Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2018, 05:57 PM
PeterJ's Avatar
PeterJ PeterJ is offline
US Veteran
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 565
Likes: 2,245
Liked 1,896 Times in 371 Posts
Default Picked up a 43C yesterday

Was looking for a light 22 revolver for my mole gun and at the gun store they showed me the 43C. Perfect ! Just what I was looking for but was not looking for that price,,,, yikes ! Oh well, not that many years left to enjoy the hobby, so went ahead and took it home. Incredibly light and is very easy to forget it is in your pocket. Took it to the range today and actually was able to get most rounds where I wanted them to be. We have hundreds of ground moles in our property and I get a huge kick out of seeing those buggers pushing up dirt and dispatching them with a couple of rounds of .22 short hollow points,,, works perfect. I used a Ruger SR 22 for a while, but you can't shoot shorts in it and my Ruger SP 101 .22 is just too dang heavy. I'm happy.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 06-06-2018, 07:14 PM
smith627's Avatar
smith627 smith627 is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 57
Likes: 75
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Yes the 43C is a little pricey j-frame .22 but it is a fantastic little revolver.
I bought my wife one a couple years ago for concealed carry/car gun because she never liked the recoil of her Mod 642-1. I took the 642 and got her the 43C, which is better than a stick for self defense. I have actually shot it much more than she has and it has never given us a problem of cylinder sticking or difficult extraction. We shoot mostly CCI Minimags and carry it loaded with CCI Stingers. Also like the front site much better than my 642.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 06-06-2018, 07:32 PM
dmthomp32's Avatar
dmthomp32 dmthomp32 is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 905
Likes: 1,331
Liked 1,303 Times in 548 Posts
Default

Glad to hear the 43C is serving you well. There has always been a special place in my heart for snub nose .22 revolvers. I have no clue why as they likely don't serve any one purpose well (although you gave a pretty good example), other than just a fun gun to carry in your pocket!

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2018, 06:22 PM
PeterJ's Avatar
PeterJ PeterJ is offline
US Veteran
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 565
Likes: 2,245
Liked 1,896 Times in 371 Posts
Default

Got my first kill today,,, a good sized mole wreaking havoc on our yard. Getting used to the trigger as I have never used a DA only revolver. Love the air weight of the gun and is a better shooter than I really expected. Could see using this for CC with the right ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-08-2018, 10:15 PM
TomkinsSP's Avatar
TomkinsSP TomkinsSP is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: May 2017
Location: E of America's Great Lake
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 1,416
Liked 4,377 Times in 1,654 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smith627 View Post
Yes the 43C is a little pricey j-frame .22 but it is a fantastic little revolver.... We shoot mostly CCI Minimags and carry it loaded with CCI Stingers. Also like the front site much better than my 642.
I like the Velocitors because they are 40 grain /1435 fps rather than 32grain /1620 fps (out of rifle length barrels). CCI says "HP cavity design derived from GDHP technology." (Will it expand? Who knows, it WILL be 20 percent heavier vs 11 percent slower.)
__________________
Certified Curmudgeon
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 06-09-2018, 12:19 AM
Kollector03 Kollector03 is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 97
Likes: 34
Liked 145 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterJ View Post
Got my first kill today,,, a good sized mole wreaking havoc on our yard. Getting used to the trigger as I have never used a DA only revolver. Love the air weight of the gun and is a better shooter than I really expected. Could see using this for CC with the right ammo.
Used .22 Short on the Mole in the 43C. Bet that was like a CO2 pellet pistol.

LR's in my 43C are super manageable, but i've never though about running any other .22 (Long, .22RF, or Shorts) through it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2018, 01:37 PM
Wee Hooker Wee Hooker is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
Default

Yea, I see the "That much for a .22 revolver?" reaction often at the shop. I've even felt it myself a few times. Still, it's not hard to understand when you consider that the same materials and workmanship go into building a 22 as a 357 mag.
Just ordered a Model 63 myself with the same logic as yours BTW.

p.s. Take a look at the CCI Quiet fragmenting ammo. 710 fps and has a bullet that breaks up into 3 pieces on impact. Nice for keeping the energy where you want it and also nice for taming ricochets. I find it very accurate too.
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 06-10-2018, 02:05 PM
PeterJ's Avatar
PeterJ PeterJ is offline
US Veteran
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 565
Likes: 2,245
Liked 1,896 Times in 371 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee Hooker View Post
Yea, I see the "That much for a .22 revolver?" reaction often at the shop. I've even felt it myself a few times. Still, it's not hard to understand when you consider that the same materials and workmanship go into building a 22 as a 357 mag.
Just ordered a Model 63 myself with the same logic as yours BTW.

p.s. Take a look at the CCI Quiet fragmenting ammo. 710 fps and has a bullet that breaks up into 3 pieces on impact. Nice for keeping the energy where you want it and also nice for taming ricochets. I find it very accurate too.
They actually GAVE me a box of that quiet ammo at the shop when I bought the gun. Blast is noticeably quieter than regular long rifles and even on par with the CCI HP shorts. What I like about the shorts is the 1105 FPS which reaches into the ground and always gets the job done. Yes, the quality shows on this gun and I don't regret the purchase for a minute.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2018, 06:45 AM
Dogmann's Avatar
Dogmann Dogmann is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
Default

Is the 43C cylinder steel?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2018, 07:58 AM
PeterJ's Avatar
PeterJ PeterJ is offline
US Veteran
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 565
Likes: 2,245
Liked 1,896 Times in 371 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmann View Post
Is the 43C cylinder steel?
No, aluminum. It may have steel sleeves in the bores though. All I know is that this sucker is light !
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-25-2018, 08:11 PM
mini14jac mini14jac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 140
Likes: 4
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Put a few tiny drops of oil down the sides of the hammer and in the openings inside the frame.

After 4-500 rounds, the trigger on my 43c smoothed and lightened up considerably.
My wife shoots it easily now.

I agree, there aren't many practical applications for this gun, but it sure is fun to shoot.

I wouldn't worry about the aluminum cylinder.
There's a small chance that S&W knows what they are doing. ;-)

And, they use an aluminum cylinder on their .22 magnum revolver, and I've not heard of any of them self destructing.
__________________
<><

Last edited by mini14jac; 06-25-2018 at 08:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-25-2018, 09:43 PM
3rdgeargrndrr's Avatar
3rdgeargrndrr 3rdgeargrndrr is offline
Member
Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday Picked up a 43C yesterday  
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 1,628
Liked 1,165 Times in 530 Posts
Default

You could have saved some cash by getting some neighborhood kid to shoot them with an air rifle for free. Hell, i woulda dunnit for free
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Picked up a S&W 457 yesterday. rfd339 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 06-04-2017 01:13 AM
Picked this up yesterday... harleytech1 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 04-02-2015 06:07 PM
Picked up Yesterday 67-1 blanda1 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 19 07-18-2014 11:57 PM
Picked up my first S&W yesterday captain_surly New Members Introduction 7 01-07-2010 06:51 PM
Picked up a 10-5 yesterday. Have a look. jbouwens S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 2 10-18-2008 05:00 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)