Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > S&W-Smithing

Notices

S&W-Smithing Maintenance, Repair, and Enhancement of Smith & Wesson and Other Firearms.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:26 PM
Grayfox's Avatar
Grayfox Grayfox is offline
US Veteran
Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bartlett, Tennessee
Posts: 7,614
Likes: 2,932
Liked 18,684 Times in 4,787 Posts
Default Ruger forcing cones

Yeah I know, this is the S&W board. But I know we have some Ruger folks here so I've got questions.
I recently bought one of the new Flat top .44 Specials. It had problems. Mainly shooting bad low and left. Sent it back to Ruger and they fixed it. Shoots to point of aim now.
But a new problem has come up. It don't like lead bullets. With jacketed bullets its a tack driver, couldn't hope for better. Lead bullets group about 4" at 25 yards. If you can call it a group. The vast majority of my shooting is done with lead bullets. So this is unacceptable.
As I understand it, Ruger's 5 degree forcing cone is known to cause just this sort of problem and recutting it can cure it. I also seriously doubt if Ruger will open it up for me under warranty.
So before I cut this thing, I need some info from those who know.
Has anyone here ever done this and how did it work out?
Should I go with 11 degrees or 18?
Will it affect how it performs with jacketed bullets?
Any information will be both helpful and appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:49 PM
Boxhead Boxhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Either Texas or Idaho
Posts: 530
Likes: 1
Liked 788 Times in 182 Posts
Default

I have cut a number of both Ruger and S&W forcing cones to the 11 degree cut offered by the Brownell's kit with nary a problem, cast or jacketed. In fact, when I buy such guns it is the first thing I do before taking it to the range.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2010, 04:26 AM
primersp primersp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: france
Posts: 211
Likes: 80
Liked 90 Times in 43 Posts
Default

before cutting cone are you sure than the lead bullet are at the good size ruger like marlin are know for large cylinder and barrel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2010, 08:03 AM
tomcatt51 tomcatt51 is offline
Member
Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: never never land, USA
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 120
Liked 824 Times in 530 Posts
Default

Before you mess with the forcing cone check the more common problems Ruger has.
1. Cylinder throat diameters. If they're undersize, they can be reamed. If they're oversize you send the gun back to Ruger, they will replace the cylinder with one that probably will have undersize throats that need to be reamed.
2. Barrel constriction at the barrel/frame threads. VERY common in Rugers. Requires firelapping or cutting a Taylor Throat to remove the constriction. Unfortunately Clymer discontinued the Taylor Throat reamers.
Check and fix both and you should have a gun that shoots lead very well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2010, 01:53 PM
992B 992B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 1,383
Liked 133 Times in 55 Posts
Default

About half the handguns I own are Smith's and the other half are Rugers. It is my opinion that all Ruger revolvers could use a forcing cone that opens the factory cone dimension to at least 11 degrees. Only had one that had to go to 18 degrees, a 1957 vintage 44 flattop. Only ever had one Smith revolver require the treatment, a 1946 vintage 38/44 Heavy Duty 4".
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2010, 09:26 PM
Boxhead Boxhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Either Texas or Idaho
Posts: 530
Likes: 1
Liked 788 Times in 182 Posts
Default

The throats on these 44 Specials have shown to be dead on (for a change) so that should not be your problem unless you are shooting undersized bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2010, 10:59 PM
tomcatt51 tomcatt51 is offline
Member
Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: never never land, USA
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 120
Liked 824 Times in 530 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxhead View Post
The throats on these 44 Specials have shown to be dead on (for a change)
That would be a nice change. Now if the barrels weren't "squished down" by the frame threads we'd be good to go.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2010, 07:10 PM
Boxhead Boxhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Either Texas or Idaho
Posts: 530
Likes: 1
Liked 788 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcatt51 View Post
That would be a nice change. Now if the barrels weren't "squished down" by the frame threads we'd be good to go.
The ones that friends own have been very fine shooters.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2010, 08:05 PM
tomcatt51 tomcatt51 is offline
Member
Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones Ruger forcing cones  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: never never land, USA
Posts: 3,013
Likes: 120
Liked 824 Times in 530 Posts
Default

The last one I really spent some time on was a .44 SBHH. It had a considerable barrel constriction and shot my usual 1050 fps 240 gr SWC loads into ~2" at 25 yds but shot 18" groups with some bullets completely sideways at 100 yds. This was with a red dot. After about 150 firelapping rds, most with 280 grit, (Ruger SS barrels are TOUGH) it shot 3 1/2" 100 yd groups with the same ammo. The constricted barrels usually shoot well close up with noticeable leading but really deteriorate accuracy wise as the distances get longer. I wanted to shoot silhouettes with the SBHH so 100 yd accuracy was necessary.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ruger


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cracked forcing cones cause? DWalt S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 50 10-21-2014 05:55 PM
J Frame Forcing Cones? Glock1911 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 05-26-2013 02:14 AM
Cracked Forcing Cones jimmyj S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 17 01-23-2013 07:15 PM
forcing cones CWH44300 S&W-Smithing 5 03-04-2012 09:00 AM
Cracked Forcing Cones? TAROMAN S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 11-07-2011 10:20 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)