|
|
07-20-2017, 06:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
New S&W 17-9
I already have two .22LR pistols (Walther P22 and Ruger Mark IV). But the head guy at my range has been saying I need a revolver, specifically a S&W 17.
I saw one yesterday that looked nice, but figured $862 is a lot for a .22 revolver. Today I thought, I'll be 70 in September, maybe the day will come when the .357 and .44 Mags get a bit much.
Anyway, I bought it today. I'll find out tomorrow at the range if it was a good way to spend $862. I also noticed the size is similar to a S&W 686, except mine is 4" and the 17 is 6".
The DA trigger pull is a little high, I understand all .22s are. However; the SA pull is really sweet. With a 6" barrel, I might get some 25 yard groups that make me feel good.
2017-07-20 16.47.18 (Medium).jpg
2017-07-20 16.47.50 (Medium).jpg
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
75Vette, 9mmsubgun-m11, bigwheelzip, ejjeff, FifthWheel, lscocoa, lunger, markeb, Protocall_Design, revolver_ph, Tom S. |
07-20-2017, 07:05 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
|
|
Congratulations
The 22 Target Masterpiece (aka Model 17) has always been a favorite of mine. I have several new and old. I can not imagine being without one.
Your Model 17 is built on a K-frame which is slightly smaller and lighter than the L-frame your 686 is built on
If after some break-in time you still feel that your D/A trigger pull is too heavy, any competent gunsmith can help with that
I hope that you enjoy your new revolver as much as I have enjoyed mine over the years.
|
07-20-2017, 07:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Prowd Kentuckian
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 2,487
Liked 1,564 Times in 660 Posts
|
|
You deserve an early Birthday present, and I think you chose well. Enjoy, and update that range outing.
__________________
"Happiness is a warm gun"
|
07-20-2017, 07:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
colt saa,
Don't get me wrong. The DA trigger isn't "too heavy", just heavier than my 686. I have a Colt Model 1917 that is so heavy my Lyman gauge can't measure the pull. Guess the troops were tough in WW1.
|
07-20-2017, 07:23 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
I bought a 617 last year, and did some trigger work on it. Despite some folks dislike for MIM parts, I found they were very smooth and in no need of stoning. The frame on the other hand had the usual amount of machining marks and one large burr. Cleaning it up and putting in a lighter rebound spring and hammer spring resulted in an amazing difference. Total time involved was maybe 20 minutes and well worth it, in my not so humble opinion.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
|
07-21-2017, 05:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Well; I took the new S&W 17-9 out to the range today.
I managed to stay disciplined and serious for about 18 rounds. The accuracy I am able to achieve with this gun is amazing. Then, I started having a lot of fun, and discipline slipped a bit. I had a great time, but wasn't quite as accurate as when I started.
That happens to me everytime a new gun is a lot of fun to shoot. Next time out, I'll have it out of my system, and be able to get serious about practice again. I no longer have any concerns about the DA trigger pull. It's very smooth, and works just fine. I also have no concerns over the cost compared to other .22 handguns, it's worth every penny.
I'll paint the face of the front sight bright red before my next time out. That will make it easier on the eyes.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-21-2017, 05:40 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2
I'll paint the face of the front sight bright red before my next time out. That will make it easier on the eyes.
|
If you want to get serious on making it easier on the eyes, add a red dot. I started using them when my eyes started going south decades ago, and now, even with my sight being corrected with cataract implants, I still prefer the red dots hands down.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
|
07-22-2017, 06:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Tom,
I have red dots on four pistols and two rifles. But I'm not yet thinking about putting them on this one. I'll try the painted front sight first.
|
07-22-2017, 08:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 198
Likes: 1,190
Liked 215 Times in 99 Posts
|
|
Agree about the red dot.Even though I have some on various guns. That would be like putting spinner hub caps on a classic Corvette .
I was torn between the 17 and the 617 a while ago. I went with the 617 but still need to have a 17 someday.
|
07-22-2017, 08:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: western pennsylvania
Posts: 214
Likes: 331
Liked 207 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Congratulations on a beautiful wood and blue steel work of art. It's so refreshing to hear someone appreciate a new s&w instead of bitc___g about it.
|
07-22-2017, 09:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
I should be totally honest. All my other Smiths, and my Ruger Redhawk, have Hogue rubber. But, my Colt Model 1917 will keep it's smooth wood grips, and the M17 will keep it's wood grips.
Drill the top strap and mount a scope -- Outch !!
|
07-22-2017, 09:56 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
|
|
Sounds like you got a great buy. I'm a real fan of the K-22 and its descendants.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
07-22-2017, 10:37 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2
Drill the top strap and mount a scope -- Outch !!
|
If you do decide on a red dot, modern Smith and Wesson revolvers are already drilled and tapped for a scope mount.
Just remove the rear sight and attach the mount
|
07-22-2017, 12:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
If you do decide on a red dot, modern Smith and Wesson revolvers are already drilled and tapped for a scope mount.
Just remove the rear sight and attach the mount
|
That's good info, I would be a lot more willing to do that than drill the frame.
But, is the M17 considered "modern"?
|
07-22-2017, 12:21 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
|
|
No drilling required for the red dot:
Mount is available from a seller on this forum.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-22-2017, 12:41 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2
That's good info, I would be a lot more willing to do that than drill the frame.
But, is the M17 considered "modern"?
|
Smith and Wesson made this change to all their revolvers in the mid 1990s
Your Model 17 is built on a D&T frame
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|