Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-07-2020, 05:56 PM
Alexei Alexei is offline
Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"

Seeking opinions. At say 25 yards, am I likely to see a huge difference in accuracy ? I'll probably be shooting 125gr. 357 and 125 gr. 38 +P ammunition.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-07-2020, 06:12 PM
murphydog's Avatar
murphydog murphydog is offline
Moderator
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,783
Likes: 937
Liked 18,877 Times in 9,241 Posts
Default

There can be a big difference between mechanical accuracy (what a gun will do bolted to a Ransom Rest or similar) and practical accuracy (how easy it is for humans to shoot unsupported).

With the longer sight radius and more muzzle weight you will 'probably' shoot smaller groups with the 6" barrel. For the truly skilled it may not make a lot of difference.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-07-2020, 08:16 PM
Protocall_Design Protocall_Design is offline
Vendor
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City area
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 53,433
Liked 13,435 Times in 4,240 Posts
Default

If both guns are in identical perfect mechanical condition, (not likely unless worked over), the group size in a Ransom Rest won't be much different. If the 6" gun has a bad barrel crown, the barrel is leaded up, out of time, etc., the 2-1/2" one could very well shoot better groups from a Ransom Rest. Holding them by hand is a different deal. A good shooter on a bench rest could tell what was what, but would most likely have bigger groups than the Ransom Rest.
__________________
protocalldesign.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2020, 09:46 AM
Dave.357 Dave.357 is offline
Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 3,534
Liked 4,157 Times in 1,390 Posts
Default

Standing up off hand at 7 yards
not much difference. At 25 yards
99% of the people out there,
Will shoot a group with the
6" gun 1/2 the size of a 2-1/2
Gun. Nothing to do with the
Potential of gun.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2020, 09:49 AM
6518John's Avatar
6518John 6518John is offline
SWCA Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: AR—Town & Country
Posts: 7,478
Likes: 80,268
Liked 26,096 Times in 5,948 Posts
Default

As I have aged I find that I shoot a 2.5 inch 686 the most accurately of any revolver. The shorter sight radius is easier to line up correctly due to my eyes.
__________________
Possum—The other white meat!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2020, 11:38 AM
oink oink is offline
Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 2,312
Liked 3,010 Times in 1,251 Posts
Default

If not in a rest you will likely see a big difference between the snubbie and the 6". A 4" is a good compromise if you're trying to go shorter. If not for concealed carry I'd go for longer than the snubbie.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2020, 12:31 PM
Alexei Alexei is offline
Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 12 Posts
Default Accuracy

Great answers, and they all make sense. Thanks !
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2020, 02:54 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is online now
US Veteran
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,389
Likes: 2,476
Liked 13,050 Times in 4,535 Posts
Default

Now I am going to have to take my 6" 586 and my 2.5" 686+ out of mothballs to see if this is true. Sounds like fun!

Don't we require pictures?



__________________
Come and take it!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 08-08-2020, 06:31 PM
Harkrader's Avatar
Harkrader Harkrader is offline
Member
Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5" Question regarding comparative accuracy of 586-6" and a 686-2.5"  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: S.E. Wisconsin and MSP
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 713
Liked 1,574 Times in 578 Posts
Default

Accuracy with a short barrel, if it is a quality gun, has a lot to do with you.

Bob Munden broke balloons at 200 yards with a S&W J-frame. Videos are online.

I met USAF Lt. Co. Wm Butler of SAC through his son, with whom I went through USAF pilot training and Viet Nam.
There was a famous story of the Lt. Col. from when he was a "butter bar" lieutenant. He was assigned to Panama and given the task of seeing to the firearms qualifications of base personnel.

At some point a many-chevroned sergeant came up. He felt it was beneath him to have to show proficiency with a hand gun, far worse that it was to a 2nd Lieutenant.
With words known only to senior NCOs he took the revolver and in movie cowboy fashion hurled six rounds downrange. Of course, it did not come close to required proficiency. The Master Sergeant declared that the (again using words known only to senior NCOs) gun was obviously a piece of (more such arcane words).
Whereupon Lt. Butler, a skilled and accomplished competition shooter, said "Let me try it, Master Sergeant." He loaded six rounds, turned his back to the target, bent over and shot all six from between his legs, all in the 10 ring.
He handed the gun back to the Master Sergeant saying "Seems fine to me, Master Sergeant. Try it again."
I never asked the Lt. Col. what revolver that was, but since it was not too far post WWII I have often wondered if it was a S&W Model 1917. He did say it was a .38, so probably not.

About 20 years ago I was whining about the miserable accuracy of a snub-nose .44-Special. A clerk I knew at a local gunstore offered to try it for me. I was certain he would validate my umbrage. Instead, he put all five rounds into a 4-inch circle at six meters.
Nuff sed.

'
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SD9VE - question about accuracy "specs" drmweaver2 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 27 09-08-2016 12:47 PM
What is meant by "Follow through" in shooting for accuracy? bushmaster1313 The Lounge 22 02-08-2016 09:50 AM
CZ 527 .223 bolt rifle, "Mini Mauser" accuracy and goodness (pics).... canoeguy Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 18 11-18-2014 04:02 PM
alaskan 2" vs 629 4" woods carry, accuracy durability island S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 39 02-06-2014 06:31 PM
5" Model of 1989 625 comparative velocites sunday bill S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 10-26-2012 08:03 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)