Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Ammunition-Gunsmithing > S&W-Smithing
o

Notices

S&W-Smithing Maintenance, Repair, and Enhancement of Smith & Wesson and Other Firearms.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2017, 01:36 AM
hassiman hassiman is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 6
Liked 65 Times in 29 Posts
Default S&W quality control going downhill?

Hi!,

Just got my new 629-6 4" home and took a few minutes to look it over closely and I found what seems to be a tool mark near the muzzle crown.

I would have thought it would have been noticeable on inspection before the gun was shipped out.... I am a bit bummed but if it wont affect the weapon's accuracy I guess it doesn't matter.

Take a look and tell me if I am being too critical...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg muzzle 2.jpg (74.6 KB, 815 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2017, 01:40 AM
silversnake silversnake is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 522
Likes: 313
Liked 523 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Unacceptable on a new gun IMO.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 02-16-2017, 01:52 AM
BLUEDOT37's Avatar
BLUEDOT37 BLUEDOT37 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,460
Likes: 5,857
Liked 9,262 Times in 3,478 Posts
Default

I agree it's not a premium crown.

I'd suggest you take it to the range & shoot some moderately loaded JHPs, to see how it groups, & then look at the crown afterwards.

If it groups poorly &/or still has those burrs on it you can send it back to S&W or have someone locally run a chamfer tool over it's crown to clean it up.

Shouldn't take much but I agree they should be doing a better job. I've had to clean up a couple of my own.

.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2017, 03:25 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,835
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
Default

Their QC has been on a steady decline now for years! Just read all the problems "out of the box guns" are being shipped with right on this Forum! Normally I'd say return it for repair but unfortunately by doing so you risk them making it even worse (fix one thing and damage it somewhere else)! While it would bother me to buy a gun brand new and discover that, I would see how it shoots and if everything else is good (including accuracy) then leaving well enough alone might be the preferred way to go.

I know that is not the way it's supposed to be, but this is how it has become. Unfortunately, I have seen and read stories that guns returned for minor problems came back worse than they the condition they were sent out in. Your call - - - hey, you might get lucky and get a perfect gun back - just don't hold your breath!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 02-16-2017, 04:04 AM
torizus's Avatar
torizus torizus is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 581
Likes: 1,515
Liked 639 Times in 288 Posts
Default

Seems as though these issues are becoming frequent, yours is 3rd one with a crown problem that I have seen on the forums in the past couple of weeks. I would not accept that, particularly with that cut mark at 11 o'clock.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2017, 05:31 AM
GeoJelly GeoJelly is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 5,580
Liked 1,378 Times in 578 Posts
Default

I guess their QC depends on maybe the day of week or a different assembly team or something like that. I just picked up a 637 this week and, cosmetically, it's the cleanest S&W I have never handled. Even under the grips, there isn't a ding or scratch or mark anyplace. Mechanically, it carries up strong on all five chambers, has a .04 BC gap, and locks up tight all the way around. Equally important to me – and I understand probably not important to normal people – the crane/yoke does not flex out with light pressure on the right side of the cylinder. The only small cosmetic flaw I can find is a couple of light scratches on one side of the hammer.

Truth be told, I got it from a kitchen-table dealer who had five or six of them NIB. The first one I checked was equally good cosmetically, but it had yoke flex and kinda loose lock up. I bought the second one I checked because it was near perfect as mentioned above. I liked the M637 so much that I did the same checkout on his stack of M442's. I selected the second one that I examined – but it will be April before I can afford to pick it up ... But, there is another issue to mention. He has a 3-in 686+ he received recently. Mechanically, it is perfect with even a smaller yoke/frame gap than any of the J-frames. But, it has a noticeable flaw on the left side at the barrel/frame junction. Some steel was pushed up when the barrel was crush-fit onto the frame. It's too much to polish out and basically ruins the appearance of the revolver in my opinion.

Last edited by GeoJelly; 02-16-2017 at 06:14 AM. Reason: Tried to post using voice-to-text - Siri is a doofus
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2017, 07:37 AM
twodog max twodog max is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Arkansas Ozarks
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 4,222
Liked 3,602 Times in 1,244 Posts
Default

No I do not think it is anything new. In the mid 80's I bought a NIB Model 15. Had a push off problem back it went. Got a 586 from the 80's with a canted barrel. The big difference is these days a buyer has a problem he jumps on the net and spreads the misery. In those days we just dealt with it ourselves IMO. There have always been problems to some degree.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2017, 08:46 AM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
Default

Pick a product, any man made product, then Google it. If it's made in any kind of quantity, you will find complaints about it. The more complex the product, the more complaints. Does that indicate everyone is making bad stuff? No, it's more likely a direct result of the internet, where people who get a flawed product flock to tell the world.

There are companies out there who make more flawed products and deserve to be raked over the coals, but we need to be careful in deciding which companies deserve this treatment and which do not. I would submit the thread that was started in the 1980 to Present area of the Revolver section of the forum:

Is that old S&W revolver as reliable as you think??

As proof that the product S&W makes today is on par and in some respects even better than that produced in the 'good old days'.

I don't believe that S&W is producing guns with more problems, at least on a number of defects per 100 guns made, but more likely that they are producing more guns now than ever before in their history. Put it in these terms: if a company makes one gun with errors out of a hundred, and produces 100 guns a week, that's 52 guns a year (ignoring holidays) with errors. If the same company at the same defect rate makes 3000 guns a week, that now translates into 1,560 guns. Which means now instead of 52 people complaining on the internet, you have 1.560. OK, honestly, you won't have 1,560 complaining, but you can see how it will be more likely you'll hear more complaints. What about the other 154,440 owners who received a perfect product? Chances are you never hear a peep from them, so at least on the surface, it appears the company is putting out a lot of problem guns when in fact, on a per ratio, compared to the 'old days', nothing has changed.

The only true way to tell if S&W is making more defective products would be to examine their records to see the number of returned items over the past few decades and compare it to the number of products made. We all know though that S&W is highly unlikely to reveal those numbers no matter how they may portray the company. So I guess we'll just have to continue to speculate on the quality of S&W products today vs. those produced in years gone by.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 02-16-2017, 10:22 AM
bushmaster1313's Avatar
bushmaster1313 bushmaster1313 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 476
Liked 16,573 Times in 3,281 Posts
Default

I don't agree.

The quality control of my first pre 27 was so good that I went out and got another one.
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 02-16-2017, 10:45 AM
2lflat4 2lflat4 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I special ordered a 627 PC 5in model from my local gun store. When it came in I looked it over closely and noticed horrible gouges in the frame, crane, forcing cone, and muzzle. I looked it over before we started the paperwork luckily. The store manager said they would send it back for a new model. The quality of the 2nd one was much better.

Being a Performance Center model you would think they would have taken extra care to ensure the gun was tip top. I guess not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 02-16-2017, 10:52 AM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twodog max View Post
No I do not think it is anything new. In the mid 80's I bought a NIB Model 15. Had a push off problem back it went. Got a 586 from the 80's with a canted barrel. The big difference is these days a buyer has a problem he jumps on the net and spreads the misery. In those days we just dealt with it ourselves IMO. There have always been problems to some degree.
10000% this

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 02-16-2017, 10:56 AM
mazer mazer is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 175
Likes: 232
Liked 285 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Well, I don't know that the QC is worse, as others have already mentioned they DO produce a LOT of guns these days, and I've had to send guns back to a LOT of manufacturers for one reason or another, and to me it's more important how their customer service treats me than anything else!!
I had to send my Ruger Alaskan, which, I bought used, 3 times before they fixed the issue, didn't cost me anything but time!! About 2 months of going back and forth!!
I sent a brand new Desert Eagle in 44mag back to Magnum Research, didn't charge me anything, they even contacted me and asked if I'd like them to install a muzzle brake for just the cost of the brake due to my inconvenience...and I did, and it was great!
I have a Rossi Rio Grand that was sent back, they said the rifle is out of warranty, going to cost me to fix it, ship it both ways.....never buy another Rossi/Taurus again.
S&W, the cylinder release fell off of my Backpacker Revolver which I bought used 5 months ago (I think it was made in 2004), brought it to my local gunsmith (figuring it would cost me to send it to S&W), who contacted S&W for parts, S&W had them ship the revolver to them and they fixed it free of charge....so...I would send my S&W's to them! They didn't have to do anything except sell the parts to my gun smith!
So needless to say, I would send any defect or messed up S&W back to them to repair it! These things happen.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:05 AM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bushmaster1313 View Post
I don't agree.

The quality control of my first pre 27 was so good that I went out and got another one.
But that's a example of 2. What about all the 27s produced that year? The only way to base QC % is off the total number made, not the total number you bought. And law of large numbers state that there were in fact problems. It's impossible to make every single product perfect so that means when both your 27s were made S&W also made a certain percentage with defects

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:40 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,835
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
Default

One of the problems with modern S&W production employees is that they are now basically "button pushers" and programers. There is less hand fitting, less inspection and less hands on than ever before. Because of this there are less people looking at a particular gun before it lands in the box, less people "feeling responsible" for its QC and less people who really give a hoot.

I have been up at the Factory lately and have seen how the new guns are made - while it does guarantee a greater profit and faster production I do NOT believe it produces a better product because of the fact employees are actually less skilled as gunmakers and more skilled at computer programing. This is exactly why many original features of their Revolver line have been altered.

This phenomenon is NOT limited to the S&W Co. and is being adapted my many manufacturing Co's. to make a product more competitive, faster and at a better profit margin. Don't expect any really high quality products from any Company producing intricate products on automated assembly lines any time soon.

As a side note:

Colt's Factory is far less high tech than S&W's is (antiquated in some respects). They operate on shoe string budgets, produce far less product than S&W does, but I must say that what is coming out of their Factory these days is the best quality I've seen in a long long time!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:45 AM
iPac's Avatar
iPac iPac is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1,565
Liked 1,364 Times in 560 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silversnake View Post
Unacceptable on a new gun IMO.
I agree. Send it back. However, the risk chief38 states is quite real. Sad that you have to put more work/money into a brand new gun to make it more 'new'.

I can't tell for sure, but it doesn't look like anything actually breeches the rifling. Although right along the edge there are marks that may. Overall a very poor crown. You could try shooting it, and if accurate, the marks are just cosmetic. Still, a consumer should not have to just 'deal' with this.

I agree it isn't just S&W, it's about any new age company. The day and age we live in, the make it cheap and disposable world. It's a numbers game, produce as many as possible as quickly as possible. If only so many come back for repairs, then it is profitable. All they need to do is keep the returns under a certain %. Since the majority of revolver owners have no in depth understanding of their gun's action design, build, or function, the chances of them realizing a problem is slim. Thus S&W beats the % odds on returns. The internet does make it easy for problems to be known, but that is also how these 'newbies' discover problems they didn't know about. Like the OP in this post who wasn't sure if that was acceptable or not. If he wouldn't have posted here, he probably would have just kept his mouth shut and kept the gun. No return for repairs, no money out of Smith's pocket. So I would consider the internet helping bring all these issues to light. Not making them appear exacerbated.

Last edited by iPac; 02-16-2017 at 12:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:55 AM
Rpg Rpg is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 20,240
Liked 13,057 Times in 4,157 Posts
Default

Unfortunately, Smith has delegated QC to the end user instead of keeping it in house.

Next time you're at a gun show take a look at every pre 1980 Smith: check for flaws. Then look at the current manufacture examples. Do the math.

You'll find a significantly higher percentage of current Smiths with obvious problems than older Smiths. Understand that these problems are only those that can be detected by visual inspection and doesn't include functional issues only discoverable at the range.

There is a reason newer Smiths don't maintain value or appreciate.

I wouldn't dream of buying a 'new' Smith
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:05 PM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 498
Likes: 188
Liked 325 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rpg View Post
Unfortunately, Smith has delegated QC to the end user instead of keeping it in house.

Next time you're at a gun show take a look at every pre 1980 Smith: check for flaws. Then look at the current manufacture examples. Do the math.

You'll find a significantly higher percentage of current Smiths with obvious problems than older Smiths. Understand that these problems are only those that can be detected by visual inspection and doesn't include functional issues only discoverable at the range.

There is a reason newer Smiths don't maintain value or appreciate.

I wouldn't dream of buying a 'new' Smith
Far too broad of a statement, IMO.....

I picked up a new Smith & Wesson E series 1911. The one with the factory engraving. The finish work is very well done. I did work in a large machine shop (decades ago), which gives me an idea of what machined products should look like.

Your statement, is just to generalized.........and I'll stick to that thought.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 02-16-2017, 12:49 PM
Goblin Goblin is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 2,455
Liked 1,148 Times in 608 Posts
Default

If I saw that in the store, I'd pass until I found one that looked new. If a new car had a dent in it, I'd buy one that didn't. If an apple has a bruise, I generally grab one that doesn't. Maybe I'm picky, but an appropriately discounted price would change those decisions. However, if I didn't notice those things until I had made the purchase, I would likely just live with it, and learn from it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-16-2017, 01:27 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
Default

Have you bought a new car lately? Go over it the same way and see how many "little bumps" you find. Do a search on Ruger Quality control. Pick just about any product that requires any degree of fine fitting and look at their QC feedback. It's not just S&W, it's everywhere.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:59 PM
bushmaster1313's Avatar
bushmaster1313 bushmaster1313 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 476
Liked 16,573 Times in 3,281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arik View Post
But that's a example of 2. What about all the 27s produced that year? The only way to base QC % is off the total number made, not the total number you bought. And law of large numbers state that there were in fact problems. It's impossible to make every single product perfect so that means when both your 27s were made S&W also made a certain percentage with defects

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Am I supposed to get you dingged
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-17-2017, 12:03 AM
Arik Arik is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bushmaster1313 View Post
Am I supposed to get you dingged
????

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-17-2017, 10:26 AM
diggler1833's Avatar
diggler1833 diggler1833 is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: OK
Posts: 279
Likes: 322
Liked 1,066 Times in 149 Posts
Default

I would be willing to be that a lot of businesses determined that it is cheaper to have one out of three "faulty" products returned by the customer for re-work, than hire the staff necessary to inspect/correct every piece.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-17-2017, 11:04 AM
hassiman hassiman is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 6
Liked 65 Times in 29 Posts
Exclamation RE:Quality Control at S&W

I am thinking of having Cylinder and Slide put an 11 degree crown on my 629. They will do a great job and I won't have to worry about it. I like an 11 degree looks nice. Won't have to worry about the quality of workmanship.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-17-2017, 11:42 AM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 498
Likes: 188
Liked 325 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diggler1833 View Post
I would be willing to be that a lot of businesses determined that it is cheaper to have one out of three "faulty" products returned by the customer for re-work, than hire the staff necessary to inspect/correct every piece.
There doesn't need to be a QC staff for every piece. A competent final assembler can easily pass or reject parts. Unless of course, the total process is automated with robots.

As far as mass produced parts go, it's also easy to see and reject parts that standout as defects. Just pull them out of the line at that point. To have one reject out of every three, would be on the side of being ridiculous, unless all workers have particularly bad eyesight. Or they're just mindless robot types.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-17-2017, 11:43 PM
Pef's Avatar
Pef Pef is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 956
Likes: 536
Liked 1,511 Times in 446 Posts
Default

How does the gun shoot?

I have a Model 60-15 that looks like this:



And shoots like this offhand at 25 yards:



I'm happy with it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 02-18-2017, 01:05 AM
brucev brucev is offline
Member
S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill? S&W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Peach State! GA!!!
Posts: 5,912
Likes: 14,210
Liked 6,250 Times in 2,325 Posts
Default

Re:OP. Call S&W. They'll make it right. Sincerely. bruce.
__________________
<><
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-18-2017, 07:43 AM
Tom S.'s Avatar
Tom S. Tom S. is offline
Moderator
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 8,386
Liked 17,058 Times in 5,593 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAA View Post
There doesn't need to be a QC staff for every piece. A competent final assembler can easily pass or reject parts. Unless of course, the total process is automated with robots.

As far as mass produced parts go, it's also easy to see and reject parts that standout as defects. Just pull them out of the line at that point. To have one reject out of every three, would be on the side of being ridiculous, unless all workers have particularly bad eyesight. Or they're just mindless robot types.
After WWII, the Japanese, with the help of an American, developed the process of doing away with inspectors by making each person responsible for their work, including the ability to stop production if a problem was found, rather than letting it go through the production system and rely on an inspector to find it and have it corrected. It's why the Japanese were beating the pants off US automakers in the 80's and 90's. Unfortunately for us, the consumers, this practice has been slow to catch on in other products produced in our country, most notably the RV industry, but I digress.

My point is, if you train employees properly and empower them to be able to make decisions, you can do away with inspectors.
__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 02-18-2017, 09:27 AM
JHB51 JHB51 is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 362
Likes: 94
Liked 79 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom S. View Post
After WWII, the Japanese, with the help of an American, developed the process of doing away with inspectors by making each person responsible for their work, including the ability to stop production if a problem was found, rather than letting it go through the production system and rely on an inspector to find it and have it corrected. It's why the Japanese were beating the pants off US automakers in the 80's and 90's. Unfortunately for us, the consumers, this practice has been slow to catch on in other products produced in our country, most notably the RV industry, but I digress.

My point is, if you train employees properly and empower them to be able to make decisions, you can do away with inspectors.
This only works when the project enginer,department manager team leader and production employe are on the same page. Throw in a shipping schedule, a team leader wanting the next promotion, managment that will tell you one thing and the supervisors production has to be met or we will be fined if we don't meet scheduled delivery but no fines if the customer rejects the parts for quailtey issues.This is how at least one automotive supplier works that I know of but working in the industr for 40 years seeing what the recall rate is it is not the only one. The customer doing the quailty inspection is a lot cheeper the number of returns is lower that way.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-26-2017, 07:07 PM
Autonomous's Avatar
Autonomous Autonomous is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 705
Likes: 533
Liked 1,016 Times in 389 Posts
Default

In the last few months I have purchased two new S&W handguns. Both have bad enough problems to warrant being sent in for repairs.
Dunno if I'll ever buy another.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-26-2017, 07:32 PM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 498
Likes: 188
Liked 325 Times in 193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autonomous View Post
In the last few months I have purchased two new S&W handguns. Both have bad enough problems to warrant being sent in for repairs.
Dunno if I'll ever buy another.
Four in the last two years. No problems at all. My last, around 4 months ago, is a 1911 E model (machine engraved). It's exceptionally well built, machining wise. Also shoots without a hitch. Adding to that, I couldn't be happier with my half year old 45 ACP Shield. Do I just live a charmed life (weapon wise) or something...
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-26-2017, 07:55 PM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,689
Likes: 57,536
Liked 52,812 Times in 16,465 Posts
Default

How do you know a gun that you bought second hand, and claim to be perfect, was never sent back to the factory?

Factory rework marks? They marked each and every gun?
__________________
GOA/SAF
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-26-2017, 08:04 PM
hassiman hassiman is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 6
Liked 65 Times in 29 Posts
Question RE:Two new guns teturned

What were the problems you experienced with your 2 new guns?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-26-2017, 08:16 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,758
Likes: 18,437
Liked 22,313 Times in 8,245 Posts
Default

Are any guns marked for factory returns now? I seriously doubt it.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-26-2017, 09:30 PM
hassiman hassiman is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 131
Likes: 6
Liked 65 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Are you saying that Smith sells refurbs as new firearms?
That is not legal....
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-16-2018, 08:11 PM
Saawfish01 Saawfish01 is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Similar issues with new 629

Longtime reader first time poster.
I too have experienced QC issues with new revolvers.

Rough tool marks, strange indentations on cylinder corrosion on stainless steel.
Sending it back.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-17-2018, 04:59 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,759
Likes: 7,835
Liked 25,615 Times in 8,661 Posts
Default

The proof is in the pudding they say....... Just another reason the vintage Smith's are in such high demand and selling for higher prices than the new ones.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #37  
Old 06-17-2018, 07:14 AM
jeeps jeeps is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Southside
Posts: 919
Likes: 280
Liked 1,278 Times in 417 Posts
Default

The new norm,no hand work corn Cobb finish.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-17-2018, 08:12 AM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief38 View Post
The proof is in the pudding they say....... Just another reason the vintage Smith's are in such high demand and selling for higher prices than the new ones.
I had to send in my new Model 29-2 for repair in 1977. It must just not have been old enough to be perfect and defect free.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-17-2018, 08:31 AM
BE Mike's Avatar
BE Mike BE Mike is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 2,235
Liked 3,476 Times in 1,475 Posts
Default

I bought a S&W model 66 back in the 80's, along with about eight other guys. Mine had the cylinder machined lopsided! I took a good flat 1/2" file and squared it instead of sending it back to S&W, since the finish wouldn't have to be touched up. It served me well for many, many years after that. I even won several local matches with it! I almost always slightly customize my handguns. Having said that, I like new stuff to look new. Since there appears to be little faith in what S&W will or won't do and their quality of repair jobs, you are probably making the right decision to send it off to C&S. I know that some manufacturers won't accept warranty work for minor cosmetic issues. There is also a question about the acceptable "accuracy" of a gun. Most customers can't shoot a gun (especially a handgun) well enough to legitimately question its accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-17-2018, 09:11 AM
Minorcan Minorcan is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 244
Likes: 533
Liked 292 Times in 138 Posts
Default

Not to be critical of Hassiman or any posters, it interests me that these guns with problems are bought and taken home before the problems are found.Something like the crown issues and especially the mark at 100 o’clock are obvious. Maybe I’m odd but I spend a good bit of time inspecting a new gun before laying down the cash. If the LGS owner has a problem with me doing that I won’t buy and will go else where (it’s happened). Maybe I’ve developed the inspection before buying because I buy a lot of used guns. Most of the S&Ws I have are vintage used guns. All have been near perfect or with normal wear that I’m OK with. I have bought two new S&W revolvers, a 642 and a 60-14. Both were inspected before buying and both are what I consider well finished guns for the prices paid. They shoot perfectly and have no reliability issues. I wonder if the issues discussed are more of a matter of the number of guns made and sold now and an increase in the quality expectations of modern consumers.

The main reason I have mostly vintage S&Ws are mostly style and I don’t believe in the hammer lock philosophy or see any possible way it makes the gun more reliable or safe. Perhaps S&W would have better success if they removed the hammer locks and put those costs into improved finishing, worker training, inspection and overall quality improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-17-2018, 09:23 AM
torizus's Avatar
torizus torizus is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 581
Likes: 1,515
Liked 639 Times in 288 Posts
Default

There's a lot to be said for the Greatest Generation. Pride,craftsmanship and integrity were values held hard and true. The proof was in the pudding.

I believe corporate America made some operation changes in he past couple decades to change qualilty control from individual inspectors to a single "returns rma " person. Sort of a consumer be the judge thing.

Corporate raiders ,hedge funds and the lot forced ceo's to address the bottom line. make and move units. If it comes back, replace it. Volume over quality. I would imagine (hope) that certain industries requiring precision and strict adherence to specs do it the old way. As mentioned in earlier posts,(Chief38,iPac, H Richard) button pushers,volume sales etc now rule, the bottom line is what counts.

In this instance, its quite simple to see that Horace Smith & Dan Wesson are't calling the shots anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-17-2018, 09:33 AM
noro noro is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Bristol TN
Posts: 251
Likes: 29
Liked 242 Times in 126 Posts
Default

its the same with every modern gunmaker. I bought a few new S&W's over the past few years, and can only say good things about their CS. The're easy to contact, listen to the problems, and pretty much will give you a solution over the phone. If they think its necessary to take it back, the'll help you with the shipping both ways.

I've had a really bad experience with a new and expensive M1911. The firm basically recently entered the market with a big push and a "lifetime" guarantee against any issue. Their sales far outstripped their
service. When they started, they would do anything to please their customers. You could contact their techs and get an opinion by an expert. They would replace defective parts for free. Anything for the customer!

Fast forward to today. You cant talk to anyone in authority. Everything is relayed back and forth between you and their "Techs" As sales grew, so did defects. The service went out the window! Now the warranty changes and "techs" try to dismiss as many problems to lessen the load on service. Parts are not available or on backorder. "Cosmetic" issues are disregarded. As long as the firearm functions, the're good with it.

A very sad way to do business.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-17-2018, 10:08 AM
RGVshooter RGVshooter is offline
Banned
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 1,112
Liked 1,609 Times in 660 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hassiman View Post
Hi!,

Just got my new 629-6 4" home and took a few minutes to look it over closely and I found what seems to be a tool mark near the muzzle crown.
Doesn't anyone realize that you have the right to inspect a firearm for flaws & proper function before filling out the 4473 & taking possession? That is just proper etiquette for pretty much every gun shop I've been to in my 38 yrs of shooting.


Now as far as muzzle crowns are concerned. The main reason why barrels on modern firearms are "crowned" is to protect the rifling from damage. This tiny little nick is on the top of the crown, which is nowhere near the rifling. The crown done it's intended purpose. The only way a firearm can cause inaccuracy is only if the rifling was nicked or damaged in some way. And even then, it would have to be very significant damage to notice any inaccuracy issues at average pistol shooting distances of 7-25 yards.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-17-2018, 10:17 AM
max503's Avatar
max503 max503 is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: So. Illinois
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 1,375
Liked 3,292 Times in 1,411 Posts
Default

The knurling on the ejector rod on my brand new 638 looked like it had been gripped with pliers.

The Model 34 Kit Gun I bought back in '80 was out of time and the cylinder face rubbed on the crown.

Yes. S&W's quality varies from time-to-time.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-18-2018, 09:27 PM
jmclfrsh's Avatar
jmclfrsh jmclfrsh is offline
Member
S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill? S&amp;W quality control going downhill?  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 261
Likes: 27
Liked 338 Times in 94 Posts
Default

I look guns over from stem to stern before paying for them, and look them over real well before saying “I’ll take it.”

If someone has two of something, I’ll ask to see them both, then choose which one I feel is better. I’ve done that for years now.

In the old days, quality was important. Nowadays, it is sadly not the case with an increasing amount of items one can purchase.

Therefore, “let the buyer beware” is more important than ever, and my guns are so personal to me, I will not accept one unless it is what I expect it to be. At that point I either make it right, if it is hard to find, or pass on it for another example.

And I frankly will not buy a new S&W. Sad to say - but my boxes are well ticked with my P&R .44s and .41 and I do not want for any other revolvers. These four do just fine!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IS GLOCK QUALITY REALLY GOING DOWNHILL? marathonrunner Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 30 06-15-2016 11:44 PM
Quality control? 329 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 04-11-2015 02:58 PM
Quality Control/Should I look used? tseehorn S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 03-26-2012 08:24 PM
IRS needs some Quality Control ancient-one The Lounge 15 03-17-2012 12:50 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)