|
|
05-06-2020, 09:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
revolvers?
greetings,
I'm looking at getting a new revolver, either in K or L frame.
I have in mind a stainless .357 mag.
I'm not familiar with current guns so do not know if there are any models to avoid, or to prefer. All my guns are from the 1980s, or before.
I will mostly use it for informal club competition,so don't want to invest a fortune in it. It will need to be red dot and/or scope capable. It should also be fairly light, as some events require weak hand only shooting.
Hope I am not asking for too much.
TIA
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-06-2020, 10:01 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,908
Likes: 989
Liked 19,030 Times in 9,312 Posts
|
|
If you are looking for a current production gun, the 4.25" model 66 fits the bill. Lighter than an L frame and without the full lug barrel. A 4" 686 SSR would be a close second.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following 18 Users Like Post:
|
4barrel, Andy Taylor, chris1961, DR505, Injunbro, JayFramer, joe44va, JohnRippert, M E Morrison, Model1567, Muley Gil, Oracle, Protocall_Design, reccpd101, runscott, rwsmith, StrawHat, Zarr |
05-06-2020, 10:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Based on the criteria mentioned, Murphydog's recommendation would also be mine.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-06-2020, 10:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
If you are looking for a current production gun, the 4.25" model 66 fits the bill. Lighter than an L frame and without the full lug barrel. A 4" 686 SSR would be a close second.
|
thank you. I am leaning toward a modern gun, mostly because of the factory drilled scope bases.
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-06-2020, 10:41 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,584
Likes: 3,072
Liked 22,574 Times in 5,847 Posts
|
|
I too would recommend the current Model 66 as a very fine offering
Quote:
Originally Posted by M E Morrison
thank you. I am leaning toward a modern gun, mostly because of the factory drilled scope bases.
|
If this is your only reason to go with a "Modern" gun, you should know that the factory began drilling and tapping frames for scope mounts in the early 1990s
So if there is an older gun that is catching your eye, there may not need to be a reason to rule it out
__________________
"Acta non verba"
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-06-2020, 10:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Taylor
Based on the criteria mentioned, Murphydog's recommendation would also be mine.
|
thank you!
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-07-2020, 12:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 763
Likes: 829
Liked 1,361 Times in 506 Posts
|
|
I have very little experience with K frames. But I have a late model 686 four inch barrel that I think is the best all around revolver made. For the money. I had TK Customs do an action job on mine and it is sweet.
Good luck with your decision.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 12:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 830
Likes: 962
Liked 902 Times in 444 Posts
|
|
+1 on the 686.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 12:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 18,081
Liked 24,284 Times in 6,870 Posts
|
|
Another vote for the 686 over the 66, which has the two-piece barrel. The extra weight of the full lug will help with 357 mag recoil.
__________________
213th FBINA
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 03:36 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,250 Times in 13,830 Posts
|
|
I suppose it matters how much.....
How much .357 are you planning on shooting through it? If you are shooting more .357 than .38, definitely get the 686. If you only shoot .357 occasionally, get the 66.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 05:09 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,908
Likes: 989
Liked 19,030 Times in 9,312 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
I too would recommend the current Model 66 as a very fine offering
If this is your only reason to go with a "Modern" gun, you should know that the factory began drilling and tapping frames for scope mounts in the early 1990s
So if there is an older gun that is catching your eye, there may not need to be a reason to rule it out
|
Correct, if you find a 66- or 686-4 or later (the ones with the rounded forward edge of the rear sight leaf), these were factory drilled and tapped for an optic mount.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 07:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,771
Likes: 19,529
Liked 11,875 Times in 5,392 Posts
|
|
Since you mentioned that you want something relatively light in weight due to having to shoot weak handed as part of competition, I'd say the Model 66 Classic would be a good fit. It's a few ounces lighter than a 4 inch Model 686. The Model 66 Classic had a much improved cylinder locking system and the two-piece barrel eliminates the thin spot at the bottom of the forcing cone in older K-frames, which is an area that can crack.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 08:14 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,759 Times in 4,037 Posts
|
|
I have shot competition and have used both the K and the L frame revolvers. For what you have requested the newer Model 66 is the answer.
My advice would be to attend a couple of shoots and see what others are using. Unless things have drastically hanged, competitors enjoy showing off what they have and use. They may even let you try a few shots.
Good luck and keep us posted.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 10:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus357
|
good info - thanks!
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-07-2020, 10:38 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
I too would recommend the current Model 66 as a very fine offering
If this is your only reason to go with a "Modern" gun, you should know that the factory began drilling and tapping frames for scope mounts in the early 1990s
So if there is an older gun that is catching your eye, there may not need to be a reason to rule it out
|
I'm leaning toward modern, pre-drilled, as there are no "gunsmiths" around here that I would trust. Down side of living out in the boonies....
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-07-2020, 10:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4
Another vote for the 686 over the 66, which has the two-piece barrel. The extra weight of the full lug will help with 357 mag recoil.
|
How about that two piece barrel? I'm not at all familiar with them......
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 10:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwsmith
How much .357 are you planning on shooting through it? If you are shooting more .357 than .38, definitely get the 686. If you only shoot .357 occasionally, get the 66.
|
I would expect to shoot more 38s, or cowboy loads in 357 - some matches have a short time limit and require a reload, so recoil becomes an issue.
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 10:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by murphydog
Correct, if you find a 66- or 686-4 or later (the ones with the rounded forward edge of the rear sight leaf), these were factory drilled and tapped for an optic mount.
|
thank you.....
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-07-2020, 10:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds
Since you mentioned that you want something relatively light in weight due to having to shoot weak handed as part of competition, I'd say the Model 66 Classic would be a good fit. It's a few ounces lighter than a 4 inch Model 686. The Model 66 Classic had a much improved cylinder locking system and the two-piece barrel eliminates the thin spot at the bottom of the forcing cone in older K-frames, which is an area that can crack.
|
thanks for that info
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-07-2020, 10:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawHat
I have shot competition and have used both the K and the L frame revolvers. For what you have requested the newer Model 66 is the answer.
My advice would be to attend a couple of shoots and see what others are using. Unless things have drastically hanged, competitors enjoy showing off what they have and use. They may even let you try a few shots.
Good luck and keep us posted.
Kevin
|
good idea - thanks
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 01:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,000
Likes: 41,665
Liked 29,250 Times in 13,830 Posts
|
|
It doesn't sound like.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by M E Morrison
I would expect to shoot more 38s, or cowboy loads in 357 - some matches have a short time limit and require a reload, so recoil becomes an issue.
|
It doesn't sound like you need the full .357 magnum power soaking ability of the 686 since 'cowboy' loads are pretty mild. So surely the 66 would be a good choice UNLESS you want to absolutely minimize recoil at the expense of a heftier frame with the full barrel lug.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 02:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwsmith
It doesn't sound like you need the full .357 magnum power soaking ability of the 686 since 'cowboy' loads are pretty mild. So surely the 66 would be a good choice UNLESS you want to absolutely minimize recoil at the expense of a heftier frame with the full barrel lug.
|
yeah, this is turning into a juggling act - heavier for less recoil - or lighter to suit the weak hand.....
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 03:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where this month?
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 264
Liked 4,215 Times in 1,714 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
If this is your only reason to go with a "Modern" gun, you should know that the factory began drilling and tapping frames for scope mounts in the early 1990s
|
IINM the rounded sight base occurred at that time as well.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 05:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 18,081
Liked 24,284 Times in 6,870 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M E Morrison
How about that two piece barrel? I'm not at all familiar with them......
|
It’s merely personal preference, but I don’t like the look of the two-piece barrel. To my eye it just looks cheap/cheesy compared to a one-piece barrel.
__________________
213th FBINA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 05:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 2,265
Liked 2,398 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
|
Reading these posts have almost talked me into a 686.....never shot one!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2020, 09:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 18,081
Liked 24,284 Times in 6,870 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babysitr
Reading these posts have almost talked me into a 686.....never shot one!
|
You won’t be disappointed.
__________________
213th FBINA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-08-2020, 07:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,771
Likes: 19,529
Liked 11,875 Times in 5,392 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M E Morrison
How about that two piece barrel? I'm not at all familiar with them......
|
Evidently the patents on the two piece barrel system pioneered by Dan Wesson has expired. S&W began using a similar system and now Ruger has started to use a similar system.
The two piece barrel consists of a tubular barrel that is threaded on both ends. It is screwed into the frame and the barrel-cylinder gap is set. Then, the external shroud is placed, usually the shroud is indexed to the frame with a pin and hole arrangement and a retention nut holds the shroud to the muzzle end of the barrel.
The first version of Dan Wesson revolvers had an ugly, external nut, but the second version used a recessed nut and that is what is seen on S&W and Ruger revolvers. One benefit of the two piece barrel system is that it tensions the barrel, which dampens vibration during firing, this often results in improved and more consistent accuracy.
Do not fear the two piece revolver barrel system, it works very well.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-08-2020, 11:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds
Evidently the patents on the two piece barrel system pioneered by Dan Wesson has expired. S&W began using a similar system and now Ruger has started to use a similar system.
The two piece barrel consists of a tubular barrel that is threaded on both ends. It is screwed into the frame and the barrel-cylinder gap is set. Then, the external shroud is placed, usually the shroud is indexed to the frame with a pin and hole arrangement and a retention nut holds the shroud to the muzzle end of the barrel.
The first version of Dan Wesson revolvers had an ugly, external nut, but the second version used a recessed nut and that is what is seen on S&W and Ruger revolvers. One benefit of the two piece barrel system is that it tensions the barrel, which dampens vibration during firing, this often results in improved and more consistent accuracy.
Do not fear the two piece revolver barrel system, it works very well.
|
OK, thanks for the explanation. I had never seen one of these, so didn't know what to expect....
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-12-2020, 04:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
well, it's settled. I ordered a 4.25" M66 yesterday afternoon.
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-12-2020, 04:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 1,908
Liked 4,432 Times in 1,361 Posts
|
|
Being late to the thread I was going to suggest GP100.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-12-2020, 05:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hittman77
Being late to the thread I was going to suggest GP100.
|
not too familiar with them, but I don't think they are as easy to install scopes/red dot sights?
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-12-2020, 05:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babysitr
Reading these posts have almost talked me into a 686.....never shot one!
|
I kind of want a new 66 now.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-12-2020, 05:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 256
Likes: 324
Liked 316 Times in 143 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt911
I kind of want a new 66 now.
|
Then I think you should get one.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-13-2020, 07:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: central ohio
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 949
Liked 826 Times in 488 Posts
|
|
Groo here
All the above and one more.
As you said light, A M327 TRR8.
5in 8 shot 357mag on an N frame BUT mounts included and goes 35 oz.
BUT they are pricy,,,,,,,
The 66 is on the K frame and if your hands are some what smaller
will be a treat.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-13-2020, 08:32 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groo01
Groo here
All the above and one more.
As you said light, A M327 TRR8.
5in 8 shot 357mag on an N frame BUT mounts included and goes 35 oz.
BUT they are pricy,,,,,,,
The 66 is on the K frame and if your hands are some what smaller
will be a treat.
|
I have a pair of N frames, a 624 and a 625 - they are bigger than I want for this application...
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
05-14-2020, 10:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 572
Likes: 271
Liked 665 Times in 235 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds
Evidently the patents on the two piece barrel system pioneered by Dan Wesson has expired. S&W began using a similar system and now Ruger has started to use a similar system.
The two piece barrel consists of a tubular barrel that is threaded on both ends. It is screwed into the frame and the barrel-cylinder gap is set. Then, the external shroud is placed, usually the shroud is indexed to the frame with a pin and hole arrangement and a retention nut holds the shroud to the muzzle end of the barrel.
The first version of Dan Wesson revolvers had an ugly, external nut, but the second version used a recessed nut and that is what is seen on S&W and Ruger revolvers. One benefit of the two piece barrel system is that it tensions the barrel, which dampens vibration during firing, this often results in improved and more consistent accuracy.
Do not fear the two piece revolver barrel system, it works very well.
|
THANK YOU for this excellent explanation. I've been looking for this information.
To the OP, I would go with either a 686 or 686SSR. I own both and they are crazy accurate; a pleasure to shoot. My standard 686+ 4 inch is both handy and well-balanced as well as accurate. Can't ask for more.
__________________
Army veteran, NRA Life Member
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-14-2020, 11:20 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
|
|
__________________
Mike
S&WCA #3065
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-27-2020, 08:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mercer County, PA, USA
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 19,302
Liked 1,781 Times in 897 Posts
|
|
got it!
picked up the M66 today - went straight to the range!
only had some Fiocchi 158 cowboy loads, so got it sighted in for them. shot it in two postal matches.
shoots pretty good - I'm happy!
__________________
Merle, retired
western PA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-27-2020, 09:20 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 6,989
Liked 9,332 Times in 2,759 Posts
|
|
I would get either a Model 66 or then new Combat Magnum version of the 66.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-27-2020, 10:56 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Selah, Washington
Posts: 708
Likes: 2,255
Liked 1,188 Times in 424 Posts
|
|
I recently asked this forum for a recommended red dot mount. Raptor Sight Mount S&W Reflex Sight Mounts was recommended so I bought one.
The mount is working great with my Trijicon RMR2.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|