|
|
|
01-14-2017, 09:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1,771
Liked 548 Times in 311 Posts
|
|
Wonder if the grip inserts are interchangeable with the originals. The M-large sounds like it might have possibilities.
|
01-14-2017, 10:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I am really interested in picking one of these up to go with my Shield.
__________________
Regards,
SnyperX
|
01-14-2017, 11:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: DFW area
Posts: 110
Likes: 5
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkin' trails
Wonder if the grip inserts are interchangeable with the originals. The M-large sounds like it might have possibilities.
|
Truth, I would like to have a couple of the MD large....
|
01-15-2017, 03:09 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 86
Liked 131 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
I wonder if the newest upgrades of the 2.0 will revise the .357sig model to come out. I truly love the round and as soon as i can save the cash for the new 2.0 40 cal i will swap the barrell so i can use .357sig.
__________________
M&P 357sig,G31 357sig,M&P 9
|
01-15-2017, 11:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
It's official the M2.0 is here!!
I have a 4.25" coming in tomorrow and was wondering if they fit 1.0 holsters? I'm wanting to get a ALS for it that will accept my TRL-1.
I have done some 25 yard shooting with full size m&ps and my p320c, both shoot 6-7" groups for me offhand. Is the accuracy issues from people bench resting them? I'm not ashamed to say I don't ever really one hole a group, even at 7-10 yards but I keep them grouped pretty well center mass.
Last edited by SickMAK90; 01-15-2017 at 11:49 AM.
|
01-15-2017, 01:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I was wondering the same about the accuracy of the 2.0.
|
01-16-2017, 06:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 86
Liked 131 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SickMAK90
I have a 4.25" coming in tomorrow and was wondering if they fit 1.0 holsters? I'm wanting to get a ALS for it that will accept my TRL-1.
I have done some 25 yard shooting with full size m&ps and my p320c, both shoot 6-7" groups for me offhand. Is the accuracy issues from people bench resting them? I'm not ashamed to say I don't ever really one hole a group, even at 7-10 yards but I keep them grouped pretty well center mass.
|
The 2.0 is slimmer than the 1.0 so i doubt the holsters are same especially plastic and kydex. Possibly an all leather holster that has not been used may fit.
As for the accuracy, videos show it to be "on point" just as previous models however, that steel liner seems to help along with some lightening of the slide.
__________________
M&P 357sig,G31 357sig,M&P 9
|
01-16-2017, 10:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 2,383
Liked 2,954 Times in 1,054 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahalo_.32
The 2.0 is slimmer than the 1.0 so i doubt the holsters are same especially plastic and kydex. Possibly an all leather holster that has not been used may fit.
As for the accuracy, videos show it to be "on point" just as previous models however, that steel liner seems to help along with some lightening of the slide.
|
Kydex and leather holster retention is usually based on the trigger guard, especially with a retention screw. S&W purposely designed the M2.0 to be backwards compatible for holsters. The trigger guard width and general shape are the same. The front and rear of the slide are the same width. Only the front half of the slide is a little thinner. This should make no difference for holster fit/retention. Dust covers are the same dimensions. No problem.
Also mags are compatible for the guns and previous mag holders. Sights are the same.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2017, 11:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
It's official the M2.0 is here!!
Went tried a m2.0 in a raven kydex (made for the original) and it worked perfect. It looks like holsters shouldn't be a problem.
Last edited by SickMAK90; 01-16-2017 at 05:10 PM.
|
01-21-2017, 08:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
|
01-21-2017, 09:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,676
Likes: 1,769
Liked 3,702 Times in 1,242 Posts
|
|
The original M&P pistols didn't inspire any desire for me to own one, the new 2.0 is on my to buy list for home defense. The revised grip and much improved trigger are the biggest improvements. My LGS encouraged me to handle and dry fire samples of old and new knowing I'd be impressed.
__________________
Virtue,Liberty & Independence
|
01-21-2017, 10:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 20
Likes: 4
Liked 24 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SickMAK90
|
That's a sexy looking gun right there! Got to play with this model and the 5" FDE version and I love the new grip texture. I really want the FDE model but I can't get over the backstrap being a different color than the frame. I may just have to add another black gun to the collection.
|
01-22-2017, 09:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 360
Likes: 1
Liked 54 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
I bought a 9mm 2.0 and a .45 Shield over the weekend. Love the grip. It's like the gun grips the hand, not the hand gripping the gun.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
|
01-29-2017, 02:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Are 5" 2.0 models WITHOUT the manual safety scheduled for production anytime soon? My searches to find one in the wild have been fruitless.
And no, I don't want to buy a Safety model and plug the safety slot.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|