Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-07-2009, 02:20 PM
windjammer's Avatar
windjammer windjammer is offline
Member
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid-Tennessee
Posts: 393
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default S&w trr8

Did any of you see the write-up and picture in the American Rifleman on the new S&W TRR8. It's a 8 shot .357 revolver.

It has a Picatinny rail on top and a rail on the bottom. The one pictured had a red dot scope on top and a Hi-intensity light on the bottom rail.

Scandium Frame, 5" barrel. MSRP.....$1414.00. The way it looks, it would be hard to carry. I guess someone could make a holster for it.

__________________
Regards,
Windjammer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2009, 02:31 PM
ChadW's Avatar
ChadW ChadW is offline
US Veteran
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 201
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

It's so tacticool!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 327trr8.JPG (27.0 KB, 2978 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2009, 03:43 PM
GatorFarmer GatorFarmer is offline
Junior Member
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheridan, Wyoming
Posts: 5,333
Likes: 159
Liked 3,889 Times in 1,361 Posts
Default

I don't think that it is actually new. It's been shown on the website and in catalogs for years. I have no idea how many they sell. The rail on top for an optic makes sense if one wants to use it as a hunting gun. The light rail... less so... since it risks putting digits forward of the barrel/cylinder gap.

Someone must have liked the looks of old Snake's gun in "Escape from LA".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:29 PM
Titan's Avatar
Titan Titan is offline
Member
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MA - Where the 2nd Amendment is under seige
Posts: 726
Likes: 30
Liked 92 Times in 43 Posts
Default

I think that the fully decked out configuration is intended for some Tactical Operator's pouch.

I can't even envision a holster that would handle it.


It would be very cool to shoot, if not own.

.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2009, 10:58 PM
jkc jkc is offline
Member
S&w trr8  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 1,256
Liked 630 Times in 357 Posts
Default

I read the review, and remain unimpressed with the concept, for several reasons. Firstly, despite the "unobtainium" alloy frame, by the time you add the electronic optic aiming widget and the light/laser module, the thing is so bulky and heavy and unwieldy that you might better be looking at a shotgun or carbine for similar purposes. Secondly, you can get superior "firepower" in terms of round count, and widgets in more ergonomically correct configuration with semiautos. Thirdly, it's still "just" a .357, a round that makes sense in a J-frame, but probably not in an envelope as large as tested in the write-up.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2009, 08:06 AM
bobf's Avatar
bobf bobf is offline
US Veteran
S&w trr8  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 638
Likes: 647
Liked 483 Times in 146 Posts
Default

I use mine without the rails but with a light and laser it would be a good nightstand gun. I have three eight shot 357s, a 27, 627 and the TRR8. I would rather shoot the TRR8, the weight balance and feel are just the way I like them.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-08-2009, 12:28 PM
roundgunner's Avatar
roundgunner roundgunner is offline
US Veteran
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rural, CT
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 578
Liked 1,390 Times in 324 Posts
Default

I think the intent was a one handed weapon for the first thru the door entry team. I have seen the man with the shield line up the sights to fire with the slide to close to the shield. When the slide comes back striking the shield, short stroking the slide, making the auto a single shot weapon at the most inappropriate time. 8 rounds of anything beats 1 round of 40 if the bad guys are shooting at you. The TRR8 would be my weapon of choice with the shield.

I don’t have the TRR8 but my nightstand gun was a 4 inch 625 for years with a separate flashlight and Crimson trace grips. I have become a M&P auto fan and now have a 40 with an attached light/laser on my bed stand.
__________________
Shoot fast & live long
Warren
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2009, 05:37 AM
mso88 mso88 is offline
US Veteran
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Middle East/SE Asia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Shooting the TRR8

I didn't see the American Rifleman write-up, but would love to fire a 327TRR8. The reliability of a revolver combined with the 8-round capacity makes it a cool alternative to Glocks or Commander-sized 1911s.
More kick with the lightweight Scandium frame? Who cares?
'Wanna get one...this year!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2009, 09:58 AM
m657's Avatar
m657 m657 is offline
Member
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sunny Orygun
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 392
Liked 307 Times in 195 Posts
Default

I had the 'gonna get one' virus a couple years ago. The chance to shoot a 627 V8 along side with a TRR8 changed my choice.

While I like the TRR8, and have fired them with the bells, whistles & kitchen appliances attached, I haven't come across a decent deal on one. Yet.

On the other hand, the 627PC is my all time favorite DA revolver. I shoot speed steel & ICORE with it. Of course it is a different creature than the TRR8.
__________________
Dum vivimus Vivamas
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-13-2009, 12:47 PM
paragon1 paragon1 is offline
Member
S&w trr8  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 164
Likes: 9
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roundgunner View Post
I think the intent was a one handed weapon for the first thru the door entry team. I have seen the man with the shield line up the sights to fire with the slide to close to the shield. When the slide comes back striking the shield, short stroking the slide, making the auto a single shot weapon at the most inappropriate time. 8 rounds of anything beats 1 round of 40 if the bad guys are shooting at you. The TRR8 would be my weapon of choice with the shield.

I don’t have the TRR8 but my nightstand gun was a 4 inch 625 for years with a separate flashlight and Crimson trace grips. I have become a M&P auto fan and now have a 40 with an attached light/laser on my bed stand.
That is correct, it is a shield gun. It was actually based on requests of some LE departments. It also comes standard with the ability to use moon clips as a standard. The bottom pic rail is usually used with a moon clip holder for reloads.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-13-2009, 05:19 PM
Titan's Avatar
Titan Titan is offline
Member
S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8 S&w trr8  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MA - Where the 2nd Amendment is under seige
Posts: 726
Likes: 30
Liked 92 Times in 43 Posts
Default

I'm genuinely curious about what a bulky red dot scope adds (other than looks) that CT laser grip wouldn't improve upon.

The idea of a 'shield gun' makes a lot of sense, but for me I think a laser grip would be a superior choice for bulk reduction and holsterability.

.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2009, 08:16 PM
Capt. Morgan Capt. Morgan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobf View Post
I use mine without the rails but with a light and laser it would be a good nightstand gun. I have three eight shot 357s, a 27, 627 and the TRR8. I would rather shoot the TRR8, the weight balance and feel are just the way I like them.

Bob

I rented both of these at Scottsdale Gun Club last month. The 627PC had the shorter wood grips. I liked the comfort of the TRR8 much better, and shot more accurately with it. Perhaps with rubber grips it would have been closer. In terms of recoil, neither were objectionable with 158gr. 357 loads.

I would like to shoot a few of the other PCs (like the 627 V8 and the R8) before buying, but at this point I would go the TRR8.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2009, 08:28 PM
The Last Standing Knight The Last Standing Knight is offline
Member
S&w trr8  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 746
Liked 1,429 Times in 540 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChadW View Post
It's so tacticool!
The pic is a joke, right?

Why would you want to hang on that "stuff" on a handgun...extra weight, bulk, and more stuff to go wrong when SHTF.

The more you complicate the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain...remember the K.I.S.S. principle.

I see WAY too much "pointless" equipment on firearms today...there is even a handgun bayonet for a Glock!!!

Puhleezzzz...
__________________
The Last Standing Knight
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2009, 08:31 PM
BlueMax_VMF114's Avatar
BlueMax_VMF114 BlueMax_VMF114 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I have One,i love it,very good shooter,and no i dont have all that junk on mine.most id do is use the rail with a StreamLight TRL2 on it,Flash light and laser in One unit that comes off easy



Last edited by BlueMax_VMF114; 11-14-2009 at 08:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
327, 627, 627pc, bayonet, carbine, commander, crimson, glock, model 625, rifleman, s&w, scandium, scope, tactical, tacticool


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TRR8! tomadv S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 1 04-06-2014 01:27 PM
S&W R8/TRR8 mjolnir2 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 12-14-2013 08:57 AM
WTB/WTT for a TRR8 or M&P R8 stanley52 WANTED to Buy 0 09-03-2013 07:32 PM
M&P R8 and 327 TRR8 Old Fashioned Six Shooter S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 02-04-2012 05:41 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)