|
|
01-06-2020, 02:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 507
Likes: 212
Liked 804 Times in 287 Posts
|
|
Four inch vs Five inch 625
Hello Smith and Wesson brain trust!
For the 625 owners out there. Do you prefer the four inch or the five inch and why? Ive toyed around with getting one and can't decide between the barrel lengths. It'd primarily be a range gun.
Thanks!
|
01-06-2020, 03:00 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,292
Likes: 8,816
Liked 7,785 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
Have had several 625s.
For me, they shot the same.
Get whichever pre-IL -3 or -4 you can get the best deal on.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 03:17 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1,236
Liked 6,043 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
The five points better for me, but that's just me.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 04:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Seattle Washington
Posts: 898
Likes: 3,820
Liked 3,818 Times in 736 Posts
|
|
5" barrels are special shooters, it is a fine balanced gun. It will give your ammo a bit better performance, but you have to shoot quality ammo. This can be done through reloading your own.
4" barrels have the edge on different applications, carry, size and excellent balance too. I have many 4" guns in several calibers.
However when I backpack deep into the outback bush I carry a 5" to 7 1.2" barrels (Smith 44 mag or a 7 1.2" inch barrel Ruger 44Mag.
5" inch heavy artillery.
and 4" inch lighter carry, say .357 mags...
to each their own, to each different useage….
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 08:38 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 3,296
Liked 4,963 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
|
On the pre-lock guns, it seems the 5" is more abundant. Not sure if 4" had less made or less for sale... I have both and if limited to only one, it would be the 4". Not because one shoots better but I think 4" is all-around ideal length.
ETA:
If for primary range use, I may go with the 5" as it shoots phenomenal and typically may be cheaper. Nothing wrong with either.
Last edited by jack the toad; 01-06-2020 at 08:48 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 09:01 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 10,136
Liked 10,126 Times in 4,798 Posts
|
|
Jack the toad sums up my opinion very well. I’d not be disappointed with either for range use. For an all-around gun, I’d prefer 4-inch. If you plan to compete in the action games, I believe the 5-inch guns are no longer authorized in certain classes of competition. That doesn’t affect my thinking, but might be important to others.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 09:11 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,582
Likes: 4
Liked 8,931 Times in 4,140 Posts
|
|
I've had a 3" and a 5" for a long time; never had a 4", but doubt you'd see appreciable difference between 4" and 5" versions.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 09:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,105
Liked 5,154 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
Never owned a 4", but the 5" 625-2 is an extremely nice shooter for me. The other four 45acp revolvers I own are old ones (65 to 101 years old). Shown is the 625-2 with a Colt 1917.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 10:34 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 507
Likes: 212
Liked 804 Times in 287 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the replies. Do any of you feel any balance shift between the 4" and 5"
As for shooting quality ammo. Thats no problem, I roll my own almost exclusively now.
|
01-06-2020, 10:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,397 Times in 773 Posts
|
|
I shoot IDPA and let me tell you, I was P.O.ed when they reduced the revolver barrel length from 5 to 4 inches.
Five inch just seems natural for the N frame.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 10:43 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 10,136
Liked 10,126 Times in 4,798 Posts
|
|
You will definitely notice the muzzle heavy aspect with the 5-inch gun more than the 4-inch, unless you have arms like a gorilla. If you’re just banging away, it’s not so much of an issue for me, but if you’re doing precision shooting that’s another thing.
|
01-06-2020, 10:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 406
Likes: 102
Liked 300 Times in 160 Posts
|
|
I prefer the 4” due to balance and ease of carry. I could care less of the IL, so I got the PC model. It does everything that I need and more, especially since I put Herrett Jordan Troopers on it, and reloaded some AR brass. It is the only N frame that I can shoot worth a hoot.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 10:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Steel City
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 6,827
Liked 4,405 Times in 1,409 Posts
|
|
I have both and like both. My Model of 1988 only shoots well with plated bullets. My 625 JM shoots everything well.
Last edited by series guy; 01-06-2020 at 11:02 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 11:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Black Hills South Dakota
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 9,061
Liked 2,988 Times in 1,128 Posts
|
|
Length does matter
You bring up a very good question; 4"bbl vs. 5"bbl.
My experience is the 4"bbl is very unforgiving at the Range.
That being said, to be constant, you have to really concentrate
on Front Sight, Trigger control (a very light/smooth, good trigger
helps here), and even grip can change things (that why all my
Serious Revolvers have the S&W Black pliable grips on).
Revolvers with longer Sight Plains, such as the 5" or 6-1/2"bbl
seem to be right there on target at ranges 7yds to 30yds, just
my experience.
I like to shoot, and do a lot of Indoor Range Shooting (we have
the Best Indoor Range/Owners in the State), and practice is the
key to hit the Bullseye.
I'm always on the look out for a S&W 625 45Colt/629 44Rem
Mag SDS with the 5"bbl. Some day I'll find a Safe Queen, one
new in the box.
The Best to you and your Endeavors.
__________________
SD social distanc'n since 1889
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 11:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,919
Likes: 14,064
Liked 13,774 Times in 4,992 Posts
|
|
I have the 3" and the 4".......Wish I had the 5" to go with them.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
|
01-06-2020, 11:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 18,081
Liked 24,284 Times in 6,870 Posts
|
|
FWIW, I have all three. I prefer the 3”625-3 for ccw, 5” 625-2 for range use and the tapered 4” of my 625-6 MG for backpacking, be it a .45 Colt and not .45 acp. If I could only have one, I’d keep the 4” MG.
__________________
213th FBINA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-06-2020, 11:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE-SC
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 1,508
Liked 271 Times in 171 Posts
|
|
I have a 3,4,and a 5 inch,they all feel great,and are outstanding shooters.
.
|
01-07-2020, 12:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 817
Likes: 409
Liked 732 Times in 370 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Watson
I shoot IDPA and let me tell you, I was P.O.ed when they reduced the revolver barrel length from 5 to 4 inches.
Five inch just seems natural for the N frame.
|
That’s the reason I bought a 4” version.
__________________
Guns + Dogs= Bliss
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-07-2020, 12:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastern Nebraska
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 10,387
Liked 8,357 Times in 2,891 Posts
|
|
I have both a 4" & 5"... 5 inch balances better for me at the range and is therefore more accurate, for me... but one thing not covered yet... if you ever want to use a holster you will want to go with the 4"... holsters specifically for 5 inch N frames are difficult to find...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-07-2020, 09:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Steel City
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 6,827
Liked 4,405 Times in 1,409 Posts
|
|
This thread prompted me to take my 5" Model of 1988 to the range last night to try some coated bullets that I loaded. I'm pretty happy. Target was at 55' fired S/A two hand hold standing. Ten rounds fired.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-07-2020, 10:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 197
Likes: 18
Liked 409 Times in 114 Posts
|
|
625-3 4"
I have a 4" that I really lucked out and picked up in 1998 through an estate sale, NIB, for the princely sum back then of $250. It's been a perfect performer for me and I carry it regularly. It's the piece that got me started on developing my trigger cocking shooting skills and is one of the guns I'll never get rid of. I had started out wanting the 5" but I've been so happy with this one, I can't see being wrong with either.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-07-2020, 07:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Southeastern Washington
Posts: 111
Likes: 264
Liked 109 Times in 54 Posts
|
|
I will take my 625-6 45 colt MG. I like the balance and it packs nice on my pack belt.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-08-2020, 07:41 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 622
Likes: 965
Liked 1,137 Times in 339 Posts
|
|
As a fan of .45 caliber revolvers, I like them all! Although I'm no Charles Atlas I've never had problems holding up any of them at the range. The large hole bored through the barrel does tend to lighten them a bit...
That being said, for some reason my 4" JM makes me look to be a much better shot than I really am!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-08-2020, 10:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 3,979
Liked 2,918 Times in 803 Posts
|
|
I have a 5" 625 in .45ACP and really like the balance. I also have a 4" 25 in .45 Colt. Both are great shooters but I seem to do a bit better with the 625 which I believe has something to do with the balance.
__________________
Ed
Last edited by OldChief; 01-08-2020 at 10:20 AM.
Reason: Add Pics
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-08-2020, 05:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Steel City
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 6,827
Liked 4,405 Times in 1,409 Posts
|
|
Ed those guns have some pretty sweet stocks. Do you know the brand/maker?
|
01-08-2020, 05:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 949
Liked 826 Times in 488 Posts
|
|
Groo here
Once you shoot 3in and 5 in you will most likely not look at another 4in or 6in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!{there are a FEW exceptions like a 6 in Python]
They just feel different.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-08-2020, 06:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 209
Liked 1,195 Times in 457 Posts
|
|
I have both the 625-6 (Model of 1989) 5" and the 625-8 JM Special. Both are ABOVE excellent revolvers. Both of mine shoot extremely well with my home cast bullets of various designs.
I live in Ohio and deer hunting is available to nearly all of the State. Ohio regs limit the minimum barrel length of a revolver to 5" for deer hunting. The .45 Auto Rim with the Lyman 452424 (250 gr Keith cast bullet) is an excellent choice for deer and hogs in the woods. You can safely drive that bullet to 900 fps plus and it is a good choice for woods use.
Some years ago, I lost most of the vision in my right eye. I switched to red dot sights and shoot right handed but left eyed. It surprisingly only took two range sessions to get up to speed with my left eye. When using the Red Dot sight, the 4" shoots just as well for me as the 5". As recently as last year I was still shooting my .45 revolvers as much as 7500 rounds per year. I found that I was using the 4" more than the 5". My youngest son expressed an interest in the 5" and I gifted him that fine revolver. He shoots it very well, too.
FWIW
Dale53
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-10-2020, 05:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 5,882
Liked 9,332 Times in 3,497 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AManWearingAHat
Do you prefer the four inch or the five inch and why?
It'd primarily be a range gun.
|
Either shoot just fine for me at the indoor range, not much difference, but I prefer a 5" for these N-frames.
.
.
.
.
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-10-2020, 10:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Center Point, Texas
Posts: 275
Likes: 51
Liked 407 Times in 120 Posts
|
|
I think there is an issue with the ECM rifling in newer model 625s. I had a JM and it had shallow ECM rifling. It never shot very well (mostly shoot cast). I found several people with 4" guns with cut rifling that all seemed to be better shooters and a few that were just like mine. I think the shallow rifling of everything in 45 ACP coupled with ECM process just isn't such a good thing.
A friend of mine wanted the JM for shooting plates at close range and it works for him for that purpose but he also has a 5" model of 1989 and agrees the 1989 shoots way tighter groups on paper. I also got a used 1989 to replace the ECM JM, totally different gun.
Bottom line is I'd personally not touch a 45 ACP gun with shallow rounded ECM rifling no matter what the barrel length. Difference is obvious with magnification. My JM also made several trips to S&W to get it "acceptable" but never close to great like most of them you hear about.
There was a thread on the topic here: Close up of 625-8 JM EDM rifling
__________________
Go West young man..
Last edited by 1-1917; 01-10-2020 at 11:13 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-10-2020, 12:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: West glacier, Mt
Posts: 190
Likes: 72
Liked 228 Times in 81 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by series guy
I have both and like both. My Model of 1988 only shoots well with plated bullets. My 625 JM shoots everything well.
|
I got a model 1988 from a forum member. One of the throats was way undersized and shaved bullets to .449". Two others were undersized as well. I just split a dowel rod and spun some 500 grit wet dry paper on there and cut down a 45 casing to screw over the paper so it would pilot it in the cylinder. I went from a shotgun blast at the target to nice 1" groups with most loads. Plus I had to get a model of 1988 since that's the year I was born. Now to find my dad a model of 1955.
I should mention that the exit of all the throats were fine, just the start of the throat was off otherwise I would have gotten a reamer.
Last edited by RonPagan; 01-10-2020 at 12:14 PM.
|
01-10-2020, 05:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 45
Likes: 3
Liked 33 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
my Bro in law has the 1986 stainless 625 in 5 inch. It’s his but I own it. Can stand there and eat the center out of a target at 30 feet. I can just flat-out shoot that thing. He can’t do that on his best day and he can shoot. We both shoot our 629’s at clay pigeons at 100 yards on the shot gun range. We hit them more times than miss them. Just to be clear, not in flight, the missed ones on the ground.That model 625 is crazy priced or I would own one. I handled a Jerry M. 4 inch model and I didn’t care for it as much.
|
01-15-2020, 10:52 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mohnton, PA
Posts: 511
Likes: 242
Liked 357 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AManWearingAHat
Hello Smith and Wesson brain trust!
For the 625 owners out there. Do you prefer the four inch or the five inch and why? .............It'd primarily be a range gun.
|
While I don't have a 625, I do have several N frames and IMHO (as others have attested to above) for overall field use (and that includes range use) the 5 inch is the best balanced of them all!! They are my favorite all purpose size while out and about on the property and hunting.
__________________
DAO Hunter, SWCA #2955
|
01-15-2020, 11:12 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,759 Times in 4,037 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AManWearingAHat
Hello Smith and Wesson brain trust!
For the 625 owners out there. Do you prefer the four inch or the five inch and why? Ive toyed around with getting one and can't decide between the barrel lengths. It'd primarily be a range gun.
Thanks!
|
I have one 625. It is an ACP Mountain Gun, so a four inch tapered barrel. I have a variety of ACP blued revolvers, from 3” to 6 1/2”. If I had to lose all but one I would keep a 4” tapered barrel. It packs well, is accurate and has plenty of power. It is my EDC.
However, you have had a bunch of replies suggesting 3, 4, and 5” barrels, some tapered, some full and some with the underlug. (Personally, I have no use for the full lugged barrel.) It boils down to personal preference. What is your planned use? You mentioned a primary role, what is the secondary purpose? A lot would depend on that.
Try as many as you can before you buy. If you were closer, I would lend you some to help you decide.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
Last edited by StrawHat; 01-15-2020 at 11:54 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-15-2020, 04:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 1,412
Liked 871 Times in 487 Posts
|
|
I really like the 5 inch bbl. When I bought mine, I picked it up from a table at the gunshow and at first thought it was a 4 incher when the guy that had the table says, "you do realize that is a 5 inch barrel"? Made me want it all that much more.
|
01-24-2020, 06:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
The one thing that some people have concerns with is the ability to use their handguns for hunting. For deer hunting, in the state of Maryland anyway, is six inches. From what I gather, it is a longer barrel length than most states require.
Here is a summary of this requirement,
"Handguns used for deer hunting must have a barrel length of six inches or more and use ammunition which produces a muzzle energy of 700 foot pounds or more."
I don't plan on hunting with my handguns, but if I do, I have to use a six inch or longer barrel. Lucky for me,. I have a stainless S&W 6" 686-4 to use. I do find the barrel length to be a bit on the front heavy side, but what's a handgun hunter to do? I could always buy a pistol length barrel for one of my T/C Encore frames, in a multitude of more appropriate cartridges. A 35 Remington comes to mind, in a 9 to 15" length.
|
01-24-2020, 06:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 13,126
Liked 7,712 Times in 2,081 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehutch
5" barrels are special shooters, it is a fine balanced gun. It will give your ammo a bit better performance, but you have to shoot quality ammo. This can be done through reloading your own.
4" barrels have the edge on different applications, carry, size and excellent balance too. I have many 4" guns in several calibers.
However when I backpack deep into the outback bush I carry a 5" to 7 1.2" barrels (Smith 44 mag or a 7 1.2" inch barrel Ruger 44Mag.
5" inch heavy artillery.
and 4" inch lighter carry, say .357 mags...
to each their own, to each different useage….
|
You always bring the Best guns to the party !
__________________
I reckon so
|
01-24-2020, 07:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 13,126
Liked 7,712 Times in 2,081 Posts
|
|
I have both the 4” & 5” and I’d give a slight edge to the 5” gun
__________________
I reckon so
|
01-24-2020, 09:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: western NC
Posts: 263
Likes: 73
Liked 556 Times in 139 Posts
|
|
I would choose the longer sight radius of the 5" for range work and plinking.
The 1988 model 5" is crazy accurate!!!!!
__________________
I love the woods and streams.
|
01-25-2020, 12:03 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 89,854
Liked 24,926 Times in 8,533 Posts
|
|
Back about 1999, my duty gun was a 1911 pattern .45 ACP. It started having feeding problems and I needed another handgun NOW. The only candidate in my collection was a 5" M625 .45 ACP. I had a Safariland M29 that I bought for a 5 1/2" Ruger Redhawk about 15 years earlier. My large speedloader pouches held 4 full moon clips, two with the bullet points down and two sitting on top with the bullet points up.
Everything was good except for the weight. With all of the junk I had to carry on my Sam Browne belt, any unneeded ounces needed to go. I called S&W, looking for a 4" Mountain Gun barrel, but the factory was out of stock with no plans to build anymore. However, Brownells had a 3" full lug barrel and that is what I bought. I installed the barrel myself.
I carried that 3" M625 until I retired in 2001. I found that I could load and reload as fast as and even faster than most of my fellow officers could using semi autos.
Round about 2006, I found a 4" M625 Mountain Gun in .45 ACP. Now I'm happy.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
01-25-2020, 01:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 976
Likes: 1,659
Liked 1,759 Times in 502 Posts
|
|
4" or 5"... I prefer a 3" . That said, I've always thought that 5" barrels and N frames were perfect together. Finding holsters for them can be tough, but you can always have one made.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|