|
|
|
11-30-2020, 07:13 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 2,543
Liked 6,888 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
Not worth $100
I received my letter from the S&W Historical Foundation today, that I requested on my Model 29 NCHP 50th Anniversary Commemorative. I must say, I'm disappointed in the information included in the letter, most of which had nothing to do with my particular revolver. The first paragraph was a quick history of the first police commemorative, for the Texas Ranger 150th Anniversary. The second paragraph told about other police commemoratives and specified the Ohio State Patrol, and how police commemoratives became popular.
The information on my specific revolver is very basic, and I've learned more about it from the Standard Catalog and general S&W forum members than was included in the letter, some of which is incorrect and/or incomplete. For instance, the letter states the NCHP "logo" which is actually the Trooper's Shield, is, and I quote "stamped" on the side plate, along with the anniversary markings on the barrel. Just to look at the markings, one can tell they are not stamped, but etched, and I have learned they were acid etched at that. I did get a specific number of how many revolvers were purchased for the series, and the shipping date of my revolver. There is no information on the rarity or collector value, which I had hoped there would be at least an estimate based on ANIB condition and unfired. I had also hoped for some statement regarding the process used to etch my revolver and those others in the series, and why that process was chosen over roll stamping, which it seems the majority, if not all other commemoratives used.
I can only hope that this letter, when included with the revolver and presentation case, will increase the value of the package by $100 if it is ever sold.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-30-2020, 07:31 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Peoples Republic of Calif
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 1,236
Liked 6,045 Times in 2,154 Posts
|
|
I don't wish to rain on your parade, but I think that maybe you have misunderstood the basic purpose and scope of the letter.
|
The Following 38 Users Like Post:
|
AlphaSig, bigggbbruce, Bullet Bob, Camster, ColbyBruce, Collects, CQB27, dave1918a2, Doug627, Gene L, GerSan69, Glashaus, HKSmith, Inusuit, JSR III, lihpster, LoboGunLeather, MAG-NUM, Messer, Modified, NCBeagle, nedlate, Nedroe, NY-1, ol777gunnerz, opoefc, plvickers, Rambler42, reccpd101, Richard Simmons, richcory, S&WIowegan, Sistema1927, Thin Man, tlmetesh, Trooperdan, wheelgun28, zonker5 |
11-30-2020, 08:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: nc
Posts: 662
Likes: 689
Liked 861 Times in 389 Posts
|
|
Reminds me of folks who spend on a $40.00 1921 Dollar to PGC ...$100.00 eval, 3 weeks later heres you're $140.00 Dollar worth $40.00.
Last edited by Mrnurse; 12-01-2020 at 08:38 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-30-2020, 08:32 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 2,543
Liked 6,888 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertrwalsh
I don't wish to rain on your parade, but I think that maybe you have misunderstood the basic purpose and scope of the letter.
|
Please enlighten me of the purpose and scope of the letter. Maybe I did misunderstand, but everything in the letter I either already knew, and in more detail, or had nothing to do with the specifics of my revolver.
|
11-30-2020, 08:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mayetta, Kansas
Posts: 616
Likes: 412
Liked 173 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
I wish you luck on recouping the cost of the letter if you should sell your revolver. I have haggled with people on purchases where I thought their asking price was a bit unrealistic. Several times they would tell me "but I'm including a factory letter". I have yet to run across one where the letter contained any worthwhile information. I'm sure as hell not going to pay any extra for useless information. That's just the chance you take with these letters.
__________________
Expect no quarter.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-30-2020, 09:00 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,312 Times in 1,905 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 357larry
I wish you luck on recouping the cost of the letter if you should sell your revolver. I have haggled with people on purchases where I thought their asking price was a bit unrealistic. Several times they would tell me "but I'm including a factory letter". I have yet to run across one where the letter contained any worthwhile information. I'm sure as hell not going to pay any extra for useless information. That's just the chance you take with these letters.
|
Letters that simply confirm a common gun in a common configuration shipped to a regular place don't add value, period.
But if you have a rare or unique configuration, it can confirm it's all factory. Or that it shipped to a specific place or individual to corroborate its history.
To the OP, commemorative ≠ collectible. Historical organizations of any form tend to shy away from valuations, that's for the market or an appraiser to decide. But, to be fair, you may have a good argument for the inaccuracies you mentioned.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
AlHunt, CH4, double-dipper, EagleEye69, M E Morrison, Mike, SC Hunter, moosedog, MSgt G, old bear, Tntcwg3, Trooperdan |
11-30-2020, 10:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 2,543
Liked 6,888 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
I'm still proud to own the revolver, it's beautiful and commemorates the Highway Patrol of my home state. I suppose I was expecting to see on the letter the things I've found out on my own, just for corroboration if nothing else, such as this being the first Model 29 to be used as a commemorative, and the only commemorative to have the markings acid-etched (others are either roll stamped or laser engraved).
I did find a discrepancy about the numbers made in the Standard catalog. In several posts on the forum, I heard numbers from 1189 to 1200 made, and the Catalog, 4th edition, on page 235 states "approx. 300 manufactured". My letter states that 1080 were ordered and delivered in July of 1979; I can say definitively that the number is at least 835, as 0835 is the number stamped on the frame of the one I own.
I do have some hopes of learning more about these guns; I've been in contact with the current armorer for the NCHP, who has said he would see what he could learn about the disposition of these guns after they were delivered, which the Historical Foundation doesn't have, and I didn't expect them to.
What makes these commemorative special in my eyes is that the initial purchaser had to be a current Trooper or a retiree, and weren't available to the general public, at least until the original owner sold theirs. Since this series was offered in 1979, I can imagine the ones coming on the market are from families of the original owners or their estates.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-30-2020, 11:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 5,462
Liked 2,784 Times in 1,263 Posts
|
|
I've never understood the Historical Letters to be anything other than a way to confirm original configuration and where, when and to whom a firearm shipped, with no guarantee that all that information is available. They usually have some information about the history of that particular firearms development.
Anything other than that mundane information is a bonus.
I'd agree that if the info re: etching vs stamping is incorrect, it should be fixed. Or, maybe there's another, more interesting explanation.
ETA: The OP posted while I was typing and I see there's some discrepancy about total numbers produced. That could be interesting. Maybe there were multiple runs?
__________________
Just Say No - To Social Media
Last edited by AlHunt; 11-30-2020 at 11:09 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-01-2020, 12:33 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 19,279
Liked 32,379 Times in 5,478 Posts
|
|
Generally speaking, factory letters will provide specific details about the firearm as it was shipped (caliber, finish, barrel length, optional features), when the piece was shipped, and to whom (dealer, distributor, etc) it was delivered. This information serves to confirm authenticity (assuming it remains as manufactured) and establishes a base point for documenting provenance.
This is not an appraisal or opinion about present condition or market value.
Again generally speaking, commemorative issues may tend to have lower market values than comparable standard production pieces, the exceptions being those purchasers desiring that specific commemorative for personal reasons or to complete a collection within a series.
In the case of the OP's revolver the persons likely to be most interested would be those with a close personal connection to NCHP, or perhaps a collector who limits his acquisitions to commemorative issues.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-01-2020, 12:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,524
Likes: 1,184
Liked 18,473 Times in 7,310 Posts
|
|
Maybe Roy was thinking of one of these.
NCSHP commemorative S&W Model 66-1
I sold this one to another member here on the board a few years ago.
__________________
Send lawyers, guns & money...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-01-2020, 07:14 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 3,902
Liked 6,802 Times in 1,851 Posts
|
|
All of the letters I've received have a basic history of the model in then first paragraph which as you say can be commonly obtained.
Personally I only letter older guns and like most here I'm looking for the info in the last paragraph. That info is where you pay your money and roll the dice. We all hope it was shipped to some famous person or organization, but most times it's just some mom and pop hardware store. Even if the gun doesn't have some exciting shipped to info I enjoy investigating the history of where it went even if it's some hardware that has long since went out of business. For me the letters have value even if they don't add value to the gun.
__________________
SWHF #595
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
Babysitr, Birdhunter6, Books, CalifEd, Delta Romeo, EagleEye69, Gregmk, JSR III, Ozark Marine, tops, Vidd |
12-01-2020, 08:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,792
Likes: 1,673
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
I've only lettered two guns my Registered Magnum...and my Dad' s 1946 M&P.
The RM letter will add value .... my Dad's M&P, not so much, it's one of a million M&P; but it's a family heirloom.
Got good information on both.... when and where the gun shipped and configuration when it left the factory.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-01-2020, 08:51 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 2,543
Liked 6,888 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
Maybe Roy was thinking of one of these.
NCSHP commemorative S&W Model 66-1
I sold this one to another member here on the board a few years ago.
|
Wow, I like that one. I see it mentioned in the Standard Catalog, but no details regarding numbers or what year. Do you know any more about them? I ouldn't mind one of those; I have an unmarked M66-1 RB 2-1/2".
I'd like to find one of the M66-2's that have the NC ALE seal, for my nephew, who worked for ALE. They were issued from 1983 to about 1986. There was also an unmarked M66-1 issued to them from '78-'83.
|
12-01-2020, 09:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 334
Likes: 140
Liked 740 Times in 184 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hair Trigger
I received my letter from the S&W Historical Foundation today, that I requested on my Model 29 NCHP 50th Anniversary Commemorative. I must say, I'm disappointed in the information included in the letter, most of which had nothing to do with my particular revolver. The first paragraph was a quick history of the first police commemorative, for the Texas Ranger 150th Anniversary. The second paragraph told about other police commemoratives and specified the Ohio State Patrol, and how police commemoratives became popular.
The information on my specific revolver is very basic, and I've learned more about it from the Standard Catalog and general S&W forum members than was included in the letter, some of which is incorrect and/or incomplete. For instance, the letter states the NCHP "logo" which is actually the Trooper's Shield, is, and I quote "stamped" on the side plate, along with the anniversary markings on the barrel. Just to look at the markings, one can tell they are not stamped, but etched, and I have learned they were acid etched at that. I did get a specific number of how many revolvers were purchased for the series, and the shipping date of my revolver. There is no information on the rarity or collector value, which I had hoped there would be at least an estimate based on ANIB condition and unfired. I had also hoped for some statement regarding the process used to etch my revolver and those others in the series, and why that process was chosen over roll stamping, which it seems the majority, if not all other commemoratives used.
I can only hope that this letter, when included with the revolver and presentation case, will increase the value of the package by $100 if it is ever sold.
|
Oh, C’Mon now ,, mine has great info
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-02-2020, 09:36 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,324
Likes: 26,849
Liked 19,404 Times in 4,090 Posts
|
|
Here is a perfect example of the information that a letter CAN tell you. Most just let you know as others have said, basic configuration and when it was shipped and to who.
But once in awhile SURPRISE!!
Wesley Grapp served as head of the Los Angeles Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) office. He was the agent who carried out Hoover's orders to give FBI information to University of California senior regent Edwin W. Pauley. Pauley allegedly had a history of political connections with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), forerunner of today's CIA, as well as a close association with Will Jenkinson, who was later to serve as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, (1953–1961).
Grapp left the FBI in 1972 and headed security for Flying Tigers Airlines.
Edwin W. Pauley
Pauley told Grapp that in the 1950s the FBI secretly gave the university reports on professors it was considering hiring. He said he wanted to restore the procedure—which the FBI had code-named the Responsibilities Program—and offered to pay someone to check FBI files. After Pauley promised not to reveal that the FBI was his source, Grapp gave him a report on UC Berkeley immunology professor Leon Wofsy that summarized news stories from 1945 to 1956, noting that Wofsy had been a self-avowed Communist Party official who tried to get young people involved with the party. The report failed to note that since 1957 the FBI had found no evidence that Wofsy had been involved with the party.[14]
On February 4, 1965, Grapp told Hoover that Pauley could be used as a source on internal University affairs, and could harass and remove suspected communists on the faculty and the Board of Regents. Hoover approved, and one week later Pauley was given confidential information on Coblentz, Roth and Heller. Pauley, Grapp reported to Hoover, was "most appreciative" of the information on his opponents. As Pauley saw it, according to Grapp's report, UC would remain in turmoil "as long as the current officials were in power at the university."[14]
__________________
__________________
SWCA #2306
DAV in honor of POP
Last edited by ditrina; 12-09-2020 at 06:35 PM.
|
The Following 16 Users Like Post:
|
donadler, EagleEye69, G-Mac, GerSan69, Gregmk, JayCeeNC, jem102, JSR III, lihpster, llowry61, LPD256, MSgt G, opoefc, Sistema1927, sophie, The Norseman |
12-05-2020, 11:18 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 611
Likes: 151
Liked 696 Times in 213 Posts
|
|
Dead on!
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkcavalier
To the OP, commemorative ≠ collectible.
|
YES! THIS! SCREAM IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS! If I had a dollar for every time someone told me they bought a commemorative gun because it was a collectible and would go up in value ... I'd have a lot of dollars. And if I had another dollar for every commemorative gun I've seen sell online for waaaay less than the original price ... I'd have a lot more dollars!
__________________
High Caliber History
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
Birdhunter6, Collects, ditrina, GerSan69, jem102, ken158, lkabug, llowry61, moosedog, MSgt G, paplinker |
12-05-2020, 05:55 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,597
Likes: 3,713
Liked 8,952 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
I think that perhaps some folks misunderstand what a historical letter is all about.
As has been stated, the beginning of most letters is a background on the model that you have asked about. Perhaps when it came into production or why, maybe how many have been produced if no longer in production etc. Then the letter goes into the specifics of your gun, date shipped, where it shipped to and if you are lucky, it will tell you the configuration that the gun left as. As others have said, this lets you know that the gun you are holding (as an example) "shipped with a 6" barrel, had a blue finish. wore gold medallion diamond stocks and had a Patridge front sight."
This is a historical letter based on information found in the S&W records. It is not an appraisal or an estimate of value, that comes from an appraiser not a historian. I think that whether the emblem was etched or stamped or roll stamped or put on with an electric pencil is a little like "you say potayto and I say pototto."
The information in the SC of S&W for the most part was taken from books written by Roy Jinks. Even errors in the original works were transcribed forward. As wonderful as the authors are, Jim and Rick never worked at S&W to my knowledge. Roy Jinks was the company historian for like 40 years and also served as Service Manager among other positions. There is no one on the planet that I know of that has his knowledge or first hand experience or knows more about Smith and Wesson's and their origins. Had Roy Jinks not purchased the factory records when the Wesson family no longer owned the company and was no longer interested in paying the storage fees for those stored records, there wouldn't be a factory history letter today.
Rather than bashing the letter or its author, I would guess that if you had returned the letter with an explanation about etching versus stamping, that Roy would have gladly corrected the letter to your liking. Even with all that Roy knows he cannot possibly remember every detail about every firearm that the factory ever produced and especially those of limited production and perhaps appeal. I have been collecting S&W's for about 50 years and have never heard of this particular gun. It maters to you because you have an affinity to NC and perhaps to the State Police.
Also remember one thing, just having any letter signed by Dr. Roy Jinks (his autograph) regardless of the contents is most likely worth the price that you paid.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
Delta Romeo, EagleEye69, GerSan69, Gregmk, GWW, LoboGunLeather, LPD256, mh51, Model46, opoefc, rwt1405, Sistema1927 |
12-05-2020, 06:02 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,597
Likes: 3,713
Liked 8,952 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
PS: As a further example, there was a gentleman who recently purchased a .22/32 HFT at a pawn shop for $300. It was a plain Jane HFT but he decided to letter the gun. As it turns out the gun was shipped to a gentleman that just happened to be Annie Oakley's husband.
That gun just sold at auction for $47,500.
What was the value of that letter?
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 20 Users Like Post:
|
.357magger, ancient-one, bengal fan, Birdhunter6, Collects, ditrina, EagleEye69, GerSan69, Gregmk, Gunsquirrel, ImprovedModel56Fan, JayCeeNC, LoboGunLeather, mh51, mikerjf, mrcvs, MSgt G, Robspeire, RWPBR, rwt1405 |
12-05-2020, 07:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 1,609
Liked 2,853 Times in 1,150 Posts
|
|
$47,500 is impressive. I buy letters for my older Smiths to determine when they were shipped, and to whom. If they were shipped with different configurations, good to know. It's how I found out my M&P 38 is a month older than I am - exactly 30 days. My crib buddy.
__________________
Heavily armed old man.
Last edited by pasound; 12-06-2020 at 10:33 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 03:43 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 7,462
Liked 15,218 Times in 3,632 Posts
|
|
It would be nice to find out that one of my older Smith & Wessons was delivered to someone famous. And for $40,000 in profit, I might even sell one
.....otherwise, I struggle to decide which ones are worth investing (risking) $100 on....especially when one owns quite a few. I know there are many collectors here who letter every one they own. I think they run in different circles than I. I can accumulate several nice guns for what it would cost me to letter all of mine....
Robert
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 07:20 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 18,612
Liked 4,687 Times in 1,722 Posts
|
|
The only guns I will letter are those with configurations, that if factory, will increase the price. An example, is a BSS Colt I bought at a polished stainless price, but was said to be factory. So, I sent for the letter and guess what, it was BSS from the factory. That letter will add a grand to the value of the gun. It was a calculated risk. I figured if it was BSS then I am ahead, if it wasn't well gonna have to hang on to that one awhile.
So, verifying factory engraving, unusual barrel lengths, stock composition (factory ivory) etc. is the real value factory letters provide.
Every once in awhile, the shipped to will add to the value, but that is like finding another copy of the Declaration of Independence hidden under a 2.00 picture purchased at a garage sale. It happens, but not very often.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 07:36 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 37
Liked 5,435 Times in 1,762 Posts
|
|
In a similar occurrence, last December I went in to a casino and lost $100. Bummer.
__________________
Pisgah
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 08:00 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 121
Likes: 4
Liked 163 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
Well said Sir.
|
12-06-2020, 08:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,894
Likes: 6,993
Liked 28,132 Times in 8,918 Posts
|
|
I’ve read this complaint I don’t know how many times, and it appears your biggest issue is Roy’s failure to have been present in the production meeting with a notepad when acid etching vs. roll stamping was discussed. I’m not sure that can be resolved . . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hair Trigger
I received my letter from the S&W Historical Foundation today, that I requested on my Model 29 NCHP 50th Anniversary Commemorative. I must say, I'm disappointed in the information included in the letter, most of which had nothing to do with my particular revolver. The first paragraph was a quick history of the first police commemorative, for the Texas Ranger 150th Anniversary. The second paragraph told about other police commemoratives and specified the Ohio State Patrol, and how police commemoratives became popular.
The information on my specific revolver is very basic, and I've learned more about it from the Standard Catalog and general S&W forum members than was included in the letter, some of which is incorrect and/or incomplete. For instance, the letter states the NCHP "logo" which is actually the Trooper's Shield, is, and I quote "stamped" on the side plate, along with the anniversary markings on the barrel. Just to look at the markings, one can tell they are not stamped, but etched, and I have learned they were acid etched at that. I did get a specific number of how many revolvers were purchased for the series, and the shipping date of my revolver. There is no information on the rarity or collector value, which I had hoped there would be at least an estimate based on ANIB condition and unfired. I had also hoped for some statement regarding the process used to etch my revolver and those others in the series, and why that process was chosen over roll stamping, which it seems the majority, if not all other commemoratives used.
I can only hope that this letter, when included with the revolver and presentation case, will increase the value of the package by $100 if it is ever sold.
|
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 08:45 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 638
Liked 6,872 Times in 2,546 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
I've only lettered two guns my Registered Magnum...and my Dad' s 1946 M&P.
The RM letter will add value .... my Dad's M&P, not so much, it's one of a million M&P; but it's a family heirloom.
Got good information on both.... when and where the gun shipped and configuration when it left the factory.
|
I’m waiting for the letter on my 1946 M&P. The serial number falls within a batch that was shipped to the NYPD, and since I am a retired member of that department I rolled the dice. I hope I’m not disappointed but nothing is guaranteed in life. I hope it is an NYPD gun. I wonder where it’s been for the last 74 years and how many owners it had. If it is an NYPD gun it will stay with me until my son has it one day.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 09:21 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Piedmont of Virginia
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 4,435
Liked 5,768 Times in 2,234 Posts
|
|
When I request a letter of authentication, I'm looking to confirm the firearm I have in my hands is the same today as the day it left the factory. I believe that to be the purpose of such a letter. The current cost of the letter is the expense of my desire to have peace of mind. I have no expectations such a letter will make the firearm more valuable then it was before the letter. Should there be a mistake, I have no doubt that Dr. Jinks would gladly correct the error.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 10:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 3,002
Liked 12,387 Times in 1,905 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hair Trigger
Wow, I like that one. I see it mentioned in the Standard Catalog, but no details regarding numbers or what year. Do you know any more about them? I ouldn't mind one of those; I have an unmarked M66-1 RB 2-1/2".
I'd like to find one of the M66-2's that have the NC ALE seal, for my nephew, who worked for ALE. They were issued from 1983 to about 1986. There was also an unmarked M66-1 issued to them from '78-'83.
|
You mean like this?
Or this?
And, you missed one:
__________________
Bill
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-06-2020, 10:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 3,002
Liked 12,387 Times in 1,905 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hair Trigger
I'm still proud to own the revolver, it's beautiful and commemorates the Highway Patrol of my home state. I suppose I was expecting to see on the letter the things I've found out on my own, just for corroboration if nothing else, such as this being the first Model 29 to be used as a commemorative, and the only commemorative to have the markings acid-etched (others are either roll stamped or laser engraved).
I did find a discrepancy about the numbers made in the Standard catalog. In several posts on the forum, I heard numbers from 1189 to 1200 made, and the Catalog, 4th edition, on page 235 states "approx. 300 manufactured". My letter states that 1080 were ordered and delivered in July of 1979; I can say definitively that the number is at least 835, as 0835 is the number stamped on the frame of the one I own.
I do have some hopes of learning more about these guns; I've been in contact with the current armorer for the NCHP, who has said he would see what he could learn about the disposition of these guns after they were delivered, which the Historical Foundation doesn't have, and I didn't expect them to.
What makes these commemorative special in my eyes is that the initial purchaser had to be a current Trooper or a retiree, and weren't available to the general public, at least until the original owner sold theirs. Since this series was offered in 1979, I can imagine the ones coming on the market are from families of the original owners or their estates.
|
They may have been delivered to Davidsons in July of 1979, but they did not get to the NC State Highway Patrol Armory until the end of August or first of September. I know as I was going through ALE Basic School (held in conjunction with the 66th NC SHP Basic School) when they were delivered. As I have posted before, we were required to "guard" them all night for about a week.
When delivered to Davidsons a problem was discovered with many of them and they were returned to S&W for the side plates to be re etched (SHP Badge) and replaced. This might explain the discrepancy in time.
__________________
Bill
Last edited by WCCPHD; 12-06-2020 at 10:17 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-09-2020, 01:31 PM
|
|
S&W Historian
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 3,400
Liked 11,336 Times in 2,894 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
I think that perhaps some folks misunderstand what a historical letter is all about.
As has been stated, the beginning of most letters is a background on the model that you have asked about. Perhaps when it came into production or why, maybe how many have been produced if no longer in production etc. Then the letter goes into the specifics of your gun, date shipped, where it shipped to and if you are lucky, it will tell you the configuration that the gun left as. As others have said, this lets you know that the gun you are holding (as an example) "shipped with a 6" barrel, had a blue finish. wore gold medallion diamond stocks and had a Patridge front sight."
This is a historical letter based on information found in the S&W records. It is not an appraisal or an estimate of value, that comes from an appraiser not a historian. I think that whether the emblem was etched or stamped or roll stamped or put on with an electric pencil is a little like "you say potayto and I say pototto."
The information in the SC of S&W for the most part was taken from books written by Roy Jinks. Even errors in the original works were transcribed forward. As wonderful as the authors are, Jim and Rick never worked at S&W to my knowledge. Roy Jinks was the company historian for like 40 years and also served as Service Manager among other positions. There is no one on the planet that I know of that has his knowledge or first hand experience or knows more about Smith and Wesson's and their origins. Had Roy Jinks not purchased the factory records when the Wesson family no longer owned the company and was no longer interested in paying the storage fees for those stored records, there wouldn't be a factory history letter today.
Rather than bashing the letter or its author, I would guess that if you had returned the letter with an explanation about etching versus stamping, that Roy would have gladly corrected the letter to your liking. Even with all that Roy knows he cannot possibly remember every detail about every firearm that the factory ever produced and especially those of limited production and perhaps appeal. I have been collecting S&W's for about 50 years and have never heard of this particular gun. It maters to you because you have an affinity to NC and perhaps to the State Police.
Also remember one thing, just having any letter signed by Dr. Roy Jinks (his autograph) regardless of the contents is most likely worth the price that you paid.
|
James
Well said. It seems no matter what some people aren't happy no matter what. You could give letters away for free, they still would find fault. We can only report what and where. I can't tell you how many times I've had people email, call or write letters back saying our research was wrong because grandpa or dad said he carried this gun with Custer or Utah beach only to tell them the gun shipped for our factory years later. If I can, I'll show you the value of lettering a plain Jane 38 M&P, or as one person said here, one of a million. I bought this at a local gun shop because it was like new and in it's original box. It letters to Frank Wesson, Treasurer, Smith & Wesson.
Don Mundell
Assistant Historian SWHF
__________________
Don Mundell
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-10-2020, 12:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 3,561
Liked 4,900 Times in 1,495 Posts
|
|
Obviously you don’t need to request a “Factory Letter” very often.
Sometimes it really pays off just cause it proves that a specific firearm was indeed produced at the factory. Many production numbers are unknown until a factory letter is requested and produced, (9 Recon for instance.) Granted factory numbers are not always precise but that’s what they got to work with. Even Roy, in an email reply to me said that S&W “was not in the business to make collectibles and their record keeping on these guns that we are collecting today are not very accurate.” “ The more modern gun records on items that we think are collectible are just a source of profit for the company.” Unfortunately all true.
One very unusual example that I had lettered was just that. Turned out to be a limited factory run of @ 15. That letter satisfied my curiosity and doubts plus added a bunch more to the value. I got another letter that came with a pistol I acquired and it was amazing. Every back and forth it did from leaving the factory, until the person I got it from was notated. The only other letter I requested proved it did not leave the factory in the configuration it is now. That letter was well received by me even though the news was not great. I appreciate the fact that these records are still around, able to be accessed and then being shared with us.
Jim
|
12-10-2020, 02:27 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 124
Liked 1,655 Times in 641 Posts
|
|
I requested information on a M-1955, the seller said he thought it was factory nickel, If true it would be a pretty valuable revolver. He wanted $2000, I inquired if it left the factory nickel and Roy said nope it left blued. Saved me from making an expensive mistake. The gentleman selling the revolver just was mistaken, he said he had research it and there was a possibility. He was not happy with the information but thanked me because he wasn't trying to fool anyone.
SWCA 892
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 08:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,795
Likes: 993
Liked 1,923 Times in 956 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah
In a similar occurrence, last December I went in to a casino and lost $100. Bummer.
|
Better chance in a casino. There is no reason to think that a letter for a gun produced in recent times, and a commemorative at that, would be accretive to the gun's value or would reveal other than mundane information.
I agree with the thoughts of others about commemoratives and their investment/collectability qualities. Right out of the gate, most have little appeal to those in forty nine other states or those without a sense of history.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-11-2020, 09:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 409
Liked 2,851 Times in 1,266 Posts
|
|
I've never paid for a letter and never would unless I was dealing with some five or six figure gun and the value really was dependent upon certain features. I'm not knocking anyone who does, but for my personal use, it wouldn't be worth $100 to know my gun shipped to XYZ Hardward in 19YY.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-19-2021, 10:42 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,597
Likes: 3,713
Liked 8,952 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
Quote:
I'm not knocking anyone who does, but for my personal use, it wouldn't be worth $100 to know my gun shipped to XYZ Hardward in 19YY.
|
What if your grandfather owned XYZ Hardware in 19YY???
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
01-19-2021, 11:13 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 01-19-2021 at 11:16 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-19-2021, 11:18 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 4
Liked 3,812 Times in 459 Posts
|
|
Am I mistaken, or did the OP say he had received a letter from the Historical Foundation? Wouldn't a factory letter instead from Roy and Don provided the info he was seeking?
Tim
|
01-19-2021, 12:25 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: STL
Posts: 887
Likes: 1,100
Liked 4,189 Times in 547 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackAgnes
Am I mistaken, or did the OP say he had received a letter from the Historical Foundation? Wouldn't a factory letter instead from Roy and Don provided the info he was seeking?
Tim
|
Factory letters are completed by the SWHF now (still Roy and Don).
Letters to me are a gateway to the service records when I happen upon a gun that has service shop marks. Those service records then usually tell me who owned the gun at that time which leads to more research into that individual. And that leads to a lot of fun and gained knowledge for me which is well worth the cost of the letter.
Also, they’re not $100 if you join the SWCA and the SWHF. And as a member of the SWCA, you can ask for the shipping month and year directly without requesting a letter. And if Roy thinks it’s worth lettering, he’ll usually add that detail. I wouldn’t have lettered my 5” 44 2nd had Roy not mentioned an interesting shipping location in my Month/Year request and that in turn led to learning it was a Toledo PD gun.
__________________
SWCA: 3154
SWHF: 552
|
01-19-2021, 03:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,439
Likes: 409
Liked 2,851 Times in 1,266 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
What if your grandfather owned XYZ Hardware in 19YY???
|
You obviously didn't know my grandfather. He may have shoplifted in a few hardware stores, but I can assure you that he never owned one!
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-20-2021, 11:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gun lovin\' Hollywood Ca.
Posts: 10,238
Likes: 7,741
Liked 18,707 Times in 3,792 Posts
|
|
I had a Rossi revolver lettered a few years back for $75. All it said was they thought it was shipped to a guy named Lenny.
__________________
Thirty characters. Exactly...
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-20-2021, 01:50 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 7,540
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
PS: As a further example, there was a gentleman who recently purchased a .22/32 HFT at a pawn shop for $300. It was a plain Jane HFT but he decided to letter the gun. As it turns out the gun was shipped to a gentleman that just happened to be Annie Oakley's husband.
That gun just sold at auction for $47,500.
What was the value of that letter?
|
A little less than $47,200 if you figure in the postage.
__________________
Formerly Model520Fan
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-20-2021, 04:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 195
Likes: 684
Liked 548 Times in 126 Posts
|
|
"Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances"
__________________
Chief
|
01-21-2021, 03:57 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Outer Uzbekistan
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 8,597
Liked 11,688 Times in 3,061 Posts
|
|
An advantage of SWCA membership
Have a "rare" configuration Ladysmith that I asked Roy for a shipping date on and I got the four words you don't want to hear:
"Open on the books".
See? Saved $100!
__________________
SWCA #3356, SWHF#611
|
01-21-2021, 04:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: yonder
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 4,196
Liked 3,548 Times in 950 Posts
|
|
I have lettered several revolvers.. the first being a 3" 66-4, primarily to get a production count (back when a letter cost $50). The precise production count of the "Ashland" 66-2s was given, along with a very vague number of all other 3" 66s combined. A letter is not worth the gamble if you want a production number.
On the other hand, I have lettered 2 revolvers solely for confirmation of being shipped to where I was told they were shipped to. Both were, and knowing that is well worth the money spent. And if they were not, it's still nice to know where they were sent to. One of the letters even included how many were sent in that shipment. I wasn't expecting that pleasant surprise.
My take...
Letter it if you need to know where it was shipped..
$100 gamble if you need to know how many were produced.
|
01-21-2021, 05:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 636
Liked 2,043 Times in 710 Posts
|
|
I found a Webley Wilkinson Model 1900 Self Extracting Revolver in a pawn shop eons ago. In my researching of the gun I sent off to Wilkinson Sword for info. They sent my a copy of the ledger where it was purchased in July 1904 by a 2nd Lt E.A.Osbourne of the Royal Engineers. I have since been able to find out most of his service history. He fought in both World Wars, received a DSO on 31 October 1914, he rose through the ranks, was involved in the Dunkirk evacuation and eventually became the commandant of the Royal Corps of Signals School. He had twin sons but I don’t know what became of them. Sometimes you get lucky with a letter. Not my revolver, mine has been shaved and reblued unfortunately but that’s what they look like.
Last edited by Baltimoreed11754; 01-21-2021 at 05:40 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-23-2021, 12:17 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,597
Likes: 3,713
Liked 8,952 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
Well as a few have pointed out, this thread is a perfect explanation of why a S&W collector should consider joining the S&WCA and the S&WHF. For mere pennies per day you are exposed to some of the premier S&W collectors on the planet. In addition, with access to the S&WCA section of the forum, you gain access to Roy Jinks in the "Ask Roy Jinks" section and again in the "Shipping Date Forum".
Getting him to answer your questions about your gun are self explanatory, getting him to give you the shipping date and adding those lovely words, "I'd letter that one", are definitely worth the price of admission.
While it is true that not every gun is going to letter as having shipped to one of the Wesson's or some famous shooter, it is nice to know that the gun you are holding shipped the same way as it appears today in your hand. In addition, even if the gun is now changed, sometimes those repair or change records are available from the S&WHF and add to the guns history. You then get to ponder why did some owner 50 years ago decide that a 4" barrel was better than the shipped 6" barrel.
For many collectors, the background story can make the gun more interesting and bring it to life.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-23-2021, 03:36 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Likes: 209
Liked 116 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
Rather than bashing the letter or its author, I would guess that if you had returned the letter with an explanation about etching versus stamping, that Roy would have gladly corrected the letter to your liking. Even with all that Roy knows he cannot possibly remember every detail about every firearm that the factory ever produced and especially those of limited production and perhaps appeal. I have been collecting S&W's for about 50 years and have never heard of this particular gun. It maters to you because you have an affinity to NC and perhaps to the State Police.
Also remember one thing, just having any letter signed by Dr. Roy Jinks (his autograph) regardless of the contents is most likely worth the price that you paid.
|
^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS!
Two things I would have done differently;
1. Contact S&W AND asked here on the forum what I could expect in a letter BEFORE requesting one.
2. If unhappy with what I got, I would have contact Roy and spoke to him about it FIRST.
Instead you blindly plunked your money down with "your" expectations in mind, then when you didn't get what you expected you chose to come here and complain "Not worth $100" instead of first contacting Roy. And you expect to gain what from your story here?
If you had contacted Roy and talked to him about the letter, I'd bet you'd be here posting an entirely different tune right now, but you didn't do that. I met the man, he is a true gentleman with a passion all things S&W, you really should have contacted him first sir. Myself, I find your actions, well I just stop right here, I think you get where I stand.
Planning on sending for any letters in the future?
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-26-2021, 12:54 AM
|
|
S&W Historian
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 3,400
Liked 11,336 Times in 2,894 Posts
|
|
I bought this from a gun shop years ago. The dealer told me he sold it 3 times after buying it from the man that had originally brought it in. It was and still is brand new in the original box. I noticed right away it was rare. How many 22/32 Airweights have you seen. I sent for a factory letter. A couple of days later, I got a call from (Dr.) Roy Jinks. Turns out it shipped to Daniel Wesson Smith & Wesson Plant Superintendent. I'm glad the previous owners never bothers to letter this revolver. I paid $375.00 OTD. I've turned down a lot more for it since then.
__________________
Don Mundell
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-26-2021, 01:42 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,312 Times in 1,905 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sipowicz
I had a Rossi revolver lettered a few years back for $75. All it said was they thought it was shipped to a guy named Lenny.
|
Is...is this a Stephen Wright joke?
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2021, 08:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 254
Likes: 68
Liked 1,470 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hair Trigger
I received my letter from the S&W Historical Foundation today, that I requested on my Model 29 NCHP 50th Anniversary Commemorative. I must say, I'm disappointed in the information included in the letter, most of which had nothing to do with my particular revolver. The first paragraph was a quick history of the first police commemorative, for the Texas Ranger 150th Anniversary. The second paragraph told about other police commemoratives and specified the Ohio State Patrol, and how police commemoratives became popular.
The information on my specific revolver is very basic, and I've learned more about it from the Standard Catalog and general S&W forum members than was included in the letter, some of which is incorrect and/or incomplete. For instance, the letter states the NCHP "logo" which is actually the Trooper's Shield, is, and I quote "stamped" on the side plate, along with the anniversary markings on the barrel. Just to look at the markings, one can tell they are not stamped, but etched, and I have learned they were acid etched at that. I did get a specific number of how many revolvers were purchased for the series, and the shipping date of my revolver. There is no information on the rarity or collector value, which I had hoped there would be at least an estimate based on ANIB condition and unfired. I had also hoped for some statement regarding the process used to etch my revolver and those others in the series, and why that process was chosen over roll stamping, which it seems the majority, if not all other commemoratives used.
I can only hope that this letter, when included with the revolver and presentation case, will increase the value of the package by $100 if it is ever sold.
|
I gave 5.90 for a large dipped cone at Dairy Queen last night. Your 100 dollar letter somehow doesn’t seem like such a bad deal anymore.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-07-2021, 12:44 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 528
Likes: 60
Liked 586 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
One of the biggest reasons to join the SWCA is the access to Roy during our symposiums. Most of the time he sits at his table and is accessible to members to discuss whatever they or Roy may want. I love doing this as he has so much knowledge not just on the guns but the history of S&W. Some of his inside knowledge is very interesting.
__________________
SWHF
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|