Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2009, 09:59 PM
aterry33's Avatar
aterry33 aterry33 is offline
Member
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Default Has anyone carried a S&W 296?

Not sure when it is discontinued (I'm too lazy to get up and check the book now). I think maybe 1999.

I handled one the other day for the first time and it intrigued me. I think it had an aluminum frame and a titanium cylinder and it was chambered in 44 special. It sort of looked like a 642 on steroids.

Anyone shot/carried this?
__________________
Aaron Terry
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2009, 10:34 PM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,699 Times in 2,623 Posts
Default

Cool guns. I have one, but I don't carry. I have shot mine some, and the recoil is stout. Face it, a gun weighing a pound and a quarter shooting .44 special is going to feel a whole lot different from a gun weighing about twice that much -- like, say, a 696 or a short-barreled 24.

I put a steel cylinder in mine (same as the 696), which raises the weight by about three ounces. It is tolerable to shoot with cowboy loads now -- low speed 240 gr bullets. But be advised that in the titanium cylinder version, Smith doesn't want you to shoot loads whose bullets weigh more than 200 gr; there is the potential for unfired rounds in the cylinder to jump crimp and tie up the gun.

I would imagine that this would be an excellent carry gun if you had to haul something around all day in a pocket. It would sure catch a bad guy's attention if circumstances required you to produce it. And in a moment of need, I imagine the recoil is the last thing you would notice. But I sure noticed it in sessions at the range.

__________________
David Wilson

Last edited by DCWilson; 08-20-2009 at 08:19 AM. Reason: Add photo
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:08 AM
whitecoyote's Avatar
whitecoyote whitecoyote is offline
Member
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 29
Liked 1,013 Times in 231 Posts
Thumbs up

The 296 is a fine revolver. Why S&W stopped making it, who knows?
It's a little on the large side for concealed carry, but manageable. And yes, it's a handful!

__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2009, 07:48 AM
aterry33's Avatar
aterry33 aterry33 is offline
Member
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
Default

It just looks like a handful
__________________
Aaron Terry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:00 AM
smithcollector's Avatar
smithcollector smithcollector is offline
SWCA Member
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 112
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Oh yeah, i got one, its great. everybody needs one. S&W should bring it back.
There is a picture of mine in my photo album.
__________________
Member SWCA, SWHF, CCA, WACA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-20-2009, 10:37 AM
s&wchad's Avatar
s&wchad s&wchad is offline
Moderator
Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296? Has anyone carried a S&W 296?  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,899
Likes: 12,802
Liked 34,022 Times in 7,991 Posts
Default

A friend and I each bought one for $375 + tax when they were being discontinued around 2001. I didn’t find recoil that bad with 200gr factory ammo, but the fluting on the back of the trigger guard is sharp and jabs my middle finger. I don’t know how much weight it saved, but they should have left the back of the trigger guard smooth. Factory ammo is expensive.

The gun wasn’t terribly popular and holsters were hard to find, unless you liked nylon. The odd barrel length, 5 shot fluted cylinder and frame hump pretty much dictate a custom holster and not all makers have a mold for the gun. I ended up with a Kramer MSP paddle and carried it a few times, but it’s pretty bulky. It is extremely comfortable on a belt because it’s so light. They’ve become a little pricey.

__________________
"I also cook."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
642, 696, concealed, crimp, fluted, kramer, s&w, titanium


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's your most carried 3rd gen? Ascension Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 61 11-05-2015 08:42 PM
Dad carried a 44 Bobbysixkiller The Lounge 9 08-28-2014 09:25 PM
lets see your ACTUALLY CARRIED 3.5in 27's donniedee S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 70 05-20-2012 01:55 PM
Has anyone carried... Helderberg Concealed Carry & Self Defense 0 09-16-2011 11:21 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)