|
|
02-03-2011, 11:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
Midsize or Compact M&P45 for duty?
So a few months back I abandoned my department issue Glock 23C in favor of an M&P 9FS (after I got the Chief to approve a policy change). So far it has been a very good decision on my part and I really like the M&P. Now I am thinking I need to "upgrade" that to an M&P 45. So the question is; do I get the full gripped mid-size model or do I get the compact. I have handled both and both fit my hand just fine. While I know this is really a just a question of opinion, I figure it can't hurt to get your feedback. Besides, I will probably just end up with both of them eventually.
|
02-04-2011, 12:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 158
Likes: 2
Liked 80 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
I have the 45 midsize
I've put about 200 rounds through it at the range. The accuracy is phenomenal. My experience ,thus far, has been completely positive. 2 inch "3 shot" groups at 15 yards, which for me is excellent.
The 45 mid, and 45c have the same 4" barrel so it pretty much depends on which grip you prefer. I don't like grip extensions on magazines, and i like a full grip, so for me the midsize model was the one to go with. hope that helps.
Last edited by bloodlord77; 02-04-2011 at 12:13 AM.
|
02-04-2011, 08:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
If you're carrying in a holster the grip size is of no consequence but magazine capacity is.
-- Chuck
|
02-04-2011, 08:52 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Likes: 3
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
The only justification I can see for the Compact is concealment...but you're not trying to conceal.
|
02-04-2011, 09:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodLark
The only justification I can see for the Compact is concealment...but you're not trying to conceal.
|
I agree with Woodlark... I'd get the compact that way you can conceal... and then if you pick up the other gun you have more options. I want to get the 45c, I have heard quite a few people say it's very accurate and a soft shooting 45... You can't go wrong with a S&W!
|
02-04-2011, 01:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I agree with the above members...
I own the 45C but it is ONLY because I am concealing off duty.
I much more prefer the fullsize grip... (plus, mag size increases)
__________________
)))X~ silvercn ~X(((
|
02-04-2011, 10:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Likes: 3
Liked 11 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate20nc
I agree with Woodlark... I'd get the compact that way you can conceal... and then if you pick up the other gun you have more options. I want to get the 45c, I have heard quite a few people say it's very accurate and a soft shooting 45... You can't go wrong with a S&W!
|
You agreed with me but gave him exactly the opposite advice from what I meant. I was saying I saw no reason at all for him to get the compact. BTW, I have the midsize and conceal it with no problem.
|
02-04-2011, 10:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 184
Likes: 11
Liked 91 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
Grip
I haven't shot but about 100 rds through my .45C. But so far it feels pretty nice the little finger curls right under the mag just kinda feels like a natural deal to me. I haven't shot one or held one with a extended mag yet.
I'm waiting on a apex kit to help this gravel road. Should be really sweet when I get that done.
Dan
|
02-04-2011, 11:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
I went and handled both of them today. Both feel good in the hand and I can get all my fingers on the compact with the extended base-pad. I should have added that I am a supervisor/administrator and probably spend 50% of my week at a desk (plain clothes) and 50% out and about (plain clothes and semi-uniformed). Needless to say I think my first thought was right all along; get them both. But I believe I will start with the mid-size. That doesn't mean I don't want any additional feedback or pictures.
|
02-05-2011, 12:13 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 19
Liked 1,313 Times in 447 Posts
|
|
I had a full size M&P 45 and even with my big hands I thought the grip to be a little large. I then bought a Compact and felt the grip size was perfect. I don't think you could go wrong with either, or do as suggeted above and buy both. I'm glad to see S&W coming back into the LE market strongly since they use to own said market when revolvers were king. I've owned a few Glocks and feel that the M&P is a superior pistol.
Last edited by mag318; 02-07-2011 at 12:41 AM.
|
02-05-2011, 12:18 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wrong side of Washington
Posts: 10,174
Likes: 13,010
Liked 17,099 Times in 5,129 Posts
|
|
Reading your last post, I would go for the compact. Maybe carry a full size magazine or two for backup.
I had one and foolishly sold it. I will be buying another.
The compact is compact for a 45 auto. But by other standards it's really not that small of a gun. I think it will serve you well.
|
02-05-2011, 03:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cross Roads, TX
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I love my 45c, but if I could carry OWB, I'd have the fullsize! Start w/the FS & move to the C.
I'm going to be purchasing a M or FS .40 & do the 9mm conversion on it.
__________________
Gen1 4513TSW
M&P 45c
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.