|
|
|
07-02-2018, 10:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
"Your" definition of a true "Combat-Magnum"
I've often wondered what the true definition of a true "Combat-Magnum" really is: I can tell you what my definition of the meaning is... But I'm wondering what the collective idea is of the term/criteria is in the minds of the knowledgeable members that make up this wonderful forum/community. I think the epitome of the idea is pretty much summed up in the borrowed first (3) pic of the revolvers posted in the pics below. It's a short (3" to 4") barreled, ramped front sight, chambered in either the venerable .357Magnum... or my new favorite, the .44Magnum; thus in a high speed, low drag profile with a round butt frame & coupled w/ combat style stocks sporting a smooth/crisp trigger and either equipped with a short spur or bobbed hammer. But that is my idea of the concept... and I want "your" idea of the concept... There is no right or wrong answer... just keep your opinion(s) honest and respectful. Thanks most of all... for participating-posting in this subjective thread and for passing on your imparted wisdom of the idea as a whole. I've been a semi-auto guy all my life except for the last (5) years... In which I've come to the blatant realization that I've been missing out on the revolver as an extremely viable, reliable, and certainly venerable concept in regards to self defense that we all enjoy; that I plan to pass down to my 7 year old daughter (when the time is right later on), and hopefully most certainly to my grandchildren in the future! Thanks again fellas!
My quintessential definition of the subject is pictured in the first (3) borrowed pic(s) below.
This last pic is of my own personal 629, and my new to me M29, "Combat-Magnum" both used now for CCW around town and "Woods Carry" revolvers that I've become so fond of... even over my beloved CZ semi-auto, the "P-01..."
|
The Following 26 Users Like Post:
|
18DAI, 2ndshift, 6518John, 6actual, 9mmsubgun-m11, amazingflapjack, Art66, Ashlander, Dolfenn24, dr. mordo, Dragon 1, Farmboy 33051, kaaskop49, KertP, klind45, kobsw, LB001, Mike Q., NCBeagle, parsonbw, S&WsRsweet, sdb321, shutupdata113, Struckat, usmc2427765, zzclancy |
07-02-2018, 10:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 5,138
Liked 2,955 Times in 1,021 Posts
|
|
I have to agree. My 4" M29 and 3" M629 are my go-to guns while my actual "Combat Magnums" stay in the safe. That said, I think a 8 shot 627 would be a heck of a CCW, and the extra weight of the N frame would make full tilt 357 much more manageable than 357 in a K/L frame, so follow-ups would be faster and more accurate.
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-02-2018, 11:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,322 Times in 2,921 Posts
|
|
IMO the "True Combat Magnum" is a 4" non model marked KT-357 that shipped between 1956-1958 prior to Model marking,
[IMG] [/IMG]
(After that the Combat Magnum became Model 19).
[IMG] [/IMG]
As for what my personal ultimate .357 "Combat Magnum" revolver might be ?
Perhaps a four inch 7 shot 686-5 Mountain gun with smooth Combat trigger and Finger groove Combat stocks.
[IMG] [/IMG]
Alternate take is the 19-7 K Comp (right)
[IMG] [/IMG]
|
The Following 17 Users Like Post:
|
9mmsubgun-m11, Art66, Breakaway500, Farmboy 33051, HamHands, HorizontalMike, KertP, klind45, kobsw, Lee's Landing Billy, old bear, parsonbw, S&WsRsweet, sdb321, Struckat, usmc2427765, zzclancy |
07-02-2018, 11:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,147
Likes: 2,420
Liked 3,586 Times in 1,597 Posts
|
|
I once owned a mod 586 ,four inch barrel magnaported, action job, Millet high visability sights, pachmeyer grippers.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-02-2018, 11:12 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Gods waiting room, W/C FL
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 3,334
Liked 4,549 Times in 2,011 Posts
|
|
IT MUST HAVE FIXED SIGHTS.
An "original" 1911 for a semi, many revo's, a 681 perhaps??? If out of ammo, it must have enough heft to bludgeon someone.
Last edited by nachogrande; 07-02-2018 at 11:14 PM.
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-02-2018, 11:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Duplicate !
Last edited by HamHands; 07-03-2018 at 07:40 AM.
|
07-03-2018, 12:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,322 Times in 2,921 Posts
|
|
The nomenclature is a bit confusing, one might argue snub Magnums are more of a CCW than a "Combat revolver" .
Prior to the introduction of the 4" Combat Masterpiece the only options for a 4" S&W duty revolver in .38 caliber were
the K frame M&P, N frame 38/44 HD or N frame 357 Magnum.
The name Combat first appears on the "Combat Masterpiece" (pre Model 15) and its .22 sibling (Pre Model 18) in 1949 and became a regular catalog item in 1950 ,
The name "Combat" was applied to distinguish the 4" versions from their 6" "Masterpiece" counterparts before the advent of model marking.
In 1954 S&W introduced the Highway Patrolman (pre 28) as a cheaper alternative duty weapon with target sites in .357 caliber ,
The 4" K target frame .357 "Combat Magnum" became available in 1956 as a lighter alternative to the bigger N frame 357's
and in SS in 1970 as the Model 66.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 07-03-2018 at 12:26 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 12:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CSRA
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 869
Liked 1,629 Times in 779 Posts
|
|
The first TRUE combat MAGNUM came out in 1847. The Colt Walker.
Even after 170 years there are just a few guns as powerful... Capable
of generating over 500 ft pounds of ENERGY.. Walker wanted a pistol
capable of killing the rider AND his horse out to 100yds. A TRUE Combat Magnum..
The cylinder chambers held 60 gr. of Black Powder.. About the same
amount as Army Muskets used in that era...
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 07:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
The nomenclature is a bit confusing, one might argue snub Magnums are more of a CCW than a "Combat revolver" .
Prior to the introduction of the 4" Combat Masterpiece the only options for a 4" S&W duty revolver in .38 caliber were
the K frame M&P, N frame 38/44 HD or N frame 357 Magnum.
The name Combat first appears on the "Combat Masterpiece" (pre Model 15) and its .22 sibling (Pre Model 18) in 1949 and became a regular catalog item in 1950 ,
The name "Combat" was applied to distinguish the 4" versions from their 6" "Masterpiece" counterparts before the advent of model marking.
In 1954 S&W introduced the Highway Patrolman (pre 28) as a cheaper alternative duty weapon with target sites in .357 caliber ,
The 4" K target frame .357 "Combat Magnum" became available in 1956 as a lighter alternative to the bigger N frame 357's
and in SS in 1970 as the Model 66.
|
Very true! In my mind/opinion the "Combat Magnum" is a hard hitting fight stopper that's easily able to be put into action, snag free upon the draw; something you'll always have on you... that doesn't require a drop leg holster to carry AND is easily reloadable.
I'm thinking of having my M29's cylinder machined for moon-clips and the chambers chamfered by Clark Customs.
I'm loving the history here; of which you seem to be well informed of. Thank you for your informative post(s)! This is exactly what I started this thread looking for...
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 08:11 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,788
Likes: 1,669
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
S&W introduced the "Combat Magnum" to the world in 1954/55 ....... 4", Blue K-frame .357 magnum with adjustable sights.......it was assigned the model number 19 in 1957!
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 08:18 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: R.T. P, area NC
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 29,595
Liked 23,021 Times in 5,791 Posts
|
|
My definition of a “combat magnum” revolver, would be any magnum caliber revolver I was willing to carry into a potential combat area. My personal choices, any 2 ½” – 4” model 19/66. Other than replacing the factory stocks, which is mostly an appearance thing, I don’t feel the need to make any modifications to any of the above.
__________________
Always Stay Strong!
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 08:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 4
Liked 289 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
I would go by Smith & Wesson's Definition. A Combat Magnum has been a 4" 585 or 686 while a Combat Masterpiece has been a 4" 67 for example.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 08:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 550
Liked 1,427 Times in 666 Posts
|
|
Combat magnum? A Glock 10 mm.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 11:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Chesterfield, Va.
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 8,922
Liked 13,323 Times in 3,303 Posts
|
|
Any revolver Smith & Wesson put/puts the name on. That would be any K-frame, 357 magnum, with adjustable sights, including "pre" 19's Model 19's all dashes, including the new "classic" 19, and the Model 69, 44 Magnum.
They named it. I don't get to change it.
__________________
John 3:16 .
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 01:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Upper Pensiula
Posts: 127
Likes: 5,479
Liked 177 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker
Combat magnum? A Glock 10 mm.
|
BOO! HISS! BOO!
Last edited by 2ndshift; 07-03-2018 at 01:05 PM.
Reason: UPDATE
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 01:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by old bear
My definition of a “combat magnum” revolver, would be any magnum caliber revolver I was willing to carry into a potential combat area. My personal choices, any 2 ½” – 4” model 19/66. Other than replacing the factory stocks, which is mostly an appearance thing, I don’t feel the need to make any modifications to any of the above.
|
Mostly Agree... But stocks for me make a huge difference with the way a revolver handles. I have meaty hands... and Magna's with a Tyler T on an "N" frame gives me a grip rivaling my 1911 Commander with slim stocks.
|
07-03-2018, 01:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker
Combat magnum? A Glock 10 mm.
|
I like handload or boutique 10mm performance for sure. And I can't even begin to entertain the capacity/firepower argument but... a 300grain full house .44mag stomps 10mm anything all day!
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 03:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,322 Times in 2,921 Posts
|
|
IIRC Combat Magnum production began in 1955 with only one or two VIP guns leaving the factory prior to the 1955 Christmas holiday shutdown, regular shipment begins in 1956 .
The L frame 586/686 series is actually the "Distinguished Combat Magnum" and the fixed sight 581/681 is the "Distinguished Service Magnum".
IMO while moonclips aid extraction when using rimless rounds in a revolver and make for faster reloads when racing the clock in competition Im not sure there is any benefit to modify a .44 Magnum for moonclips unless you are using it in competition ,
If so the excessive recoil and muzzle flip of the 44 Mag cartridge would likely negate its use.
The advantage of Magnum rounds are their higher lethality from a well placed center mass shot with the focus on accuracy instead of volume of fire .
If there is a reasonable threat of multiple targets or a prolonged gunfight scenario requiring a higher volume of fire its time to consider a 15 shot 9mm semi auto with two spare mags,...In that scenario some believe a handgun is a tool best used to fight your way to your rifle or shotgun
Last edited by Engine49guy; 07-03-2018 at 03:41 PM.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 04:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Clermont,Florida
Posts: 66
Likes: 262
Liked 220 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamHands
I've often wondered what the true definition of a true "Combat-Magnum" really is: I can tell you what my definition of the meaning is... But I'm wondering what the collective idea is of the term/criteria is in the minds of the knowledgeable members that make up this wonderful forum/community. I think the epitome of the idea is pretty much summed up in the borrowed first (3) pic of the revolvers posted in the pics below. It's a short (3" to 4") barreled, ramped front sight, chambered in either the venerable .357Magnum... or my new favorite, the .44Magnum; thus in a high speed, low drag profile with a round butt frame & coupled w/ combat style stocks sporting a smooth/crisp trigger and either equipped with a short spur or bobbed hammer. But that is my idea of the concept... and I want "your" idea of the concept... There is no right or wrong answer... just keep your opinion(s) honest and respectful. Thanks most of all... for participating-posting in this subjective thread and for passing on your imparted wisdom of the idea as a whole. I've been a semi-auto guy all my life except for the last (5) years... In which I've come to the blatant realization that I've been missing out on the revolver as an extremely viable, reliable, and certainly venerable concept in regards to self defense that we all enjoy; that I plan to pass down to my 7 year old daughter (when the time is right later on), and hopefully most certainly to my grandchildren in the future! Thanks again fellas!
My quintessential definition of the subject is pictured in the first (3) borrowed pic(s) below.
This last pic is of my own personal 629, and my new to me M29, "Combat-Magnum" both used now for CCW around town and "Woods Carry" revolvers that I've become so fond of... even over my beloved CZ semi-auto, the "P-01..."
|
It's funny you bring up your CZ P-01, cause my P-01 along with my Model 19 "Combat Magnum" is my most accurate handgun. I absolutely love them both.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 04:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 550
Liked 1,427 Times in 666 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HamHands
I like handload or boutique 10mm performance for sure. And I can't even begin to entertain the capacity/firepower argument but... a 300grain full house .44mag stomps 10mm anything all day!
|
No question. I've got a 2.75 44 combat magnum myself. What's practical for me too shoot from it and get it back on target for a 2nd shot? A load that's about equivalent to a full house 10 mm. Physics.
Might as well carry a Glock 20 with 3x the capacity.
Last edited by shocker; 07-03-2018 at 08:09 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 04:37 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 3,543
Liked 3,996 Times in 1,627 Posts
|
|
IMHO---EITHER ONE OF THE THREE MOUNTAIN GUNS, PICTURED BELOW, WOULD FIT THE CRITERIA. THEY ALL HAVE 4" BARRELS, AND ROUND BUTTS. THEY ARE WELL BALANCED, AND EASILY CARRIED CONCEALED IN A BELT OR SHOULDER HOLSTER.....
THEY ARE L TO R---
A M686+, 7 SHOT, IN .357 MAGNUM......
A M629, IN .44 MAGNUM......
A M625, IN .45 COLT......
THE M686 IS ACTUALLY NAMED THE "DISTINGUISHED COMBAT MAGNUM". AS SUCH, I WOULD INCLUDE MY 2 1/2" M686+, WHICH IS MY EDC, IN THIS CATEGORY AS WELL......
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 04:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,980 Times in 467 Posts
|
|
My 69 snubby reads combat magnum in the barrel. I’d say it qualifies. IMO.
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 04:39 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 27,196
Liked 37,377 Times in 4,591 Posts
|
|
I suppose it is a subjective term, no doubt coined by S&W. I am sure that there are many that would go with the N frame, in a short bbl 357, and while I love N frame models, my idea would be a meat and potatoes K frame 4" model 65, with combat rubber( don't like to look at them, prefer wood) grips, a wide smooth trigger, and a finely tuned and polished action. Using standard 158 gr Kieth type hard cast SWC,s When I did LEO combat qualifying with mine( using std 38 158gr loads, I did well. i see no reason not to do well with 357 loads with the appropriate practice. One of my worst moves was getting rid of my model 65, 4". Just my ,02
__________________
Pete
I ain't no fortunate son
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 05:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by one eye joe
IMHO---EITHER ONE OF THE THREE MOUNTAIN GUNS, PICTURED BELOW, WOULD FIT THE CRITERIA. THEY ALL HAVE 4" BARRELS, AND ROUND BUTTS. THEY ARE WELL BALANCED, AND EASILY CARRIED CONCEALED IN A BELT OR SHOULDER HOLSTER.....
THEY ARE L TO R---
A M686+, 7 SHOT, IN .357 MAGNUM......
A M629, IN .44 MAGNUM......
A M625, IN .45 COLT......
THE M686 IS ACTUALLY NAMED THE "DISTINGUISHED COMBAT MAGNUM". AS SUCH, I WOULD INCLUDE MY 2 1/2" M686+, WHICH IS MY EDC, IN THIS CATEGORY AS WELL......
|
Oh yes... I've admired all (3) of those Revo's before... drooled to be honest! Thanks for sharing again OEJ!!! You have solid taste sir!
|
07-03-2018, 05:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 2,809
Liked 5,794 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
|
4” model 19 is what I envision
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 05:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbysixkiller
My 69 snubby reads combat magnum in the barrel. I’d say it qualifies. IMO.
|
It certainly does qualify! Pics though man, pics!
|
07-03-2018, 06:07 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Gods waiting room, W/C FL
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 3,334
Liked 4,549 Times in 2,011 Posts
|
|
"COMBAT"
COMBAT, to me means a gun at home with lot's of hard use! It IS NOT a gun that MAY be used SOMEDAY & more likely never. It had better be extremely tough/durable/fairly accurate & reliable with plenty of power. concealability/light weight, need not apply. L frames rule & J/K frames drool, LOL.
Last edited by nachogrande; 07-03-2018 at 06:09 PM.
|
07-03-2018, 06:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolfenn24
It's funny you bring up your CZ P-01, cause my P-01 along with my Model 19 "Combat Magnum" is my most accurate handgun. I absolutely love them both.
|
My P-01 just edges out my 1911 Commander... but only by 2 hairs. The "P-01" is such a special piece. It just fits my hand like a glove and is death and taxes reliable. I'm a CZ and Smith nut... Below is a pic of my CZ family!
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 06:14 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SE USA
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 4,482
Liked 1,926 Times in 872 Posts
|
|
No Highway Patrolman folk here? Much rather carry that on a tour through whatever than a Model 19. Make a good hammer, too.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 06:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Tampa/miami
Posts: 685
Likes: 35
Liked 1,049 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
Combat
Combat means combat!
That said, a 686 plus in 4" is going to be the best bet. 7 shot, easy to shoot one handed. I have a 3", but would go with 4" if I was going to battle with it.
|
07-03-2018, 06:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
IIRC Combat Magnum production began in 1955 with only one or two VIP guns leaving the factory prior to the 1955 Christmas holiday shutdown, regular shipment begins in 1956 .
The L frame 586/686 series is actually the "Distinguished Combat Magnum" and the fixed sight 581/681 is the "Distinguished Service Magnum".
IMO while moonclips aid extraction when using rimless rounds in a revolver and make for faster reloads when racing the clock in competition Im not sure there is any benefit to modify a .44 Magnum for moonclips unless you are using it in competition ,
If so the excessive recoil and muzzle flip of the 44 Mag cartridge would likely negate its use.
The advantage of Magnum rounds are their higher lethality from a well placed center mass shot with the focus on accuracy instead of volume of fire .
If there is a reasonable threat of multiple targets or a prolonged gunfight scenario requiring a higher volume of fire its time to consider a 15 shot 9mm semi auto with two spare mags,...In that scenario some believe a handgun is a tool best used to fight your way to your rifle or shotgun
|
I respect your opinion and understand your line of logic; but we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. A faster and positive extraction/reload is always a desirable attribute whether in a semi or a revolver. My M29 is my to-be dedicated "Woods-Gun" for sure... But there are 2 legged problems in woods just as dangerous if not more so than any 4 legged problems... and having the ability to reload faster if the need arises is never a negative. For me, a 9mm in the woods is far better than a sharp stick... but I want the performance to deal with whatever threat might arise; whether it be a pair of mullet heads sporting cut off jean shorts or a pissed off pelt covered predator. Of which, the .44Magnum is more than capable of dispatching either type. I ran upon someone's "Science Project" in the woods before on the outskirts of Athens, Georgia while in college unbeknownst to me and my girlfriend who were innocently hiking one spring day. I'm glad we were armed to say the least!
Last edited by HamHands; 07-03-2018 at 06:35 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 06:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Meadows Place, Texas
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 25,155
Liked 16,452 Times in 4,173 Posts
|
|
This is my Combat Magnum, a 19-2.
I do think this 65-3 fits the description as well.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 06:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Highlands, North Carolina
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 2,096
Liked 2,202 Times in 883 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRippert
This is my Combat Magnum, a 19-2.
I do think this 65-3 fits the description as well.
|
Beautiful M19 John! But that 65-3 is just irresistible! What a nice pair of girls you have there!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 07:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,369
Likes: 1,552
Liked 4,271 Times in 1,805 Posts
|
|
Combat Magnum: a large bottle of champagne wielded in a fight or battle.
Assault Weapon: the champagne bottle after you’ve swung it at someone.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 07:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Los Angeles,California
Posts: 1,889
Likes: 3,817
Liked 4,107 Times in 1,215 Posts
|
|
Sure. I'll play. Combat Magnum. Ready for battle?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
3rdgeargrndrr, 9mmsubgun-m11, Art66, BIGDOC, ctxcummins, Dolfenn24, filthyj24, Fish4bass101, HamHands, RKmesa, RSBH44, S&WsRsweet, zzclancy |
07-03-2018, 07:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 113
Likes: 282
Liked 158 Times in 53 Posts
|
|
The TRR8/R8 is the epitome of a 21st century Combat Magnum, and the only one I would take to a modern warzone.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 07:20 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,564
Likes: 5,011
Liked 21,359 Times in 6,447 Posts
|
|
I am sorry, but if I have to go back to war then I will be carrying a M1911 in my holster.
If I have to carry a revolver. It will be my Model 27 - 2 in 3.5 inch.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 07:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 2,724
Liked 5,054 Times in 1,442 Posts
|
|
M19, 66, 69.....
|
07-03-2018, 07:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 1,628
Liked 1,165 Times in 530 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lou_the_welder
Sure. I'll play. Combat Magnum. Ready for battle?
lk
|
You beat me to it Lou. I dont own one but these were made for SWAT for protection while holding a riot shield.
If I had to raid my stable I would skip the 629, 460, 686 and grab the 617 and 63, a bunch of 22 subsonics and bug out like mad until it was all over.
Im not bringing any revolver into a actual gun fight
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 10:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Clermont,Florida
Posts: 66
Likes: 262
Liked 220 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ
I am sorry, but if I have to go back to war then I will be carrying a M1911 in my holster.
If I have to carry a revolver. It will be my Model 27 - 2 in 3.5 inch.
|
About a month ago I shot for the first time my newly purchased Para Ordnance Elite 1911 and I was absolutely blown away by the accuracy of it. It is such a sweet shooter. I am now a huge fan of 1911s...so much so that I have been considering a Wilson Combat 1911.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-03-2018, 11:02 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 9,564
Likes: 5,011
Liked 21,359 Times in 6,447 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolfenn24
About a month ago I shot for the first time my newly purchased Para Ordnance Elite 1911 and I was absolutely blown away by the accuracy of it. It is such a sweet shooter. I am now a huge fan of 1911s...so much so that I have been considering a Wilson Combat 1911.
|
Save your money. Look around and find a used original Series 70 Gold Cup Colt or a Pre-Series 70 Gold Cup. Yes, you pay for the name Colt, but I would rather pay for the name Colt than Wilson. I have owned over 35 M1911's over the years, including a ParaOrd P14 custom gun. I own two M1911's now, one is in .38 Special and the other is a Series 70 Gold Cup.
Now back to the original question.................
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
|
07-03-2018, 11:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ALBUQUERQUE, NM
Posts: 13,893
Likes: 8,098
Liked 25,425 Times in 8,550 Posts
|
|
I carried my Model 19 in SEA.
__________________
NRA LIFE MEMBER
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 12:46 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 816
Likes: 1,123
Liked 1,549 Times in 556 Posts
|
|
In my view, "Combat Magnum" is purely a marketing tag no doubt brainstormed by S&W's white-collars in a conference room. I doubt that Bill Jordan had any input in the naming of the adjustable sighted, 4" .357 Magnum K-frame that he was instrumental in creating. I'm pretty sure that he could have cared less what it was called, as long as it was produced and did the job for which it was intended.
As a matter of firearm semantics, "Combat Magnum" would mean that the gun in question (a revolver in this case) is/was/will be wielded in "combat", and is chambered in a designated "magnum" caliber. I posit that the type of sights don't matter a whit, nor does what is roll-marked on the barrel.
That being said, I further posit that most "Combat Magnums" should, for the sake of accuracy and reality, be called "Range Magnum", "Target Magnum", "Safe Queen Magnum", "Night Stand Magnum", "Bear Magnum", "Why Did I Buy That Damned Brutal Thing Magnum?", etc.
Hey, it's only a name... it doesn't make the gun any more lethal because of it. It's the person squeezing the trigger that does.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 04:03 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Maine
Posts: 587
Likes: 761
Liked 922 Times in 349 Posts
|
|
I have twenty some different Smith revolvers. I would proably be late to the gun fight trying to decide which one to use, so many choices........
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Clermont,Florida
Posts: 66
Likes: 262
Liked 220 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ
Save your money. Look around and find a used original Series 70 Gold Cup Colt or a Pre-Series 70 Gold Cup. Yes, you pay for the name Colt, but I would rather pay for the name Colt than Wilson. I have owned over 35 M1911's over the years, including a ParaOrd P14 custom gun. I own two M1911's now, one is in .38 Special and the other is a Series 70 Gold Cup.
Now back to the original question.................
|
Have you ever shot or even owned a 1911 in .38 Super? If so, what are your thoughts? I have seen a few Colt 1911s chambered in .38 Super.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Location: TTown Alabama ,Roll Tide
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 9,772
Liked 2,220 Times in 1,031 Posts
|
|
To me the words "combat magnum " conjur up thoughts of a 3 to 5 inch barel 357 magnum K or L frame size gun equipped with adjustable sights and wielded by someone who knows how to fight with a revolver although I must admit I personaly love my 629 44 mag but the "combat magnum " round is the 357 magnum or a 41 magnum or a 44 special . Man we live in a beautiful world with all these choices .I would love to see some of the old guys who are in shooters heaven take a look at the choices in calibers frame sizes not to mention lights and reflex sights we can have today but yea the 357 is the combat magnum well or a 41 mag or a 44--------------
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Huntington, TX
Posts: 69
Likes: 126
Liked 474 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Combat Magnum...My Model 19, however If I ever get dropped into another hot LZ I want my rifle either my M14 or a M4 depending upon the environment. As far as my sidearm goes my actual Combat Magnum will be my Colt M1945A1. I have a plan...revolver<1911<carbine<rifle<tank.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Silver Hill, NC
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 4,551
Liked 4,329 Times in 825 Posts
|
|
__________________
C & L
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 08:57 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Tampa/miami
Posts: 685
Likes: 35
Liked 1,049 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
Combat magnum= Remember that episode of star trek where Kirk was put on that planet with the lizard dude to fight to the death? What handgun would Kirk choose to punch through that thick lizard skin and put that alien down? A combat magnum ! .357 hot load jsp all the way.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-04-2018, 09:14 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Gods waiting room, W/C FL
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 3,334
Liked 4,549 Times in 2,011 Posts
|
|
GET IN THAT MANY "ACTUAL" GUN FIGHTS, DO YA?
Im not bringing any revolver into a actual gun fight[/QUOTE]
I sure hope the word COMBAT does not become overused like TACTICAL. Too late???
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|