Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2012, 01:19 AM
mesinge2's Avatar
mesinge2 mesinge2 is offline
Member
.40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 640
Likes: 369
Liked 530 Times in 180 Posts
Default .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226

Bullet Points: The SIG has less felt recoil, points better (for me), and I still like the smooth DAK trigger (reminds me of a S&W revolver). That said, the M&P is faster on target and I am able to get rounds on target faster. Also, the M&P is more tolerant of a slip of the trigger. In the 226's video you can see me throw about four shots south because I rushed the trigger; the M&P is more tolerant of this mistake.

All shooting done at 14 yards with Winchester Ranger 180gr BCHP.



.40 S&W SIG 226 DAK:




40 S&W SIG 226 DAK 6






.40 S&W M&P-40:




.40 S&W M&P-40
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor

Last edited by mesinge2; 12-28-2012 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:08 PM
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
Member
.40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Big Orange Country
Posts: 546
Likes: 325
Liked 381 Times in 183 Posts
Default

Last summer I was at the range and two guys on my right were firing Sigs (don't remember the model). What I do remember was how complicated they were. To many additional things to fool with. I liked the simplicity of my MP40 in comparison.
__________________
Wake me when it's over...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:13 PM
t-bird t-bird is offline
Member
.40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: kentucky
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1,098
Liked 422 Times in 299 Posts
Default

Thanks for the pics and info.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disappointing K22 range report/UPDATE-range report Old Corp S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 27 02-15-2016 12:56 PM
SA Range Officer Range Report UPDATE...I got it back from SA! See Post 22 Rawhyde The Lounge 46 03-02-2014 12:24 PM
Range Report 11/25/12 w/pics + 11/30 range report oneyeopn Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 45 12-01-2012 12:17 PM
Range Report-686-6 first try Blastmeister S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 05-22-2012 01:17 PM
Range report Heavy_Hog Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 1 05-02-2010 09:13 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)