Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > S&W-Smithing

Notices

S&W-Smithing Maintenance, Repair, and Enhancement of Smith & Wesson and Other Firearms.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2016, 03:58 PM
armorer951's Avatar
armorer951 armorer951 is online now
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville, Indiana USA
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 483
Liked 11,381 Times in 3,519 Posts
Default titanium cylinders - J-frame

Midway has the J-frame titanium cylinders they have in stock on sale right now if anyone needs one for a project or replacement.


s&w cylinders - MidwayUSA
__________________
Ret. LE, FA Instr, S&W Armorer

Last edited by armorer951; 12-31-2016 at 04:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 12-31-2016, 04:30 PM
Wee Hooker Wee Hooker is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
Default

I have to wonder what weight you would end up with if a titanium cylinder was installed on a basic airweight. I'm guessing 13 oz +/-?
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2016, 04:37 PM
armorer951's Avatar
armorer951 armorer951 is online now
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville, Indiana USA
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 483
Liked 11,381 Times in 3,519 Posts
Default

One poster in an earlier thread advised it shaved almost 3oz. off the weight of his 442.
__________________
Ret. LE, FA Instr, S&W Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-2017, 01:53 AM
ridgewalker ridgewalker is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Western USA
Posts: 731
Likes: 902
Liked 514 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Thanks for the heads up. I have one on order.
__________________
Accuracy supercedes Speed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-01-2017, 02:05 AM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,986
Likes: 41,646
Liked 29,239 Times in 13,823 Posts
Default Get soft grips...

A Hogue monogrip improved the comfort of my lightweight tremendously. Have fun.
__________________
"He was kinda funny lookin'"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2017, 10:05 PM
ridgewalker ridgewalker is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Western USA
Posts: 731
Likes: 902
Liked 514 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Okay, I have some follow up news. I recently received the Titanium cylinder from Midway. While I occasionally remove the yoke and cylinder for cleaning, I never unscrewed the central cylinder shaft before. I was aware it has a reverse thread but I watched a YouTube video because I didn't want to be surprised by flying springs or something. Looked like I could handle it.

I compared the Ti cylinder to the cylinders on my 642 and my MP 340. The Ti cylinder package was marked 357 magnum. The length and size looked identical to the steel cylinders on both guns. Although the 642 is marked 38 special on the barrel, I decided to try the Ti cylinder on the 642.

I removed the yoke screw and the yoke and cylinder. I placed 3 fired shells into the cylinder to keep the star aligned. I chucked up the cylinder shaft into a portable electric drill and loosened the shaft just enough so I could turn it by hand. I unscrewed it and the 2 springs on the shaft are not under pressure so it was very easy to remove. Then I took out the shaft the star is attached to. I decided to reuse the original star although the Ti cylinder came with a star too. Just put it all back together in reverse order. Remember reverse thread on the cylinder shaft. I only tightened it hand tight. I'll keep an eye on it to see if it loosens.

Got the yoke screw in and checked the barrel cylinder gap which looked fine. Tried some dry firing and there were no problems. It seemed to be functioning perfectly.

Then the question was this is a 357 magnum cylinder on a revolver marked 38 special +P. Now I reload and most of my revolvers are 357 but I load them lightly into the 38 special range so I can enjoy shooting them at the range but it is easier to clean after shooting. So I asked a couple of my range buddies and we all agreed it should be okay to shoot the 38 special level loads in the 357 magnum shells through the 642. I tried a few shells and it worked fine.

So I weighed the 642 with a postal scale when I got home. It weighed 12.5 ounces. I didn't weigh it before I swapped cylinders but I weighed a stock 442 which weighed 14.6 ounces.

So overall I am very pleased with the 642 with Ti cylinder. It is noticeably lighter. It is now so light that I am going to load some even lighter loads for practice at the range.

Here are some pics before and after swapping the steel cylinder for the Ti cylinder.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1918.jpg (126.9 KB, 185 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1829.jpg (134.6 KB, 175 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1917.jpg (128.4 KB, 217 views)
__________________
Accuracy supercedes Speed
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 04-20-2022, 06:07 PM
wingsuitkeith wingsuitkeith is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 20
Likes: 62
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Do these titanium cylinders work in the 638s?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2022, 06:23 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,367
Likes: 18,061
Liked 24,246 Times in 6,860 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wingsuitkeith View Post
Do these titanium cylinders work in the 638s?
Smith & Wesson Cylinder Assembly S&W J-Frame +P Model 637-1 638-2
__________________
213th FBINA
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2022, 07:09 PM
hyena hyena is online now
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 763
Likes: 829
Liked 1,361 Times in 506 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee Hooker View Post
I have to wonder what weight you would end up with if a titanium cylinder was installed on a basic airweight. I'm guessing 13 oz +/-?
I put the titanium cylinder on my 642-1. With Altamont rosewood boot grips it weighs 12.0 ounces. With Uncle Mike's boot grips it weighs 12.9 ounces.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2022, 08:01 PM
armorer951's Avatar
armorer951 armorer951 is online now
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville, Indiana USA
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 483
Liked 11,381 Times in 3,519 Posts
Default

Looks a bit strange, but the cylinder fit well with very little work in terms of fitting. This is a 442-1


__________________
Ret. LE, FA Instr, S&W Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-23-2022, 11:24 AM
ridgewalker ridgewalker is offline
Member
titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame titanium cylinders - J-frame  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Western USA
Posts: 731
Likes: 902
Liked 514 Times in 261 Posts
Default

I’m glad that this old thread was revived. I just want to reiterate that the Ti cylinder that I used 5 years ago was marked 357 magnum and will chamber the 357 magnum cartridges which are longer than 38 special cartridges. This revolver is marked 38 special. The barrel and forcing cone and frame are not designed to handle the greater pressure of 357 magnum cartridges. Great care must be taken to use 38 special level cartridges only. If someone mistakenly loads 357 magnum level loads, potentially very dangerous and deadly consequences may result. Because of this concern, I switched the cylinder back to the 38 special cylinder and I will use the 357 magnum cylinder on a revolver rated for 357 magnum. Be safe.
__________________
Accuracy supercedes Speed

Last edited by ridgewalker; 04-23-2022 at 12:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titanium Cylinders? D.H. Callahan S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 0 01-02-2016 11:13 PM
Cleaning Titanium Cylinders HarrishMasher S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 10-10-2014 12:10 PM
New titanium cylinders available! - Updated w/pic WC145 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 37 09-20-2010 04:57 PM
Titanium cylinders Robert B S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 17 01-09-2010 06:13 AM
cleaning titanium cylinders? bps7us S&W-Smithing 15 12-01-2008 06:44 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)