|
|
|
06-07-2018, 12:29 AM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The Badger State
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 3,410
Liked 6,481 Times in 3,065 Posts
|
|
I owe some on this thread and apology, when I stated they had given bad advise and not read the OP's original post.
Turns out it was I who was guilty of misinterpreting the original post, as I had assumed the OP was look for a SELF DEFENCE handgun for his wife. Something for her to carry in her purse, in the car, on her person.
Reread that initial post and truth is the OP never mentions self defense. He was asking for advise for a plinking, target, shooting range type gun. Light weight and low powered.
That being the case, in my view, the Model 63/34 would be an ideal gun for the OP's wife. The somewhat uncommon 5-inch M63-4 of a few years ago is particularly well suited as a light target gun. The M317 is still a good choice, also. A older 4-inch Model 18 with the traditional tapered barrel and the right grips would be good, but that's the heaviest gun I would recommend.
The heavy barrel 17/18's and all versions of the M617 are heavy pigs. In fact, I believe long barrel version of the Model 617 may be the heaviest revolver S&W has ever made in it's 150 history.
__________________
~ S&W aficionado in training ~
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-07-2018, 11:36 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,292
Likes: 8,814
Liked 7,785 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
Wrong forum, I know, but another viable option would be the M&P 22 Compact.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
06-07-2018, 11:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: NYS
Posts: 834
Likes: 1,946
Liked 1,472 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
Here's your answer: the .22 magnum, 7 shot j-frame revolver.
Alloy frame, too.
"Like a feather."
|
06-07-2018, 02:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 2,515
Liked 1,682 Times in 703 Posts
|
|
Not to disagree with the excellant suggestions given previously... She'll do the best with a gun she picks out.
The original premis is is a light gun which has light recoil. These are opposing considerations. Sure a .22 has light recoil. Might even start with target loads, shorts or even CB caps. But I would be honest with her. Basic physics indicates the lighter the gun, the more the felt recoil. Surely she can grasp this. If not a quick range demo will illustrate it. Same ammo in a lighter vs heavier gun.
The gun needs to be light enough that she can hold it on target. Remember as a beginner... she might take a long minute just to align the sights for one shot. Speed will come with experience. The gun needs to be on target for what 2 or 3 minutes. Let her practce with an empty gun (in a safe location), "say bang when she has the sights lined up". Lower gun, rest, repeat.
Do teach sight picture by the way. I think she'll surprise us.
__________________
NRA LIFE
Reserve Officer 9yrs
|
06-07-2018, 04:33 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,345
Likes: 7,534
Liked 5,585 Times in 2,559 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggibson511960
Buy her what she wants...…….quickly...…...and ignore the responses here that suggest their alternate favorite. What a privilege to have a wife be so interested as to have a preference! These guys don't understand the primacy of her opinion. She likes what she likes for the same reason that those with alternate choices like their favorite. Even if she ultimately changes her mind it is far better to let her be self determinant. You are a lucky man to have a spouse shooting companion. Flatter her choice.
|
It is hard to disagree with this post at all, and overall I like it very much. If it is at all possible, I think that you should try to give her an opportunity to fire a 4" 34 or 63, which I think she would like a lot better. But who knows for sure?
__________________
Formerly Model520Fan
|
06-07-2018, 04:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,986
Likes: 41,646
Liked 29,236 Times in 13,822 Posts
|
|
Good gun.....
Do not worry about getting into magnum rounds. For paper and plinking there's no need. Noise and power for nothing.
The 317 has a 3" barrel (nice) Shorter barrels are harder to shoot. It has adjustable sights, too. Very nice. All you can do is let her evaluate the trigger and if it's too hard, get a trigger job. Common and nothing radical about that.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-07-2018, 05:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,111
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,314 Times in 4,238 Posts
|
|
Consider a S&W "J" frame in a center fire caliber. The action will be lighter and smoother.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 03:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Southern Utah
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I would like to thank all those who took the time to thoughtfully consider our particular desires for a light weight and low recoil plinking and target shooting pistol. After much study and deliberation I just bought her a very nice S&W model 63. We could not find one (a 63 or 34 etc) here to hold so I had her hold my Walther PPK that with a full clip inserted weighed as much as the Model 63. She could handle the weight fine. In the end I thought durability and balance issues favored this choice over the 317. They are identical except for the stainless so the fit in the hand should be the same. She wanted a fool proof weapon where she did not need to load a clip and pull a slide. When we go to the range we take a table and chairs (plus my oxygen, etc) and I have a steady rest she can use for accuracy if she wishes. We will not do a great deal of shooting but I hope our range time will increase as she warms to the sport. I have the hearing protection, chrony, etc. one needs for target shooting. My next item will be a swinging metal target we can put far enough away to be safe from fragments. We both appreciate the glow sights since old eyes (I only have one that works) need all the help they can get. I have waited over 50 years for her to become interested so I wanted to make sure the gun she wanted and could use would be the one we got for her. I appreciate all the thoughtful responses members here made that influenced this choice. I feel very good about it and she is excited to get the new revolver when it gets here next week. Thanks again.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 05:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: West Texas
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 5,289
Liked 3,903 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
|
Best of luck to both of you! Hope you have many happy hours burning powder and being together!
__________________
So long ... Ken
|
06-09-2018, 05:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1eyeshooter
I would like to thank all those who took the time to thoughtfully consider our particular desires for a light weight and low recoil plinking and target shooting pistol. After much study and deliberation I just bought her a very nice S&W model 63. We could not find one (a 63 or 34 etc) here to hold so I had her hold my Walther PPK that with a full clip inserted weighed as much as the Model 63. She could handle the weight fine. In the end I thought durability and balance issues favored this choice over the 317. They are identical except for the stainless so the fit in the hand should be the same. She wanted a fool proof weapon where she did not need to load a clip and pull a slide. When we go to the range we take a table and chairs (plus my oxygen, etc) and I have a steady rest she can use for accuracy if she wishes. We will not do a great deal of shooting but I hope our range time will increase as she warms to the sport. I have the hearing protection, chrony, etc. one needs for target shooting. My next item will be a swinging metal target we can put far enough away to be safe from fragments. We both appreciate the glow sights since old eyes (I only have one that works) need all the help they can get. I have waited over 50 years for her to become interested so I wanted to make sure the gun she wanted and could use would be the one we got for her. I appreciate all the thoughtful responses members here made that influenced this choice. I feel very good about it and she is excited to get the new revolver when it gets here next week. Thanks again.
|
FWIW, I just held a 317 and a 63 myself this week. While I still think either would be a good choice, I do believe you made the right choice ( for your stated purpose) with the 63. The extra weight and improved ballance is going to help tame the firing sequence and make it less likely to pull off the target with the trigger squeeze.
Hope you and the wife make many a great memories with that little gun.
ps. You know you owe us a range report soon, right?
__________________
Dave
|
06-12-2018, 09:08 AM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,091
Likes: 9,379
Liked 12,841 Times in 2,905 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdgun
I bought my wife a little J-frame S&W Model 34-1 "Kit Gun" back in 1980. She loves the revolver because it's light and easy for her to shoot. It is a sweet shooter and I have used it to introduce other ladies to handguns.
S&W Model 34-1 "Kit Gun" in .22 Long Rifle with Altamont Walnut grip stocks.
Thanks for looking at my wife's Kit Gun.
God bless,
Birdgun
|
Beautiful! I need to remind my girls that Fathers Day is upon us.
Have a blessed day,
Leon
|
06-12-2018, 09:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 1,397
Liked 3,330 Times in 1,428 Posts
|
|
"Wife wants a light weight light recoil revolver "
I want one too.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|