Quote:
Originally Posted by Digitalpoodle
When I unbowed my shield, I was pissed about the condition of the gun. I had to spend about 2 and a half hours to clean it...
The sights suck. There seems to be an excessive amount of white space between the front sight and rear sight. I don't personally like that, and I have become spoiled with the very quick fiber optic front sight of the XDS.
|
I am curious. Just how could you spend 2.5-hours cleaning a Shield?
As to the sights, you probably will find that "excessive amount of white space between the front sight and rear sight" is pretty nice when you get a little older.
It sounds like you are pretty happy with the Shield. I have to agree. I shot one for the first time last Saturday and liked the operation of the trigger, but couldn't call the one I shot smooth - just not a lot of take-up and a quick reset. Given how heavy the trigger was (probably 10-12#, maybe more), the gun I shot was acceptably accurate. It did seem to shoot about 4-inches higher at 25-yards than I would prefer.
We put about 75-rounds through it of various types of ammunition without any incident. Very comfortable gun to fire - much more so than my Kahr PM9, or any other compact 9x19 I have fired.
Others may scoff at the notion but I was very fond of the thumb safety. I imagined it would be poorly shaped, exceptionally stiff, hard to operate with the thumb, etc., etc. The safety on the pistol I fired was just right. It moved easily, but without moving too easily, was nicely sized and shaped, and it can be swept with the thumb, in my case. And... the safety is pressed DOWN (the proper way - Kahrs, unfortunately, are pressed up
).
Some comparative weights, loaded, in oz.:
Kahr PM9 20
Shield 24
442 & 637 17
PPK/.380 23
LWS/.32 12
3913 28
G27 26
G23 31
.45 Commander 33
In terms of weight vs. firepower, the Shield is not any sort of quantum leap, but it is more comfortable and manageable than lighter guns in the same caliber.