There is NO NEED to remove the copper from the barrel unless and until it gets so bad the weapon is wildly inaccurate. Copper "fouling" is largely self limiting and any you remove tonight will be right back there as soon as you fire the pistol in the morning. Scouring the barrel with harsh chemicals and brushes is probably more harmful than shooting the pistol.
Copper fouling used to be a problem. Note the past tense. Waaaaay past tense! When corrosive primers were normal the copper would literally plate over the corrosive salts from the primer. Barrel still looked good until the fouling started flaking off as the corrosive salts ate the barrel steel underneath the copper and left large pits.
Corrosive primers haven't been used in US commercial pistol ammo since before WW2 (anyone here alive then?) and the last loading of USGI ammo with corrosive primers was circa 1952 in .30 M2 Ball (AKA .30-06). Before this time it was paramount to get rid of the fouling -- and basic training drill sergeants still use this as an attention-to-detail training tool. Ain't necessary.
Couple this with chrome plated borea and there's even less necessity.
CLP and a bore snake is all ya need.
The only reason there are so many powder and copper solvents on the gun shop shelves is merely because folks will buy them. Even they're largely useless a gun shop has to make money to stay in business. So they ain't explaining now needless the removal of copper "fouling" is.
-- Chuck