|
|
05-05-2022, 04:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 275
Likes: 144
Liked 538 Times in 114 Posts
|
|
Barrel/Cylinder Gap Question
One of my revolvers has a gap of about .009/.010 ( measuring with the cylinder held back) but when I measure it after pulling/holding the trigger back (with snap caps), the gap is around .007.
I was thinking about having the gap tightened up a bit but now I'm thinking that I should just leave it?
|
05-05-2022, 04:26 PM
|
Suspended
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,914 Times in 3,554 Posts
|
|
Just leave it alone, it is well within current factory specifications. Even if you were to have the barrel set-back to .006 or less it is unlikely you would achieve any improvement in either accuracy or velocity. I have set back barrels from ca. .010" to as little as .002" to see how much improvement in velocity I would realize and the difference before/after over the chronograph was exactly 000FPS.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-05-2022, 04:28 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 1,236
Liked 6,044 Times in 2,154 Posts
|
|
As long as it is shooting OK and not blasting back at you I would tend to leave it alone. I confess to liking the old specification (.004-.006) much better than the current specs which are much more generous, but that's just me.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-05-2022, 04:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 275
Likes: 144
Liked 538 Times in 114 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the responses.
Nothing blasting back. Also, the timing, lock up, and alignment are all perfect.
I just reread the a post on how to properly measure the gap / end shake (quoted below) and according to those instructions, my gap is actually .007/.008 with around .002 of end shake so well within spec.
"When initially checking your revolver you should start by pushing (& hold) the cylinder forward & then measure the gap between the cylinder face & barrel breach.
Next you push (& hold) the cylinder to the rear & re-measure that gap.
(Admittedly it doesn't matter which you check first. The rearward reading will always be the larger (maximum) reading.)
The forward reading is B-C gap & the rearward reading is B-C gap plus (any) endshake.
Any difference between the two readings is the end shake.
You have to do both checks to come to a meaningful understanding. If you do one without the other you do not have the whole picture or all the details."
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-05-2022, 06:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 275
Likes: 144
Liked 538 Times in 114 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alk8944
Just leave it alone, it is well within current factory specifications. Even if you were to have the barrel set-back to .006 or less it is unlikely you would achieve any improvement in either accuracy or velocity. I have set back barrels from ca. .010" to as little as .002" to see how much improvement in velocity I would realize and the difference before/after over the chronograph was exactly 000FPS.
|
I was curious about what (if any) increase there would be in velocity so that's good to know.
|
05-05-2022, 07:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,774
Likes: 19,538
Liked 11,881 Times in 5,393 Posts
|
|
Basically, you have a barrel-cylinder gap of around 0.009", which is within S&W limits, and end shake of around 0.002", which is also within S&W limits. Nothing really to worry about unless you experience bullet spitting from the gap.
Since you mentioned the relationship between velocity and the barrel-cylinder gap, you can read about an experiment at this link.
BBTI - Ballistics by the Inch :: Cylinder Gap
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.