Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2020, 07:42 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question

Traded my Browning Hi-Power 9mm and $75 cash for this 629-1 3" Mag-na-ported 44 Magnum today. I've heard several times that the 629-1 model is equivalent to the 29-3 model as far as engineering changes go and both are before the "endurance package". So my question is what FACTORY load would be best to run thru this (1200-1500 per year approximately)? I'd like to stay away from 44 special if possible, but if that is all this will handle, then I guess that's what I'll use. I wish I could run hot loads often, but don't want to rattle it loose. Thanks in advance for all helpful replies!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2020, 08:22 PM
Dieseltech56's Avatar
Dieseltech56 Dieseltech56 is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 1,648
Liked 3,117 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

If you are shooting that many a year have you considered reloading your own?

I would also question why not get a newer 3” 629 to shoot and preserve your nice old one?
__________________
-Matt
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 02-20-2020, 08:30 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

I have been saving my brass for a year or 2 and do plan to reload in the future, but don't have a press yet. Probably start reloading in the fall. 1300 rounds per year is only a 50 round box every other week, so it's not too much money. I know it will be cheaper to reload, but I just don't have the time. I barely have enough time to go to range every other week. When I do make it to range its spur of the moment.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 02-20-2020, 08:41 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Sorry I only answered your first question. To answer your second question, Im not a collector, so I only keep guns that I shoot. That's the reason I traded off the Hi-Power for this gun. I only shot the Hi-Power once and didn't care for it. I plan to shoot this gun. But to keep it in good condition, I want to shoot it with safe loads that won't ruin it.

Last edited by nate-dogg; 02-20-2020 at 08:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 02-20-2020, 08:47 PM
Glashaus Glashaus is offline
SWCA Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 1,638
Liked 3,802 Times in 881 Posts
Default

Just a question, but why shoot 1200-1500 rounds a year of full house .44 magnums out of a 3" mag ported 629-1? I could think of a few more pleasant things to do. I shoot mostly cowboy load .44 magnum rounds at the range just for practice. A few full house magnums at a time just to keep in practice and remind me of what the .44 Magnum is really like.

Nice 3" 629-1, great gun

Just for the record, I own and shoot a 3 " M629-4, backpacker



and a 4" M629-5

__________________
Life NRA, Life TSRA, C&R FFL

Last edited by Glashaus; 02-20-2020 at 09:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:03 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glashaus View Post
Just a question, but why shoot 1200-1500 rounds a year of full house .44 magnums out of a 3" mag ported 629-1? I could think of a few more pleasant things to do.
As I said above it's only 50 rounds every other week. I don't mind recoil.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:12 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

But like I said, I understand full power loads aren't good for this gun so I'm okay with shooting the lower recoil rounds. I just need help determining which loads are safe. I usually just buy Winchester white box.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:30 PM
Nightowl's Avatar
Nightowl Nightowl is offline
SWCA Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,415
Likes: 2,868
Liked 3,333 Times in 1,704 Posts
Default

There are others here that have shot lots of full power loads their .44s, hopefully they will chime in. But, I shot a lot of slightly reduced power reloads through my 29-2 and it held up without problems. Hickok45 claims more than 75,000 rounds through his 29-2 from the mid 70s. He did break a trigger stud.
Guns are different. Some hold up better than others, it seems to me. Shooting a lot of heavy .44s will create some endshake and wear the ratchets so that a new hand will need to be installed, and maybe some other small parts, but as long as the frame and cylinder hold up, they can be rebuilt without a lot of money invested.
From what I have read, the big problem with the pre upgrade guns were heavy use of 300 grain full power loads used in metallic silhouette shooting back in the 80s. Factory 240 grain loads does not seem to be as hard on the guns as the 300 grain loads.
Personally, I think you just shoot it to your hearts content, or as much as your hand will tolerate, then if it needs a tune up, have one done or send it back to the factory, and truck on!!
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:43 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightowl View Post
Personally, I think you just shoot it to your hearts content, or as much as your hand will tolerate, then if it needs a tune up, have one done or send it back to the factory, and truck on!!
I am thinking I will likely buy some 44 special and keep buying Winchester white box 240 grain fmj and just shoot half a box of each per range session that way at the end of the year only half of the 1200ish rounds were full power.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:47 PM
Goblin Goblin is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,455
Liked 1,148 Times in 608 Posts
Default

I recommend Magtech 240 grain. They seemed to have noticeably lighter recoil than some other brands like Winchester white box. Mild enough to shoot a whole box, but you know it’s a magnum and not a special.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 02-20-2020, 09:51 PM
k22fan k22fan is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate-dogg View Post
I am thinking I will likely buy some 44 special and keep buying Winchester white box 240 grain fmj and just shoot half a box of each per range session that way at the end of the year only half of the 1200ish rounds were full power.
The problem with that is the difference in point of impact vertically. Traditional 246 grain RNL are down around half the velocity of standard .44 240 grain cartridges. They don't get out of the barrel until it has risen higher.

There is no reason to believe that your 629 will not hold up as well as old Elmer Keith's Model 29s did. He did not live long enough to see the endurance package and never knew is 29s were not adaquate for standard loads. See night owl's comments on 300 grain bullets above.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 02-20-2020, 10:18 PM
Rammer Jammer's Avatar
Rammer Jammer Rammer Jammer is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 885
Likes: 1,070
Liked 1,750 Times in 579 Posts
Default

Don't worry about it and just shoot it. It'll hold up fine.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:16 PM
Dieseltech56's Avatar
Dieseltech56 Dieseltech56 is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 1,648
Liked 3,117 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

Also I think your gun will tell you what it likes and what is too heavy. If you’re experiencing counter rotation of the cylinder due to it unlocking under heavy recoil I think it’s safe to say that load is too hot. I tried to fix my 29-3 and never had any luck. It needed reduced loads or nothing.
__________________
-Matt
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 02-21-2020, 11:46 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dieseltech56 View Post
Also I think your gun will tell you what it likes and what is too heavy. If you’re experiencing counter rotation of the cylinder due to it unlocking under heavy recoil I think it’s safe to say that load is too hot. I tried to fix my 29-3 and never had any luck. It needed reduced loads or nothing.
I won't feed it anything that is heavy or hot. Just regular 44 mag or maybe 44 special.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 02-22-2020, 12:13 AM
LPD256's Avatar
LPD256 LPD256 is offline
SWCA Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 20,185
Liked 6,282 Times in 1,566 Posts
Default

Great looking new gun. Have fun with it. Hopefully the Mag-na-port will also counteract some recoil. Jh
__________________
SWCA 3255 SWHF 615
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 02-22-2020, 02:12 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 5,882
Liked 9,332 Times in 3,497 Posts
Default

I can't answer your question about factory ammo to use, since I reload, but I'll echo what some others have said, they're not weaklings if you're reasonable with them.

I bought my 29-2 new & shot it a lot (thousands) for many years, but nothing over 240/250gr weight bullets. Some very hot, by today's standards, & a lot of moderate loads.

Some months ago I noticed it was getting hard to unlatch/open the cylinder. Turned out I finally accumulated too much endshake.

Two shims later & all is good with nothing else needing attention.

Use it, don't abuse it & it'll last a long time. (I have my newer 629's if I need a sledgehammer. )

Congrats on your find!

.



.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 02-22-2020, 02:59 AM
Gunhacker's Avatar
Gunhacker Gunhacker is offline
SWCA Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF East Bay - "the delta"
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,587
Liked 4,495 Times in 1,516 Posts
Default

If you haven't fired it yet, you're in for a learning experience about using full loads in a ported short barrel.

And while the gun is up to the task handling full loads, you may find that the unpleasantness of the added blast with a ported gun will be the determining factor in what you're going want to run in it.

I had magnaported 4" bbl 29-2, I had the barrel changed back to a non-ported barrel... can't imagine what a 3" ported barrel is going to be like.
__________________
Conrad
SWCA #1830 SWHF #222
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 02-22-2020, 04:31 AM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunhacker View Post
If you haven't fired it yet, you're in for a learning experience about using full loads in a ported short barrel.

And while the gun is up to the task handling full loads, you may find that the unpleasantness of the added blast with a ported gun will be the determining factor in what you're going want to run in it.

I had magnaported 4" bbl 29-2, I had the barrel changed back to a non-ported barrel... can't imagine what a 3" ported barrel is going to be like.
I think as long as I use factory fmj ammo like Winchester white box Arnscor, Magtech, Fiochi, etc, the recoil and muzzle blast will be fine. I understand that 44 magnum is a scary caliber for many people on this forum. People respond differently to recoil and muzzle blast and I personally enjoy it. This is probably because I am still kinda young, so as I get older I will likely shoot less or none 44 magnum rounds. If it proves to be too much, then I'll just shoot 44 special rounds.

Copied straight from Mag-na-ports website:

"Dual Trapezoidal Mag-na-porting is designed for shooters using shorter barrels with a minimum length of 3 inches. This style of porting provides greater relief from muzzle lift. Using two trapezoidal ports on each side of the barrel, the primary focus of gas dissipation helps reduce the muzzle lift. Extremely effective on the snub nose magnum revolvers.

The Mag-na-port process does not, in itself, alter a handgun's accuracy. The improvement comes from the shooter's being more comfortable, and able to return the gun to a firing position more quickly because of softer recoil. It is this characteristic that is responsible for the popularity of Mag-na-porting amongst law enforcement personnel and competitive shooters."
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-22-2020, 04:49 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,379
Likes: 18,080
Liked 24,283 Times in 6,869 Posts
Default

I shoot standard pressure 44 mag loads, mostly 240 gr Winchester white box or similar out of my 3” 629-1s and 629 Mountain Guns. However, annually I probably shoot 100 to 200 rounds from all of them combined. Not that your gun can’t handle that many rounds, if it were me I’d buy a different 44 mag, perhaps a Ruger or Freedom arms.
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-22-2020, 04:49 AM
Groo01's Avatar
Groo01 Groo01 is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 949
Liked 826 Times in 488 Posts
Default

Groo here
Nice gun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't get hungup over porting [I have many]
Some shooters forget that ALL revolvers are ported[ the BC gap]
The porting on that gun will help the thumb web area[ hurts me]
NOT the kick.
For ammo order from online guys like Georgia, Americam etc,
With cast loads they seldom load heavy..
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-22-2020, 05:04 PM
Gunhacker's Avatar
Gunhacker Gunhacker is offline
SWCA Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF East Bay - "the delta"
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,587
Liked 4,495 Times in 1,516 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate-dogg View Post
I think as long as I use factory fmj ammo like Winchester white box Arnscor, Magtech, Fiochi, etc, the recoil and muzzle blast will be fine. I understand that 44 magnum is a scary caliber for many people on this forum. People respond differently to recoil and muzzle blast and I personally enjoy it. This is probably because I am still kinda young, so as I get older I will likely shoot less or none 44 magnum rounds. If it proves to be too much, then I'll just shoot 44 special rounds.

Copied straight from Mag-na-ports website:

"Dual Trapezoidal Mag-na-porting is designed for shooters using shorter barrels with a minimum length of 3 inches. This style of porting provides greater relief from muzzle lift. Using two trapezoidal ports on each side of the barrel, the primary focus of gas dissipation helps reduce the muzzle lift. Extremely effective on the snub nose magnum revolvers.

The Mag-na-port process does not, in itself, alter a handgun's accuracy. The improvement comes from the shooter's being more comfortable, and able to return the gun to a firing position more quickly because of softer recoil. It is this characteristic that is responsible for the popularity of Mag-na-porting amongst law enforcement personnel and competitive shooters."
Ah yes... being young and enjoying the blast/muzzle flash.

I can relate to that, in my younger days I relished that too, where I competed with my Cousin in seeing which one of use could come up with the hottest .44 Mag Hand loads to make the other wince, and he won hands down with his loads using Hodgdon H110.

The Hodgdon website says this about H110... "H110 is the spherical powder that screams "no wimps, please!", delivering top velocities with great accuracy in 44 Magnum, 454 Casull, 475 Linebaugh and the 460 and 500 S&W magnums.

We shot at an outdoor range and we usually ended up clearly the spots on either side of us at the shooting table when we unleashed our hot loads.

As for factory loads, I've found that Fiocchi is on the hotter side of factory ammo.

Enjoy your gun... I have a 3" 657 .41 Magnum and still enjoy shooting it, albeit with tamer loads to suit this arthritic 67 year old.
__________________
Conrad
SWCA #1830 SWHF #222

Last edited by Gunhacker; 02-22-2020 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-22-2020, 05:43 PM
yfdcap's Avatar
yfdcap yfdcap is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 448
Likes: 379
Liked 396 Times in 164 Posts
Default

I say shoot it with what you want as much as you want. Life is short. Have fun and try and wear it out. If you do, show it off with a round count and how many smiles you got out of it. Have it fixed or buy another at that point. Rinse and repeat as needed. Great gun you have. Enjoy.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 02-22-2020, 06:17 PM
mbliss57's Avatar
mbliss57 mbliss57 is offline
US Veteran
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Desert South West
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 7,356
Liked 8,688 Times in 2,312 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nate-dogg View Post
I am thinking I will likely buy some 44 special and keep buying Winchester white box 240 grain fmj and just shoot half a box of each per range session that way at the end of the year only half of the 1200ish rounds were full power.
I am just curious as to why where you came up with 1200 rounds per year over several years being the "Number" that will ruin your 629? I think there is a lot of myth to shooting/ shaking a 44 magnum apart. I have several magnum guns with short barrels including the 44 magnum 629-3 and 629-4. I have no intention of ever shooting .44 specials out of them. If I do (which I doubt) get some end shake I will just have it fixed and shoot on. Enjoy your beautiful 629-1. Shoot it like it was meant to be shot.
__________________
John 1:17
NRA Life Benefactor
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #24  
Old 02-24-2020, 06:55 PM
nate-dogg's Avatar
nate-dogg nate-dogg is offline
Member
629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question 629-1 3" Mag-na-port question  
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: South central Kansas
Posts: 691
Likes: 2,304
Liked 2,255 Times in 425 Posts
Default

Couldn't sleep today so I snuck off to the range for a little bit. I had a few boxes of various brands of 44 Mag so I sampled them all. Shot 8 cylinders total (48 rounds). The Winchester and American Eagle both shot the same. The Defender Big Boar was much lighter shooting. Felt like 357 mag. I bought a few boxes of the Defender Big Boar at a gun show a while back. I can't find it anywhere online or in store. Must be discontinued. If anyone knows where to find it let me know. The Winchester and American Eagle in the 3" didn't seem anymore powerful than they do out of my 4" 29-2. Not sure what all the fuss is about. To be honest, I was kinda nervous after all the comments above about full power loads in a 3" barrel. I suppose every body is different. Im not a "recoil junkie", but I do appreciate and enjoy shooting large calibers. After seeing how the gun handled today, I have no plans of shooting 44 special. I just hope it doesn't rattle loose too soon. If it does I'll update this thread.



Last edited by nate-dogg; 02-24-2020 at 06:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
632 power port question peyton S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 36 12-04-2021 09:22 PM
66-4 Mag-na-Port serial number question firemanhank S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 09-28-2019 07:03 PM
640-1 357 w P Port Question??? mbliss57 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 10-04-2018 03:56 PM
Mag na port question bikeboy S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 15 08-19-2016 03:26 PM
S&W PC K-Port .357 question Fleshwound S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 05-05-2009 07:06 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)