Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2018, 10:39 PM
ARAK1547 ARAK1547 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 81
Likes: 6
Liked 200 Times in 35 Posts
Default Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)

So I was finger banging my Smith today (acquired the full package, box and all, for $550) and noticed this



-1 overstamped with a -2. *** is this? Transition period from the -1 to -2?


And porn of it




Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 05-19-2018, 10:52 PM
g8rb8 g8rb8 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 5,443
Liked 2,921 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

That's a nice looking revolver and a nice package.

First the facts.
66-1 was made circa 1977 to 1982 and the barrel was pinned and the cylinder was recessed, i.e. counter bored.
66-2 was made circa 1982 to 1986 and the pinned barrel and the recessed cylinder was eliminated.
Serial number 127K627 dates to 1982.
The barrel on your revolver is not pinned, i.e. consistent with a dash-2 or later.
There appears to be a 1 under the 2 (or some people might see it the other way, a 1 over a 2).

Now for the conjecture.
I cannot tell from the pictures if the cylinder is recessed. It looks like there's a fair chance it could be. Looking at the back of the cylinder would answer the question. If the cylinder is recessed many would refer to your revolver as a "transitional" example, i.e. having some traits of the newer model (unpinned barrel) and some traits of the older model (recessed or counter bored cylinder). More than likely your frame had been struck with the dash-1 prior to the engineering changes made to the dash-2 and during the production process the engineering change was made and the 1 on the frame was over-struck with a 2.
__________________
Scoundrel & Ne'er-Do-Well

Last edited by g8rb8; 05-19-2018 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2018, 10:57 PM
ARAK1547 ARAK1547 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 81
Likes: 6
Liked 200 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g8rb8 View Post
That's a nice looking revolver and a nice package.

First the facts.
66-1 was made circa 1977 to 1982 and the barrel was pinned and the cylinder was recessed, i.e. counter bored.
66-2 was made circa 1982 to 1986 and the pinned barrel and the recess cylinder was eliminated.
Serial number 127K627 dates to 1982.
The barrel on your revolver is not pinned.
There appears to be a 1 under the 2 (or some people might see it the other way, a 1 over a 2).

Now for the conjecture.
I cannot tell from the pictures if the cylinder is recessed. If the cylinder is recessed many would refer to your revolver as a "transitional" example, i.e. having some traits of the newer model and some traits of the older model. If the cylinder is not recessed then you have a frame that was was either incorrectly stamped and then corrected or had been in production at the time of the engineering change and originally stamped as a dash-1 and then purposefully re-struck with a dash-2.
Non-recessed


Last edited by ARAK1547; 05-19-2018 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 05-20-2018, 11:50 AM
njl njl is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 136
Likes: 5
Liked 71 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Where the heck did you find that for $550? Around here, they’d have been asking a couple hundred more for that package.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 05-20-2018, 12:15 PM
apollo99 apollo99 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 103
Liked 1,475 Times in 601 Posts
Default

That's a good deal on a fine revolver, If you can't get used to that -2 over the -1 thing, I'll take it off your hands. Congratulations on your purchase.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-20-2018, 01:51 PM
Nesmith's Avatar
Nesmith Nesmith is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Cumberlands of TN
Posts: 74
Likes: 142
Liked 126 Times in 28 Posts
Default Another one!

I have a 66-2 that is stamped exactly the same (“2” stamped on top of “1”). It is neither pinned nor recessed. I agree with g8rb8 on the likely production scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-20-2018, 09:30 PM
ARAK1547 ARAK1547 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 81
Likes: 6
Liked 200 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njl View Post
Where the heck did you find that for $550? Around here, they’d have been asking a couple hundred more for that package.
Local FFL has it on consignment.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2018, 09:31 PM
ARAK1547 ARAK1547 is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 81
Likes: 6
Liked 200 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo99 View Post
That's a good deal on a fine revolver, If you can't get used to that -2 over the -1 thing, I'll take it off your hands. Congratulations on your purchase.
It’s going nowhere lol.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2018, 03:23 AM
SeamasterSig SeamasterSig is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 494
Likes: 1,457
Liked 534 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARAK1547 View Post
So I was finger banging my Smith today
Congratulations on scoring the quintessential revolver of the 20th century for an amazing price! I, too, have a 4-inch 66-2 and consider it to be the perfect foundation for every S&W collection.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2018, 10:13 AM
Hasbeen1945 Hasbeen1945 is offline
Absent Comrade
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Deer Park Texas
Posts: 450
Likes: 410
Liked 596 Times in 212 Posts
Default

I guess mean there are still some good deals out there. You did extremely well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-25-2018, 10:47 PM
Warren Sear's Avatar
Warren Sear Warren Sear is offline
Member
Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1) Question on my 66-2 (maybe -1)  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 10,990
Liked 10,879 Times in 3,281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo99 View Post
That's a good deal on a fine revolver, If you can't get used to that -2 over the -1 thing, I'll take it off your hands. Congratulations on your purchase.
I am willing to lend a hand, too. :-)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question About Smith Model 360PD Scandium/Titanium Question Rhetorician S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 03-28-2015 09:25 AM
Nickel Baby Chief: W/Photos: New Question: Question Answered WCCPHD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 29 01-26-2015 11:31 PM
Taurus Brand Question: An Honest Question? Rhetorician Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 108 12-21-2014 11:23 AM
Question about a Ladysmith 60LS .357 mag 2 1/8" - A Christmas Present for my Wife that came into my FFL. I have a recoil question and a couple of other questions to anyone that has one of these! .460V & XVR Magnum Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 35 09-24-2014 09:19 AM
email question *Question Answered, Thanks! timn8er FORUM OFFICE 2 08-26-2013 08:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)