Model 43C

gerhard1

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
646
Reaction score
1,158
Location
Kansas
103043_01_lg.jpg


Some time back, I had my LGS put a new Model 43 C aside for me and a few days later, I picked it up, using my oil royalty check to pay for it.

The 43C is an eight-shot revolver in 22 Long Rifle made of either magnesium or aluminum alloy and the first thing I noticed when I picked it up was the weight, which was almost nothing. According to the S&W website, it weighs in at 11 ounces. Mine also sports Spegel-style boot grips.

The second thing I took note of was that there is no--repeat NO--lock. The internal lock is gone!! To be truthful, however, my understanding is that most, in fact, almost all, of the IL failures have been on Scandium framed magnum revolvers with full charge loads, so for me, they have never really been an issue. That said, I don't particularly like them, as the potential for unintended engagement is always there.

I took the little S&W out to my range and gave it a workout. The light weight, and the almost total lack of recoil in the rounds made the gun very pleasant to shoot and with the short barrel, combined with the light weight should make this gun a joy to carry in a pocket of the vest that a friend gave me.

This gun is intended for very close range work, and here it should serve admirably. As a BUG, it would be a good choice for some. Granted, the 22 LR is not a power-house, but it is cheap to shoot and this lack of expense will perhaps encourage some to practice. I think it will make it easier for me to do so.

It won't replace my K-, L-, and N-frames in more traditional (more powerful) calibers, but, like my 32's, it has its' niche and in this niche, it will serve quite well, as I can hide it in my hand and be ready to shoot with no one being the wiser. Plus, it won't frighten the sheep if I hide it in my hand, which is something that I can't do with my other, larger revolvers.

This is one 2" that I'd carry.

Plus, it is a lot of fun to shoot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register to hide this ad
Good choice, I gave each of my grown daughters this gun. To quote a self defense expert (forgot his name) the purpose of a self defense gun is to cause a break in contact w/the suspect.
 
I have Herritt Ace grips in my 340PD w/a grip adapter. Perfect fit, they cover the backstrap & absorb recoil better.
 
I picked up a new 43c about two months ago. I was looking at a few Charter and Taurus 22s in lightweight platforms for training. I ended up spending an extra 200-300 for Smith quality. However, I have not been very impressed with the 43c quality. It has an unacceptable amount of misfires to the rate of about 10-15% even using CCI ammunition. Without warning, the locking bolt will not compress forward to allow you to close the cylinder. I fired a cylinder full at the range the other day and reloaded just to find I was not able to close the cylinder. Once I got home I was able to compress the bolt with a small screwdriver to unfreeze it. I really wish I would have bought a Charter Arms now.
 
Glad to hear a good report on a recent Model 43C. How would you describe the trigger pull? It is never great on such a light rimfire, but gather you are satisfied.

I have both a 317 and 351. Neither have great trigger pulls, but the newer 351 is preferable, even if not lighter.

Greg Ellifritz, noted trainer who just retired as police officer, reported a few weeks ago that his vintage (and irreplaceable) S&W 317 blew up. He is a long time fan of rimfire snubs. Read his story, which sounds like a good reminder of what not to do.
Why Did My Gun Blow Up? | Active Response Training
 
Congrats on your 43C and the report. I have always wanted one. Maybe I can make that happen when/if we get back to some sense of normalcy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top