Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2020, 08:40 PM
gobblergetter's Avatar
gobblergetter gobblergetter is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 58
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Default 629 which one ?

Looking to get an n frame 44. More than likely my only one. Really like the 3" deluxe
But not opposed to the 4" or 5". Mainly for targets, maybe an occasional hog hunt as backup. I also hand load so would probably target shoot more with 44 special. So what say ya'll for if you picked only one ?


Sent from my LG-H931 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 05-16-2020, 10:12 PM
smithman smithman is offline
Member
629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 455
Likes: 167
Liked 433 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Standard 629 4” would be fine. 3” is a bit short for paper punching for me.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 05-16-2020, 10:18 PM
Suburbanite Suburbanite is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Liked 113 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Have you fired at 3" N frame? I haven't. But I have shot a 4" Model 29 enough to think that the 5" 629 Classic is one of the best ideas S&W ever had for the .44 Magnum. It would be a great choice for punching holes in paper or hogs. I am partial to the Winchester Q4240 240 grain JSP for a factory hunting load. A 240 grain LSWC over 9 grains of Unique is a nice general purpose load in magnum cases and has about as much energy as many .357 loads.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-16-2020, 10:21 PM
Engineer1911's Avatar
Engineer1911 Engineer1911 is offline
US Veteran
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 6,125
Likes: 6,652
Liked 6,168 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

PM sent with an offer of availability. You can't just have ONE.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Table decorations.jpg (168.4 KB, 220 views)
__________________
S&WHF 366

Last edited by Engineer1911; 05-17-2020 at 09:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 05-16-2020, 10:44 PM
Oracle's Avatar
Oracle Oracle is offline
US Veteran
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Selah, Washington
Posts: 708
Likes: 2,255
Liked 1,188 Times in 424 Posts
Default

I bought my first revolver, a 629-6 6.5" revolver two years ago and was immediately smitten. I have bought another three S&W revolvers since then. My most recent was a 629-6 3", I had one chance to take it to the range prior to impending ankle replacement surgery and then the Covid-19 virus sequestering at home and lock downs.

It is a super nice revolver, exactly the same fit and trigger feel as my 629-6 6.5" and my model 29 6.5".

The 3" model as is to be expected does have a little more recoil than the 6.5", but the recoil is certainly not overwhelming or flinch inducing.

I would buy the 3" again.

Don
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 05-16-2020, 11:02 PM
diyj98 diyj98 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 403
Liked 2,849 Times in 1,265 Posts
Default

4" is as short as I want a 44 magnum. I have a 2 3/4" 69, but it's mainly my 44 special gun. I'd get either the 4" or 5" depending upon which one balanced the best in my hand.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 05-16-2020, 11:14 PM
geeollie geeollie is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: on the great plains
Posts: 245
Likes: 85
Liked 237 Times in 94 Posts
Default

I've owned a standard 629 4 inch, two 624 with 3 inch barrel and a 629 Mountain gun.

For just looks, the 3 inch N frame is it. For hunting a standard 629 with the heaver barrel may be the winner. But the winning combo for looks, handling and to actual carry is the Mountain gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 05-17-2020, 05:49 AM
CCantu357's Avatar
CCantu357 CCantu357 is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 968
Likes: 1,729
Liked 808 Times in 378 Posts
Default

I have been thinking about getting another .44 as well. As I already I have a Blackhawk with a 6.5 inch barrel, I am considering shorter barreled N-frames. The 3" looks good, but I wonder if that short of a barrel makes sense in .44 Magnum. The 4" 29 or 629 seems like the best option. Plus with newer 629s having a round butt, I figure that it can handle just as easy as the snub nose model.

Last edited by CCantu357; 05-17-2020 at 05:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 05-17-2020, 07:56 AM
Narragansett's Avatar
Narragansett Narragansett is offline
SWCA Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 27,045
Liked 37,129 Times in 4,576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobblergetter View Post
Looking to get an n frame 44. More than likely my only one. Really like the 3" deluxe
But not opposed to the 4" or 5". Mainly for targets, maybe an occasional hog hunt as backup. I also hand load so would probably target shoot more with 44 special. So what say ya'll for if you picked only one ?


Sent from my LG-H931 using Tapatalk
For me, it would be 4,5,6" for paper, and 6" or longer for hunting. The cartridge has a lot more capability in a 6" as opposed to a 3". More velocity, energy and a better sight radius.

Just my .02
__________________
Pete
I ain't no fortunate son
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 05-17-2020, 09:13 AM
gfors's Avatar
gfors gfors is offline
SWCA Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 808
Likes: 1,508
Liked 3,039 Times in 509 Posts
Default

As a "do-all" bbl length, I think 4" is about right. Fairly easy to carry, acceptable sight radius, and better velocity than the 3" guns.
Be sure to check your hunting regs. Here, in CO, a sidearm carried, while hunting, during any of the big game rifle seasons must be at least 4" in length, and ammo used, capable of a minimum 550 foot pounds, at 50 yards.
My 629-6 hits all those requirements, and looks pretty good doing it. I carry this strictly as a back-up. A true "hunting revolver" should probably be 2 inches longer, wearing optics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 101F7999-2372-49DF-B9EF-25014FEE799E.jpg (74.2 KB, 98 views)

Last edited by gfors; 05-17-2020 at 09:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 05-17-2020, 11:35 AM
gobblergetter's Avatar
gobblergetter gobblergetter is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 58
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Love the opinions, keep them coming
Leaning on 4" now

Sent from my LG-H931 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-17-2020, 12:24 PM
Narragansett's Avatar
Narragansett Narragansett is offline
SWCA Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 27,045
Liked 37,129 Times in 4,576 Posts
Default

629 classic pre lock full lug in 5" should give you the sighting radius, and balance you want
__________________
Pete
I ain't no fortunate son
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 05-17-2020, 12:54 PM
Technique Technique is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 7
Liked 48 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobblergetter View Post
Looking to get an n frame 44. More than likely my only one. Really like the 3" deluxe
But not opposed to the 4" or 5". Mainly for targets, maybe an occasional hog hunt as backup. I also hand load so would probably target shoot more with 44 special. So what say ya'll for if you picked only one ?


Sent from my LG-H931 using Tapatalk
I love long barrels but the 4" is very well balanced and would be a good compromise; 3" is too short for target shooting unless you're a glutton for punishment or need a challenge XD
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 05-17-2020, 11:04 PM
Tbojo Tbojo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I have a 6.5 inch & 5 inch Classic with the full under lug barrel and also a 3 inch Deluxe model. All are wonderful revolvers but have there place. The 6.5 sports a 2x scope and is very accurate out to about 80 yards. Also even with heavy hunting loads it is very manageable to fire. The 5 inch is also fairly accurate with iron sights and my old eyes out to about 45-50 yards. It is a little more robust with the heavy stuff but still not unbearable to fire. The 3 inch will make you say uncle pretty quick with hot hunting loads but is a pleasure to shoot with target or moderately loaded ammo. I find it to be the quickest on target for close in action and still surprisingly accurate out to about 25 yards or so. It also carries very nicely and is a very intimidating piece when viewed from the muzzle loaded with hollow point ammo. If I could only have one ??? - well that won't ever happen, but the 5 inch is the Jack of all trades, yet master of none. Which ever one you choose I'm sure you'll be happy, but just like a 1911 it seems like you can't only have one!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 05-17-2020, 11:40 PM
pistolpete10 pistolpete10 is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 272
Likes: 22
Liked 211 Times in 125 Posts
Default

I recently bought the 6" 629 with the standard bbl. It's a range gun unless I take up hog hunting. I seem to shoot better with a 6" bbl. revolver than the shorter lengths.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 05-18-2020, 12:45 AM
JustDan JustDan is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I agree 100% - do I have shorter barrel ones - definitely - but the best all around is the standard 6.5" barrel - which is likely why they outsell all other 629 models.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 05-18-2020, 07:08 AM
ultratec00 ultratec00 is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Liked 318 Times in 216 Posts
Default

If all you want to do is some range work and occasional carry, I'd go 5". It's the right balance for both and you'll appreciate the extra sight radius and weight when it comes to shooting 44 mag loads or occasional hunting.

I have a 3" full lug 629-5 the previous owner had a complete package done by the S&W performance center. Magnaported, action job, crowned barrel, etc. Totally enamored with it, but you have to tailor the loads to the firearm. It is not one for stiff loads and/or heavier bullets. The grips I use for my longer barrels don't work with the 3".

Even with magnaport and full lug, the 3" is very snappy. We're not talking 300gr bear loads. Most are no more than 240 gr, very accurate and manageable in 5" and up barrel lengths. Make no mistake, they're magnum loads but not hand stingers or unpleasant to shoot. Those loads in the 3" are quite a handful. Had to change up the grip which altered my hold to prevent the cylinder release from cutting up my thumb.

Thought about loading up some 44 specials for practice, but had no plans on carrying that in the field and it seemed counter productive to practice with something that wasn't going to be used. Granted, the 3" would never accompany me in the deer woods but more applicable as a summer firearm with snake shot and loads appropriate for varmint/feral dog/coyotes.

Last edited by ultratec00; 05-18-2020 at 08:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 05-22-2020, 08:26 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,367
Likes: 18,061
Liked 24,246 Times in 6,860 Posts
Default

I have 629/29s in 3, 4, 5, 6.5 and 8 3/8 inch barrels. For all around use, l prefer the tapered 4” barrel of the Mountain Gun/Revolver.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 63B60F67-37B4-45AA-96EC-DDF808B227D3.jpg (132.5 KB, 100 views)
File Type: jpg 19E49A5B-E548-46B0-BC20-D7D810C19D5F.jpg (102.0 KB, 90 views)
File Type: jpg 7CB44CD3-84FF-4649-B1BE-B0A96D5BE6D6.jpg (113.5 KB, 100 views)
File Type: jpg 443B26E4-4B57-4E66-A032-4995FE22D0F3.jpg (174.0 KB, 16 views)
__________________
213th FBINA

Last edited by CH4; 06-04-2020 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #19  
Old 05-22-2020, 12:27 PM
mikeruns's Avatar
mikeruns mikeruns is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal/native Montanan
Posts: 552
Likes: 1,425
Liked 472 Times in 235 Posts
Default

I like the 4"...and in my experience, the longer bbls jump higher in recoil because they burn more powder...all of my 7.5" Rugrrs and 6"" & 8-3/8" s&w 44 magnums had more felt recoil than the 4" guns...you will not lose much belocity in a 4" gun and you can hunt it if you like...if you want maximum pressure and velocity and want to scope it as a primary hunting arm then a long bbl may be better suited to that purpose. I have a 4" mtn gun and it is lighter than a model 28 because of the bigger bore and same tapered bbl. the standard 629 4" would be about as handy and very accurate in the experience I had with one I had owned....the 6" and longer are just generally too big to pack on the hip with rifle in tow for me but some folks don't mind...and as backup I usually carry a 2-3/4" Ruger speed-six 357.....ymmv-to each his own and now you have my opinion as to what I favor and choose for some reasons....��
There is always the chest or shoulder holsters if one has his mind set on a longer bbl version though-good luck!

Last edited by mikeruns; 06-13-2020 at 10:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 05-22-2020, 08:00 PM
mfholmes mfholmes is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 235
Liked 100 Times in 36 Posts
Default

If you only plan on one ( and that might not last long after the first ) I'd go for a nice early blued pre-29 5 screw. Nothing beats the feel. 44 special feels like a 22 and the hog load 44 mags just feel awesome. Nothing longer than 5" or shorter than 4". If you can't find one at the right price then the 629 classic is a beauty. Same length.

Last edited by mfholmes; 05-22-2020 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 05-30-2020, 10:18 AM
STRAUK STRAUK is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gobblergetter View Post
Looking to get an n frame 44. More than likely my only one. Really like the 3" deluxe
But not opposed to the 4" or 5". Mainly for targets, maybe an occasional hog hunt as backup. I also hand load so would probably target shoot more with 44 special. So what say ya'll for if you picked only one ?


Sent from my LG-H931 using Tapatalk
I too had the same question when I considered owning a 44, I do not have an unlimited budget for guns. So I settled on the 5". Fired it for the first time last weekend. What a dream boat of a gun. Even my 150 pound wife can handle the recoil of the heavy load 240Gn JSP ammunition. Both of us were able to punch holes within 2-4in on targets at 7-10 yards. My 18 year old grandson mastered it within 12 rounds. We all were absolutely in love with the S&W 629-6 in 5" in a matter of a few rounds. Recoil was not unbearable and the accuracy is stunning for such a big and powerful handgun. I will be quite unafraid to carry it on my next hog hunt for a backup sidearm.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 06-04-2020, 01:45 PM
Mike_Fontenot Mike_Fontenot is offline
Member
629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 414
Likes: 45
Liked 185 Times in 136 Posts
Default

Another vote for the 5" full-underlug 629. It's my EDC, and it is very comfortable to shoot, even with the full-spec 240gr Underwoods I exclusively shoot (partially because of the very relaxed grip I use, combined with the X500 grips).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 06-04-2020, 01:49 PM
gen3guy gen3guy is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 604
Likes: 21
Liked 660 Times in 284 Posts
Default

I have a friend who has the 5 inch "Classic". He loves it. I don't think I would go on a hog hunt with a 3" anything.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #24  
Old 06-04-2020, 02:56 PM
roberth roberth is offline
Member
629 which one ?  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westminster, Colorado
Posts: 79
Likes: 6
Liked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Default

My 5 inch 629 came in, gotta wait 20 hours for the background check.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #25  
Old 06-05-2020, 03:05 AM
Univibe Univibe is offline
Banned
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 10
Liked 2,152 Times in 854 Posts
Default

I like my 6.5 inch. Longer sight radius, better recoil damping.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-05-2020, 07:11 AM
SLT223's Avatar
SLT223 SLT223 is online now
Member
629 which one ?  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 2,723
Liked 5,054 Times in 1,442 Posts
Default

44 snubs are really fun especially if you handload. 3” to 5” 629’s are my favorite. Caution: The snubs become an expensive addiction!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-05-2020, 07:35 AM
Jdavis's Avatar
Jdavis Jdavis is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central Florida
Posts: 798
Likes: 1,203
Liked 1,015 Times in 391 Posts
Default

Lots of good advice and opinions given here. I like the longer 6” or 6.5” for targets because of the added sight radius and recoil is somewhat mitigated during extended shooting secessions. For packing on a hunting or hiking in a hip holster, the 4” is ideal but the longer barrel can be made more comfortable in a shoulder or bandolier rig. Many here have suggested the 5” as a good compromise, which it is. However, in my experience, I prefer the 4” standard (half lug) 629 for most all situations. YMMV
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2325566B-AE9D-4EC0-A103-903AE0D32ABC.jpg (95.9 KB, 23 views)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-07-2020, 08:40 PM
ShootMeStraight ShootMeStraight is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 110
Likes: 7
Liked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Default

I love my 5" 629 Classic with the full length underlug.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-07-2020, 08:49 PM
kleeber kleeber is offline
Member
629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ? 629 which one ?  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 17
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

I have 629's in 3, 4, 5, 6, 6.5, and 8 3/8". If I had to narrow it down to just one, I'd pick the 5" classic.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)