|
|
10-15-2017, 09:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Likes: 29
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Model 686-1 vs 686-4
I have a Model 686-1 with 6" barrel that I purchased new in October 1987. Comments in various threads have stated that the 686-4 is the most desirable and valuable model. My question is - -what are the technical or design improvements/modifications that were made between the model progression from 686-no dash to 686-4. Any help in this regard would be appreciated.
Bob
|
10-15-2017, 09:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 165
Likes: 53
Liked 156 Times in 64 Posts
|
|
From Wiki, I assume it's accurate:
686 no dash, introduced model
686-1, 1986, radius stud package, floating hand
686-2, 1987, changed hammer nose, bushing and associated parts
686-3, 1988, new yoke retention system
686-4, 1993, change rear sight leaf, drill and tap frame, change extractor, Hogue grips
686-5, 1997, change frame design to eliminate cylinder stop stud, eliminate serrated tangs, change to metal injection molded (MIM) hammer with floating firing pin, change to MIM trigger, change internal lockwork
686-6, 2001, internal lock
|
10-15-2017, 04:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,369
Likes: 592
Liked 2,596 Times in 1,132 Posts
|
|
One advantage of some of the older versions is a pinned front sight, usually a black Patridge, instead of an integral sight, usually a red ramp.
Ed
|
10-15-2017, 06:44 PM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 3,410
Liked 6,481 Times in 3,065 Posts
|
|
I believe it was the -5 that universally had the pinned front sight. Prior to that, it was only used sporadically on certain variations of the M686. Such as the Patridge sight option Ed mentions.
__________________
~ S&W aficionado in training ~
Last edited by Kernel Crittenden; 10-15-2017 at 06:46 PM.
|
10-15-2017, 07:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 387
Liked 5,641 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
|
If your 686-1 has had the recall done, it has effectively been updated to a 686-2.
The biggest difference, in my opinion, between your 686-1 and a 686-4 is the use of the new style rear sight (round tang), as the old square tang sights are no longer available from Smith. That plus the drilled and tapped top strap are value added items.
Adios,
Pizza Bob
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
|
10-15-2017, 07:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
I can add that earlier 686s had flash chromed hammers and triggers to match the silver color of stainless steel and stop them from rusting. Those were discontinued to reduce parts inventory. While that down grade did not get an increase in dash number most or all dash 3s have flash chromed hammers and triggers and most or all dash 4s have case colored hammers and triggers. Also, round butt grip frames superseded square butt grip frames across the whole revolver line during the 686-4 years. Wood stocks were standard on nearly all Dash 3s and earlier dashes. Wood was replaced by rubber Hogues in the dash 4s.
Whether the dash 4's optical sight mounting holes add value depends on whether you'll actually use them. Most owners do not.
I do not intend to bad mouth 686-4s. They are great revolvers. However, they are not necessarily the vintage of 686 that has the combination of features that will make you the happiest.
|
10-15-2017, 08:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,855
Likes: 9,468
Liked 14,848 Times in 5,049 Posts
|
|
We've had a lot of discussion lately on how amazing the 686-4 is... but here's something that I haven't heard mentioned.
I've seen tons of 686's. I've had three of my own and I have helped friends shop for others and dangit, I have clicked on every 686 thread on every board, every time they come up.
In my experience, the 686-2 is without any doubt the RAREST of all the variations.
So for all the features we often talk about, consider two points:
--every pre-lock 686 is fantastic
--686-2 is the rarest, made in the shortest supply
Does this matter? Nope.
But it's neat.
|
10-15-2017, 10:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
If you are not wed to forged internals and a less common but still well known variation is desired the 686-5 7 shot Mountain Gun comes to mind. They could be thought of as an improved Model 66. They had the same weight with and extra round and better durability firing .357s.
We used to frequently have threads in which the desirability of 3" CS-1s was touted. The threads stopped after S&W made quantities of 7 shot 3" 686s but that did not reduce the capabilities of the CS-1s. Oddly S&W gave the 3" 7 shot 686s the short extractor rods that are used in 2 1/2" revolvers. One of the virtues of 3" CS-1s was they had the full length extractor rods used in 4" revolvers.
My point is the dash 4s are not everyone's first choice.
|
10-15-2017, 10:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Derby City,Ky.
Posts: 4,675
Likes: 5,277
Liked 3,504 Times in 1,680 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bangbig
From Wiki, I assume it's accurate:
686 no dash, introduced model
686-1, 1986, radius stud package, floating hand
686-2, 1987, changed hammer nose, bushing and associated parts
686-3, 1988, new yoke retention system
686-4, 1993, change rear sight leaf, drill and tap frame, change extractor, Hogue grips
686-5, 1997, change frame design to eliminate cylinder stop stud, eliminate serrated tangs, change to metal injection molded (MIM) hammer with floating firing pin, change to MIM trigger, change internal lockwork
686-6, 2001, internal lock
|
Thank you for sharing this,I never thought to google this info.
__________________
Life is short,live it fully.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|