Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2018, 09:53 PM
Frank121 Frank121 is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 395
Likes: 521
Liked 995 Times in 192 Posts
Default S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition

I took my new S&W Model 442 out to the range this morning to see how it shot and felt. At the great sale price and very concealable pocket carry size I wanted to at least give that model one more chance.

This is the second 442 I have owned. The first was one I bought from Bud's about 2 1/2 years ago. That one was about $100 more than this one ($395 vs. $289.99 with rebate on this one) and wasn't a pleasant shooting experience.

That 442 caused great pain to the bone or nerve or something in the web of my right shooting hand just to the right of my thumb joint. I tried to like it and tolerate the pain, but after taking sometimes weeks for the swelling and discomfort to go away it found a new owner. I do have some arthritis in my hands, so that probably makes me more susceptible to the recoil than someone without it.

I wanted to keep the small boot grips on the gun that came with it since it makes the gun so easy for small pocket holster carry, so I tried it out as it came. I was going to make a concerted effort to keep from letting the bare metal at the top of the frame grip lie against my thumb joint as it probably did when I shot one in 2016.

What I found was my revolver grip had changed since shooting back then and the grip I use now holds the gun firmer and lower on the grip than when I was first started shooting guns in 2016 again after a 20 year hiatus. That grip kept the recoil down today and didn't pound the joint like I remembered the first 442 doing.

I went through 60 rounds of WWB 130 grain .38 Special while tracking my target results from 15, 21, 30, and 40 feet away. 15 and 21 feet away the groupings were excellent, while the 30 and 40 feet distances still hit within the colored circles on the target.

So far, so good as far as not having any residual results in my hand from shooting today. I plan on going out again to the range tomorrow morning with a couple of folks and will shoot the rest of the 100 round box, but it won't be an "all the time" range gun like the first 442 was. I will shoot my Model 36 revolver and 9mm pistol most of the time at the range as I have been, but will shoot the 442 on occasion to ensure I am comfortable with it as my pocket holster carry.

Last edited by Frank121; 07-06-2018 at 10:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 07-07-2018, 12:50 AM
socalDDS socalDDS is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 86
Likes: 23
Liked 104 Times in 24 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank121 View Post
I took my new S&W Model 442 out to the range this morning to see how it shot and felt. At the great sale price and very concealable pocket carry size I wanted to at least give that model one more chance.

This is the second 442 I have owned. The first was one I bought from Bud's about 2 1/2 years ago. That one was about $100 more than this one ($395 vs. $289.99 with rebate on this one) and wasn't a pleasant shooting experience.

That 442 caused great pain to the bone or nerve or something in the web of my right shooting hand just to the right of my thumb joint. I tried to like it and tolerate the pain, but after taking sometimes weeks for the swelling and discomfort to go away it found a new owner. I do have some arthritis in my hands, so that probably makes me more susceptible to the recoil than someone without it.

I wanted to keep the small boot grips on the gun that came with it since it makes the gun so easy for small pocket holster carry, so I tried it out as it came. I was going to make a concerted effort to keep from letting the bare metal at the top of the frame grip lie against my thumb joint as it probably did when I shot one in 2016.

What I found was my revolver grip had changed since shooting back then and the grip I use now holds the gun firmer and lower on the grip than when I was first started shooting guns in 2016 again after a 20 year hiatus. That grip kept the recoil down today and didn't pound the joint like I remembered the first 442 doing.

I went through 60 rounds of WWB 130 grain .38 Special while tracking my target results from 15, 21, 30, and 40 feet away. 15 and 21 feet away the groupings were excellent, while the 30 and 40 feet distances still hit within the colored circles on the target.

So far, so good as far as not having any residual results in my hand from shooting today. I plan on going out again to the range tomorrow morning with a couple of folks and will shoot the rest of the 100 round box, but it won't be an "all the time" range gun like the first 442 was. I will shoot my Model 36 revolver and 9mm pistol most of the time at the range as I have been, but will shoot the 442 on occasion to ensure I am comfortable with it as my pocket holster carry.


I have a 642 for one of my EDCs... I had a gunsmith do a trigger job on it (springs etc.), and I put a set of Hogue Grips on it... after that, I absolutely love it! I will admit, when I first bought it and took it to the range, it was absolutely miserable to shoot! But after the modifications, it’s a pleasure to shoot, and incredibly comfortable to carry!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 07-07-2018, 12:57 PM
Jerry in SC Jerry in SC is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Upstate
Posts: 465
Likes: 150
Liked 93 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Guys with larger hands or shooting with a high grip can have a hard time with the 442. Craig Spegel centennial style boot grips (good luck finding any) eliminate the corner of the frame battering the thumb joint.

I always wondered why no one approached him about licensing a synthetic version (after the Uncle Mike's fiasco).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2018, 01:29 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,807
Likes: 4,238
Liked 15,203 Times in 4,161 Posts
Default

I’ve been carrying/shooting J frames since I was a rookie cop in 1968 and they do put a hurting on you if you don’t know how to handle them. I have XLG hands and carry the no lock 340PD but do not load it w/magnums, preferring +P for accuracy and quick follow up shots. I pocket carry w/a pocket holster and wood boot grips so that’s how I practice w/it. It chews up my trigger finger and leaves me sore for about a week. I use either a Model 60 or older Model 37 w/oversize rubber target grips for extended (100+) range sessions.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 07-07-2018, 04:08 PM
mrmike7189's Avatar
mrmike7189 mrmike7189 is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 736
Likes: 2,823
Liked 518 Times in 278 Posts
Default

I had a 642 and it hurt my hand same as described by the op. I now carry Bodyguard 380 and /or my Glock 26 which is same size as the snubby.
I know lots of snubby owners who love theirs, but not for me.
I guess Arthur Rightis is coming for me
__________________
S&W BG380, S&W 915 9mm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2018, 04:57 PM
TTSH TTSH is offline
Junior Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 13,905
Liked 9,470 Times in 4,391 Posts
Default

This is a very timely thread for me as I am strongly considering a brand new Model 442-1 as my next acquisition. If it comes to pass, it will be my first brand new S&W revolver purchase in over 35 years!

As I have posted previously, my interest in the 442-1 was piqued when I found a very slightly used 442-1 with aftermarket rubber grips for a song back in July of 2015. Sadly, someone came up with the cash before I did, but I did make a mental note that when the stars aligned properly again, I should try to find another slightly used one for cheap or, preferably, a brand new one (since there is no IL issue and on-line prices right now are very attractive).

I know the 442-1 will not be kind to my hand. I have long had an old Model 49, so I know what I am getting into. My Model 49 also wears rubber grips and with +P rounds, it's not crazy fun to shoot lots of rounds... but it does work. A lighter version of roughly the same gun would be attractive to me for pocket carry in some circumstances.

I know the stock grips are not loved, so I'm interested in opinions on what grips, brand and model, will tame the 442-1 best without blowing the budget.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:11 PM
hkcavalier's Avatar
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
US Veteran
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,286 Times in 1,898 Posts
Default

This 442-1 is, since I started getting into S&Ws about 6 years ago, my first new revolver.

I couldn't get it to hurt even with heavy wadcutters. Is it soft shooting? No, but easier on the hand than my 629 5" launching full pressure loads.

__________________
Psalm 27:2
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:12 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,779
Likes: 57,900
Liked 53,023 Times in 16,535 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TTSH View Post
This is a very timely thread for me as I am strongly considering a brand new Model 442-1 as my next acquisition. If it comes to pass, it will be my first brand new S&W revolver purchase in over 35 years!

As I have posted previously, my interest in the 442-1 was piqued when I found a very slightly used 442-1 with aftermarket rubber grips for a song back in July of 2015. Sadly, someone came up with the cash before I did, but I did make a mental note that when the stars aligned properly again, I should try to find another slightly used one for cheap or, preferably, a brand new one (since there is no IL issue and on-line prices right now are very attractive).

I know the 442-1 will not be kind to my hand. I have long had an old Model 49, so I know what I am getting into. My Model 49 also wears rubber grips and with +P rounds, it's not crazy fun to shoot lots of rounds... but it does work. A lighter version of roughly the same gun would be attractive to me for pocket carry in some circumstances.

I know the stock grips are not loved, so I'm interested in opinions on what grips, brand and model, will tame the 442-1 best without blowing the budget.
Lighter version of a 49, a 38-3 Airweight my EDC.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5A03F401-4CED-4A05-BDBC-805BCD34EE6A.jpg (86.6 KB, 40 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:14 PM
Vulcan Bob's Avatar
Vulcan Bob Vulcan Bob is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 5,336
Likes: 2,745
Liked 2,492 Times in 1,182 Posts
Default

Good to hear of your successful reunion with the light weight J frame. I avoided the alloy frame J frames for a lot of years. For whatever reason I decided to give a new no lock 442 a try a few years ago and was happily surprised with it. Good smooth trigger pull right out of the box and sights that I could see. With a set of Eagle's " smooth Secret Service grips" I don't mind the extra bit of recoil at all and shoot it rather well.
__________________
Stay safe people!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:25 PM
since 61 since 61 is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Newnan, Ga
Posts: 60
Likes: 290
Liked 64 Times in 33 Posts
Default

I have a 642-2 and have tried several grips none seemed to help with recoil. I finally tried the Ergo Delta Grips and they helped a lot with the recoil and I shoot better. I know they are ugly but I can get past that when I think about shooting before I got them. I have Arthur in both thumbs so unless I find something as good they will stay.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-07-2018, 06:36 PM
OLDSTER's Avatar
OLDSTER OLDSTER is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 10,146
Likes: 14,193
Liked 12,746 Times in 3,482 Posts
Default

IMO, grips make all the difference between enjoying and hating to shoot an Airweight J frame. I've owned this 642-1 for 6 years and have shot it a lot. But a few years back, my arthritic wrists could no longer handle the recoil with "boot" grips. So on the advice from guys on this forum, I bought a set of these. Voila !! Now I actually enjoy shooting a box of plinkers at the range.

__________________
John
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 07-07-2018, 08:40 PM
shouldazagged shouldazagged is offline
Absent Comrade
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
Default

Two words: Pachmayr Compacs.

Yes, they are larger than the boot grips, but not hard to conceal in a pocket. They give purchase for the little finger of my medium large mitts, and allow a high hold without punishment for better control. The backstrap is covered and the space behind the trigger guard is filled.

If you have arthritis in your hands and wrists, you'll appreciate them. Even if you don't, you may like them.
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 07-07-2018, 09:57 PM
HardToHandle's Avatar
HardToHandle HardToHandle is online now
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 506
Likes: 2,639
Liked 676 Times in 312 Posts
Default

Pacmayr Compacs make alloy frame practice easier. Maybe not fully enjoyable, but 50 rounds are doable compared to 10 rounds with stock 442 before pain starts. More grip circumference, easier to get higher and I can get almost a whole hand on them.

I find Compacs workable for belt carry. They are too chunky for jacket or pocket carry in my opinion however. You may have a different opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-07-2018, 10:55 PM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 9,433
Liked 2,728 Times in 998 Posts
Default

I put Hogue Tamer grips on my 442 that I carry in the waist. I kept the stock boot grips on my 442 and 37 that I use for pocket carry. My 36 has Pachmayr Compacts. Needless to say, the 36 being heavier can be shot for a long time. The 442 with Hogue Tamer is a light gun but that grip makes it easy to practice for an hour at the Range. The 37 and 442 with the old uncle mike’s boot grips are good for 50-100 rounds and them I’m about done.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg B5324406-2BD6-4CF1-BC52-BF9134C556D3.jpg (84.0 KB, 52 views)
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 07-08-2018, 02:17 AM
riverrat38 riverrat38 is offline
US Veteran
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 9,073
Liked 2,169 Times in 970 Posts
Default

I like to shoot my M442-1, but, I too have Arthur in my thumbs, and so I shot a lot of 125 gr plated bullets over 4.0 gr of Trail Boss. Not bad. Can't shoot lead at the local indoor ranges. My carry ammo is the new Federal 130 gr HST micro, which, although plus P, has less recoil than the 135 gr Speer SB that I used to carry. I shoot a few of the plus P for "calibration". Can't afford to shoot too many of them in any case! Point of aim is close, and I don't think I would notice the recoil in a Serious Social Situation.

Best,
Rick
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 07-08-2018, 01:49 PM
Boogsawaste's Avatar
Boogsawaste Boogsawaste is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Quakertown PA
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 4,772
Liked 1,180 Times in 491 Posts
Default

My favorite boot grip is actually the Taurus factory one. It covers the backstrap and is still short. Very minor mods to make fit. I pull out the medallions and glue in 38 case heads but one could leave them in.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 83DCA07D-35EC-4651-AEFE-9AF9CBFA8678.jpg (54.6 KB, 28 views)
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-08-2018, 02:04 PM
S&W Rover's Avatar
S&W Rover S&W Rover is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 1,255
Liked 1,134 Times in 521 Posts
Default

Grip selection can help with the problem brought up by the OP -- J frames can be snappy.

Another way to deal with J frame recoil is ammo choice. To enjoy J frames for extended shooting at the range, 148 grain lead hollow-base wadcutters are the way to go. (They are also very accurate at shorter ranges and leave distinct, clean holes in a paper target).

Commercially produced .38 Special 148 grain lead wadcutter ammo is soft-shooting (generally 700-800 fps) and modestly priced. Remington, Black Hills, Selliers & Bellot, etc., make this type of ammo. Not everyone is familiar with it; there was a case this past year of a police officer loading some in a small pistol thinking it was blanks, with tragic results in the ensuing demonstration.

Photo attached to show what this ammo looks like.

(It's a good idea after shooting this milder ammo to make your last five rounds of the day be your choice SD ammo, just as a mental reminder that the 442/642 can have some kick).

I handload Speer 148 grain LHBWC bullets over 2.2 grains of Trail Boss with good results. For ranges that won't allow lead bullets, you can find plated or coated DEWC bullets from the usual bullet companies, but the plated bullets require a bit more velocity than lead to work well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LHBWC Ammo.jpg (86.2 KB, 9 views)
__________________
S&W Rover

Last edited by S&W Rover; 07-09-2018 at 11:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 07-08-2018, 04:09 PM
hostler hostler is offline
Member
S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition S&W Model 442 range review: Second Edition  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southcentral PA
Posts: 605
Likes: 173
Liked 968 Times in 367 Posts
Default

I've been carrying an older (steel) model 60 for years, and I've shot many rounds through it. I never considered it a hard kicking gun with any of the many different grips it has worn throughout the time I've had it.
Last month I bought a 442, I feel little difference in recoil between the two guns. It came with a boot grip which actually was super comfortable, even with a box of +p. I have since put Crimson Trace grip on it (the short pocket CT grip). I don't care for the shape of the CT grip compared to the original S&W but its certainly not uncomfortable to shoot. I shot 50 130gr +Ps and 10 defensive +Ps and not a bit of discomfort. I feel like I could've shot it all day.
For whatever reason I don't think I'm as recoil sensitive as most people. I don't think I have arthritis in my hands of wrists like some do, maybe that's the difference. I also work outside with my hands a lot so my skin is pretty rough. I can shoot my little LCP all day as well and that's another gun that people complain about recoil pain, although the LCP does tend to pinch my trigger finger between the guard and trigger. I have shot the LCP
enough to bloody my trigger finger a time of two.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handloader Special Edition - a review tennexplorer Reloading 14 01-07-2018 06:10 PM
M&P 10 Range review cb4017 Smith & Wesson M&P10 Rifles 7 06-23-2013 01:54 PM
M&P 15 Sport range review - over due cyphertext Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 1 02-26-2012 09:46 PM
Model 327 Range Review magnum12pm S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 05-13-2009 05:24 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)