Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2017, 01:39 PM
1sailor 1sailor is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 89
Liked 1,648 Times in 584 Posts
Default Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost

I currently carry an M&P340. Nice light pistol, easy to carry, and pretty dead on out to about 50ft. This is way more than satisfactory for up close protection. As you get past the 50ft mark it starts drifting off to the right pretty quickly. I'm not sure if it's the sights or if because of the ultra light weight I'm pulling it off to the right as I pull the trigger. I have a 2.5" K model that I can shoot dead center at 20 meters in DA. I've been thinking about getting something a little heavier to carry when we go to the city. I'm hoping the heavier pistol will allow me to be a little more accurate beyond the 50ft mark. My K frame is not nearly as easy to conceal as a J frame. I tried a Shield .45 and it will shoot amazing groups out to at least 20+ meters but it just doesn't conceal as well on me as a J frame. Anyway, I've been looking at some M640's which can be had used for around $400 in the original box with all the stuff they come with and in excellent condition. Or I can also get a 640 PRO which has the drift adjustable sights. Of course with the PRO model I'd be paying at least $200 more than the standard 640. I hate spending an extra $200 but at the same time I don't want to end up wishing I had spent the extra money if the standard model doesn't give me what I'm wanting. I'm sure a lot of you guys have 640's and I'm hoping at least some of you have at least been able to compare the standard and the PRO models. I'm pretty sure that anyone who owns a PRO is going to be happy with it but how do it and the standard 640 compare in real world shooting.

Last edited by 1sailor; 10-07-2017 at 01:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 10-07-2017, 02:06 PM
dubshooter dubshooter is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 543
Likes: 136
Liked 1,042 Times in 310 Posts
Default

I have a recent production standard 640. Shoot it very well. We qualify out to 25 yards and I have no problem. Little orange paint on the front sight and I was good. Carries great in my Lobo Leather offset belt clip. It’s with me everyday, at work or off duty.

No experience with the pro models. I like the idea of the sights, but I don’t like 3 dots. I prefer an all black rear sight. So the standard model is just fine for me. And I found a good deal on it.

Only change I made was a set of UM boot grips instead of the standard 3 finger grips it came with. I like flush bottom and exposed back strap

Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 10-07-2017, 03:01 PM
Mister X Mister X is online now
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 414
Liked 2,249 Times in 1,032 Posts
Default

The 340 will be perfectly adequate in the vast majority of civilian defense scenarios you are likely to be involved in. Unless you are making some really bad decisions that put you at risk, the odds are relatively low that you'll ever be forced to fire a weapon in self-defense and astronomically low that you would have to make hits past a few feet or yards. Civilian defense encounter are almost always close, quick and short lived. If the 340 wasn't adequate in a particular situation, I think it unlikely the 640 would be either since the most likely shortcoming would be capacity and the only solution there would probably be an autoloader. I'd simply stuck with the 340 since I don't see a practical need to burden yourself with a heavier, more difficult to carry gun for no added benefit, but if you do, I would just go with a standard 640.

Last edited by Mister X; 10-07-2017 at 04:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 10-07-2017, 03:16 PM
1sailor 1sailor is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 89
Liked 1,648 Times in 584 Posts
Default

I mostly agree with you regarding defense situations. While living in big cities I was jumped twice and successfully robbed once. Both times it was up close and very personal. The thing I am thinking of is when we take trips up to the city. These days it seems to have become more common for insane people to take there final acts of aggression out on crowds of innocent people. For these situations if I did need to draw and fire I would prefer to keep as much distance as I can between me and the A.H. doing the shooting. The nice thing about the standard 640 is that I can swap out the front sight so my sight picture is nearly the same between it and my M&P340. On the other hand there's no reason to spend the money on a pistol that won't offer the advantages I'm hoping for. Although it would still make a great gift for somebody now that xmas is coming up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2017, 03:35 PM
dubshooter dubshooter is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 543
Likes: 136
Liked 1,042 Times in 310 Posts
Default

Mister X, sometimes people come to gun boards with outlandish scenarios theyve concocted just as an excuse to buy a new gun. And you’ve gone and ruined this mans excuse. Now he has to think up another reason to buy that 640 that he wants!

It’s a great gun. I want a 340 due to the light weight aspect. But I have a M38 that isn’t much different. And my 640 can do everything the 340 can. But I still want one.
The 640 is also a lot more fun at shoot.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 10-07-2017, 04:14 PM
sdb321 sdb321 is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: LaFontaine In.
Posts: 397
Likes: 5,628
Liked 629 Times in 236 Posts
Default 640 PRO??

Is the 640 Pro worth the extra money? I have one and knowing then what I know now I would buy a standard 640 and have a action job performed on it. When I bought my pro it suffered from a long ratchet. So I had my smith fix that and do a deluxe action job while he was in there. Although the night sights are super. "Pros and cons. LOL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-07-2017, 04:17 PM
ContinentalOp's Avatar
ContinentalOp ContinentalOp is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 13,115
Liked 12,802 Times in 4,228 Posts
Default

My thoughts, for whatever they're worth...

I don't have experience with either the 640 or the 640 Pro. I will say that for several years my "grail gun" has been the 640 no-dash. I think having a steel J-frame has a lot of merit if you already have a lightweight snub. I belt carry 99.9999999999% of the time, so in that sense the weight difference between a 340 and a 640 wouldn't make much difference (not that I wouldn't notice the difference, just that it wouldn't make much difference to me). I do like the idea of carrying a lightweight snub and having a similar, but heavier, steel snub for the bulk of my practice (periodic practice/training with the lightweight snub would still be necessary). It would also make longer training courses more comfortable.

The difference is really in the sights (the Pro is cut for moon clips, but that's a moot point for me). I prefer my self defense guns to have, essentially, the same sight picture, which is one of the reasons I prefer plain black sights. I was curious so I compared the M&P 340, 640 Pro, and 640. As it turns out, both the M&P 340 and the regular 640 have pinned front sights, so it looks like you could get the same front sight mounted on the 640. The front sight on the 640 Pro is dovetailed, plus it has the 2-dot tritium rear sight.

So, if I were in your position, I would get the regular 640 as a supplement to the M&P 340. Then I would have the same front sight as the M&P 340 installed on the 640 (I have neither the tools nor the skills to do it myself). Paint the 640's rear sight black to match the 340's finish, and you have two guns with the same sight picture, a light one for regular carry and occasional practice and a heavier one for regular practice and carry at other times. Or, if you felt the need, carry both.

Just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 10-07-2017, 04:40 PM
GTBL's Avatar
GTBL GTBL is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 251
Likes: 731
Liked 420 Times in 153 Posts
Default

Have the 640 Pro and carry it everyday. To me, it was worth the extra money. Love the Night Sights, the fluted barrel and option to use Moon Clips.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 640.jpg (33.5 KB, 129 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:04 PM
1sailor 1sailor is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 89
Liked 1,648 Times in 584 Posts
Default

There's a couple of nice 640's coming up on GB soon so lets see what happens. My feelings on it are pretty much the same as continentalOp. Dubshooter, you might be partly right but sadly that scenario is maybe not as outlandish as it once was.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:08 PM
Mister X Mister X is online now
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 414
Liked 2,249 Times in 1,032 Posts
Default

One consideration would be how you plan on carrying it. I've previously owned both 640's and 340's in the past and found the 640 wasn't ideal for pocket carry while the 642/442 pretty much hit the sweet spot for me in terms of weight, cost and proven dependability. I have two 642's and do most of my hard training with an old beater 442. Most people do find the 640 more pleasant to train with and less so with the air-weights, but how much depends on the individual and I personally don't find it prohibitively unpleasant to put as many rounds down range as I want to with the 442. Plus I like training with a weapon that is identical(aside from color) to my carry gun.

I honestly don't spend too much time worrying about active-shooter scenarios because despite all of the fanatical media coverage they receive, they are an exceedingly rare occurrence and there are much more important and common potential personal defense encounters to focus on. However, if you are one of the select unlucky few to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and there is a substantial gap between you and the shooter, my recommendation would be to get yourself and your family away from the scene as quickly as possible. I for sure wouldn't recommend getting into a long range shootout against a homicidal/suicidal individual armed with an AR or AK when all you have is a snub revolver if you can avoid it. My recommendation would be the same even if armed with a Glock 17. In very close-quarters, the dynamics probably wouldn't differ all that much from any other defense scenario and there isn't going to be much difference between the 340 and 640 in such cases except maybe the latter would offer a bit more recoil management and perhaps make for a slightly better striking implement if things were to become that desperate. I travel to many of the largest cities in the country on a regular basis and feel well armed and well served by my 642.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:18 PM
Joe4d Joe4d is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Virginia
Posts: 273
Likes: 42
Liked 165 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Hey if we were all realistic we'd all only have one gun. So any excuse to buy a new gun is a good one.
Logically ? buy a good concealed holster for that K frame. Its not all that much of a size difference.
Far as the 340 ? trade it, I wont own an unaccurate gun, I dont care if it most likely will only be used point blank .
Then use the money to buy the 640 pro.
Better sights.
Better windage adjustment.
Moonclips.. I like moon clips.
easy enough to black out rear dots. I like a dot front but hate anything but black rear.
All my other handguns have Bomar or Novak style rear sights.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:18 PM
luangtom's Avatar
luangtom luangtom is offline
US Veteran
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Hall County, GA
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 513
Liked 741 Times in 324 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1sailor View Post
I mostly agree with you regarding defense situations. While living in big cities I was jumped twice and successfully robbed once. Both times it was up close and very personal. The thing I am thinking of is when we take trips up to the city. These days it seems to have become more common for insane people to take there final acts of aggression out on crowds of innocent people. For these situations if I did need to draw and fire I would prefer to keep as much distance as I can between me and the A.H. doing the shooting. The nice thing about the standard 640 is that I can swap out the front sight so my sight picture is nearly the same between it and my M&P340. On the other hand there's no reason to spend the money on a pistol that won't offer the advantages I'm hoping for. Although it would still make a great gift for somebody now that xmas is coming up.
I did just what you suggested...I put the XS-Sight Regular-Dot on my standard M640. Works very well out to 25-yards.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
__________________
GA Carry member
Vietnam Vet
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:25 PM
JohnRippert's Avatar
JohnRippert JohnRippert is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Meadows Place, Texas
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 24,898
Liked 16,286 Times in 4,142 Posts
Default

I think the sights alone make it worth the scratch. That is the only thing I would change on my two 640-1's.

Last edited by JohnRippert; 10-07-2017 at 07:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-2017, 05:49 PM
dubshooter dubshooter is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 543
Likes: 136
Liked 1,042 Times in 310 Posts
Default

Speaking of the active shooters, at 25 yards, even with faith I could make the shot with adrenaline pumping, my biggest thing I consider is how many people are running in between me and my target that may run right in front of me when I pull that trigger? Or who or how many people behind him?

But that’s a side note. I think you will be very happy with either 640 you purchase. Very easy to carry tucked appendix IWB.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 10-07-2017, 08:54 PM
Bill In Texas Bill In Texas is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Home is Texas.
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 3,402
Liked 1,402 Times in 843 Posts
Default

I, like Continental Op, like my carry guns to have as close to the same sight picture as possible. My main carry is a 640-1. I painted the front sight bright green and blacked out the rear. I did the same with my bug, a 637-2 with a bobbed hammer spur.

Now, I'm no long distance shooter, but this works for me out to 15 yards or so with either gun. My recommendation would be the standard 640, however either makes a great carry piece!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-08-2017, 12:31 PM
Jingles's Avatar
Jingles Jingles is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 628
Likes: 76
Liked 1,112 Times in 356 Posts
Default

I got a Pro because of the sights and they turned out to be the better than I hoped. They are the best sights I have ever found on a compact defensive revolver.

Smooth action, moon clips, fluted barrel are all just icing in the cake compared to the sights.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 10-08-2017, 12:51 PM
springer99's Avatar
springer99 springer99 is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mid-Pa aka Pennsytucky
Posts: 183
Likes: 66
Liked 177 Times in 80 Posts
Default

Personally, I suggest you actually look at the nite-sights on the Pro version to make up your mind. I had a Pro version of the Model 60 and the nite-sights were so small as to be almost useless from a practical standpoint. I don't use moon clips so I find that the standard 640 is fine for it's intended purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-08-2017, 01:41 PM
1sailor 1sailor is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 89
Liked 1,648 Times in 584 Posts
Default

This is where you guys living in a city have an advantage. It's a long drive for me to any real gun shops and usually impossible to even find a pistol I want to look at. Finding two that I can compare side by side has never actually happened.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 10-08-2017, 01:48 PM
les.b's Avatar
les.b les.b is offline
US Veteran
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 104,949
Liked 22,295 Times in 4,529 Posts
Default

Well, I have a bunch of these little guys, and I love the sights on the 640-1 Pro Series. Here are some of my centennials together, where you can compare them a little.



Best Regards, Les
__________________
SWCA 3084, SWHF 495, PGCA 3064
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-09-2017, 08:40 AM
digiroc's Avatar
digiroc digiroc is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 585
Likes: 296
Liked 1,182 Times in 374 Posts
Default 640 Pro Series is worth it ...



I have three J frames in .357 Magnum and the 640 Pro Series is the only one that I run Magnum ammo in.

The Crimson Trace laser grips offer an air channel over the backstrap that reduces felt recoil to manageable levels.

The night sights on the Pro are the best of any J frame that I have handled. This feature alone make the Pro Series worth the price of admission.

The Model 60 Lady Smith has the lightest pull and best trigger of all the J frames. The small wood grips are great for concealment but harder to hold onto with Magnum loads so I feed it +p's in .38 Special.


Putting an XS Big Dot Tritium front sight on the Lady Smith makes it an excellent carry gun.

The 360PD AirLite is the lightest, by far, of the three but this very lightness makes it a beast to shoot. Great to carry, but difficult to manage the blast and recoil.



Under a pound loaded and holstered. Shown with the CT laser grip that has been moved to the 340 Pro. I'll be getting another CT grip for this ultra lightweight J frame to help with recoil.

With J frames you pays your money and you makes your choices. If I kept only one, it would be the 640 Pro.

digiroc
__________________
Shoot Well My Friends

Last edited by digiroc; 10-09-2017 at 08:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 10-09-2017, 01:15 PM
Mister X Mister X is online now
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 414
Liked 2,249 Times in 1,032 Posts
Default

I'd recommend saving your money and spend it on something more useful.

Moonclip capability sounds nice, but considering the fragility of the clips themselves and the potential reliability issues whether using the clips or not, I think a gun cut for moonclips is most suited for gun games and best avoided on a personal defense weapon.

A lot of fuss is made over sights, but the reality is that they really are not all that relevant in the vast majority of armed defense scenarios in which a civilian would be involved. And the incidents where sights might be useful, night sights would be of no added benefit over standards ones. For civilian personal defense, threat focused shooting is the norm and is almost always preferred considering the reactive nature of such events and the distances at which they occur. And while I think it is possible to align the sights while visually focused on a target in a controlled range environment, such is not likely the case in a dynamic one where you will rely primarily on physical indexing methods and the guns silhouette superimposed on the threat and I don't think sights contribute anything meaningful to aiming the weapon in this manner.

Just as a revolution occurred in the martial arts after the rise of NHB/MMA, I sometimes think something similar needs to happen with the shooting arts.

With reality-based and Force-on-Force training steadily gaining greater acceptance and credibility among reputable instructors who are starting to understand its value, it could be said it has already begun to some degree, but there are still countless holdouts who think the lessons learned are somehow invalid or that everything you could ever need to know about defensive shooting can be learned by static range work. And unless participants actually start using live ammo in FoF so that there is absolutely no doubt regarding the results, widespread acceptance will continue to be a gradual and relatively slow process. While FoF isn't the end all, be all(the same applies to MMA in relation to H2H) in the context of training for personal defense, it's about the best simulation currently available in terms of realistic training and everyone would be wise to learn and understand at least some portion of the useful elements that have been derived from it and apply it to their own training methods and preparedness plan. I think doing so would radically change opinions just as the UFC did with the martial arts.

If we take what we have learned from Force-on-Force and combine it with an analysis of real world events, it becomes clear what role handgun sights(in general and in particular night sights) actually play in civilian personal defense encounters, which is actually a relatively minor one.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-10-2017, 10:28 PM
TENWOLVES TENWOLVES is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 28
Likes: 25
Liked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Default

My 640 Pro is accurate, has a great smooth trigger, has enough heft to handle Buffalo Bore 38 special+P with ease, even though it's rated for 357 magnum, I carry the later, +P will do the job, one of the things about the 640 Pro is the night sights that work well, nice feature, and of course the gun just feels great in my hand as do most j-frames...
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #23  
Old 10-10-2017, 11:07 PM
Big Cholla Big Cholla is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 5,932
Liked 5,259 Times in 1,732 Posts
Default

Been carrying a small revolver EDC for more than 30 yrs. now. I've been thru a bunch.... M 10-2" RB, M 31, M 36, M 60, M 640, M 642, Colt DS, and finally a M 640 Pro. IMHO, It is the definitive small self defense revolver. As stated, the sights are the best bar none, the 357 M chambering is a plus, the moon clip is nice and the ergonomics for me at least are the best. I too carry 38 Special +Ps with a strip speed loader of 357 M.

I was pleasantly surprised at the perfectness of the action and the finish. I'm a pistolsmith and can perform any tuneup required. Other than opening it up just to look, clean and oil, I have not felt the need to do any modifications. Out to a normal pocket pistol range I can shoot it right along with my M 66, 2.5". I have carried it on my ankle, in a very light shoulder holster and a IWB holster... all very comfortably. If I have to carry in the front pocket of my Jeans, I switch back to the M 642. IMHO, it is worth the price. ......

Living on the edge of the desert, we experience coyotes in our street or our yard at least one or two nights per month. When I walk our little foofoo dogs out at night to do their duty I carry the M 640 Pro. Our 85 lb. Pit-bull/Mastiff can take care of her self. ... :-)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #24  
Old 10-15-2017, 04:51 PM
pazzo pazzo is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 137
Likes: 83
Liked 114 Times in 44 Posts
Default

I was actually thinking about the 640Pro until I handled one a few weeks ago. I to didn’t like the sights, but could’ve lived with them. I did fondle the PS M60 today and really liked the balance.
Something about 3” barrel I like.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-18-2017, 09:01 AM
jeeps jeeps is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southside
Posts: 919
Likes: 280
Liked 1,278 Times in 417 Posts
Default

This year I shot the TDI stubby class 16 hours and 750 rounds with the 640 pro. It performed great and was very accurate. I carry IWB and the 158 S.W.C. +P. Night sites are nice in hotel rooms . I have the banana grips on since I do not pocket carry,but outside coat pockets in cold weather.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #26  
Old 10-18-2017, 10:11 AM
two-bit cowboy's Avatar
two-bit cowboy two-bit cowboy is offline
US Veteran
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: trail's end in ol' Wyo
Posts: 7,206
Likes: 17,364
Liked 18,221 Times in 5,014 Posts
Default I simply can't resist the 640 Pro threads.

It seems the more times this question gets asked the better the responses become. There's some well-thought-out self defense logic here among a bunch of just plain ol' common sense. I appreciate both aspects, but I tend to rely on the common sense.

A Centennial for ccw makes sense to me. I started with the M&P 340, then I moved on to the 640 Pro. At the end of the day I truly don't know the 8-ounce difference between the two (4 o'clock in a Lobo Enhanced Pancake). I'm better with the 640, but I attribute that to more time on the range. I'm not at all shabby with the 340. I don't train out to long distances; the Monty Python movie said it best, "Run away, run away."

Since getting hooked on these two Cents I've added an older 642 (no +P), a 940, a 43C and a 1955 steel Centennial. I like 'em all, but the original two are the only ones I carry due to the horsepower (my perception of a thread has more than two legs). I don't get hung up on the sights because that's not the way I train. One's as good as another.

The 43C is the most fun to shoot! The 640 Pro is the best looking! Neither of those attributes gets points if a time comes where I need to present it (not yet!).

My two bits,

Bob
__________________
Wrangler of stray Chiefs
Bob
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-18-2017, 10:28 AM
iPac's Avatar
iPac iPac is offline
Member
Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost Is the 640 PRO worth the extra cost  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1,565
Liked 1,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister X View Post
A lot of fuss is made over sights, but the reality is that they really are not all that relevant in the vast majority of armed defense scenarios in which a civilian would be involved. And the incidents where sights might be useful, night sights would be of no added benefit over standards ones. For civilian personal defense, threat focused shooting is the norm and is almost always preferred considering the reactive nature of such events and the distances at which they occur. And while I think it is possible to align the sights while visually focused on a target in a controlled range environment, such is not likely the case in a dynamic one where you will rely primarily on physical indexing methods and the guns silhouette superimposed on the threat and I don't think sights contribute anything meaningful to aiming the weapon in this manner.
This is a good point MisterX.

After speaking with renowned SAA expert Jim Martin on the phone one day, he informed me of how he only point shoots and how he is able to teach folks in 1hr or money back. This peaked my interest so I began reading books on point shooting. The ones composed by Fairbairn, Sykes, Applegate, etc. (I have digital copies of those books.)

The fact that one is not usually going to be able to "set up" a bullseye target shot in a self defense situation, it really gives the incentive of breaking one's reliance on sights.

I have begun training with point shooting, and I will say it is relatively easy. However, I haven't trained enough to where I'm a super shot. So while practicing I began to try different things, and found that I can focus solely on the target while just slightly referencing my front sight peripherally. Can get good, fast accuracy like that.

So now I just need a bright and easy to pick up front sight, and it's only used briefly for alignment reference. Anything else just isn't needed. In fact, I wish I could remove the blocky rear accro and install some kind of slimmer custom "channel" sight like most snubbies have.

Of course not everyone will pursue this, but it's an idea if one wants to. Relying on sights is never good if you have to use your gun.

Last edited by iPac; 10-18-2017 at 10:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trigger stop an extra cost option? Frank237 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 20 03-31-2015 01:14 PM
Chronograph - worth the cost? Double-O-Dave Reloading 49 09-24-2013 11:57 AM
Cost of Used M&P 15-22 with 2 extra 32rd mags, and a 550 box of 22 ammo TommyTtapz Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 7 05-30-2013 07:00 PM
945 PC. Is it worth the extra cost? 686forme Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 15 01-14-2013 04:48 PM
627PC is it worth the cost tlr16 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 11-29-2010 09:21 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)