Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22
o

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2013, 03:18 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default Target v Plinking

When I got to a range that allows a more relaxed set of rules I like to enjoy plinking at things. Steel, spinners, clay targets and such. When I do this I expect the same accuracy from my gun and ammo as I do when I am shooting targets. I want accuracy when I go plinking so why would I ever shoot ammo that is considered good enough for plinking, but not for target shooting? I want to hit what I am aiming at in either type of shooting.

On a separate issue, After 3,000 plus rounds in the last 3 months with my 15-22 I have tried most of the major brands of ammo and speeds. While some brands are more consistent I found it interesting that the slower the bullet, the better the results. CCI 40 gr standard velocity 40 has given me the best result consistently while the CCI AR Tactical ammo is good at 25 yds, at 50 the group opens up to more than double the standard velocity.
  #2  
Old 09-02-2013, 03:31 PM
RedNeck Jim's Avatar
RedNeck Jim RedNeck Jim is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 660
Liked 1,731 Times in 783 Posts
Default

There is a current discussion regarding subsonic ammo.
Subsonics, hrmm?
__________________
FIDELITAS ET FORTITUDO
  #3  
Old 09-02-2013, 04:05 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Standard velocity ammo is virtually always more accurate than HV. there's a reason match ammo isn't HV.
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 09-02-2013, 05:15 PM
crazykg85's Avatar
crazykg85 crazykg85 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 171
Likes: 92
Liked 112 Times in 51 Posts
Default

I understand the point of the thread, but I just wanted to point out that target shooting and plinking don't need the same ammo. If you hit a spinner or other steel targets then you reached your objective. But when one is target shooting hitting paper does not equal hitting your target.
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 09-02-2013, 07:59 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazykg85 View Post
I understand the point of the thread, but I just wanted to point out that target shooting and plinking don't need the same ammo. If you hit a spinner or other steel targets then you reached your objective. But when one is target shooting hitting paper does not equal hitting your target.

I understand your point completely and generally agree. That being said, there are times when I plink that the target is as small as the 10 ring, or maybe as small as the X ring. In my way of thinking, I want the same accuracy everytime I pull the trigger.

I am just complaining because over 70% of my stash of ammo is 1200 fps or more. Good up to 25-35 yards... but from there it seems to be all down hill.
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 09-02-2013, 08:16 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Just keep in mind that the 15-22 is not a tack-driving match rifle. On average, it is, at best, a 3MOA firearm. If you want better accuracy than that, you'll need to spend a whole lot more on a semi-auto than you paid for the 15-22 or buy a good bolt action.
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 09-02-2013, 08:40 PM
RedNeck Jim's Avatar
RedNeck Jim RedNeck Jim is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 660
Liked 1,731 Times in 783 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
I understand your point completely and generally agree. That being said, there are times when I plink that the target is as small as the 10 ring, or maybe as small as the X ring. In my way of thinking, I want the same accuracy everytime I pull the trigger.

I am just complaining because over 70% of my stash of ammo is 1200 fps or more. Good up to 25-35 yards... but from there it seems to be all down hill.
With a 3 MOA gun, at 50 yards you will shoot approx. 1.5" groups... no matter the ammo. That is just the nature of the 15-22. That is why I shoot 8" steel targets at that range with a 3" reactive center. My intent is to plink but do so with training in mind. My primary goal is to hit center mass each time... thus the 8" target. I do like to know if I am doing better than that... thus the 3" reactive center. No matter the ammo, I can still train and not be worried if one brand is a little better than the other.

Now if I want to see how accurate I can get, I switch over to my CZ 455 with Leupold Mark 4. That is sub MOA. Then I bring out the CCI Green Tag.
__________________
FIDELITAS ET FORTITUDO
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 09-02-2013, 08:42 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

I shoot suppressed and use CCI SV. If I wasn't shooting suppressed, I'd use cheap HV bulk pack for plinking.

My definition of plinking is shooting offhand at soda cans and other debris inside 50yds.

If cheap HV ammo isn't accurate enough for your plinking, use bigger targets.

Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 09-02-2013 at 08:45 PM.
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 09-02-2013, 11:46 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I know that the 15-22 is a 3 MOA gun and with standard velocity rounds I can shoot that size groups at 50 yards from a bench. Switch to the 1200 fps rounds and the group becomes 7-9 MOA. That disappoints me when I have just recently purchased so much of the HV ammo. Good stuff, just not as accurate.
  #10  
Old 09-03-2013, 04:21 AM
Doc Robin Doc Robin is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 251
Likes: 158
Liked 75 Times in 53 Posts
Default

You might want to check the barrel nut to make sure it is tight; I sold my first 15-22 because it did not produce good groups at 50 yds; should have checked the barrell nut first. The ones I have now shoot much better.

Bill
__________________
GO HOGS
  #11  
Old 09-03-2013, 04:29 AM
Doc Robin Doc Robin is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 251
Likes: 158
Liked 75 Times in 53 Posts
Default

This is 100 rounds of Winchester 36 grain HP's at 50 yds using a Tru Glo Red Dot. Shot from the bench using sand bags. Good enough for plinking, I use the bolt action 22 for tack driving.

__________________
GO HOGS
  #12  
Old 09-03-2013, 06:16 AM
RedNeck Jim's Avatar
RedNeck Jim RedNeck Jim is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 660
Liked 1,731 Times in 783 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
I know that the 15-22 is a 3 MOA gun and with standard velocity rounds I can shoot that size groups at 50 yards from a bench. Switch to the 1200 fps rounds and the group becomes 7-9 MOA. That disappoints me when I have just recently purchased so much of the HV ammo. Good stuff, just not as accurate.
I don't see that much variation when I switch between my ammo. Wonder if others see such a great difference?
__________________
FIDELITAS ET FORTITUDO
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 09-03-2013, 06:37 AM
photoracer photoracer is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
I know that the 15-22 is a 3 MOA gun and with standard velocity rounds I can shoot that size groups at 50 yards from a bench. Switch to the 1200 fps rounds and the group becomes 7-9 MOA. That disappoints me when I have just recently purchased so much of the HV ammo. Good stuff, just not as accurate.
You have to remember that all ammo has accuracy issues when they go from hypersonic to subsonic. Crossing the SB causes the bullet to hit turbulence which can throw it around. The lighter the bullet and the lower the sectional density the more it can get pushed around. .22LR is almost the worst because the bullet is not very aerodynamic. But using standard velocity, subsonic, or match ammo can bypass that since it never goes hypersonic. Out of a pistol even Mini-Mags are usually subsonic. But other factors also affect accuracy. One of the biggest according to rimfire BR shooters is rim thickness. They usually mic all their ammo and put them in groups based on the rim thickness. that way they can shoot more consistantly.
My accuracy .22 is a custom Rem 597 semi with about $1000 into it. It shoots consistent .5 MOA.
  #14  
Old 09-03-2013, 06:46 AM
photoracer photoracer is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
I understand your point completely and generally agree. That being said, there are times when I plink that the target is as small as the 10 ring, or maybe as small as the X ring. In my way of thinking, I want the same accuracy everytime I pull the trigger.

I am just complaining because over 70% of my stash of ammo is 1200 fps or more. Good up to 25-35 yards... but from there it seems to be all down hill.
Not possible unless all of your ammo is subsonic in speed. And even than no 2 ammos will shoot to the same point of aim either. I have 2 subsonic supplies, CCI-SV and Eley Pistol Match. Both will shoot .5 MOA out of my Rem 597 but if I zero for the SV the Eley shoots its group at about 3:30.
  #15  
Old 09-03-2013, 06:50 AM
photoracer photoracer is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 57
Liked 362 Times in 268 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeck Jim View Post
I don't see that much variation when I switch between my ammo. Wonder if others see such a great difference?
The less accurate your firearm is the less difference you will notice because the spread of a 2-4 MOA rifle will make most of the ammo merge into a large group. It is more noticable with an accurate rifle. I notice it big time with my .5 MOA Rem 597. I hardly even notice it much with either of my 15-22s.
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 09-03-2013, 10:03 AM
SmokeStack Lightning's Avatar
SmokeStack Lightning SmokeStack Lightning is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Danksville, near Budsburg
Posts: 643
Likes: 139
Liked 390 Times in 196 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeck Jim View Post
I don't see that much variation when I switch between my ammo. Wonder if others see such a great difference?
Me neither.............Probably cuz I'm a bad shooter!!!

(At least I'll admit it!)

With a reflex sight at 100 yds (Both eyes open, I've been practicing), I'm satisfied to group 6".

Last edited by SmokeStack Lightning; 09-03-2013 at 10:07 AM.
  #17  
Old 09-03-2013, 12:59 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
I know that the 15-22 is a 3 MOA gun and with standard velocity rounds I can shoot that size groups at 50 yards from a bench. Switch to the 1200 fps rounds and the group becomes 7-9 MOA. That disappoints me when I have just recently purchased so much of the HV ammo. Good stuff, just not as accurate.
That is not normal. 3 MOA means three inches at 100 yards, 1.5 inches at 50 yards and 0.75 inches at 25 yards. Note that this is from a rest, not off hand shooting.

You have a rifle problem. Either loose sights or a loose barrel.
  #18  
Old 09-03-2013, 01:00 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeck Jim View Post
I don't see that much variation when I switch between my ammo. Wonder if others see such a great difference?
Me neither.
  #19  
Old 09-03-2013, 01:38 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
That is not normal. 3 MOA means three inches at 100 yards, 1.5 inches at 50 yards and 0.75 inches at 25 yards. Note that this is from a rest, not off hand shooting.

You have a rifle problem. Either loose sights or a loose barrel.
I know what MOA means and what I should expect. Ater 45 plus years of shooting I even know how to get those types of groups with all types of weapons. I know the sights are tight so I ordered a barrel wrench just to test out that potential issue. No question the 15-22 is a plinking gun and I don't expect the same results as a bolt action or a true target rifle. That being said, I have other 22s that seem to be less affected by ammo types (Std V vs HCV) than the 15-22.

On the other hand, with standard velocity ammo I get good results, 3 MOA at all ranges, but with HV ammo the groups are MUCH worse.

Assujing I attached the file correctly, here is a pic of two groups, both at 35-40 yards, the center mass was standard Velocity CCI while the head shoots were with the CCI AR Tactical ammo. That is not what I had expected with this type of ammo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg photo3.jpg (47.5 KB, 63 views)

Last edited by Mike1161; 09-03-2013 at 01:54 PM.
  #20  
Old 09-03-2013, 01:47 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

I don't know what to tell you. Federal champion gives me three inch groups at 100 yards, day in and day out, from a rest. Standard velocity about 2.5".
  #21  
Old 09-03-2013, 01:50 PM
RedNeck Jim's Avatar
RedNeck Jim RedNeck Jim is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 660
Liked 1,731 Times in 783 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
On the other hand, with standard velocity ammo I get good results, 3 MOA at all ranges, but with HV ammo the groups are MUCH worse.
I don't see how the barrel could cause this. If that were the case, why would the standard velocity shoot normal?
__________________
FIDELITAS ET FORTITUDO
  #22  
Old 09-04-2013, 11:49 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Went out today and tried a number of different ammos, both brands and speeds. The picture here shows the results of two different speed CCI's, the Standard and the AR Tactical. At both 25 and 50 yards the standard speed held its group pretty well (two groups on the right).

The center group was the first group shot after adjusting the scope on a different target while using the Tactical ammo which is what has caused its placement to be spot on.

Comparing the left most group to the top right group you can see the difference inn the ammo the most. Today it was better than normal.

Only change from last time out is that the gun wasn't cleaned after the last time on the range.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg target 1.JPG (52.3 KB, 58 views)
  #23  
Old 09-05-2013, 12:23 AM
Rpg Rpg is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 20,240
Liked 13,057 Times in 4,157 Posts
Default

In the '60s, I had the good fortune to be part of my high school rifle team courtesy of ROTC. We shot indoor 50' I used a Winchester 52C. The other guys were issued Rem 40x.

We used Remington standard vel lr for everything but matches. We were issued Eley match for matches. We cold take as much ammo as we wanted home to shoot.

As you might expect, among 15-17 year old boys, a debate arose about why we didn't get the 'good stuff' the high vel ammo.

Instead of just telling us to do as we were told, Sgt Shaw bought some of the 'good stuff' for us and had us shoot a round (40 shots/ 10 shots at each of 4 positions possible 400 points).

The 'good stuff' the high vel, averaged 40 points less than the sv.

Made a believer out of me! I haven't intentionally used hv 22 ammo since.
  #24  
Old 09-05-2013, 11:07 AM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1161 View Post
Went out today and tried a number of different ammos, both brands and speeds. The picture here shows the results of two different speed CCI's, the Standard and the AR Tactical. At both 25 and 50 yards the standard speed held its group pretty well (two groups on the right). ...Only change from last time out is that the gun wasn't cleaned after the last time on the range.

If you are going to get accurate results from ammo tests, you can't just swap ammo and keep shooting. You need to start with a clean barrel and then, before you switch ammo, you need to clean the barrel with two or three passes with solvent and a BoreSnake or traditional cleaning rod and patches. Then you need to put 10 rounds downrange to acclimate the barrel to the new ammo.

If you don't do this, you are wasting both your time and the ammo.
  #25  
Old 09-05-2013, 12:34 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

The result from my small test don't really agree with the need for such a cleaning. The 25 round groups themselves show no real difference between ammo type at 25 yards. But the groups do open up as the distance grows which is exactly what one would expect. If I was shooting my 22-250 out at 200 plus yards (capable of .5 MOA), then barrel cleaning MIGHT make a difference, but in this case, short yardage, high volume shooting, very little. The number of rounds shot of each hides many errors and flyers.

There is scientific testing and then real world. I enjoy the real world more that lab work.

I prefer a cold barrel to a clean one. But that is my opinion and it may not agree with that of others.
  #26  
Old 09-05-2013, 01:34 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Do it your way ... But ask any bench rest shooter; a cold barrel is guaranteed NOT to give you best accuracy.

You come asking for advice but don't like what you are told. I won't waste any more of my time.

Last edited by Majorlk; 09-05-2013 at 02:27 PM.
  #27  
Old 09-05-2013, 05:17 PM
Mike1161 Mike1161 is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 106
Likes: 29
Liked 26 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
Do it your way ... But ask any bench rest shooter; a cold barrel is guaranteed NOT to give you best accuracy.

You come asking for advice but don't like what you are told. I won't waste any more of my time.
No problem, I came here talking about the performance difference between std and Hv ammo. I showed what results I was getting with different speeds. I asked for thoughts on the performance of different ammo types.

What I didn't ask for was a lesson from someone who TELLS me what I should do. While in a scientific test, one might go to all the trouble of cleaning the bore after each ammo type, for a plinking rifle with mass produced ammo, that is over kill.

If you really think a hot barrel is preferable to a cold one, then you have shown me that you might not really know that much, unless one judges by the number of posts made. Any bench rest shooter knows, that after a barrel gets to a certain temp the accuracy drops. But heck, I have only been doing this for 45 plus years, I guess I have been doing it wrong in your opinion. Time to fire up the gun, heat the barrel and then see how good it shoots. NOT !
  #28  
Old 09-05-2013, 05:38 PM
Majorlk's Avatar
Majorlk Majorlk is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 5,480
Liked 4,286 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default

Yup, based on MY 50+ years of shooting and probably close to 100k rounds a year for about 20 of those years, including bench rest, you have been.

To each his own ...
  #29  
Old 09-05-2013, 05:47 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking Target v Plinking  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Knock off the bickering
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plinking is the best! beagleye The Lounge 1 07-25-2014 07:36 PM
CCI Target and Plinking Ammunition 84z28 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 8 03-22-2013 03:42 PM
Plinking Targets Richard Hurts Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 7 02-03-2013 12:16 PM
Plinking Targets MnCowboy96 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 65 02-15-2011 11:48 AM
What is the most versatile bullet for 38/357 target/plinking? rc51kid Reloading 20 01-24-2011 08:55 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)