 06:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 473
Likes: 290
Liked 648 Times in 240 Posts
|
|
duplicate,sorry
Last edited by grip frame; 04-29-2017 at 06:15 PM.
|
04-29-2017, 11:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,777
Likes: 2,484
Liked 8,313 Times in 2,917 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bangbig
It's a different length. The screw for the front of the sight is just above the throat. Later version is longer.
|
IIRC the 629-3 rear site tang is longer than the 629-4 tang... but they are different rear site units,
the 629-4 site will swap with current production where the 629-3 rear site is unique to that revision so may be difficult to find one if lost or damaged.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|