Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols
Forum Register Expert Commentary Members List


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2012, 01:19 AM
mesinge2's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 619
Likes: 353
Liked 419 Times in 166 Posts
Default .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226

Bullet Points: The SIG has less felt recoil, points better (for me), and I still like the smooth DAK trigger (reminds me of a S&W revolver). That said, the M&P is faster on target and I am able to get rounds on target faster. Also, the M&P is more tolerant of a slip of the trigger. In the 226's video you can see me throw about four shots south because I rushed the trigger; the M&P is more tolerant of this mistake.

All shooting done at 14 yards with Winchester Ranger 180gr BCHP.



.40 S&W SIG 226 DAK:




40 S&W SIG 226 DAK 6






.40 S&W M&P-40:




.40 S&W M&P-40
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor

Last edited by mesinge2; 12-28-2012 at 09:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:08 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Big Orange Country
Posts: 502
Likes: 281
Liked 310 Times in 155 Posts
Default

Last summer I was at the range and two guys on my right were firing Sigs (don't remember the model). What I do remember was how complicated they were. To many additional things to fool with. I liked the simplicity of my MP40 in comparison.
__________________
Dewey, Cheatem & Howe
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:13 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: kentucky
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 790
Liked 251 Times in 189 Posts
Default

Thanks for the pics and info.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols Thread, .40 S&W Range Report: M&P-40 vs. 226 in Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols; Bullet Points: The SIG has less felt recoil, points better (for me), and I still like the smooth DAK trigger ...
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-wesson-m-p-pistols/285327-40-s-w-range-report-m-p-40-vs-226-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
Thread 135 grain .40 S&W | S-W Forum | BoardReader This thread Refback 12-19-2013 10:21 PM
Thread reloading 40 S&W with Lead | S-W Forum | Page 2 | BoardReader This thread Refback 02-12-2013 12:35 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disappointing K22 range report/UPDATE-range report Old Corp S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 25 11-28-2014 12:31 PM
SA Range Officer Range Report UPDATE...I got it back from SA! See Post 22 Rawhyde The Lounge 46 03-02-2014 12:24 PM
Range Report 11/25/12 w/pics + 11/30 range report oneyeopn Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 45 12-01-2012 12:17 PM
Range Report-686-6 first try Blastmeister S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 05-22-2012 02:17 PM
Range report Heavy_Hog Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 1 05-02-2010 10:13 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)