Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2017, 06:39 PM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default New S&W 17-9

I already have two .22LR pistols (Walther P22 and Ruger Mark IV). But the head guy at my range has been saying I need a revolver, specifically a S&W 17.

I saw one yesterday that looked nice, but figured $862 is a lot for a .22 revolver. Today I thought, I'll be 70 in September, maybe the day will come when the .357 and .44 Mags get a bit much.

Anyway, I bought it today. I'll find out tomorrow at the range if it was a good way to spend $862. I also noticed the size is similar to a S&W 686, except mine is 4" and the 17 is 6".

The DA trigger pull is a little high, I understand all .22s are. However; the SA pull is really sweet. With a 6" barrel, I might get some 25 yard groups that make me feel good.

2017-07-20 16.47.18 (Medium).jpg

2017-07-20 16.47.50 (Medium).jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2017, 07:05 PM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
Default

Congratulations

The 22 Target Masterpiece (aka Model 17) has always been a favorite of mine. I have several new and old. I can not imagine being without one.

Your Model 17 is built on a K-frame which is slightly smaller and lighter than the L-frame your 686 is built on

If after some break-in time you still feel that your D/A trigger pull is too heavy, any competent gunsmith can help with that

I hope that you enjoy your new revolver as much as I have enjoyed mine over the years.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2017, 07:07 PM
markeb's Avatar
markeb markeb is online now
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Prowd Kentuckian
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 2,487
Liked 1,564 Times in 660 Posts
Default

You deserve an early Birthday present, and I think you chose well. Enjoy, and update that range outing.
__________________
"Happiness is a warm gun"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2017, 07:10 PM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default

colt saa,

Don't get me wrong. The DA trigger isn't "too heavy", just heavier than my 686. I have a Colt Model 1917 that is so heavy my Lyman gauge can't measure the pull. Guess the troops were tough in WW1.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2017, 07:23 PM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
Default

I bought a 617 last year, and did some trigger work on it. Despite some folks dislike for MIM parts, I found they were very smooth and in no need of stoning. The frame on the other hand had the usual amount of machining marks and one large burr. Cleaning it up and putting in a lighter rebound spring and hammer spring resulted in an amazing difference. Total time involved was maybe 20 minutes and well worth it, in my not so humble opinion.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2017, 05:32 PM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Well; I took the new S&W 17-9 out to the range today.

I managed to stay disciplined and serious for about 18 rounds. The accuracy I am able to achieve with this gun is amazing. Then, I started having a lot of fun, and discipline slipped a bit. I had a great time, but wasn't quite as accurate as when I started.

That happens to me everytime a new gun is a lot of fun to shoot. Next time out, I'll have it out of my system, and be able to get serious about practice again. I no longer have any concerns about the DA trigger pull. It's very smooth, and works just fine. I also have no concerns over the cost compared to other .22 handguns, it's worth every penny.


I'll paint the face of the front sight bright red before my next time out. That will make it easier on the eyes.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 07-21-2017, 05:40 PM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2 View Post
I'll paint the face of the front sight bright red before my next time out. That will make it easier on the eyes.
If you want to get serious on making it easier on the eyes, add a red dot. I started using them when my eyes started going south decades ago, and now, even with my sight being corrected with cataract implants, I still prefer the red dots hands down.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-22-2017, 06:09 AM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Tom,

I have red dots on four pistols and two rifles. But I'm not yet thinking about putting them on this one. I'll try the painted front sight first.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-22-2017, 08:04 AM
lunger's Avatar
lunger lunger is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 198
Likes: 1,190
Liked 215 Times in 99 Posts
Default

Agree about the red dot.Even though I have some on various guns. That would be like putting spinner hub caps on a classic Corvette .

I was torn between the 17 and the 617 a while ago. I went with the 617 but still need to have a 17 someday.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-22-2017, 08:44 AM
ejjeff ejjeff is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: western pennsylvania
Posts: 214
Likes: 331
Liked 207 Times in 91 Posts
Default

Congratulations on a beautiful wood and blue steel work of art. It's so refreshing to hear someone appreciate a new s&w instead of bitc___g about it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-22-2017, 09:17 AM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default

I should be totally honest. All my other Smiths, and my Ruger Redhawk, have Hogue rubber. But, my Colt Model 1917 will keep it's smooth wood grips, and the M17 will keep it's wood grips.

Drill the top strap and mount a scope -- Outch !!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-22-2017, 09:56 AM
Targets Guy's Avatar
Targets Guy Targets Guy is offline
US Veteran
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,968 Times in 5,588 Posts
Default

Sounds like you got a great buy. I'm a real fan of the K-22 and its descendants.
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-22-2017, 10:37 AM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2 View Post
Drill the top strap and mount a scope -- Outch !!
If you do decide on a red dot, modern Smith and Wesson revolvers are already drilled and tapped for a scope mount.

Just remove the rear sight and attach the mount
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-22-2017, 12:18 PM
jnichols2 jnichols2 is offline
Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 404
Likes: 36
Liked 491 Times in 190 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa View Post
If you do decide on a red dot, modern Smith and Wesson revolvers are already drilled and tapped for a scope mount.

Just remove the rear sight and attach the mount
That's good info, I would be a lot more willing to do that than drill the frame.

But, is the M17 considered "modern"?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-22-2017, 12:21 PM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
Default

No drilling required for the red dot:



Mount is available from a seller on this forum.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 07-22-2017, 12:41 PM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9 New S&W 17-9  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,450 Times in 5,824 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnichols2 View Post
That's good info, I would be a lot more willing to do that than drill the frame.

But, is the M17 considered "modern"?
Smith and Wesson made this change to all their revolvers in the mid 1990s

Your Model 17 is built on a D&T frame
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)