|
|
08-07-2017, 01:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Model 69 2.75" or 4"? "It's Here"
I'm ready to order a model 69 and am going back and forth on barrel length. I will not be hunting with it and will be shooting 44 Special type loads in it. I have a 300 grain cast bullet load I shoot in my suppressed Ruger 77/44 that is subsonic. I'd like a companion handgun to go with the rifle. I am leaning towards the 2.75" barrel. I like the looks of the short barrel, and it should be easier to carry on the hip. Thoughts?
Last edited by timspawn; 08-10-2017 at 01:39 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 02:49 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: upper corner lower alabam
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Liked 5,275 Times in 1,510 Posts
|
|
I have one with 4.25" bbl and it is a handful with Factory 44mag. While you're shooting 44spl, it is with 300gr loads, and probably hotter than factory LRN 44spl loads. Better sight radius, slightly better velocity, probably better accuracy(shootability) and only 1.5" more length. I don't want one shorter than 4.25". To me, only reason the shorter bbl makes possible sense is if it's only a concealed carry gun. I think it was well thought out in the original length, if only it didn't have the pimple on the side (lock) Good luck, I think you will like it either way, it's just personal preference.
That's a neat combo with the canned ruger! I hope you're killin lotsa hogs with it!!
__________________
PTLAPTA!
Last edited by S&W ucla; 08-07-2017 at 02:51 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 04:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 4,996
Liked 1,309 Times in 685 Posts
|
|
With 44 Special loaded I like the 2.75" barrel. It would be a fun gun and relatively easy to carry.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 06:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
If it's to be carried as a companion to a rifle then go for the sub 3" barrel for sure. I just did some light yard/machete work wearing a 4" barreled "N" frame... I barely noticed it was there. With the right holster & belt a 4" barreled revolver is easily doable. But I'd be lying if I said it wouldn't have been even easier with a 2.75" barrel...
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 06:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,602 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
The newly designed cylinder lock up on the 2.75 inch model is the reason I bought one.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 06:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Derby City,Ky.
Posts: 4,675
Likes: 5,277
Liked 3,503 Times in 1,680 Posts
|
|
I'm going to buy the S&W 69 .44 mag. 4.25" next month.That is my choice.
__________________
Life is short,live it fully.
Last edited by MCorps0311; 08-07-2017 at 06:34 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 07:11 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: upper corner lower alabam
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Liked 5,275 Times in 1,510 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macinaw
The newly designed cylinder lock up on the 2.75 inch model is the reason I bought one.
|
What was changed on the cylinder lockup? Usually if S&W makes an engineering change, it applies to all barrel lengths.
__________________
PTLAPTA!
|
08-07-2017, 07:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,602 Times in 538 Posts
|
|
Copied from another forum member's post.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-07-2017, 09:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by S&W ucla
I have one with 4.25" bbl and it is a handful with Factory 44mag. While you're shooting 44spl, it is with 300gr loads, and probably hotter than factory LRN 44spl loads. Better sight radius, slightly better velocity, probably better accuracy(shootability) and only 1.5" more length. I don't want one shorter than 4.25". To me, only reason the shorter bbl makes possible sense is if it's only a concealed carry gun. I think it was well thought out in the original length, if only it didn't have the pimple on the side (lock) Good luck, I think you will like it either way, it's just personal preference.
That's a neat combo with the canned ruger! I hope you're killin lotsa hogs with it!!
|
It works wonders on hogs!
|
08-07-2017, 09:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
|
|
As a companion to a rifle, I recommend the 2.75 inch. I'm really liking mine. Need to shoot it some more.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-08-2017, 02:37 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 5,859
Liked 9,271 Times in 3,480 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timspawn
I like the looks of the short barrel, and it should be easier to carry on the hip.
|
I do too.
Paul105 posted some chrono data & the 2-3/4" was surprisingly close on several loads, IIRC.
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-01a)
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-03a)
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-08-2017, 07:27 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 442
Likes: 679
Liked 282 Times in 147 Posts
|
|
You would think that the engineering change to the cylinder lock up would make it a 69-1....
|
08-08-2017, 07:54 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North of DFW metromess
Posts: 69
Likes: 486
Liked 77 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
I have carried my 69 in 2.75" configuration for 4 months now and I love it. I put the Pachmyer Diamond Pro grips on it and they tame the recoil quite a bit. I carry either 215gr or 240gr lsw at about 900fps in .44spl. Good accurate load with moderate recoil. Accuracy at 25 yds has been good with several loads in .44spl and .44mag. Recoil is manageable with .44mag factory loads, but the .44spl is more fun to shoot.
The only problem with the gun was a factory DA trigger pull at 14+ pounds, but that was easily remedied with a Wolf mainspring. I highly recommend the 2.75" version.
Last edited by km101; 08-08-2017 at 08:08 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-08-2017, 10:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 580
Liked 1,839 Times in 603 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timspawn
I'm ready to order a model 69 and am going back and forth on barrel length. I will not be hunting with it and will be shooting 44 Special type loads in it. I have a 300 grain cast bullet load I shoot in my suppressed Ruger 77/44 that is subsonic. I'd like a companion handgun to go with the rifle. I am leaning towards the 2.75" barrel. I like the looks of the short barrel, and it should be easier to carry on the hip. Thoughts?
|
Your 300gr subsonic rifle load will probably only clock 800 or 900 fps in either barrel length. This will most likely require a higher front sight to properly regulate point of impact.
Either should work fine for your application. I have both and carry all day everyday - the 4 1/4" is my choice, although I could live happily with the 2 3/4" gun.
FWIW,
Paul
|
08-08-2017, 12:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEDOT37
I do too.
Paul105 posted some chrono data & the 2-3/4" was surprisingly close on several loads, IIRC.
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-01a)
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-03a)
.
|
These pictures sold me. I just ordered the 2.75" barrel. I should have it Thursday or Friday.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-08-2017, 02:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: upper corner lower alabam
Posts: 2,509
Likes: 0
Liked 5,275 Times in 1,510 Posts
|
|
So we'll expect a range report by Monday!
__________________
PTLAPTA!
|
08-08-2017, 02:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by S&W ucla
So we'll expect a range report by Monday!
|
I'll do my best!
|
08-09-2017, 08:49 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Brooksville, FL
Posts: 727
Likes: 4,447
Liked 991 Times in 372 Posts
|
|
Hay timspawn, very nice pics, I wish my 69 snub had a barrel crown as good as yours! I love mine, I'm sure you will to!
Good luck
SEMPER PARATUS
__________________
NRA Life Member
CPO
|
08-09-2017, 10:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 390
Liked 2,827 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
I have both. I'd pick the longer barrel for hunting, but since I use mine primarily as a 44 special home defense/plinking gun, I'll probably end up selling the longer barrel.
|
08-10-2017, 01:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 5,859
Liked 9,271 Times in 3,480 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gripgrabber
...I wish my 69 snub had a barrel crown as good as yours!
|
I chamfered it, as I've done to most of mine.
.
66 Combat Magnum - muzzle recrowned/chamfered
(-02b.jpg)
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-10-2017, 08:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 2,735
Liked 1,373 Times in 573 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timspawn
These pictures sold me. I just ordered the 2.75" barrel. I should have it Thursday or Friday.
|
That is one bad --- looking revolver. A nice thing about the 44 magnum is that finding an accurate load is really easy if you hand load. Plus you can have all the velocity you want but don't really need it to have an effective load. I like the .357 a lot but the versatility and flexibility of the .44 magnum is amazing.
|
08-10-2017, 10:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
BLUEDOT37
What do you use to chamfer your barrels?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-10-2017, 01:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Other than some cosmetic dings around the muzzle and a slight ring around the ejector rod where the finish is gone, everything looks good.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-11-2017, 12:18 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 5,859
Liked 9,271 Times in 3,480 Posts
|
|
Muzzle chamfering
Quote:
Originally Posted by timspawn
What do you use to chamfer your barrels?
|
Tools I got from Brownell's.
The 45˚ chamfer cutter screws into the handle & the brass .44 muzzle pilot (#080-944-440WB, not shown) inserts into the nose of the cutter & is held in place by a set screw. You'll also need some cutting oil (not shown).
Use the 45˚ brass lap in an electric drill & some abrasive 600 grit compound (#083-045-600WB, not shown) to polish the cut . Finish off the chamfer with some 1200 grit wet & dry sandpaper.
.
Brownells Chamfering Tools
(-01a)
.
Brownells Chamfering Tools
(-02a)
.
.
Be careful, you may like it so much you find others to do...
.
629-6 Classic, muzzle chamfer
(-02a)
.
627-5 PC, barrel crown, after
(-01a)
.
686-6 TALO, barrel chamfer, after
(-01a)
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 08-11-2017 at 01:32 AM.
Reason: .
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-11-2017, 10:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SW FL
Posts: 120
Likes: 15
Liked 176 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Thank you very much.
|
08-12-2017, 12:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEDOT37
I do too.
Paul105 posted some chrono data & the 2-3/4" was surprisingly close on several loads, IIRC.
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-01a)
.
69 Combat Magnum
(-03a)
.
|
Now that is a sexy "Combat Magnum!" I love a .44 Mag loaded with .44Spec for sure. You can load the Special up near to near nuclear levels topped off with a Hard Cast "Keith Bullet" or download them as you will. Nice piece for sure! A sub 3" barreled revolver in .44Spec, Mag or even a .45 caliber revolver is about as good as it gets in the CCW department for me. YMMV...
Last edited by HamHands; 08-12-2017 at 12:12 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|