|
|
07-22-2016, 01:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 89
Likes: 8
Liked 34 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
At my local gun shop today....
they were talking about a new ruling from the Attorney General of Mass. It redefined the meaning of assault weapon to include all semi-automatic weapons. She banned all of them in that state. Considering this ruling S&W should move out of that state and relocate in a state which is a bit more friendly toward gun owners. Then again I suppose the folks up there could have a recall vote and get rid of her.
__________________
To be forgiven, I must forgive
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-22-2016, 01:24 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 5,372
Likes: 104,950
Liked 22,296 Times in 4,529 Posts
|
|
We have been having a rather spirited discussion about this here: Mass AG drops the bomb some of your thoughts have been addressed, and there have been some administrative additions, so that there is a lot of reference material.
Also there is a second amendment sub forum where this thread should probably go.
And I'm not saying I don't agree with you, on all counts.
Best Regards, Les
__________________
SWCA 3084, SWHF 495, PGCA 3064
Last edited by les.b; 07-22-2016 at 01:27 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-22-2016, 08:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,200 Times in 7,303 Posts
|
|
If I were the Mass AG I'd also ban ALL pressure cookers.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-22-2016, 08:38 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 394
Likes: 542
Liked 449 Times in 171 Posts
|
|
The Mass. AG should investigate and ban terrorist that want to fly out of Logan Airport. Isn't that where a majority of the 9-11 terrorist flew out of??
It seems like these ill informed politicians want to go after everything except what the real problem is.
I guess law abiding, tax paying citizens are "Soft Targets" and "Easy Pickings" for political hacks with aspirations??
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-22-2016, 09:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: New England
Posts: 1,361
Likes: 10,187
Liked 1,001 Times in 491 Posts
|
|
You cant buy new semi auto rifles.....CMP shipped a M1D sniper Garand to my door Wed but you cants buy a 10/22 Ruger. Makes perfect sense to me.
SENT FROM BEHIND ENEMY LINES
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-22-2016, 11:56 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
If you can't get rid of her I'm sure PA would love to have them. A lot of NY FFL's and their employees moved to PA after the SAFE Act was enacted.
Otherwise. I think Texas would give them wicked tax breaks if they went down there.
Primum non Nocere
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2016, 01:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
Posts: 10,183
Likes: 7,176
Liked 14,375 Times in 5,412 Posts
|
|
Having battled the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the tax arena over the years, I have nothing good to say for their politics and their politicians undying contempt for individual freedom. A very troublesome, and self-important small plot of land to do business in. My unabridged opinions cannot be typed here.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2016, 06:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 296
Likes: 19
Liked 135 Times in 81 Posts
|
|
Arizona is attracting the firearm industry away from California because of stupid gun laws.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-23-2016, 06:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central Florida
Posts: 798
Likes: 1,203
Liked 1,015 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
Perhaps I am misreading this but, I am surprised that an appointed bureaucrat (AG) has the authority to write and implement laws. I would assume that all states require a law to go through the legislative process before going into effect. Regardless, I suspect that the AG's dictate will be challenged.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-23-2016, 08:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 37
Liked 5,435 Times in 1,762 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdavis
Perhaps I am misreading this but, I am surprised that an appointed bureaucrat (AG) has the authority to write and implement laws. I would assume that all states require a law to go through the legislative process before going into effect. Regardless, I suspect that the AG's dictate will be challenged.
|
The AG of Massachusetts, as in 43 states, is a publicly elected official.
__________________
Pisgah
Last edited by Pisgah; 07-23-2016 at 08:39 AM.
|
07-23-2016, 08:54 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 939
Likes: 404
Liked 1,185 Times in 415 Posts
|
|
I think that if you tried to order an M-1 today from CMP (assuming they had any left) you would be greatly disappointed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jframejoey
You cant buy new semi auto rifles.....CMP shipped a M1D sniper Garand to my door Wed but you cants buy a 10/22 Ruger. Makes perfect sense to me.
SENT FROM BEHIND ENEMY LINES
|
__________________
Frosty
S&WCA # 2816
|
07-23-2016, 04:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 89
Likes: 8
Liked 34 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Actually Arkansas and Alabama have recently gotten firearms manufacturing plants. Barrett is here in Tennessee. This state is very firearm friendly. All of these firearm manufacturing plants should move out of states which aren't firearm friendly.
__________________
To be forgiven, I must forgive
Last edited by Dave Nowlin; 07-23-2016 at 05:50 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2016, 04:46 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southwest Iowa
Posts: 10,867
Likes: 2,688
Liked 18,970 Times in 5,589 Posts
|
|
Legislatures need to get back to the business of passing laws. Non legislative officials need to be removed if the majority of folks think they have a screw loose.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
07-24-2016, 06:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 2
Liked 463 Times in 265 Posts
|
|
Vote her OUT.
|
07-24-2016, 07:09 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: central Florida
Posts: 798
Likes: 1,203
Liked 1,015 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah
The AG of Massachusetts, as in 43 states, is a publicly elected official.
|
Elected or appointed makes no difference. The judicial branch shouldn't write legislation. Perhaps the AG has "interpreted" the existing laws to suit her agenda as the Federal judiciary often does.
|
07-24-2016, 09:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 167
Liked 979 Times in 490 Posts
|
|
She's basically a lawyer, no? How can she declare a ban on anything? Isn't ner job to INTERPRET laws after they are written by the legislative process?
Last edited by scattershot; 07-24-2016 at 09:52 AM.
|
07-24-2016, 10:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York State
Posts: 6,572
Likes: 23,601
Liked 31,521 Times in 5,695 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scattershot
She's basically a lawyer, no? How can she declare a ban on anything? Isn't ner job to INTERPRET laws after they are written by the legislative process?
|
Yes - to the question of the AG functioning as the state's chief attorney. No - to the issue of interpretation; the AG is part of the executive branch and enforces the law. The courts interpret the law. If the state's Chief Executive doesn't do his job, the people must sue the State and the AG, asking for relief. Overreaching officials must be checked by the courts; having said that, the aggrieved parties must take action and seek redress of those grievances in the appropriate forum.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|